Search

End-of-life care (EOLC) exemplifies the joint mission of intensive and palliative care (PC) in their human-centeredness. The explosion of technological advances in medicine must be balanced with the culture of holistic care. Inevitably, it brings together the science and the art of medicine in their full expression. High-quality EOLC in the ICU is grounded in evidence, ethical principles, and professionalism within the framework of the Law. Expert professional statements over the last two decades in India were developed while the law was evolving. Recent landmark Supreme Court judgments have necessitated a review of the clinical pathway for EOLC outlined in the previous statements. Much empirical and interventional evidence has accumulated since the position statement in 2014. This iteration of the joint Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine--Indian Association of Palliative Care (ISCCM--IAPC) Position Statement for EOLC combines contemporary evidence, ethics, and law for decision support by the bedside in Indian ICUs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Critical care in the era of novel coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) infection has multiple challenges including management of the patient, underlying comorbidities, and the complications. With no end in sight to the pandemic, intensive care unit (ICU) practitioners and hospital administrators have to join hands to prepare for the long battle ahead. Critically ill COVID-19 patients need imaging or image-guided interventions in one form or the other including X-rays, ultrasonography (USG), echocardiography (ECHO), and CT scan. These patients often require renal replacement therapy (RRT) for either the preexisting chronic renal insufficiency or acutely developing kidney injury. Another important component of care is transfer of the patient to and fro from the ICU or to higher care centers. Most of the ICUs are equipped with modern facilities but with increasing number of patients a large number of makeshift arrangements are being made for managing these patients. This position paper outlines important tips to formulate protocols and procedures for critically ill patients, who are managed in the ICU. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The majority of patients with advanced upper abdominal malignancies suffer from moderate to severe pain due to unavailability of morphine in developing world. This study was undertaken to evaluate the role of neurolytic celiac plexus block on pain and quality of life in this patient subpopulation. One hundred consecutive patients receiving opioids for their pain relief were divided in two groups. Group I (control) patients received oral morphine and NSAIDs and group II (study) patients underwent neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) to compare their effects on pain relief, morphine consumption, quality of life (QOL), Karnofsky and performance scores up to one month. NCPB provided statistically significant better pain relief and reduced morphine consumption at one month (P = 0.000). Superior Karnofsky and performance scores also favored NCPB group (P = 0.000): however the difference in overall QOL was not statistically significant (P = 0.24). Patients in oral morphine group had more side effects (94% vs. 58%) as compared to NCPB (P = 0.000). NCPB is an effective tool to reduce opioid requirement and the drug-related adverse effects. It is a rewarding technique, especially when morphine availability and its easy accessibility to the deserving patient is poor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]