Search

Introduction: Acquired patella baja is often characterized by painful limitation of knee joint range of motion and anterior knee pain (AKP). Only few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of surgical treatment in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM's) and sports activity. Thus, the goal of this study was to assess PROM's and sports activity after proximalization tibial tubercle osteotomy (P-TTO) in patients with symptomatic patella baja., Methods: Between 2016 and 2018, a case series of 11 patients (male/female 4/7; age 48 ± 12 years) were treated by P-TTO and were retrospectively evaluated after a mean of 33.7 months (range 24-51 months). The Tegner activity score and the Kujala anterior knee pain scale were used in addition to a visual analogue scale (VAS; 0-10) regarding self-reported knee joint function and intensity of AKP. Radiographic assessment included the measure of patellar height using the Caton-Deschamps (CD) and Blackburne-Peel (BP) index., Results: Postoperatively both the CD and the BP index increased to normality (p < 0.0001; p = 0.0012). Knee joint flexion improved from 100 ± 32° preoperatively to 123 ± 14° postoperatively (p = 0.0235). AKP decreased from 6.5 ± 2.1 points preoperatively to 3.7 ± 2.1 points postoperatively (p = 0.0061). This was accompanied by a significant increase in self-reported knee joint function from 1.8 ± 1.2 points preoperatively to 6.8 ± 2.3 points postoperatively (p = 0.0001) and an increase of the Tegner activity score from 1.8 ± 1.6 points preoperatively to 3.9 ± 1.5 points postoperatively (p = 0.0074). Although the Kujala score improved significantly by an average of 31.55 points (p = 0.001) overall score results remained reduced at 65.6 ± 17.9 points at final follow-up., Conclusion: P-TTO yielded significant improvements in terms of AKP, subjective knee joint function and sports activity. However, the overall Kujala score results remained reduced, indicating that surgical correction of patellar height is not sufficient to relieve all patients' complaints. In addition, the incidence of postoperative complications was high., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Patellar malalignment has been considered one of the major pathomechanical causes of patellofemoral instability and pain. The results have been reported after femoral varization/torsional osteotomy and tibial tuberosity distalization osteotomy (TTD-O). However, the combination of a femoral deformity (genu valgum/increased femur antetorsion) and patella alta remains underreported. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients simultaneously treated by distal femoral osteotomy and TTD-O. The hypothesis was that restoration of patellofemoral (PF) alignment via the abovementioned osteotomies would achieve good patient-reported outcome measures. Materials and methods: Between 2016 and 2019, a series of 25 knees in 20 patients were treated by a distal femoral osteotomy combined with a TTD-O aiming to correct patellofemoral malalignment consisting of genu valgum and/or increased femur antetorsion and patella alta. Six patients were lost to follow-up, and one patient refused to participate. Thus, 17 knees in 13 patients (male/female 1/12; age 27.4 ± 5.4 years) were included and comprised the study group for this investigation. Patients were evaluated after a mean of 3.1 ± 0.9 years postoperatively. The Kujala anterior knee pain scale and the PF-subscale of the Knee Osteoarthritis and Outcome score (KOOS-PF) were used to assess patients' reported outcome measures from pre- to postoperatively. Results: The mean amount of torsional correction, valgus correction, and tibial tuberosity distalization averaged 14° (10°–18°), 5.2° (3.8°–8°), and 9 mm (6°–15 mm), respectively. The Kujala score increased by an average of 24.18 points from a mean of 66.6 ± 18.3 points (34–93 points) preoperatively to 90.8 ± 14.2 points (44–100 points) postoperatively (95% CI − 33.0 to − 15.3; p < 0.0001). The KOOS-PF score increased by an average of 33.7 points from a mean of 49.5 ± 24.5 points (9.1–88.6 points) preoperatively to 83.2 ± 21.6 points (15.9 –100 points) postoperatively (95% CI − 47.5 to − 19.9; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that the combination of a distal femoral osteotomy and a tibial tuberosity distalization osteotomy is effective in patients presenting with patellar instability and patellofemoral pain due to patella alta and femoral malalignment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The need for concomitant bony procedures to realign pathoanatomic risk factors in addition to medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) remains unclear. Purpose: To evaluate a clinically derived 2-part classification of lateral patellar instability aimed at identifying patients indicated for a concomitant bony procedure. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The study included 122 patients (42 male, 80 female; mean ± SD age, 22 ± 6 years) who were assigned to a mild instability group (mIG) and a complex instability group (cIG) based on the reversed dynamic patellar apprehension test (ReDPAT) and J-sign. The mIG had a positive ReDPAT result <40° to 50° of knee flexion and an absent or low-grade J-sign (grade 1), and the cIG had a positive ReDPAT result >40° of knee flexion and/or a high-grade J-sign (grade 2 or 3). The mIG underwent isolated MPFL-R, and the cIG underwent MPFL-R and concomitant bony procedures depending on the established risk factor assessment. For evaluation, the BANFF Patellar Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0) and numeric analog scale (0-10) for patellofemoral pain and subjective knee function were used. The minimal clinically important difference for the BPII 2.0 was ascertained by calculating half the standard deviation of baseline scores. Results: Radiographic analysis confirmed a significantly more pronounced pathoanatomic risk factor constellation in the cIG regarding severity of trochlear