Search

Background: Bowel symptoms are considered indicators of the presence of colorectal cancer and other bowel diseases. Self administered questionnaires that elicit information about lower bowel symptoms have not been assessed for reliability, although this has been done for upper bowel symptoms. Our aim was to develop a self administered questionnaire for eliciting the presence, nature and severity of lower bowel symptoms potentially related to colorectal cancer, and assess its reliability. Methods: Immediately before consulting a gastroenterologist or colorectal surgeon, 263 patients likely to have a colonoscopy completed the questionnaire. Reliability was assessed in two ways: by assessing agreement between patient responses and (a) responses given by the doctor at the consultation; and (b) responses given by patients two weeks later. Results: There was more than 75% agreement for 78% of the questions for the patient-doctor comparison and for 92% of the questions for the patient-patient comparison. Agreement for the length of time a symptom was present, its severity, duration, frequency of occurrence and whether or not medical consultation had been sought, all had agreement of greater than 70%. Over all questions, the chance corrected agreement for the patient-doctor comparison had a median kappa of 65% (which represents substantial agreement), interquartile range 57-72%. The patient-patient comparison also showed substantial agreement with a median kappa of 75%, interquartile range 68-81%. Conclusion: This self administered questionnaire about lower bowel symptoms is a useful way of eliciting details of bowel symptoms. It is a reliable instrument that is acceptable to patients and easily completed. Its use could guide the clinical consultation, allowing a more efficient, comprehensive and useful interaction, ensuring that all symptoms are assessed. It will also be a useful tool in research studies on bowel symptoms and their predictive value for colorectal cancer and other diseases. Studies assessing whether bowel symptoms predict the presence of colorectal cancer should provide estimates of the reliability of the symptom elicitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractBackground and Aims: Clinical practice is determined by many different factors, but with the advent of evidence-based medicine, there may be a tendency to concentrate upon the scientific facts when decision-making rather than focusing on the patient. Furthermore, individual clinician opinion or bias may potentially influence patient management. This study outlines clinician opinion with regard to management of patients with hepatic colorectal metastases, and compares it to present practice in the Sydney metropolitan area. Methods: Clinician opinion was assessed by using a questionnaire and compared to results from a prospective multicenter study looking at patterns of care of patients with hepatic colorectal metastases. Results: Clinicians participating in the present study had a good knowledge of the current evidence concerning hepatic colorectal metastases and its treatment. However, there was a discrepancy between clinician knowledge that matched scientific evidence and actual clinical practice. Conclusions: This study suggests that clinician bias/opinion does influence patterns of care for patients with hepatic colorectal metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors experience difficulty navigating complex care pathways. Sharing care between GPs and specialist services has been proposed to improve health outcomes in cancer survivors following hospital discharge. Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) groups are known to have poorer outcomes following cancer treatment but little is known about their perceptions of shared care following surgery for CRC. This study aimed to explore how non-English-speaking and English-speaking patients perceive care to be coordinated amongst various health practitioners. Methods: This was a qualitative study using data from face to face semi-structured interviews and one focus group in a culturally diverse area of Sydney with non-English-speaking and English-speaking CRC survivors. Participants were recruited in community settings and were interviewed in English, Spanish or Vietnamese. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed by researchers fluent in those languages. Data were coded and analysed thematically. Results: Twenty-two CRC survivors participated in the study. Participants from non-English-speaking and English-speaking groups described similar barriers to care, but non-English-speaking participants described additional communication difficulties and perceived discrimination. Non-English-speaking participants relied on family members and bilingual GPs for assistance with communication and care coordination. Factors that influenced the care pathways used by participants and how care was shared between the specialist and GP included patient and practitioner preference, accessibility, complexity of care needs, and requirements for assistance with understanding information and navigating the health system, that were particularly difficult for non-English-speaking CRC survivors. Conclusions: Both non-English-speaking and English-speaking CRC survivors described a blend of specialist-led or GP-led care depending on the complexity of care required, informational needs, and how engaged and accessible they perceived the specialist or GP to be. Findings from this study highlight the role of the bilingual GP in assisting CALD participants to understand information and to navigate their care pathways following CRC surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Colorectal cancer is common. At presentation 25% of patients have established hepatic metastases and overall at least half will develop hepatic metastases. Many different therapeutic options have been proposed. This study evaluates the current resources available and patterns of care for patients with hepatic colorectal metastases in the Sydney metropolitan area. Methods: Prospective data were collated describing all patients presenting to any one of nine hospitals within the Sydney metropolitan area in a 12-month period, diagnosed with hepatic metastases. The data included patient demographics and background, treatment of the primary tumour, diagnosis and treatment of the hepatic metastases and histopathology both of the primary and of the hepatic metastases. Results: There were 194 patients in the study. Most when diagnosed with hepatic colorectal metastases were independent, active, retired and usually had existing social supports. The majority had had their primary colorectal cancer resected and were later treated with systemic chemotherapy. Conclusions: This study highlights the need for a comprehensive multicentre, prospective data collection of patients with hepatic metastatic disease. This would clarify the effectiveness or otherwise of the health system caring for such patients and provide additional information for the development and implementation of guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: This study aimed to test the relevance of a cognitive behavioural model of body image in a prospective study of colorectal surgery patients and to determine if pre-existing body image disturbance influenced psychological adjustment following surgery. Methods: Sixty-seven adult consecutive colorectal surgery patients completed measures assessing psychopathology, body image related beliefs and health related quality of life during pre-admission for surgery using a questionnaire battery. Each participant was followed up three months after surgery. Results: Depression and anxiety were positively correlated with body image disturbance and self evaluation at baseline. Those patients who went on to receive stomas experienced a significant deterioration in their body image that was not observed in those whose surgery did not result in the formation of a stoma. In the regression analysis, body image disturbance was a significant predictor of baseline levels of depression and emotional quality of life. Initial levels of body image disturbance remained a significant predictor of depression and anxiety at follow up assessment after medical variables and baseline levels of depression and anxiety, respectively, had been controlled for. Conclusion: Our findings support the hypothesis that pre-existing vulnerabilities in body image influence emotional adjustment during the recovery phase following surgery. Further research on screening for body image disturbance in surgical patients in order to promote adjustment is warranted. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]