1. Hospital safety-net burden does not predict differences in rectal cancer treatment and outcomes.
- Author
-
Hoehn RS, Go DE, Hanseman DJ, Shah SA, and Paquette IM
- Subjects
- Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Rectal Neoplasms therapy, United States epidemiology, Patient Readmission statistics & numerical data, Rectal Neoplasms mortality, Safety-net Providers statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Background: Safety-net hospitals have been shown to have inferior short-term surgical outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare rectal cancer management and survival across hospitals stratified by payer mix., Materials and Methods: Rectal cancer patients (n = 296,068) were identified using the 1998-2010 National Cancer Data Base. Hospitals were grouped into safety-net burden categories, according to the proportion of patients with Medicaid or no health insurance, as follows: low-, medium-, and high-burden hospitals (HBHs). Patient and tumor characteristics, processes of care, and outcomes were evaluated, and regression analysis was used to investigate correlations between hospital safety-net burden on patient survival., Results: HBH encountered patients with more advanced disease (P < 0.001). Despite this, stage I-III patients at HBH had equal likelihood of receiving surgery and guideline-appropriate radiation and chemotherapy (all P > 0.05). The 30-day readmissions and mortality were also similar across safety-net groups (all P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed no difference in survival between HBH and low-burden hospital (P = 0.164)., Conclusions: Hospital payer mix may not adversely influence management of rectal cancer. This study highlights potential areas to improve cancer care for vulnerable patient populations., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF