Search

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the potential effect of short, moderate intensity (≤70% maximum heart rate) cyclette exercise on levodopa (LD)/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor bioavailability and motor response in a subgroup of Parkinson disease (PD) patients presenting a moderate-to-severe delay in fasting morning LD dose absorption and matched motor response., Methods: Ten patients underwent an oral LD instrumental kinetic-dynamic test based on simultaneous serial measurements of plasma LD concentrations, finger tapping motor effects, dyskinesia ratings plus Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale Motor Section (section III) evaluation after ingestion of their usual fasting first morning LD dose, on 2 occasions, 2 weeks apart, according to an intrasubject randomized cross-over design: once receiving their oral LD test dose immediately before a 15-minute cycling and once at seated rest. The main LD pharmacokinetic variables were time to peak, peak plasma concentration, and the area under the 4-hour plasma concentration-time curve. The main LD pharmacodynamic variables were the latency, duration of the motor effect elicited by the LD test dose, and the area under the 4-hour tapping effect-time curve., Results: The LD pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics did not differ between the 2 sessions., Conclusions: We found no significant effect of a moderate, clinically practical exercise on LD rate and extent of absorption and matched motor response in a subgroup of patients with delayed LD kinetic-dynamic effect.

Objective: The aim of the study was to explore the potential effect of the catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor entacapone coadministration on the rate of absorption and matched latency to motor response of an oral test dose of levodopa/benserazide in the treatment of Parkinson disease (PD)., Methods: Fourteen PD patients (Hoehn and Yahr stages 2-2.5) entered the study protocol. They underwent an oral levodopa instrumental kinetic-dynamic test on 2 occasions, 4 weeks apart, according to an intrasubject open comparative design: at the first examination, while receiving their usual levodopa/benserazide therapy, and at the second one after a 4-week entacapone (200 mg) dosing concomitantly with usual first morning levodopa/benserazide intake., Results: Entacapone coadministration was associated with a median 15-minute lengthening (P < 0.05) of time to peak levodopa plasma concentration compared with levodopa/benserazide alone but failed to have a statistically significant effect on matched latency to drug motor effect. Levodopa peak plasma concentration was nearly identical in the 2 treatments., Conclusions: Overall, the delayed latency to single-dose peak plasma levodopa concentration on entacapone cotreatment was modest and of negligible clinical significance in a cohort of moderately affected PD patients.

We explored the potential effect of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) genetic polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a standard oral dose of levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). We prospectively collected blood samples for COMT genotyping from a population of 104 PD patients. Each patient was examined by a standard oral levodopa/benserazide test, based on simultaneous serial measurements of plasma levodopa concentrations, finger-tapping motor effects and dyskinesia ratings, up to 4 hours after dosing. The main levodopa pharmacokinetic outcome variables were time to peak and peak plasma concentration, plasma elimination half-life, and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve. The main outcome levodopa pharmacodynamic variables were latency, duration, and magnitude of the motor effect elicited by the levodopa test dose, the area under the tapping effect-time curve, and the presence of dyskinesias. Nineteen patients (18%) harbored the low-activity homozygous COMT genotype (A/A), 63 patients (61%) carried the intermediate-activity heterozygous COMT genotype (A/G) and 22 patients (21%) had the high-activity homozygous COMT genotype (G/G). The three groups were comparable for vital and clinical characteristics. No significant difference was found in levodopa main pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic variables and dyskinesia incidence among the three subgroups of patients. We failed to identify clinically relevant levodopa pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic response patterns associated with the COMT polymorphism in PD patients., ((c) 2005 Movement Disorder Society.)

