1. Digital health technologies and self-efficacy in Parkinson's: a scoping review.
- Author
-
Hall AM, Allgar V, Carroll CB, and Meinert E
- Subjects
- Humans, Self-Management methods, Quality of Life, Telemedicine, Digital Health, Parkinson Disease psychology, Parkinson Disease therapy, Self Efficacy
- Abstract
Objective: Prior research has identified that people with Parkinson's reporting lower levels of self-efficacy exhibit worsening motor and non-motor symptomology, reduced quality of life, and self-management. Our key objective was to conduct a scoping review examining the impact of digital health technologies on self-efficacy in people with Parkinson's., Design: A scoping review using Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) framework was undertaken., Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar principally for grey literature were searched from 1 January 2008 to the 24th of July 2024., Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies: Primary studies which incorporated digital health technologies, measured self-efficacy and had a sample population of people with Parkinson's were searched., Data Extraction and Synthesis: Following identification of potentially eligible records, two independent reviewers undertook title and abstract screening, followed by full-text screening. Data was extracted using our earlier published data extraction sheet which incorporated the Practical Reviews in Self-Management Support (PRISMS) taxonomy, and the template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist. Data was extracted from a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and synthesised by describing themes, demographic data and numerical data., Results: From 33 165 unique records following screening and independent review by two reviewers, 11 eligible records were found. Of these five elevated self-efficacy to a statistically significant level, five did not and one lowered self-efficacy. Of the studies which raised self-efficacy to a statistically significant level, all adopted a multimodal approach with a variety of devices. Thematically, these devices were focused on physical activity, falls/falls prevention, or both. The level of heterogeneity precluded comparisons between studies., Conclusions: This scoping review identified significant knowledge and evidence gaps in the literature, and the limited number of eligible studies make these findings not generalisable. Future self-management research might benefit from also considering self-efficacy., Competing Interests: Competing interests: VA sits on the Statistical Advisory Board of the BMJ Open. AMH, CBC and EM have not competing interests to declare., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF