Search

Objective: Responsiveness is a concept developed by the World Health Organisation (WHO) to evaluate health system performance. It measures how well a health system meets its users' legitimate expectations in non-medical related service aspects. Responsiveness consists of the categories "patient orientation" and "respect for persons". It is operationalised by nine (8+1) domains. This project aims to explore the responsiveness concept as a possibility to evaluate the performance of mental health care., Method: Face to face interviews with users of outpatient and hostel mental health services by means of a standardised instrument, developed by WHO were carried out., Results: Overall responsiveness in outpatient care was rated by a lower proportion of users negative than responsiveness in hostel care (15 vs. 20%). Socio-demographic characteristics were related only to responsiveness ratings in hostel care when legal guardianship was considered. Domains indicated as most important (attention, participation) in out-patient care did not perform well there. In hostel care the domains attention and respect were rated as most important. These domains performed well., Discussion and Conclusions: The results are in line with the literature and adequately reflect the realities in mental health care. The responsiveness concept offers a systematic approach for considering the categories "patient orientation" and "respect for persons" as quality criteria in mental health care. Evaluating mental health service provision using the concept of responsiveness, indicates where to launch reforms in health care., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: Health systems increasingly try to make their services more responsive to users' expectations. In the context of the World Health Report 2000, WHO developed the concept of health system responsiveness as a performance parameter. Responsiveness relates to the system's ability to respond to service users' legitimate expectations of non-medical aspects. We used this concept in an effort to evaluate the performance of mental health care in a catchment area in Germany., Methods: In accordance with the method WHO used for its responsiveness survey, responsiveness for inpatient and outpatient mental health care was evaluated by a standardised questionnaire. Responsiveness was assessed in the following domains: attention, dignity, clear communication, autonomy, confidentiality, basic amenities, choice of health care provider, continuity, and access to social support. Users with complex mental health care needs (i.e., requiring social and medical services or inpatient care) were recruited consecutively within the mental health services provided in the catchment area of the Hanover Medical School., Results: 221 persons were recruited in outpatient care and 91 in inpatient care. Inpatient service users reported poor responsiveness (22%) more often than outpatients did (15%); however this was significant only for the domains dignity and communication. The best performing domains were confidentiality and dignity; the worst performing were choice, autonomy and basic amenities (only inpatient care). Autonomy was rated as the most important domain, followed by attention and communication. Responsiveness within outpatient care was rated worse by people who had less money and were less well educated. Inpatient responsiveness was rated better by those with a higher level of education and also by those who were not so well educated. 23% of participants reported having been discriminated against in mental health care during the past 6 months. The results are similar to prior responsiveness surveys with regard to the overall better performance of outpatient care. Where results differ, this can best be explained by certain characteristics that are applicable to mental health care and also by the users with complex needs. The expectations of attention and autonomy, including participation in the treatment process, are not met satisfactorily in inpatient and outpatient care., Conclusion: Responsiveness as a health system performance parameter provides a refined picture of inpatient and outpatient mental health care. Reforms to the services provided should be orientated around domains that are high in importance, but low in performance. Measuring responsiveness could provide well-grounded guidance for further development of mental health care systems towards becoming better patient-orientated and providing patients with more respect.

Aim: To assess the wishes and expectations of alcoholic patients concerning their therapy. Methods: 227 alcohol-dependent patients from three sites in two cities in Germany completed a questionnaire about their aspirations for the outcome (20 items) and their expectations about the elements (23 items) of treatment. Results: Some components of treatment were equally important to men and women (a life without alcohol, individual sessions during therapy). Women attached more importance than men to 'strengthening of self-esteem' and 'an environment of tranquillity and security'. Most patients in this study were aware of their alcohol dependence, which limits the generalizability of these results to patients at earlier stages of recovery. Conclusion: Patients request individual, patient-oriented treatment. Some differences in expectations between men and women suggest that a gendered approach in treatment could mean an increase in patients' satisfaction, and thus a decrease in drop-outs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]