Objectives: To assess the potential association between dopamine transporter (DAT) genotype, single photon emission CT (SPECT) measures using [123I]-N-omega-fluoropropyl-2beta-carbomethoxy-3beta-(4-iodophenyl)nortropane ([123I]-FP-CIT) of striatal dopaminergic function, and oral levodopa response pattern in a cohort of patients with Parkinson disease., Methods: Thirty-six patients at different disease stages enrolled in the study. Each patient was examined by [123I]-FP-CIT SPECT and a standardized oral levodopa test on 2 separate days in a randomized order within 3 weeks. The main outcome variables were the specific-to-nonspecific tracer uptake ratio in the contralateral putamen for SPECT analysis; latency, duration, and magnitude of the motor effect; and presence of dyskinesias for the levodopa test. The variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) polymorphisms of the gene coding for DAT were detected for each patient by standard methods., Results: Contralateral putamen [123I]-FP-CIT uptake ratios were similar in the patients carrying the 9-copy allele (n=20) of the DAT VNTR compared with 10-repeat homozygotes (n=16). No significant difference was found in levodopa main outcome variables and dyskinesia incidence between the two groups of patients stratified by DAT VNTR polymorphism., Conclusions: The study did not identify clinically relevant in vivo DAT neurochemical function phenotypes or levodopa response patterns associated with the DAT polymorphism.

Levodopa pharmacokinetic-phamacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling may be able to test the functional integrity of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system in Parkinson's disease (PD). [(123)I]-FP-CIT SPECT imaging of striatal dopamine transporters has also been introduced for the evaluation of presynaptic dopaminergic homeostasis. We aimed to assess the intrapatient relation between levodopa PK-PD and SPECT measures of dopaminergic function in PD. Thirty-five PD patients, 1 to 4 on the Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) scale, enrolled in the study. Each patient was examined by levodopa PK-PD modeling and SPECT imaging. Primary measure outcomes were the levodopa half-life in the effect compartment (t1/2(eq)) for PKPD modeling and the ratio of specific to non specific (SP/NSP) tracer striatal uptake for SPECT. Levodopa t1/2(eq) was highly significantly correlated with H&Y scale (r = -0.815, p < 0.0001), Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) (r = -0.691, p < 0.0001) and PD symptom duration (r = -0.647, p < 0.0001). SPECT contralateral putamen SP/NSP ratio showed the most significant correlations with clinical indicators of disease severity: H&Y, r = -0.526, p < 0.002; UPDRS, r = -0.523, p < 0.002; symptom duration, r = -0.513, p < 0.002. Significant correlations were observed between levodopa t1/2(eq) and putamen SP/NSP ratios, yielding the closest correlation for the contralateral region (r = 0.522, p < 0.002). An indirect PK-PD dopaminergic functional variable and direct SPECT measures of presynaptic dopaminergic system homeostasis were in close agreement with clinical data and correlated to each other. Levodopa PK-PD modeling can be a practical clinical tool indirectly assessing the functional integrity of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system in PD patients.

We examined the potential sex-related differences in levodopa pharmacokinetics and their relation with the presence of dyskinesias in a group of 115 patients (67 men, 49 women) with Parkinson's disease. The patients were given a standard oral dose of levodopa plus benserazide (100/25 mg). The area under the levodopa plasma concentration time curve, corrected for the levodopa test dose (in mg/kg body weight), (AUC(w)) was significantly higher in women than in men, with a reduced oral clearance. No difference in the proportion of men and women experiencing dyskinesias was observed.

The authors performed 72-hour polysomnography, including a levodopa-placebo-controlled choice reaction time test with continuous monitoring of cardiovascular variables in two patients with Parkinson's disease complaining of excessive daytime sleepiness on levodopa monotherapy. The subacute levodopa challenge was accompanied by physiologic sleep episodes, worsened reaction times, and a reduction in mean blood pressure and heart rate over baseline values, linked temporally to the sleep episodes.

The authors assessed differences in both therapeutic and dyskinesia-matched concentrations of levodopa by kinetic-dynamic modeling in a large cohort of patients with Parkinson disease grouped by severity of symptoms. The goal was to provide a kinetic-dynamic approach to levodopa therapy monitoring to assist treating physicians in rationalizing patients' drug schedules in line with disease progression. Eighty-six patients, grouped according to Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) clinical stage (H&Y I, n = 23; II, n = 25; III; n = 25; IV, n = 13) enrolled in the study. After a 12-hour levodopa washout each patient was examined using a standard oral levodopa test, based on simultaneous serial measurements of plasma levodopa concentrations, finger-tapping motor effects, and dyskinesia ratings. The kinetic-dynamic modeling for both effects was carried out according to the "link" effect compartment model and sigmoidal pharmacodynamic model. Levodopa plasma kinetics did not differ among patient groups. Duration of motor response was significantly (p < 0.001) curtailed in patients in advanced clinical stages whereas dyskinesia duration showed minor changes among the three affected groups (H&Y II, III, and IV). Median effective concentrations (EC 50 ) were increased at the more advanced clinical stage (p < 0.001), from a median 0.2 microg/mL in patients at H&Y stage I to 0.9 microg/mL in patients at H&Y stage IV, whereas the maximum effect showed less consistent changes among the four groups. Intrasubject levodopa therapeutic concentrations were lower than values for dyskinesias in patients at the moderate stage of the disease, equaling dyskinesia-matched drug concentrations in the more affected patients. These findings are in line with previous observations of major changes in levodopa concentration-effects relationship with disease progression and support a stratification of patients with Parkinson disease according to kinetic-dynamic modeling. From a practical point of view, knowledge of individual patients' kinetic-dynamic variables can help the physician assess patients' clinical needs objectively and optimize levodopa dosing according to disease progression.

