1. Inter-comparison of personal monitors for nanoparticles exposure at workplaces and in the environment
- Author
-
Simon Clavaguera, Johannes Pelzer, Karine Elihn, Sébastien Bau, Nico Dziurowitz, Asmus Meyer-Plath, Christian Monz, Patrick Thali, Dirk Dahmann, Stefanie Beckmann, Martin Fierz, Hélène Dozol, Volker Neumann, Heinz Kaminski, Christof Asbach, Arjan van der Vleuten, Delphine Bard, Göran Lidén, Ilse Tuinman, Barbara Katrin Simonow, Ana Maria Todea, and Huub Vroomen
- Subjects
Environmental Engineering ,Materials science ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Particle number ,Analytical chemistry ,Urbanisation ,Air Pollutants, Occupational ,010501 environmental sciences ,01 natural sciences ,Number concentration ,Wearable Electronic Devices ,Scanning mobility particle sizer ,Personal monitors ,Occupational Exposure ,Comparability ,Ultrafine particle ,Humans ,Environmental Chemistry ,Particle Size ,Diffusion (business) ,2015 Observation, Weapon & Protection Systems ,Workplace ,Waste Management and Disposal ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Aerosols ,TS - Technical Sciences ,Range (particle radiation) ,CBRN - CBRN Protection ,Mean particle size ,Pollution ,Aerosol ,Alveolar lung deposited surface area concentration ,Nanoparticles ,Particle ,Ergonomics ,Particle size ,Environment & Sustainability ,Environmental Monitoring - Abstract
Personal monitors based on unipolar diffusion charging (miniDiSC/DiSCmini, NanoTracer, Partector) can be used to assess the individual exposure to nanoparticles in different environments. The charge acquired by the aerosol particles is nearly proportional to the particle diameter and, by coincidence, also nearly proportional to the alveolar lung-deposited surface area (LDSA), the metric reported by all three instruments. In addition, the miniDiSC/DiSCmini and the NanoTracer report particle number concentration and mean particle size. In view of their use for personal exposure studies, the comparability of these personal monitors was assessed in two measurement campaigns. Altogether 29 different polydisperse test aerosols were generated during the two campaigns, covering a large range of particle sizes, morphologies and concentrations. The data provided by the personal monitors were compared with those obtained from reference instruments: a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) for LDSA and mean particle size and a ultrafine particle counter (UCPC) for number concentration. The results indicated that the LDSA concentrations and the mean particle sizes provided by all investigated instruments in this study were in the order of ± 30% of the reference value obtained from the SMPS when the particle sizes of the test aerosols generated were within 20–400 nm and the instruments were properly calibrated. Particle size, morphology and concentration did not have a major effect within the aforementioned limits. The comparability of the number concentrations was found to be slightly worse and in the range of ± 50% of the reference value obtained from the UCPC. In addition, a minor effect of the particle morphology on the number concentration measurements was observed. The presence of particles > 400 nm can drastically bias the measurement results of all instruments and all metrics determined. © 2016 Elsevier B.V.
- Published
- 2017