Search

Background: Neuroimaging studies suggest an association between apathy after deep brain stimulation (DBS) and stimulation of the ventral part of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) due to the associative fibers connected to the non-motor limbic circuits that are involved in emotion regulation and motivation. We have previously described three patients with severe apathy that could be fully treated after switching stimulation from a ventral electrode contact point to a more dorsal contact point., Objectives: To determine whether more dorsal stimulation of the STN decreases apathy compared to standard care in a multicenter randomized controlled trial with a crossover design., Methods: We will include 26 patients with a Starkstein Apathy Scale (SAS) score of 14 or more after subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for refractory Parkinson's disease. This is a multicenter trial conducted in two teaching hospitals and one university medical center in the Netherlands after at least 3 months of STN DBS. Our intervention will consist of 1 month of unilateral dorsal STN stimulation compared to treatment as usual. The primary outcome is a change in SAS score following 1 month of DBS on the original contact compared to the SAS score following 1 month of DBS on the more dorsal contact. Secondary outcomes are symptom changes on the Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor part III, Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, 39-item Parkinson's disease questionnaire, Parkinson's disease impulsive-compulsive disorders questionnaire, changes in levodopa-equivalent daily dosage, apathy rated by the caregiver, and burden and quality of life of the caregiver., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NL8279. Registered on January 10, 2020., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an established treatment for disabling motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) that persist despite optimal pharmacological treatment. Currently, DBS is not performed if there is concomitant significant cognitive impairment based on concerns of cognitive deterioration, higher complication rate and less functional improvement. However, this has not been investigated so far., Methods: A single center, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point (PROBE design) pilot clinical trial is being performed. Patients are eligible for the trial if they have PD dementia (PDD), are able to provide informed consent, and experience disabling motor response fluctuations, bradykinesia, dyskinesia, or painful dystonia, despite optimal pharmacological treatment. In total 44 patients will be randomized to either STN-DBS accompanied by best medical treatment (DBS group) or to best medical treatment alone (BMT group). The primary outcome measure is the change from baseline to 30 weeks on the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III score in a standardized off-drug phase. The main secondary outcome measures consist of scales assessing cognitive aspects of daily living, neuropsychiatric symptoms and impulsive compulsive disorders. Additional secondary outcome measures include motor signs during on-drug phase, dyskinesia, motor fluctuations, cognitive performance, (severe) adverse events, treatment satisfaction, and caregiver burden. Patients will be followed during 52 weeks after randomization., Discussion: The Deep Brain Stimulation for MOtor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease DEmentia (DBS-MODE) trial directly compares the effectiveness and safety of DBS with BMT in patients with PDD., Trial Registration: The DBS-MODE trial has been registered in the International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (NL9361) on the 24 th of March 2021 ( https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NL9361 )., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objective: Local field potential (LFP) recordings from deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes are often contaminated with electrocardiographic (ECG) artifacts that hinder the detection of disease-specific electrical brain activity., Methods: Three ECG suppression methods were evaluated: (1) QRS interpolation of the Perceive toolbox, (2) template subtraction, and (3) singular value decomposition (SVD). LFPs were recorded with the Medtronic Percept TM PC system in nine Parkinson's disease patients with stimulation OFF ("OFF-DBS"; anode disconnected) and ON at 0 mA ("ON-DBS 0 mA"; anode connected). Findings were verified with simulated ECG-contaminated time series., Results: ECG artifacts were present in 10 out of 18 ON-DBS 0 mA recordings. All ECG suppression methods