We compared the kinetic-dynamic profile of a postprandial dose of levodopa-benserazide dispersible formulation to that of the standard form in eight patients with parkinsonism presenting delayed or irregular patterns of after-meal levodopa dose effects. Patients were studied on two occasions, one week apart, according to an intra-subject randomized cross-over design. Thirty minutes after the consumption of a standard meal, patients received their usual levodopa-benserazide postprandial dose, on one occasion in the standard formulation and on the other one in the dispersible form. Blood venous samples for analysis of plasma levodopa concentrations were drawn at 15-minute intervals for the first 2 hours, then half-hourly until 5 hours after dosing. Motor response to the levodopa test dose was assessed by the finger tapping test at the same times as blood was sampled. The only statistically significant finding was a shorter time to peak plasma levodopa concentration with the levodopa-benserazide dispersible formulation compared with the standard form, whereas comparisons of levodopa pharmacodynamics showed little advantage of either formulation. Considering that liquid formulations of levodopa are less practical, we suggest reserving dispersible levodopa-benserazide tablets for selected patients and carefully monitoring drug dose motor response.

Objective: The aims of the study were to follow prospectively the intrasubject progression of idiopathic PD in a cohort of patients using levodopa kinetic-dynamic modeling and to assess the relation between the rate of progression of the disease and patients' different clinical characteristics., Methods: Thirty-four patients (Hoehn and Yahr stages 1 to 3) enrolled in the longitudinal follow-up. Each patient was examined at 1-year intervals over a median 4 years by a standardized oral levodopa test. The primary measure outcome was the computed half-life of levodopa in the "effect compartment" (t1/2eq), a proposed indicator of nigrostriatal dopaminergic functionality and integrity., Results: Values of levodopa t1/2eq correlated negatively with severity of symptoms (r = -0.652, p < 0.0001) and decreased over the years together with a worsening of patients' clinical stage (p < 0.001). The rate of reduction in drug t1/2eq was more rapid in patients at the earlier stages of the disease compared with the more advanced ones, falling from a median annual reduction of 37 minutes in patients at initial Hoehn and Yahr stage 1 to 6.5 minutes in stage 3 patients (p < 0.001). Patients without tremor at onset, otherwise comparable to patients with tremor for baseline values of levodopa t1/2eq, disease severity, duration, and daily dose of levodopa, tended to show a higher rate of reduction in levodopa t1/2eq than patients with tremor. Overall, patients' annual reduction in levodopa t1/2eq over baseline values averaged 17+/-9%., Conclusions: These results are in keeping with PET findings on the objective assessment of idiopathic parkinsonism evolution, and they support the suggestion that levodopa pharmacodynamic modeling may offer a practical clinical tool to assess indirectly the functional integrity of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system over time in parkinsonian patients.

Objective: The aim of the study was to assess the effect of the time of ingestion of a meal on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a levodopa/carbidopa controlled-release formulation in parkinsonian patients on chronic levodopa therapy., Methods: The kinetic-dynamic profile of one tablet of controlled-release levodopa/carbidopa 200/50 mg was monitored in eight patients, according to an intrasubject randomized cross-over design in two different sessions. A standard meal was consumed by the patients after they had fasted for 15-17 h, on one occasion 30 min before the ingestion of the test dose, and on the other occasion 2 h after the ingestion of the same drug dose. Blood venous samples for analysis of plasma levodopa and its metabolite 3-O-methyldopa were drawn at 20-min intervals up to 6 h after dosing. Motor response to the levodopa test dose was assessed by the finger tapping and walking speed tests at the same times as blood was drawn., Results: Controlled release [corrected] levodopa intake after meals resulted in a significant delay in drug absorption, with an almost twofold increase in time of initial appearance of levodopa in plasma and time to peak plasma concentration. Peak plasma drug concentrations were not significantly different in the two experimental conditions; the area under the 6-h plasma concentration-time curve showed an average reduction of 24% in the fed condition, partly reflecting the incomplete assessment of levodopa absorption, within the 6 h of examination, due to 5-h delayed peak plasma levodopa concentration in two patients. With reference to levodopa pharmacodynamics, time to onset of motor response was significantly delayed and duration of motor response significantly curtailed in the fed condition, while the magnitude and overall extent of motor effect were unchanged., Conclusions: In keeping with previous findings on levodopa standard-release preparations, these data show that time of meal ingestion is an important determinant of levodopa disposition, even from controlled-release preparations in parkinsonian patients. From a clinical point of view, these results help to explain some of the delayed, curtailed and even lacking responses that often complicate afternoon motor performances in patients at the more advanced stages of the disease.

We conducted a 3-year prospective assessment of the relationship between levodopa (L-DOPA) plasma concentration and both dyskinesias and tapping motor response after a standard oral L-DOPA dose in 11 parkinsonian patients, Hoehn & Yahr (H & Y) stages 2-3, with L-DOPA therapeutic response complicated by involuntary movements. Over the 3-year period, duration of the tapping effect significantly decreased, while that of dyskinesias showed minor changes. Initially, the L-DOPA therapeutic response significantly outlasted the dyskinesia effect and progressively shortened to parallel the dyskinesia profile at the more advanced clinical stage. According to kinetic-dynamic modeling, L-DOPA concentrations producing 50% of maximum therapeutic and toxic effects (EC50) also changed independently. EC50 for dyskinesias did not vary over time. EC50 for the tapping effect was, at the first observation, significantly lower than that of the matched value for dyskinesias and progressively rose to values similar to the EC50 for dyskinesias by the third year of follow-up. These data suggest a dissociation of the kinetic-dynamic relationship of L-DOPA motor and dyskinesia effects, possibly reflecting different cerebral handling of exogenous levodopa-derived dopamine with disease progression.

The current symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease mainly relies on agents which are able to restore dopaminergic transmission in the nigrostriatal pathway, such as the dopamine precursor levodopa or direct agonists of dopamine receptors. Ancillary strategies include the use of anticholinergic and antiglutamatergic agents or inhibitors of cerebral dopamine catabolism, such as monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors. Levodopa is the most widely used and effective drug. Its peculiar pharmacokinetics are characterised by an extensive presystemic metabolism, overcome by the combined use of extracerebral inhibitors of the enzyme aromatic-amino acid decarboxylase and rapid adsorption in the proximal small bowel by a saturable facilitated transport system shared with other large neutral amino acids. Drug transport from plasma to the brain is mediated by the same carriers operating in the intestinal mucosa. The main strategies to assure reproducibility of both drug intestinal absorption and delivery to the brain and clinical effect include standardisation of levodopa administration with respect to meal times and a controlled dietary protein intake. The levodopa plasma half-life is very short, resulting in marked plasma drug concentration fluctuations which are matched, as the disease progresses, with swings in the therapeutic response ('wearing-off' phenomena). 'Wearing-off' phenomena can be also associated, at the more advanced disease stages with a 'negative', both parkinsonism-exacerbating and dyskinetic effect of levodopa at subtherapeutic plasma concentrations. Dyskinesias may be also related to high-levodopa, excessive plasma concentrations. Recognition of the different levodopa toxic response patterns can be difficult on a clinical basis alone, and simultaneous monitoring of levodopa concentration-effect relationships may prove useful to disclose the underlying mechanism and in planning the correct pharmacokinetic management. Controlled-release levodopa formulations have been developed in an attempt to smooth out fluctuations in plasma profiles and matched therapeutic responses. The delayed levodopa absorption and lower plasma concentrations which characterise controlled-release formulations compared with standard forms must be taken into account when prescribing dosage regimens and can be complicating factors in the management of the advanced disease stages. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characterisation of the other antiparkinsonian agents is hampered by the lack of sensitive and specific analytical methods to measure their very low plasma drug concentrations and by the difficulty in quantitatively assessing overall moderate drug clinical effects. In clinical practice an optimal dosage schedule is still generally found for each patient on an empirical basis. Future strategies should focus on the search for pharmacological agents with a better kinetic profile, particularly a higher and reproducible bioavailability and a predictable relationship between plasma drug concentration and clinical response. Treatments aimed not only at controlling the symptoms, but also at slowing the neurodegenerative process, are currently under intensive investigation.

We investigated the relationship between the rate of motor response after a standard levodopa oral dose and drug dynamic variables and disease-related factors in 66 patients with Parkinson's disease. Time to maximum finger tapping effect was positively correlated with matched duration of levodopa dose response and fell from a median 120 minutes in patients at Hoehn and Yahr stage I and II to 60 minutes in stage IV patients (p < 0.001). The accelerated response to levodopa dose with the advancement of disease was also apparent as an increased steepness of the tapping effect versus time curve, with a shift from a hyperbolic to a sigmoid profile. The rate of motor response to oral levodopa may reflect the rate of dopamine interaction with the postsynaptic receptors, providing an indirect objective index of presynaptic dopaminergic homeostasis.

Objective: The population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a standardised oral test dose of levodopa have been determined in patients with mild to severe Parkinson's disease using parametric, non-linear mixed effect modelling with the program NON-MEM. Levodopa plasma concentration data and motor effect behaviour (tapping times) were obtained from 46 patients, for whom a total of 970 observations were available (approximately 21 pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic observations per patient). The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model used was a one-compartment first-order absorption model linked to the sigmoid EMax representation of the Hill equation via an equilibration rate-constant, ke0. The model was also tested via a reduction in the number of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data points to a total of four to eight per patient., Results: In the final regression models the Hoehn and Yahr (HY) status of the patient and duration of disease (DUR) were found to be important determinants of the pharmacodynamic parameters for levodopa. The pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly affected by any covariates. A test group of 16 additional parkinsonian patients was used to evaluate the predictive performance of the population parameters. The predictive performance of the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling using the full and reduced data sets was evaluated in NONMEM using posthoc, Bayesian forecasting. Statistically insignificant bias existed among predicted and observed levodopa concentrations, whereas the pharmacodynamic model underpredicted the observed tapping times. There was little difference in the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic predictive performance among results for the full and the reduced data sets., Conclusion: In a clinical setting knowledge of the population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters for oral levodopa may prove useful in estimating the duration of the drug's beneficial motor activity in patients with mild to severe Parkinson's disease (Hoehn and Yahr status I-IV).

We prospectively evaluated over 4 years the intrasubject relationship between levodopa plasma concentration and the tapping effect after a standard oral levodopa test in 28 patients with mild-to-moderate idiopathic Parkinson's disease. The onset and duration of the tapping effect significantly shortened over years; response amplitude did not vary. Levodopa plasma kinetics remained unchanged. Pharmacodynamic modeling indicated a progressive decrease in the equilibration half-life between plasma drug concentration and effect, which correlated with the shorter motor response. No clear-cut change in maximum response (Emax) emerged, but levodopa concentration needed to yield 50% of maximum effect (EC50) significantly increased. These data indicate that the duration of motor response becomes a major determinant of drug efficacy over years. The modifications in levodopa effect-compartment equilibration half-life and EC50 further support the suggestion that alterations in cerebral levodopa kinetics have an important role in the development of response fluctuations.

We investigated the relationship between levodopa plasma concentration and the tapping effect, after a standard oral levodopa test, by kinetic-dynamic modeling in 40 parkinsonian patients with stable or fluctuating response to levodopa, and found no difference in levodopa plasma pharmacokinetics between stable and fluctuating patients. Conversely, levodopa equilibration half-life between plasma and effect-site concentration was five-fold shorter on average in fluctuating patients. Overall, levodopa equilibration half-life highly correlated with the duration of tapping response and provided a reliable quantitative index of central mechanisms that affect the length of clinical effect. Individual fitting of tapping measures to modeled drug effect-site concentrations by sigmoid Emax model revealed that fluctuating patients required almost two-fold higher levodopa concentrations (EC50) to elicit almost the same motor response (Emax). These findings suggest that shortening of levodopa clinical effect may be accompanied by a reduced drug affinity for the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system (EC50), with no change in its intrinsic activity (Emax).

