Search

Aims: Across higher education, systems and policies explicitly address the impact of research. This paper contributes to the impact and engagement discussion from a regional, rural and remote perspective. We focus on how impact and engagement fit with regional, rural and remote research and explore strategies that can be employed to enhance impact and engagement in a rural health research context. Context: The impact agenda in Australia is a response to a worldwide call for demonstrable change or potential for change resulting from university research. As funding models evolve to integrate impact, there are increased pressures for universities and academics to plan for, evidence and report on it. The current lack of focus on impact in regional, rural and remote research may further disadvantage regional, rural and remote researchers' prospects for career progression and funding opportunities. Approach: Ignoring or avoiding impact will marginalise rural researchers and research. We discuss the definitions of impact and engagement as they apply to rural research and argue that engagement and impact must be commensurate with employment conditions. To platform regional, rural and remote impact, we provide strategies to assist researchers and administrators in building impact and engagement into their research and academic culture. Conclusion: The message to researchers is that impact is here to stay. The high levels of rural engagement can lead to impact, but we need to be clever at providing clear evidence to make that visible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Advance care planning (ACP) is increasingly regarded as the best way to optimise end‐of‐life (EOL) care. Studies have examined a multitude of factors impacting on the lagging uptake of ACP. In the current study, we specifically focused on patient factors related to the uptake of ACP in adult cancer patients. Methods: A scoping review was conducted, for which we searched the CINAHL, Cochrane, MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases (January 2013–December 2018). Studies exploring patient‐related factors influencing the uptake of ACP in cancer patients were eligible for inclusion. Results: Eleven papers and two overarching themes: person‐related (e.g. socio‐demographic) factors and "comprehension and awareness," were identified. White, well‐educated patients with a support network were more likely to be involved in ACP. However, there is limited comprehension and awareness among cancer patients regarding ACP. Conclusions: The identified themes warrant a tailored approach to ACP. With regard to person‐related factors, the existing body of knowledge on health literacy, disparities and shared decision‐making should be used when designing strategies to improve ACP uptake. Further, our findings regarding "comprehension and awareness" suggest that ACP should not be limited to a narrow process without acknowledging the complexity surrounding personalised cancer care near the EOL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]