drastically reduced artifact-induced beta band (13-35 Hz) power and at least partly recovered the beta peak and beta burst dynamics. Using external ECG recordings and lengthening artifact epoch length improved the performance of the suppression methods. Increasing epoch length, however, elevated the risk of flattening the beta peak and losing beta burst dynamics., Conclusions: The SVD method formed the preferred trade-off between artifact cleaning and signal loss, as long as its parameter settings are adequately chosen., Significance: ECG suppression methods enable analysis of disease-specific neural activity from signals affected by ECG artifacts., (Copyright © 2022 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Organizing and executing a large clinical trial is a complex process, and often recruitment targets are not met. We describe the organization of the Levodopa in the Early Parkinson's disease (LEAP) trial and the results of an external assessment of the recruitment process., Methods: Several strategies were used to ensure that recruitment for the trial was effective and efficient. We analyzed the patterns in referrals, inclusions, and non-inclusions to investigate whether there were bottlenecks in the referral and inclusion process. For the external assessment of the recruitment process, the QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI-Two) was used retrospectively, focusing on finding possible issues impeding recruitment that are less easily recognized., Results: Recruitment took 57 months, which was 27 months longer than initially expected. 6.8% of the estimated eligible patients in the Netherlands were included. The number of referrals differed widely between participating centers and regions in the Netherlands, with the region of the principal study center having the most referrals. Reasons of exclusion varied across regions, as in some regions more patients already started, wanted to start, or did not want to start with Parkinson medication compared to other regions., Discussion: Executing a large, investigator-initiated clinical trial on a limited budget still remains possible by focusing on minimizing administrative and organizational procedures. Our study suggests that centers with closer institutional ties to a principal study center tend to have a higher referral rate. The review of the LEAP trial recruitment strategies and data using the QRI-Two suggested that the variations in referrals and reasons of non-inclusion could indicate the presence of issues related to clinical equipoise, patient eligibility, or study presentation. Integrating a recruitment intervention could have explored issues with study presentation and equipoise that might have increased recruitment efficiency., Trial Registration: ISRCTN ISRCTN30518857 . The registration was initiated on 02/08/2011 and finalized on 25/08/2011. Recruitment started on 17/08/2011, after the initiation of public registration., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Both Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) and Continuous intrajejunal Levodopa Infusion (CLI) are effective therapies for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). To our knowledge, no direct head-to-head comparison of DBS and CLI has been performed, whilst the costs probably differ significantly. In the INfusion VErsus STimulation (INVEST) study, costs and effectiveness of DBS and CLI are compared in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in patients with PD, to study whether higher costs of one of the therapies are justified by superiority of that treatment., Methods: A prospective open label multicentre RCT is being performed, with ancillary patient preference observational arms. Patients with PD who, despite optimal pharmacological treatment, have severe response fluctuations, bradykinesia, dyskinesias, or painful dystonia are eligible for inclusion. A total of 66 patients will be randomized. There is no minimal inclusion in the patient preference arms. The primary health economic outcomes are costs per unit on the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) and costs per unit Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) at 12 months. The main clinical outcome is patient-reported quality of life measured with the PDQ-39 at 12 months. Patients will additionally be followed during 36 months after initiation of the study treatment., Discussion: The INVEST trial directly compares the costs and effectiveness of the advanced therapies DBS and CLI., Trial Registration: Dutch Trial Register identifier 4753, registered November 3rd, 2014; EudraCT number 2014-001501-32, Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02480803.

