Search

Abstract: Background: The influence of atrial fibrillation (AF) on outcome in patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic disease has not been thoroughly studied. Methods: FRENA is an ongoing registry of stable outpatients with coronary (CAD), cerebrovascular (CVD), or peripheral (PAD) artery disease. With the aim to guide therapy, we assessed the incidence of subsequent myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke or major bleeding in patients with AF, according to initial presentation. Results: As of June 2011, 3848 patients were recruited: 1436 had CAD, 1104 CVD, and 1308 had PAD. Of these, 470 (12%) had AF: 151 patients with CAD, 157 with CVD, and 162 with PAD. Over a mean follow-up of 16±13months, 19 patients with AF developed acute MI, 22 ischemic stroke and 7 bled. Among AF patients with CAD, the incidence of subsequent MI (5.00 events per 100 patient-years; 95% CI: 2.54-8.91) was non-significantly higher than that of stroke (1.48; 95% CI: 0.38-4.04) or major bleeding (1.47; 95% CI: 0.37-4.01). Among those with CVD, the incidence of stroke (5.61; 95% CI: 2.95-9.75) exceeded that of MI (no events) or major bleeding (0.51; 95% CI: 1.24-6.36). Among those with PAD, the incidence of MI (4.41; 95% CI: 2.15-8.10) and stroke (3.93; 95% CI: 1.82-7.46) were similar. Conclusions: CAD patients with AF are at a higher risk of subsequent MI than of stroke. Among those with CVD, the risk of stroke far exceeds that of MI. Those with PAD have a high and similar risk for both events. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Cilostazol increases the walking distance in patients with intermittent claudication, but there is scarce evidence of any effect on the risk for subsequent ischemic events, bleeding or death. Patients and Methods We used data from the FRENA Registry to compare the clinical outcome in stable outpatients with intermittent claudication, according to the use of cilostazol. Results As of January 2013, 1,317 patients with intermittent claudication were recruited in FRENA, of whom 191 (14.5%) received cilostazol. Over a mean follow-up of 18months, 39 patients developed myocardial infarction, 23 ischemic stroke, 20 underwent limb amputation, 15 had major bleeding and 70 died. There were no significant differences in the rate of subsequent ischemic events, major bleeding or death between patients receiving or not receiving cilostazol. On multivariate analysis, the use of cilostazol had no influence on the risk for subsequent myocardial infarction (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.33-20.8), ischemic stroke (HR: 1.46; 95% CI: 0.48-4.43), limb amputation (HR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.04-20.6), major bleeding (HR: 1.52; 95% CI: 0.33-7.09) or death (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.40-20.0). Conclusions In stable outpatients with intermittent claudication, the use of cilostazol was not associated with increased rates of subsequent ischemic events, major bleeding or death. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]