Search

Purpose: Patellar maltracking caused by a rupture of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) can be improved by MPFL reconstruction (MPFL-R) with a tendon graft. Nonresorbable suture tape (FiberTape®, FT) is possibly becoming an option to tendon grafts for MPFL-R. Patella-side fixation of FT can be performed with suture anchors or via soft-tissue fixation. The aim of this study was to investigate patellar tracking considering soft-tissue-based and anchor-based patella-side fixation techniques. Methods: In eight fresh-frozen human knee joint specimens (m/f 4/4; age 75 ± 10 years), the MPFL was identified, and a rupture was placed near the femoral insertion site. In the study group (SG; 4 knees), soft-tissue fixation of the FT was performed at the medial patellar retinaculum; in the control group (CG; 4 knees), FT was fixed at the patella via suture anchors. For native MPFL (nMPFL), ruptured ("injured") MPFL (iMPFL) and reconstructed MPFL (FT-MPFL-SG, respectively, FT-MPFL-CG) cone beam CT scans were performed in 15°, 30°, and 45° of knee joint flexion. Patellar tracking was assessed using the radiological parameters patellar tilt (PT), congruence angle (CA) and posterior patellar edge-trochlear groove ratio (PTR). Results: All recorded radiological parameters increased, respectively, decreased in the CG and SG from the nMPFL to the iMPFL state. After MPFL-R, all parameters normalized when compared to the intact state (nMPFL), regardless of patella-side fixation technique. All investigated parameters of patellotrochlear alignment were positively, respectively, negatively significantly (p < 0.05) correlated throughout all evaluated conditions (nMPFL, iMPFL, FT-MPFL-SG, FT-MPFL-CG). Conclusion: MPFL-R with a nonresorbable suture tape can normalize patellar maltracking in fresh-frozen human knee joint specimens in earlier degrees of knee joint flexion independent of patella-side fixation technique. The investigated parameters of patellotrochlear alignment correlate with each other. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The need for concomitant bony procedures to realign pathoanatomic risk factors in addition to medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) remains unclear. Purpose: To evaluate a clinically derived 2-part classification of lateral patellar instability aimed at identifying patients indicated for a concomitant bony procedure. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The study included 122 patients (42 male, 80 female; mean ± SD age, 22 ± 6 years) who were assigned to a mild instability group (mIG) and a complex instability group (cIG) based on the reversed dynamic patellar apprehension test (ReDPAT) and J-sign. The mIG had a positive ReDPAT result <40° to 50° of knee flexion and an absent or low-grade J-sign (grade 1), and the cIG had a positive ReDPAT result >40° of knee flexion and/or a high-grade J-sign (grade 2 or 3). The mIG underwent isolated MPFL-R, and the cIG underwent MPFL-R and concomitant bony procedures depending on the established risk factor assessment. For evaluation, the BANFF Patellar Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0) and numeric analog scale (0-10) for patellofemoral pain and subjective knee function were used. The minimal clinically important difference for the BPII 2.0 was ascertained by calculating half the standard deviation of baseline scores. Results: Radiographic analysis confirmed a significantly more pronounced pathoanatomic risk factor constellation in the cIG regarding severity of trochlear dysplasia, distal malalignment, and patellar height (all P <.05). At final follow-up, no patellar redislocation occurred in either group; 2 patients in the cIG reported patellar subluxation. Within both groups, all outcome scores improved significantly pre- to postoperatively (all P <.0001); no between-group difference was found regarding BPII 2.0 score and numeric analog scale for function. The minimal clinically important difference for the BPII 2.0 was met by 84% (32/38) of the mIG and 90% (76/84) of the cIG (P =.36), but the cIG experienced more patellofemoral pain than the mIG (1.3 ± 1.6 vs 2.1 ± 2.1; P =.036). Conclusion: Patients with a high-grade J-sign and/or a positive ReDPAT finding beyond 40° to 50° of knee flexion exhibited a significantly more pronounced pathoanatomic risk factor constellation; however, the correction of modifiable risk factors led to similarly good outcomes to patients who underwent isolated MPFL-R. A slightly higher level of patellofemoral pain after bony procedures was evident in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There are few reports on the return to sports after complex patellar-stabilizing surgery. Purposes: To evaluate patients' ability to return to sports and to investigate the extent to which the preoperative level of sports participation influences sports activity after deepening trochleoplasty (TP) and concomitant patellar-stabilizing procedures. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Between April 2015 and April 2019, 144 patellar-stabilizing procedures, including deepening TP and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction or medial reefing with and without concomitant realignment procedures, were carried out in 142 patients. The Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0) and the Tegner activity score were used to assess patients' quality of life and sports activity level. In addition, a numerical analog scale was used to evaluate patellofemoral pain intensity during rest and activity and subjective knee joint function. Results: Outcomes were available for 111 patients (112 knees) (male/female, 77/34; mean age, 23.4 ± 7.8 years), yielding a 77.7% follow-up rate at a mean of 39.2 ± 9.9 months (range, 24-48 months). Two-thirds of the patients returned to their preoperative level of activity or higher, but their Tegner scores did not change significantly (4.5 ± 2.4 vs 4.7 ± 1.6; P =.365). Low-level athletes (preoperative Tegner score 0-4) participated at a higher level of sports activity (2.7 ± 1.4 to 4.1 ± 1.2; P <.0001), whereas higher-level athletes (preoperative Tegner score 5-10) participated at a lower level (6.8 ± 1.3 to 5.5 ± 1.7; P <.0001). The likelihood of returning to the preoperative activity level (Tegner score) was significantly higher in the low-level activity group than in the high-level activity group (P =.0001; 95% CI, 4.055-27.05; odds ratio, 10.47). All of the patient-reported outcome measures improved postoperatively, independent of the patients' age, sex, and body mass index. Conclusion: Patients undergoing deepening TP and medial soft tissue stabilization with or without concomitant realignment surgery for complex patellar instability can expect good clinical results and a high rate of return to sports participation, with two-thirds of patients returning to their preoperative Tegner-level of activity or higher. However, higher-level athletes should be informed that their likelihood of returning to sports at the preoperative level or full participation at a competitive level is reduced. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Complications and the need for revision surgery after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) are evident in the current literature. However, there is a shortage of clinical data evaluating the results of revision surgery in individual patients after failed MPFLR. Purpose: To investigate the results of tailored revision surgery for failed MPFLR, including the correction of predisposing factors. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Between August 2015 and March 2019, 25 patients (male:female, n = 9:16; mean ± SD age, 25.9 ± 6.5 years) underwent revision surgery for failed MPFLR (study group). The Banff Patella Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0) and a numerical analog scale (0-10) for patellofemoral pain and subjective knee joint function were used to assess patient-reported quality of life before and after revision surgery. The control group of 50 patients (male:female, n = 18:32; age, 22.8 ± 4.3 years) who underwent identical patellar-stabilizing procedures was matched 1:2 by the surgical procedure, predisposing factors, sex, age, and follow-up time. Results: Evaluation was performed postoperatively at a mean 27.8 ± 14.0 months (range, 12-54 months) in the study group and 26.1 ± 11.2 months (range, 12-56 months) in the control group (P =.55). The BPII 2.0 score increased from 28.6 ± 17.9 points to 68.7 ± 22.3 points (P <.0001) in the study group and from 43.8 ± 22.5 points to 75.5 ± 21.4 points (P <.0001) in the control group from preoperatively to postoperatively, respectively. Before revision surgery, the BPII 2.0 scores in the study group were significantly inferior to those in the control group (P =.0026). At the final follow-up, the BPII 2.0 score in the study group was not significantly lower (P =.174), and a similar number of patients in the study group and the control group achieved the minimally clinically important difference (P =.49). Patellofemoral pain and subjective knee joint function improved significantly in both groups (P <.0001, P <.0001), without any significant difference between them at the final follow-up (P =.85, P =.86). Conclusion: Revision surgery for MPFLR failure, including the correction of major anatomic risk factors, yielded a significant improvement in patient-reported quality-of-life outcome measures. Patients with failed MPFLR, however, were significantly more restricted before revision surgery than patients without previous interventions when evaluated with the BPII 2.0. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]