Background: The aim of the study is to investigate if deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for Parkinson's disease (PD) under general anesthesia further improves outcome by lessening postoperative cognitive, mood, and behavioral adverse effects; shorten surgical time and hospital admittance; and produce comparable symptomatic and functional improvement to surgery under local anesthesia., Methods/design: The study will be a single-center, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint trial comparing DBS under general anesthesia with DBS under local anesthesia. The primary outcome measure is a composite score of the postoperative cognitive, mood, and behavioral adverse effects and will be measured 6 months after surgery. The secondary outcome measures consist of changes in motor symptoms, adverse effects of stimulation and surgical complications, surgical time, functional health, quality of life, patient satisfaction with the outcome of treatment, patient evaluation of the burden of therapy, and medication. A total of 110 patients with advanced PD who are candidates for DBS will be randomized during a 2.5-year period., Discussion: The aim of this trial is to further enhance the effectiveness of DBS treatment in PD while reducing the burden of DBS surgery by studying if DBS surgery under general anesthesia results in less cognitive, mood, and behavioral adverse effects compared with surgery under local anesthesia., Trial Registration: Netherlands Trial Register, NTR5809 . Registered on 23 April 2016.

Background: The aim of this study is to investigate if early treatment with levodopa has a beneficial disease modifying effect on Parkinson's disease (PD) symptoms and functional health, improves the ability to (maintain) work, and reduces the use of (informal) care, caregiver burden, and costs. Additionally, cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of early levodopa treatment will be assessed., Methods: To differentiate between the direct symptomatic effects and possible disease modifying effects of levodopa, we use a randomised delayed-start double-blind placebo-controlled multi-centre trial design. Patients with early stage PD whose functional health does not yet necessitate initiation of PD-medication will be randomised to either 40 weeks of treatment with levodopa/carbidopa 100/25 mg TID including 2 weeks of dose escalation or to 40 weeks placebo TID. Subsequently, all patients receive levodopa/carbidopa 100/25 mg TID for 40 weeks. There are 8 assessments: at baseline and at 4, 22, 40, 44, 56, 68, and 80 weeks. The primary outcome measure is the difference in the mean total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale scores between the early- and delayed-start groups at 80 weeks. Secondary outcome measures are rate of progression, the AMC Linear Disability Score, side effects, perceived quality of life with the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39, the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), ability to (maintain) work, the use of (informal) care, caregiver burden, and costs. 446 newly diagnosed PD patients without impaired functional health need to be recruited in order to detect a minimal clinical relevant difference of 4 points on the total UPDRS at 80 weeks., Discussion: The LEAP-study will provide insights into the possible disease modifying effects of early levodopa., Trial Registration: ISRCTN30518857, EudraCT number 2011-000678-72.

Background: A new 32-contacts deep brain stimulation (DBS) lead, capable of directionally steering stimulation, was tested intraoperatively., Objective: The aim of this pilot study was to perform recordings from the multidirectional contacts and to investigate the effect of directional current steering on the local field potentials (LFPs)., Methods: In eight patients with Parkinson's disease, after standard microelectrode recording and clinical testing, the new lead was temporarily implanted. The 32-channel LFP recordings were measured simultaneously at different depths and directions before and after directional stimulation., Results: The spatial distribution of LFPs power spectral densities across the contact array at baseline marked the borders of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) with a significant increase in beta power and with a mean accuracy of approximately 0.6 mm in four patients.The power in the 18.5-30 Hz frequency band varied across different directions in all patients. In the three cases that showed improvement of rigidity, this was higher when current was steered toward the direction with the highest LFP power in the beta band. Subthalamic LFPs in six patients showed a differential frequency-dependent suppression/enhancement of the oscillatory activity in the 10-45 Hz frequency band after four different 'steering' modes as compared to ring mode, suggesting a higher specificity., Conclusions: Through a new 32-contact DBS lead it is possible to record simultaneous subthalamic LFPs at different depths and directions, providing confirmation of adequate lead placement and multidirectional spatial-temporal information potentially related to pathological subthalamic electrical activity and to the effect of stimulation. Although further research is needed, this may improve the efficiency of steering stimulation., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We examined the development of Parkinson disease (PD)-mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in patients with newly diagnosed PD over 5 years using recently proposed consensus criteria, and we assessed the reliability of the criteria., Methods: Patients with PD (n = 123) underwent extensive neuropsychological testing at baseline and after 3 (n = 93) and 5 years (n = 59). Two neuropsychologists independently applied the PD-MCI criteria to examine the interrater and intrarater reliability., Results: At baseline, 35% of patients had PD-MCI. Three years later, 53% of the patients had PD-MCI. At 5-year follow-up, 20 patients who had PD-MCI at an earlier assessment had converted to PD dementia and 50% of the remaining patients without dementia had MCI. The interrater reliability (kappa) was 0.91. The intrarater reliabilities were 0.85 and 0.96., Conclusion: Approximately one-third of patients with newly diagnosed PD fulfill the consensus criteria for PD-MCI; after 5 years, this proportion is approximately 50% of patients without dementia. The criteria have good interrater and intrarater reliability.

Cognitive change is frequently observed in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the exact profile and extent of cognitive impairments remain unclear due to the clinical heterogeneity of PD and methodological issues in many previous studies. In this study, we aimed to examine the severity, frequency, and profile of cognitive changes in newly diagnosed PD patients over 5 years. At baseline and after 3 and 5 years, a hospital-based sample of PD patients (n = 59) and healthy controls (n = 40) were given neuropsychological tests covering six cognitive domains. Patients showed greater decline over time than healthy controls on all cognitive domains, except for attention. The profile of decline showed that psychomotor speed and memory were most affected. At the individual level 53% of the patients showed more cognitive decline than controls. Age at onset and memory impairment at baseline predicted cognitive decline. Cognitive functions in PD patients show greater decline in most domains than in healthy elderly over the course of 5 years. Due to selection bias as a result of attrition, the actual degree of decline may be greater than reported here.

