Search

Copyright of American Journal on Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities is the property of American Association on Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objective:To estimate real-world healthcare costs, resource utilization, and treatment patterns among metastatic melanoma (MM) patients who received a therapy recommended in current treatment guidelines during 2011 and 2012, following approval in the US of novel therapies (ipilimumab and vemurafenib). Research design and methods:Administrative claims data were used in a retrospective, longitudinal, open cohort study. Adult MM patients were identified using ICD-9 codes. Therapy-based patient cohorts and index dates were defined by the first receipt of a therapy of interest: ipilimumab, vemurafenib, paclitaxel (alone and in combination), interleukin-2, dacarbazine (alone and in combination), or temozolomide. The follow-up period extended until the end of eligibility or data availability. A multivariate regression model was used to compare outcomes of the ipilimumab and vemurafenib cohorts, controlling for baseline and demographic characteristics. Main outcome measures:Direct healthcare costs (2013 US dollars) and utilization (incidence rates) were measured on a per-patient-per-month (PPPM) basis for each treatment cohort. Treatment patterns were assessed, including the frequency of patients receiving a second therapy of interest. Results:The study population included 834 patients (265 ipilimumab, 234 vemurafenib, 174 paclitaxel, 104 interleukin-2, 46 dacarbazine, and 11 temozolomide). Costs ranged from $10,879 PPPM (temozolomide) to $35,472 PPPM (ipilimumab). Adjusted total costs were $18,337 PPPM higher for the ipilimumab vs. the vemurafenib cohort (p < 0.001), primarily due to higher outpatient costs. Multivariate analysis did not find significant differences in resource utilization between ipilimumab and vemurafenib, except that ipilimumab patients had fewer outpatient visits (excluding treatment visits). Ipilimumab and vemurafenib patients received a second therapy of interest (12% and 11%, respectively) less frequently than interleukin-2 and dacarbazine patients. Conclusions:The cost and resource utilization burden of MM is high and varies substantially across treatment cohorts. The two novel therapies, ipilimumab and vemurafenib, have quickly been adopted and are the most frequently used therapies. The results observed during the approximately 6 month follow-up period may not be representative of the full clinical experience of patients with MM. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The article focuses on a study conducted by the authors on complications in sickle cell disease (SCD) patients after blood transfusion and iron chelation therapy (ICT). It mentions that complications such as pain and avascular necrosis increased in patients who did not get ICT and reduction in complications with repeated blood transfusion. It highlights patients who were regularly transfused and received ICT were hospitalized less.

Angiogenesis inhibitors have become standard of care for advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma ( RCC), but data on the impact of adverse events ( AEs) and treatment modifications associated with these agents are limited. Medical records were abstracted at 10 tertiary oncology centers in Europe for 291 patients ≥18 years old treated with sunitinib as first-line treatment for advanced RCC (no prior systemic treatment for advanced disease). Logistic regression models were estimated to compare dose intensity among patients who did and did not experience AEs during the landmark periods (18, 24, and 30 weeks). Cox proportional hazard models were used to explore the possible relationship of low-dose intensity (defined using thresholds of 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9) and treatment modifications during the landmark periods to survival. 64.4% to 67.9% of patients treated with sunitinib reported at least one AE of any grade, and approximately 10% of patients experienced at least one severe (grade 3 or 4) AE. Patients reporting severe AEs were statistically significantly more likely to have dose intensities below either 0.8 or 0.9. Dose intensity below 0.7 and dose discontinuation during all landmark periods were statistically significantly associated with shorter survival time. This study of advanced RCC patients treated with sunitinib in Europe found a significant relationship between AEs and dose intensity. It also found correlations between dose intensity and shorter survival, and between dose discontinuation and shorter survival. These results confirm the importance of tolerable treatment and maintaining dose intensity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study estimated the average lifetime costs of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) relative to similar patients without cancer. An analysis of the Medicare 5% database (1999-2007) was conducted. Each patient with CLL was matched up to three patients without cancer based on year of birth, gender, race and state. Average total lifetime costs were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier sample average estimator and stratified by treatments. For patients who died, average monthly costs during continuing and terminal phases were compared between cohorts. A total of 7463 patients with CLL and 22 331 matched controls were identified (mean age: 76 years; proportion of women: 49%). The mean observation period was 39.4 months for patients with CLL and 45.9 months for matched controls. Patients with CLL incurred average costs of $87 151 compared to $47 642 for matched controls ( p < 0.001). Among common CLL treatments, average costs per patient were $5140 for rituximab and $953 for radiation therapy. Compared to matched controls, patients with CLL had significantly higher monthly costs during the continuing and terminal phases. This study showed that average lifetime costs to Medicare were $87 151 for patients with CLL compared to $47 642 for matched controls without cancer, for a significant difference of $39 509. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the study which compares recombinant human erythropoietin or epoetin (EPO) monotherapy and EPO in combination with granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (G-/GM-CSF) in myelodysplastic syndromes. In the study, researchers have adopted therapeutic strategies to optimize the clinical benefits of EPO for anemic patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. It shows that the erythroid response rates were comparable between the 2 EPO-based therapeutic strategies.