dysplasia, distal malalignment, and patellar height (all P <.05). At final follow-up, no patellar redislocation occurred in either group; 2 patients in the cIG reported patellar subluxation. Within both groups, all outcome scores improved significantly pre- to postoperatively (all P <.0001); no between-group difference was found regarding BPII 2.0 score and numeric analog scale for function. The minimal clinically important difference for the BPII 2.0 was met by 84% (32/38) of the mIG and 90% (76/84) of the cIG (P =.36), but the cIG experienced more patellofemoral pain than the mIG (1.3 ± 1.6 vs 2.1 ± 2.1; P =.036). Conclusion: Patients with a high-grade J-sign and/or a positive ReDPAT finding beyond 40° to 50° of knee flexion exhibited a significantly more pronounced pathoanatomic risk factor constellation; however, the correction of modifiable risk factors led to similarly good outcomes to patients who underwent isolated MPFL-R. A slightly higher level of patellofemoral pain after bony procedures was evident in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) is an important treatment for recurrent patellar instability. Although complications such as redislocation, patellofemoral pain (PFP) and restricted knee range of motion have been reported, few studies have investigated the results of revision surgery for failed MPFL-R. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the results of the tailored revision surgery after considering the cause of the reconstruction failure. Materials and methods: Between 2015 and 2019, 28 patients (male/female 9/19; age 26.2 ± 6.4 years) underwent revision surgery for failed MPFL-R. The patients were grouped into the "recurrent instability" (SG1) group and "PFP" and/or "restricted range of motion" (SG2) group. Preoperatively, the clinical data, anatomical risk factor profile, and position of the femoral MPFL tunnel were determined for each patient. The Banff Patella Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0) and numerical analogue scale (NAS 0–10) were administered preoperatively and at the final follow-up for the subjective assessment of the PFP and knee joint function. Results: Overall, the BPII 2.0 score improved from 28.8 ± 16.6 points preoperatively to 68.0 ± 22.7 points (p < 0.0001) postoperatively. SG1 exhibited an increase in the BPII 2.0 score from 28.9 ± 20.2 points to 75.7 ± 23 points (p < 0.0001). PFP decreased from 6.8 ± 2.4 to 1.6 ± 1.9 (p < 0.0001), while the knee joint function increased from 4.3 ± 2.5 to 8.8 ± 1.6 (p < 0.0001). In SG2, the BPII 2.0 score increased from 28.7 ± 12.6 points preoperatively to 57.7 ± 19.7 points (p = 0.0002) postoperatively and was thus significantly lower than that in SG1 (p = 0.038). The intensity of PFP decreased from 6.6 ± 3.0 preoperatively to 2.1 ± 1.9 postoperatively (p = 0.0006), while the subjective knee joint function improved from 3.2 ± 1.4 preoperatively to 7.6 ± 2.3 postoperatively (p < 0.0001). The differences between the groups were not significant. Conclusion: Tailored revision surgery for failed MPFL-R significantly improves the patient-reported disease-specific quality of life. The study results indicate that patients undergoing revision surgery as a consequence of patellar redislocation appear to benefit more from revision surgery than those patients undergoing revision due to postoperative PFP and/or a limited knee joint range of motion. Level of evidence: Level IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There are few reports on the return to sports after complex patellar-stabilizing surgery. Purposes: To evaluate patients' ability to return to sports and to investigate the extent to which the preoperative level of sports participation influences sports activity after deepening trochleoplasty (TP) and concomitant patellar-stabilizing procedures. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Between April 2015 and April 2019, 144 patellar-stabilizing procedures, including deepening TP and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction or medial reefing with and without concomitant realignment procedures, were carried out in 142 patients. The Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0) and the Tegner activity score were used to assess patients' quality of life and sports activity level. In addition, a numerical analog scale was used to evaluate patellofemoral pain intensity during rest and activity and subjective knee joint function. Results: Outcomes were available for 111 patients (112 knees) (male/female, 77/34; mean age, 23.4 ± 7.8 years), yielding a 77.7% follow-up rate at a mean of 39.2 ± 9.9 months (range, 24-48 months). Two-thirds of the patients returned to their preoperative level of activity or higher, but their Tegner scores did not change significantly (4.5 ± 2.4 vs 4.7 ± 1.6; P =.365). Low-level athletes (preoperative Tegner score 0-4) participated at a higher level of sports activity (2.7 ± 1.4 to 4.1 ± 1.2; P <.0001), whereas higher-level athletes (preoperative Tegner score 5-10) participated at a lower level (6.8 ± 1.3 to 5.5 ± 1.7; P <.0001). The likelihood of returning to the preoperative activity level (Tegner score) was significantly higher in the low-level activity group than in the high-level activity group (P =.0001; 95% CI, 4.055-27.05; odds ratio, 10.47). All of the patient-reported outcome measures improved postoperatively, independent of the patients' age, sex, and body mass index. Conclusion: Patients undergoing deepening TP and medial soft tissue stabilization with or without concomitant realignment surgery for complex patellar instability can expect good clinical results and a high rate of return to sports participation, with two-thirds of patients returning to their preoperative Tegner-level of activity or higher. However, higher-level athletes should be informed that their likelihood of returning to sports at the preoperative level or full participation at a competitive level is reduced. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]