Search

The ability to initiate volitional action is fundamental to human behaviour. Loss of dopaminergic neurons in Parkinson's disease is associated with impaired action initiation, also termed akinesia. Both dopamine and subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) can alleviate akinesia, but the underlying mechanisms are unknown. An important question is whether dopamine and DBS facilitate de novo build-up of neural dynamics for motor execution or accelerate existing cortical movement initiation signals through shared modulatory circuit effects. Answering these questions can provide the foundation for new closed-loop neurotherapies with adaptive DBS, but the objectification of neural processing delays prior to performance of volitional action remains a significant challenge. To overcome this challenge, we studied readiness potentials and trained brain signal decoders on invasive neurophysiology signals in 25 DBS patients (12 female) with Parkinson's disease during performance of self-initiated movements. Combined sensorimotor cortex electrocorticography and subthalamic local field potential recordings were performed OFF therapy (n = 22), ON dopaminergic medication (n = 18) and on subthalamic deep brain stimulation (n = 8). This allowed us to compare their therapeutic effects on neural latencies between the earliest cortical representation of movement intention as decoded by linear discriminant analysis classifiers and onset of muscle activation recorded with electromyography. In the hypodopaminergic OFF state, we observed long latencies between motor intention and motor execution for readiness potentials and machine learning classifications. Both, dopamine and DBS significantly shortened these latencies, hinting towards a shared therapeutic mechanism for alleviation of akinesia. To investigate this further, we analysed directional cortico-subthalamic oscillatory communication with multivariate granger causality. Strikingly, we found that both therapies independently shifted cortico-subthalamic oscillatory information flow from antikinetic beta (13-35 Hz) to prokinetic theta (4-10 Hz) rhythms, which was correlated with latencies in motor execution. Our study reveals a shared brain network modulation pattern of dopamine and DBS that may underlie the acceleration of neural dynamics for augmentation of movement initiation in Parkinson's disease. Instead of producing or increasing preparatory brain signals, both therapies modulate oscillatory communication. These insights provide a link between the pathophysiology of akinesia and its' therapeutic alleviation with oscillatory network changes in other non-motor and motor domains, e.g. related to hyperkinesia or effort and reward perception. In the future, our study may inspire the development of clinical brain computer interfaces based on brain signal decoders to provide temporally precise support for action initiation in patients with brain disorders., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.)

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an invasive treatment option for patients with Parkinson's disease. Recently, adaptive DBS (aDBS) systems have been developed, which adjust stimulation timing and amplitude in real-time. However, it is unknown how changes in parameters, movement states and the controllability of subthalamic beta activity affect aDBS performance., Objective: To characterize how parameter choice, movement state and controllability interactively affect the electrophysiological and behavioral response to single threshold aDBS., Methods: We recorded subthalamic local field potentials in 12 patients with Parkinson's disease receiving single threshold aDBS in the acute post-operative state. We investigated changes in two aDBS parameters: the onset time and the smoothing of real-time beta power. Electrophysiological patterns and motor performance were assessed while patients were at rest and during a simple motor task. We further studied the impact of controllability on aDBS performance by comparing patients with and without beta power modulation during continuous stimulation., Results: Our findings reveal that changes in the onset time control the extent of beta power suppression achievable with single threshold adaptive stimulation during rest. Behavioral data indicate that only specific parameter combinations yield a beneficial effect of single threshold aDBS. During movement, action induced beta power suppression reduces the responsivity of the closed loop algorithm. We further demonstrate that controllability of beta power is a prerequisite for effective parameter dependent modulation of subthalamic beta activity., Conclusion: Our results highlight the interaction between single threshold aDBS parameter selection, movement state and controllability in driving subthalamic beta activity and motor performance. By this means, we identify directions for the further development of closed-loop DBS algorithms., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: JR has received speaker honoraria from Medtronic outside of this work. GHS has received honoraria from Medtronic and Boston Scientific outside of this work. WJN has received speaker honoraria from Medtronic outside of this work. AAK has served on advisory boards of Medtronic and has received honoraria and travel support from Medtronic and Boston Scientific outside of this work., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment option for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, clinical programming remains challenging with segmented electrodes., Objective: Using novel sensing-enabled neurostimulators, we investigated local field potentials (LFPs) and their modulation by DBS to assess whether electrophysiological biomarkers may facilitate clinical programming in chronically implanted patients., Methods: Sixteen patients (31 hemispheres) with PD implanted with segmented electrodes in the subthalamic nucleus and a sensing-enabled neurostimulator were included in this study. Recordings were conducted 3 months after DBS surgery following overnight withdrawal of dopaminergic medication. LFPs were acquired while stimulation was turned OFF and during a monopolar review of both directional and ring contacts. Directional beta power and stimulation-induced beta power suppression were computed. Motor performance, as assessed by a pronation-supination task, clinical programming and electrode placement were correlated to directional beta power and stimulation-induced beta power suppression., Results: Better motor performance was associated with stronger beta power suppression at higher stimulation amplitudes. Across directional contacts, differences in directional beta power and the extent of stimulation-induced beta power suppression predicted motor performance. However, within individual hemispheres, beta power suppression was superior to directional beta power in selecting the contact with the best motor performance. Contacts clinically activated for chronic stimulation were associated with stronger beta power suppression than non-activated contacts., Conclusions: Our results suggest that stimulation-induced β power suppression is superior to directional β power in selecting the clinically most effective contact. In sum, electrophysiological biomarkers may guide programming of directional DBS systems in PD patients. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society., (© 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.)