We studied the effect of chronic bromocriptine cotherapy on levodopa kinetics in seven patients with Parkinson's disease who were receiving levodopa therapy. Plasma levodopa concentrations were measured after a standard oral levodopa fasting dose over a 5-hour period, on two different sessions, without and with bromocriptine at a fixed daily dose of 15 mg. We found no statistically significant difference in the rate and extent of levodopa absorption between the two treatments, with minimal intrasubject variability. Our observations suggest that chronic bromocriptine cotherapy is unlikely to affect the plasma levodopa pharmacokinetics under standardized intake conditions or to contribute to a less predictable pattern of drug plasma concentrations.

The effect of chronic intake of the anticholinergic drug orphenadrine on the bioavailability of levodopa was studied in six patients with Parkinson's disease. Plasma levodopa profiles and corresponding motor response to a standard dose of levodopa plus an inhibitor of peripheral L-aromatic aminoacid decarboxylase (benserazide) were followed, over a 5-h period, on two different sessions, with and without anticholinergic cotherapy. Six control patients were also included in the study for assessment of intrasubject variability in levodopa absorption under identical conditions. A considerable delay in levodopa absorption was found in one patient, and decreased absorption in an additional two patients while on anticholinergic. Patients' clinical performance corresponded well to plasma levodopa profiles. A significant impairment of basal clinical state was observed in two cases on anticholinergic withdrawal, probably as a result of pharmacodynamic interactions. Our observations suggest that chronic anticholinergic intake may contribute to a less predictable pattern of levodopa absorption and related therapeutic response in some subjects.

The influence of age on the kinetics of a standard oral dose of levodopa administered with an inhibitor of peripheral dopa decarboxylase enzymes (benserazide) has been evaluated in 40 patients with Parkinson's disease (age 34-78 y) on chronic therapy. They were divided into 2 groups, on the basis of age below (21 patients, Group A) or above (19 patients, Group B) 65 y. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of levodopa was significantly greater in the older group (547 versus 428 mumol.l-1.min in Group B), coupled with a reduced apparent oral clearance (8.1 versus 10.7 ml.min-1.kg-1) and a longer plasma elimination half-life (67.6 versus 54.6 min). The age of the patients was positively correlated with the AUC of levodopa (r = 0.474) and its plasma elimination half-life (r = 0.391), and was negatively correlated with clearance (r = -0.489). The findings confirm previous data on volunteers that showed a reduction in the systemic clearance of levodopa due to age, which would probably account for the finding of a greater AUC of levodopa in older patients. The observed, age-mediated differences in levodopa pharmacokinetics, albeit statistically significant, were moderate and were likely to be of only minor importance for the dosing schedule.

The influence of meal ingestion time on rate and extent of oral levodopa absorption was evaluated in a group of 17 patients, after administration of their usual second daily dose of levodopa plus carbidopa (Sinemet 10:1) or benserazide (Madopar 4:1). Standard meals were consumed by the patients after they had fasted 15-17 h, on one occasion 30 min before ingestion of the levodopa "study dose" and, at another time, 2 h after ingestion of the same dose. This study dose, ranging from 50 to 250 mg levodopa, was given to the patients at 11 a.m., 4 h after their first morning dose. Time to peak plasma levodopa concentration increased threefold (from 45 +/- 23 to 134 +/- 76 min, p less than 0.001), when levodopa was administered after meals. Area under the 6-h plasma concentration-time curve for levodopa was decreased in 10 subjects, unchanged in three and higher in four after ingestion of meals, the latter finding probably resulting from an erratic absorption even at fasting. On the whole, levodopa absorption proved significantly lower (p less than 0.01), on the average 15%. Similarly, peak plasma levodopa concentrations were lower in 12 patients, unchanged in two, and higher in three, with an overall significant decrease (p less than 0.001) of 30% on the average. The data confirm the importance of meal ingestion time in relation to levodopa dose as a determinant of drug absorption.