Objectives: Using a family study design, we describe the motor and nonmotor phenotype in probands with LRRK2 G2019S mutations and family members and compare these individuals to patients with idiopathic Parkinson disease (iPD) and unrelated controls., Methods: Probands with G2019S mutations and their first-degree relatives, subjects with iPD, and unrelated control subjects were identified from 4 movement disorders centers. All underwent neurologic examinations and tests of olfaction, color vision, anxiety, and depression inventories., Results: Tremor was more often a presenting feature among 25 individuals with LRRK2-associated PD than among 84 individuals with iPD. Subjects with LRRK2-PD had better olfactory identification compared with subjects with iPD, higher Beck Depression Inventory scores, and higher error scores on Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue test of color discrimination. Postural or action tremor was more common among 29 nonmanifesting mutation carriers compared with 53 noncarriers within the families. Nonparkinsonian family members had higher Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor scores, more constipation, and worse color discrimination than controls, regardless of mutation status., Conclusions: Although tremor is a more common presenting feature of LRRK2-PD than iPD and some nonmotor features differed in degree, the phenotype is largely overlapping. Postural or action tremor may represent an early sign. Longitudinal evaluation of a large sample of nonmanifesting carriers will be required to describe any premotor phenotype that may allow early diagnosis.

Background: Current Health Canada instructions for use of the dopamine agonists (DA), pramipexole and ropinirole, state that Parkinson's disease (PD) patients should be told not to drive. The objective was to assess neurologists' actual clinical practice concerning driving advice they give to PD patients starting a DA., Methods: An online survey was created consisting of 4 items regarding demographics, 5 regarding PD and driving, and 9 regarding DA use and driving. The survey was distributed to 563 neurologists., Results: In total 96 neurologists (17.9%) responded. 4.4% tell patients with PD not to drive, solely because they are taking a DA. Respondents assess the patient's tendency for excessive daytime sleepiness and sleep attacks after starting a DA more frequently than after starting other dopaminergic drugs (p < 0.001)., Discussion: A minor proportion of the clinicians responding to our survey advise PD patients not to drive, solely because they use a DA. Such being the case, we propose that current Health Canada guidelines need revision.

Background: To investigate whether STN stimulation is more efficacious than unilateral pallidotomy in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) one year after surgery., Method: Thirty-four patients with advanced PD were randomly assigned to unilateral pallidotomy or bilateral STN stimulation. Outcome measures were parkinsonian symptoms in off and on phases (UPDRS 3), dyskinesias, functional status, Parkinson's disease quality of life questionnaire, the effects on separate symptoms, timed tests, patient diaries, dopaminergic drugs changes, adverse effects, and global outcome scale. Patients were assessed before surgery, six months and one year after surgery. The primary outcome measure was the off phase UPDRS 3 at six months follow-up., Findings: The off phase UPDRS 3 score improved from 46.5 to 32 points in the pallidotomy patients and from 51.5 to 24 in the STN stimulation patients (p = 0.002). On phase UPDRS 3 and off phase Schwab and England functional scale improved significantly in favour of the STN stimulation patients. Dopaminergic drugs reduction was larger in the STN group although the difference between the treatment groups was not significant. One patient in each group had a major adverse effect., Conclusions: Bilateral STN stimulation is more efficacious than unilateral pallidotomy in advanced PD up to one year after surgery.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of unilateral pallidotomy and bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation in patients with advanced Parkinson disease (PD) in a randomized, observer-blind, multicenter trial., Methods: Thirty-four patients with advanced PD were randomly assigned to have unilateral pallidotomy or bilateral STN stimulation. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to 6 months in the motor part of the Unified PD Rating Scale (motor UPDRS) in the off phase. Secondary outcomes were parkinsonian symptoms in the on phase (motor UPDRS), dyskinesias (Clinical Dyskinesia Rating Scale and dyskinesias UPDRS), functional status (activities of daily living UPDRS and Schwab and England scale), PD Quality of Life questionnaire, changes in drug treatment, and adverse effects., Results: The off phase motor UPDRS score improved from 46.5 to 37 points in the group of pallidotomy patients and from 51.5 to 26.5 in the STN stimulation patients (p = 0.002). Of the secondary outcome measures, on phase motor UPDRS and dyskinesias UPDRS improved significantly in favor of the STN stimulation patients. Reduction of antiparkinsonian drugs was greater after STN stimulation than after pallidotomy. One patient in each group had a major adverse effect., Conclusions: Bilateral STN stimulation is more effective than unilateral pallidotomy in reducing parkinsonian symptoms in patients with advanced PD.

Objective: To study the frequency of morbidity and mortality associated with pallidotomy., Method: The authors searched the MEDLINE electronic database for pallidotomy articles reported between January 1992 and December 2000. They selected studies by the following criteria: original clinical data, unequivocal description of morbidity and mortality, and unselected consecutive cases. The authors extracted the following data: number of patients, unilateral or bilateral procedures, age, localization technique, follow-up time, number of patients with adverse effects, number of patients with permanent adverse effects (>3 months), types of adverse effects, and mortality., Results: For unilateral pallidotomy, 12 prospective studies included 334 patients. Of these patients, 30.2% (95% CI, 25.3 to 35.2) had adverse effects, and 13.8% (95% CI, 10.1 to 17.5) had permanent adverse effects. A symptomatic infarction or hemorrhage occurred in 3.9% (95% CI, 2.1 to 6.6). The mortality rate was 1.2% (95% CI, 0.3 to 3.0). In the series with microelectrode recording, the frequency of adverse effects was 14.4% (95% CI, 4.7 to 24.1) higher and the frequency of stroke was 4.9% (95% CI, 1.4 to 8.4) higher. The most frequent adverse effects were problems with speech (11.1%) and facial paresis (8.4%). For bilateral pallidotomy, five historical cohort studies including 20 patients were available for review. Fourteen patients had an adverse effect, and the most frequent adverse effects were impairments of speech and cognition., Conclusions: The risk of permanent adverse effects associated with unilateral pallidotomy was 13.8%. A symptomatic infarction or hemorrhage occurred in 3.9% of patients, and the associated mortality rate was 1.2%.

Objectives: In a randomised trial to study the efficacy of unilateral pallidotomy in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease, patients having pallidotomy within 1 month after randomisation were compared with patients having pallidotomy 6 months after the primary outcome assessment. Of the 37 patients enrolled 32 had a unilateral pallidotomy. The follow up study of these patients is presented to report (1) clinical outcome; (2) adverse effects; (3) cognitive and behavioural effects; (4) relation between lesion location and outcome; and (5) preoperative patient characteristics predictive for good outcome., Methods: Outcome measures were the motor section of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS), levodopa induced dyskinesias, disability, quality of life, and a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify preoperative patient characteristics independently associated with good outcome., Results: Off phase assessment showed a reduction in parkinsonism from 49 to 36.5 points on the UPDRS 6 months after surgery. Improvements were also demonstrated for activities of daily living and quality of life. In the on phase dyskinesias were reduced. All effects lasted up to 12 months after surgery. Three patients had major permanent adverse effects. Besides worsening of verbal fluency after left sided surgery, systematic cognitive deterioration was not detected. Patients taking less than 1000 levodopa equivalent units (LEU)/day were more likely to improve., Conclusions: The positive effects of unilateral pallidotomy are stable up to 1 year after surgery. Patients taking less than 1000 LEU per day were most likely to improve.

Three target structures are available in stereotactic surgery for Parkinson's disease: the thalamus, the globus pallidus and the subthalamic nucleus. The subthalamic nucleus appears to be the most promising structure. However, the thalamus can be considered in the case of an incapacitating tremor presenting as a primary symptom. Surgery in the globus pallidus may be as effective as in the subthalamic nucleus, but in the latter it is often accompanied by a reduction in dopaminergic medication. The surgical technique of electrical stimulation causes fewer adverse effects than that of coagulation and can therefore be applied bilaterally, but does require more intense postoperative care. In the selection of patients for surgery, levodopa responsiveness plays an important role in predicting effectiveness, except in the case of tremor.