Background:  With increasing prevalence of Parkinson's disease (PD), instrumentation surgery of the thoracolumbar spine of PD patients grows in importance. Poor operative results with high rates of revision surgery have been reported. The goal of this study was to compare the biomechanical complications of thoracolumbar instrumentation surgery of patients with and without PD., Methods:  In a retrospective case-control study, we compared 16 PD patients with a matched cohort of 104 control patients regarding the following postinstrumentation complications: (1) adjacent joint disease, (2) material failure, and (3) material loosening. Also, we compared the spinal bone density, which is the main prognostic criteria for failed instrumentation surgery, between the groups., Results:  We found the rate of material revision to be significantly higher in PD patients (43.8 vs. 13.5%, p  = 0.008, odds ratio (OR) = 5.0). Furthermore, the indications for revision surgery differed between the groups, with more hardware failures in the PD group and more adjacent segment degeneration in the control group. PD patients profited from modern operation techniques (percutaneous instrumentation and CT-navigated screw implantation). Hospitalization was significantly longer for PD patients (20.2 ± 15.1 vs. 14.1 ± 8.9 days, p  = 0.03)., Conclusion:  PD patients exhibit challenging biomechanical demands on instrumenting the spine. Besides osteoporosis, especially sagittal imbalance, gait disturbance, and altered muscle tone may be contributive. PD patients may particularly profit from navigated and less invasive surgical techniques., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Subthalamic nucleus (STN) beta (13 - 35 Hz) activity is a biomarker reflecting motor state in Parkinson's disease (PD). Adaptive deep brain stimulation (DBS) aims to use beta activity for therapeutic adjustments, but many aspects of beta activity in real-life situations are unknown., Objective: The aim was to investigate Christmas-related influences on beta activity in PD., Methods: Differences in Christmas Day to nonfestive daily averages in chronic biomarker recordings in 4 PD patients with a sensing-enabled STN DBS implant were retrospectively analyzed. Sweet-spot and whole-brain network connectomic analyses were performed., Results: Beta activity was significantly reduced on Christmas Eve in all patients (4.00-9.00 p.m.: -12.30 ± 10.78%, P = 0.015). A sweet spot in the dorsolateral STN connected recording sites to motor, premotor, and supplementary motor cortices., Conclusions: We demonstrate that festive events can reduce beta biomarker activity. We conclude that circadian and holiday-related changes should be considered when tailoring adaptive DBS algorithms to patient demands. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society., (© 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.)

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is highly effective in controlling motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease. However, correct selection of stimulation parameters is pivotal to treatment success and currently follows a time-consuming and demanding trial-and-error process. We aimed to assess treatment effects of stimulation parameters suggested by a recently published algorithm (StimFit) based on neuroimaging data., Methods: This double-blind, randomised, crossover, non-inferiority trial was carried out at Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany, and enrolled patients with Parkinson's disease treated with directional octopolar electrodes targeted at the STN. All patients had undergone DBS programming according to our centre's standard of care (SoC) treatment before study recruitment. Based on perioperative imaging data, DBS electrodes were reconstructed and StimFit was applied to suggest optimal stimulation settings. Patients underwent motor assessments using the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (MDS-UPDRS-III) during OFF-medication and in OFF-stimulation and ON-stimulation states under both conditions, StimFit and SoC parameter settings. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either StimFit-programmed DBS first and SoC-programmed DBS second, or SoC-programmed DBS first and StimFit-programmed DBS second. The allocation schedule was generated using a computerised random number generator. Both the rater and patients were masked to the sequence of SoC and StimFit stimulation conditions. All patients who participated in the study were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint of this study was the absolute mean difference between MDS-UPDRS-III scores under StimFit and SoC stimulation, with a non-inferiority margin of 5 points. The study was registered at the German Register for Clinical Trials (DRKS00023115), and is complete., Findings: Between July 10, 2020, and Oct 28, 2021, 35 patients were enrolled in the study; 18 received StimFit followed by SoC stimulation, and 17 received SoC followed by StimFit stimulation. Mean MDS-UPDRS-III scores improved from 47·3 (SD 17·1) at OFF-stimulation baseline to 24·7 (SD 12·4) and 26·3 (SD 12·4) under SoC and StimFit stimulation, respectively. Mean difference between motor scores was -1·6 (SD 7·1; 95% CI -4·0 to 0·9; superiority test p superiority =0·20; n=35), establishing non-inferiority of StimFit stimulation at a margin of -5 points (non-inferiority test p non-inferiority =0·0038). In six patients (17%), initial programming of StimFit settings resulted in acute side-effects and amplitudes were reduced until side-effects disappeared., Interpretation: Automated data-driven algorithms can predict stimulation parameters that lead to motor symptom control comparable to SoC treatment. This approach could significantly decrease the time necessary to obtain optimal treatment parameters., Funding: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through NeuroCure Clinical Research Center and TRR 295., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JR received speaker honoraria from Medtronic. TAD has received grants from the German Research Foundation (Cologne Clinician Scientist Program, FI 773/15-1) and received speaker honoraria from Medtronic and Boston Scientific. PK received speaker honoraria from Stadapharm. G-HS received Speaker honoraria from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Abbott. AH has received grants from the German Research Foundation (Emmy Noether Stipend 410169619 and Transregio CRC 424778381—TRR 295) as well as the German Aerospace Center, the National Institutes of Health (2R01 MH113929), and the Foundation for OCD Research (FFOR). AAK has received grants from the German Research Foundation (Transregio CRC 424778381—TRR 295) and the Lunbeck Foundation. AAK is on the advisory board of Boston Scientific and Medtronic and has received honoraria from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Zambon, and Stadapharm. JA, JLB, A-PK, and KF declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: There is a high demand on spinal surgery in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) but the results are sobering. Although detailed clinical and radiological diagnostics were carried out with great effort and expense, the biodynamic properties of the spine of PD patients have never been considered. We propose a noninvasive method to quantify the impairment of motion abilities in patients with PD., Methods: We present an analytical cross-sectional study of 21 patients with severe PD. All patients underwent a biodynamic assessment during a standardized movement-choreography. Thus, individual spinal motion profiles of each patient were objectively assessed and compared with a large comparative cohort of individuals without PD. Moreover, clinical scores to quantify motor function and lumbar back pain were collected and X-ray scans of the spine in standing position were taken and analysed., Results: Biodynamic measurement showed that 36.9% of the assessed motions of all PD patients were severely impaired. Men were generally more functionally impaired than women, in 52% of all motion parameters. The neurological and radiological diagnostics recorded pathological values, of which UPDRS-III ON correlated with findings of the biodynamics assessment (R = 0.52, p = 0.02)., Conclusions: The decision to operate on a PD patient's spine is far-reaching and requires careful consideration. Neurological and radiological scores did not correlate with the biodynamics of the spine. The resulting motion profile could be used as individual predictive factor to estimate whether patients are eligible for spinal surgery or alternative therapies., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become a well-established treatment modality for Parkinson's disease (PD), especially regarding motor fluctuations, dyskinesias, and tremor. Although postural abnormalities (i.e., Camptocormia [CC] and Pisa syndrome [Pisa]) are known to be a major symptom of PD as well, the influence of DBS on postural abnormalities is unclear. The objective of this study is to analyze the existing literature regarding DBS for PD-associated postural abnormalities in a systematic review and meta-analysis. In compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18 studies that reported the effect of DBS regarding postural abnormalities. After screening of 53 studies, a total of 98 patients (44 female, 53 males, 1 not reported; mean age: 62.3, range 30-83 years) with postural abnormalities (CC n = 98; Pisa n = 11) were analyzed from 18 included studies. Of those patients, 94.9% underwent STN-DBS and 5.1% had GPi as DBS target area. A positive outcome was reported for 67.8% with CC and 72.2% with Pisa. In the meta-analysis, younger age and lower pre-operative UPDRS-III (ON/OFF) were found as positive predictive factors for a positive effect of DBS. DBS might be a potentially effective treatment option for PD-associated postural abnormalities. However, the level of evidence is rather low, and definition of postoperative outcome is heterogenous between studies. Therefore larger, prospective trials are necessary to give a clear recommendation., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Objective: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has evolved as a powerful therapeutic alternative for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Despite its clinical efficacy, the mechanisms of action have remained poorly understood. In addition to the immediate symptomatic effects, long-term neuroprotective effects have been suggested. Those may be mediated through neurotrophic factors (NFs) like vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF). Here, the impact of DBS on the expression of NFs was analysed in a rat model of PD., Methods: Unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesioned rats received DBS in the STN using an implantable microstimulation system, sham DBS in the STN, or no electrode placement. Continuous unilateral STN-DBS (current intensity 50 µA, frequency 130 Hz, and pulse width 52 µs) was conducted for 14 days. Rats were then sacrificed and brains shock frozen. Striata and motor cortices were dissected with a cryostat. Levels of VEGF, BDNF, and GDNF were analysed, both by quantitative PCR and colorimetric ELISA., Results: PCR revealed a significant upregulation of only BDNF mRNA in the ipsilateral striata of the DBS group, when compared to the sham-stimulated group. There was no significant increase in VEGF mRNA or GDNF mRNA. ELISA analysis showed augmentations of BDNF, VEGF, as well as GDNF protein in the ipsilateral striata after DBS compared to sham stimulation. In the motor cortex, significant increases after DBS were observed for BDNF only, not for the other 2 NFs., Conclusions: The upregulation of trophic factors induced by STN-DBS may participate in its long-term therapeutic efficacy and potentially neuroprotective effects., (© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Introduction: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been an established surgical procedure in the field of functional neurosurgery for many years. The experimental electrophysiological method of local field potential (LFP) recordings in postsurgically externalized patients has made substantial contributions to the better understanding of pathophysiologies underlying movement disorders. As interest in LFP recordings for the development of improved stimulation strategies increases, this study's aim was to provide evidence concerning safety of this research method, in a major DBS center., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed incidence and infection characteristics in adult patients who underwent two-staged DBS surgery with temporary externalization of leads in our center between January 2008 and November 2019. We focused on whether patients had participated in LFP recordings, and evaluated incidence of infections at 3 months and 1 year after the surgery based on medical records. Infection rates were compared to major DBS studies and reports focusing on the risk of infection due to externalization of DBS leads. Results were visualized using descriptive statistics., Results: Between January 2008 and November 2019, DBS surgery was performed in 528 patients (389/139 patients in the LFP/non-LFP group), mainly for movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease (308), dystonia (93), and essential tremor (86). Of the patients, 72.9% participated in LFP recordings. The incidence of infections in the acute postsurgical phase (3 months) was 2.46% and did not differ significantly between the LFP group (1.8%) and the non-LFP group (4.32%). The overall incidence after 1 year amounted to 3.6% (19 patients) with no difference between LFP/non-LFP groups. Incidence rates reported in the literature show a large variety (2.6-10%), and the incidence reported here is within the lower range of reported incidences., Discussion/conclusion: This study demonstrates that DBS is a surgical procedure with a low risk of infection in a large patient cohort. Importantly, it shows that LFP recordings do not have a significant effect on the incidence of infections in patients with externalization. With a representative cohort of more than 380 patients participating in LFP-recordings, this underlines LFP as a safe method in research and supports further use of this method, for example, for the development of adaptive stimulation protocols., (© 2021 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)