Objective: To investigate whether unilateral pallidotomy affects cognitive and behavioral functioning., Methods: At baseline and after 6 months we assessed neuropsychological functioning in 35 patients with advanced PD. After baseline examination, patients were randomized to pallidotomy within 1 month (6 left-sided, 13 right-sided) or to pallidotomy after follow-up assessment 6 months later (n = 16; control group). We performed neuropsychological tests of language, visuospatial function, memory, attention, and executive functions. Self ratings and proxy ratings of memory problems and dysexecutive symptoms were also collected., Results: No significant differences over time were found between pallidotomy and control groups, with the exception of a decrease of verbal fluency in the left-sided pallidotomy group., Conclusions: Unilateral pallidotomy is relatively safe with respect to cognition and behavior. Left-sided pallidotomy may lead to minor deterioration in verbal fluency. The sample size of this study is too small, however, to rule out the possibility of infrequent but clinically important side effects.

Object: The purpose of this prospective study was to compare stereotactic coordinates obtained with ventriculography with coordinates derived from stereotactic computer-reconstructed three-dimensional magnetic resonance (3D-MR) imaging in functional stereotactic procedures., Methods: In 15 consecutive patients undergoing functional stereotactic procedures, both preoperative frame-based stereotactic 3D-MR imaging and intraoperative ventriculography were performed. Differences between 3D-MR imaging and ventriculography in X, Y, and Z coordinates of the anterior commissure (AC), posterior commissure (PC), and target area were calculated, as well as the 3D distance between the position of AC, PC, and target within stereotactic space as obtained using both methods. The position of the stereotactic MR imaging fiducial markers measured using 3D-MR imaging compared well with the markers' known position embedded in the software (mean error 0.4 mm, maximal error for an individual slice 1.2 mm). For the individual coordinates, only for Y-PC was a difference found between 3D-MR imaging and ventriculography that significantly exceeded half the size of a pixel, the theoretical limit of precision when using a digitized imaging technique. However, the mean difference was smaller than 1 mm. The mean 3D distance between the 3D-MR imaging- and ventriculography-derived coordinates was 1.09 mm for AC, 1.13 mm for PC, and 1.29 mm for the targets., Conclusions: With these data it is shown that there is sufficient agreement between ventriculography-derived and 3D-MR imaging-derived stereotactic coordinates to justify the use of 3D-MR imaging target determination in frame-based functional stereotactic neurosurgery.

Background: The results of several cohort studies suggest that patients with advanced Parkinson's disease would benefit from unilateral pallidotomy. We have assessed the efficacy of unilateral pallidotomy in a randomised, single-blind, multicentre trial., Methods: We enrolled 37 patients with advanced Parkinson's disease who had, despite optimum pharmacological treatment, at least one of the following symptoms: severe response fluctuations, dyskinesias, painful dystonias, or bradykinesia. Patients were randomly assigned to unilateral pallidotomy within 1 month or to pallidotomy after the primary outcome assessment (6 months later). The primary outcome was the difference between the groups in median changes on the motor examination section of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS 3) score done in the off phase. Secondary outcome measures included levodopa-induced dyskinesias (dyskinesia rating scale [DRS]) and extent of disability (UPDRS 2)., Findings: The median UPDRS 3 off score of the pallidotomy patients improved from 47 to 32.5, whereas that of control patients slightly worsened from 52.5 to 56.5 (p<0.001). In the on phase the median DRS score improved 50% in pallidotomy patients compared with no change in controls. The UPDRS 2 off score improved with a median of 7 in the pallidotomy group. Two treated patients had major adverse effects., Interpretation: Unilateral pallidotomy is an effective treatment in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease, who have an unsatisfactory response to pharmacological treatment.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of unilateral pallidotomy in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD)., Patients and Methods: Twenty-six patients with PD and disabling dyskinesias, painful and/or disabling dystonia, and/or pain as part of PD despite optimal pharmacotherapy underwent unilateral pallidotomy. For assessment, the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS; part II and III), Hoehn and Yahr staging, the Schwab and England scale, a Dyskinesia Rating Scale, and timed tests were used. Assessment was performed in defined "off' and "on," and on average 2 months before and 7.5 months after the unilateral pallidotomy. Adverse effects were classified as transient or permanent and as major or minor., Results: In the "off' phase, the median UPDRS II score improved from 26.5 to 20.5 (23%) and the median UPDRS III score improved from 47.5 to 33.0 (31%). In the "on" phase, dyskinesias contralateral to the side of the procedure improved with 88% ipsilateral dyskinesias improved only temporarily, and the total UPDRS II and III scores remained unchanged. Thirteen patients had transient adverse effects, three patients had permanent, and two patients had a combination of transient and permanent adverse effects. The transient adverse effects in two patients were classified as major., Conclusion: Stereotactic unilateral pallidotomy can improve symptoms and disability in the "off' phase. In the "on" phase, dyskinesias disappeared at the side contralateral to the procedure. Permanent minor complications of pallidotomy occurred in 19% of the patients.

For patients with Parkinson's disease who have become unresponsive to pharmacotherapy or have developed severe motor complications due to medical therapy, a number of symptomatic neurosurgical interventions are available: thalamotomy, thalamic stimulation and pallidotomy. These stereotactic operations are performed under local anaesthesia. The target is located using anatomical and physiological techniques, after which the neuro-ablative or neuromodulatory procedure is performed. The choice of the target depends on the symptoms of the patient that most impair daily functioning. In case of dominating tremor, thalamic surgery is performed. Patients who are mainly incapacitated by rigidity, hypokinesia or pharmacotherapy-induced dyskinesias are suitable candidates for pallidotomy. Contraindications are cognitive dysfunction, severe disturbance of gait and balance, advanced cerebral atrophy on CT or MRI, limited life expectancy and a poor general condition enhancing surgical risk, e.g. coagulation disorders or uncontrolled hypertension. Surgical treatment of Parkinson's disease is being carried out in clinical trials in the Netherlands in the Academic Medical Centre in Amsterdam, the Academic Hospital in Groningen and the St. Elisabeth Hospital in Tilburg.

In this report, we describe the effect of staged bilateral posteroventral pallidotomy in three patients with advanced Parkinson's disease who were all of the young-onset type. Two patients had developed response fluctuations after the use of levodopa, with severe hypokinesia, painful dystonia, and rigidity in the "off" phase and violent dyskinesias in the "on" phase. One patient, in a continuous hypokinetic rigid state, was totally unresponsive to dopaminergic medication. All were at Hoehn and Yahr stage 5 in the "off" phase before surgery. After surgery, the hypokinetic state was reversed and dyskinesias were abolished in all patients. Hoehn and Yahr stages were 3 in the "off" phase postoperatively. Overall functional improvement was marked and lasting after follow-up for 7, 12, and 13 months, respectively. Complications were visual field deficit and transient central facial paresis, both in the same patient. Bilateral posteroventral pallidotomy can ameliorate response fluctuations, hypokinesia, rigidity, and painful dystonia in advanced Parkinson's disease.

Since 1992 there has been renewed interest in pallidotomy now that the limitations and adverse effects of long-term dopaminergic therapy have become more apparent and more difficult to control in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. The authors describe the effect of pallidotomy in 19 patients, sixteen of whom had advanced Parkinson's disease with painful dystonia and/or response fluctuations with severe akinesia while in "off" and dyskinesias while in "on". One patient had cortico-basal degeneration with rigidity, one patient had secondary dystonia and one had dystonic posturing due to Wilson's disease. Fifteen patients underwent unilateral pallidotomy, four patients had a staged bilateral procedure. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 42 months (mean 18 months). All patients with peak-dose dyskinesias and/or dystonia had marked reduction of symptoms, including the cases of Wilson's disease and secondary dystonia. The akinesia and rigidity scores of Parkinson-patients in "off" were greatly reduced, mainly but not only on the contralateral side. Evaluation by the patients showed remarkable improvement of symptoms in 79%, leading to substantially improved functional abilities in 68%. In this series the decrease in dopamine-response fluctuations, dystonia, hypokinesia and rigidity with functional improvement as judged by examiners and patients reflect a significant regain of independence.