Search

Background: The multicentre randomised controlled PEPaNIC trial showed that withholding parenteral nutrition (PN) during the first week of critical illness in children was clinically superior to providing early PN. This study describes the cost-effectiveness of this new nutritional strategy., Methods: Direct medical costs were calculated with use of a micro-costing approach. We compared the costs of late versus early initiation of PN (n = 673 versus n = 670 patients) in the Belgian and Dutch study populations from a hospital perspective, using Student's t test with bootstrapping. Main cost drivers were identified and the impact of new infections on the total costs was assessed., Results: Mean direct medical costs for patients receiving late PN (€26.680, IQR €10.090-28.830 per patient) were 21% lower (-€7.180, p = 0.007) than for patients receiving early PN (€33.860, IQR €11.080-34.720). Since late PN was more effective and less costly, this strategy was superior to early PN. The lower costs for PN only contributed 2.1% to the total cost reduction. The main cost driver was intensive care hospitalisation costs (-€4.120, p = 0.003). The patients who acquired a new infection (14%) were responsible for 41% of the total costs. Sensitivity analyses confirmed consistency across both healthcare systems., Conclusions: Late initiation of PN decreased the direct medical costs for hospitalisation in critically ill children, beyond the expected lower costs for withholding PN. Avoiding new infections by late initiation of PN yielded a large cost reduction. Hence, late initiation of PN was superior to early initiation of PN largely via its effect on new infections., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01536275 . Registered on 16 February 2012.

Background and Aims: During hospitalization in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), critically ill children are fed artificially. Administered via the preferred enteral route, caloric targets are often not reached. Hence, parenteral nutrition is given to this patient population. In this review we analyzed the available evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that supports the use of parenteral nutrition in children during critical illness., Methods: A search strategy in Ovid MEDLINE and Ovid EMBASE was created and trial registries were screened to identify the relevant RCTs. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials, involved pediatric patients admitted to PICU, and compared different dosing/compositions of parenteral nutrition. Descriptive studies and reviews were excluded., Results: Of the 584 articles identified by the search strategy, only 114 articles were retained after title screening. Further abstract and full text screening identified 6 small RCTs that compared two dosing/composition strategies of parenteral nutrition. These trials reported differences in surrogate endpoints without an effect on hard clinical endpoints. The RCTs observed improvements in these surrogate endpoints with the use of more calories or when parenteral glutamine or fish oil was added., Conclusions: The few RCTs suggest that surrogate endpoints can be affected by providing parenteral nutrition to critically ill children, but the studies were not statistically powered to draw meaningful clinical conclusions. Large RCTs with clinically relevant outcome measures are urgently needed to support the current nutritional guidelines that advise the use of parenteral nutrition in the PICU., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.)

Background: Recent trials have questioned the benefit of early parenteral nutrition in adults. The effect of early parenteral nutrition on clinical outcomes in critically ill children is unclear., Methods: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial involving 1440 critically ill children to investigate whether withholding parenteral nutrition for 1 week (i.e., providing late parenteral nutrition) in the pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) is clinically superior to providing early parenteral nutrition. Fluid loading was similar in the two groups. The two primary end points were new infection acquired during the ICU stay and the adjusted duration of ICU dependency, as assessed by the number of days in the ICU and as time to discharge alive from ICU. For the 723 patients receiving early parenteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition was initiated within 24 hours after ICU admission, whereas for the 717 patients receiving late parenteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition was not provided until the morning of the 8th day in the ICU. In both groups, enteral nutrition was attempted early and intravenous micronutrients were provided., Results: Although mortality was similar in the two groups, the percentage of patients with a new infection was 10.7% in the group receiving late parenteral nutrition, as compared with 18.5% in the group receiving early parenteral nutrition (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.66). The mean (±SE) duration of ICU stay was 6.5±0.4 days in the group receiving late parenteral nutrition, as compared with 9.2±0.8 days in the group receiving early parenteral nutrition; there was also a higher likelihood of an earlier live discharge from the ICU at any time in the late-parenteral-nutrition group (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.37). Late parenteral nutrition was associated with a shorter duration of mechanical ventilatory support than was early parenteral nutrition (P=0.001), as well as a smaller proportion of patients receiving renal-replacement therapy (P=0.04) and a shorter duration of hospital stay (P=0.001). Late parenteral nutrition was also associated with lower plasma levels of γ-glutamyltransferase and alkaline phosphatase than was early parenteral nutrition (P=0.001 and P=0.04, respectively), as well as higher levels of bilirubin (P=0.004) and C-reactive protein (P=0.006)., Conclusions: In critically ill children, withholding parenteral nutrition for 1 week in the ICU was clinically superior to providing early parenteral nutrition. (Funded by the Flemish Agency for Innovation through Science and Technology and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01536275.).

Objective: To assess current nutritional practices in critically ill children worldwide., Design: A two-part online, international survey. The first part, "the survey", was composed of 59 questions regarding nutritional strategies and protocols (July-November 2013). The second part surveyed the "point prevalence" of nutritional data of patients present in a subgroup of the responding PICUs (May-September 2014)., Setting: Members of the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies were asked to complete the survey., Subjects: Pediatric critical care providers., Interventions: Survey., Measurements and Main Results: We analyzed 189 responses from 156 PICUs in 52 countries (survey). We received nutritional data on 295 patients from 41 of these 156 responding PICUs in 27 countries (point prevalence). According to the "survey", nutritional protocols and support teams were available in 52% and 57% of the PICUs, respectively. Various equations were in use to estimate energy requirements; only in 14% of PICUs, indirect calorimetry was used. Nutritional targets for macronutrients, corrected for age/weight, varied widely. Enteral nutrition would be started early (within 24 hr of admission) in 60% of PICUs, preferably by the gastric route (88%). In patients intolerant to enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition would be started within 48 hours in 55% of PICUs. Overall, in 72% of PICUs supplemental parenteral nutrition would be used if enteral nutrition failed to meet at least 50% of energy delivery goal. Several differences between the intended (survey) and the actual (point prevalence) nutritional practices were found in the responding PICUs, predominantly overestimating the ability to adequately feed patients., Conclusion: Nutritional practices vary widely between PICUs worldwide. There are significant differences in macronutrient goals, estimating energy requirements, timing of nutrient delivery, and threshold for supplemental parenteral nutrition. Uniform consensus-based nutrition practices, preferably guided by evidence, are desirable in the PICU.

Background: The state-of-the-art nutrition used for critically ill children is based essentially on expert opinion and extrapolations from adult studies or on studies in non-critically ill children. In critically ill adults, withholding parenteral nutrition (PN) during the first week in ICU improved outcome, as compared with early supplementation of insufficient enteral nutrition (EN) with PN. We hypothesized that withholding PN in children early during critical illness reduces the incidence of new infections and accelerates recovery., Methods/design: The Pediatric Early versus Late Parenteral Nutrition in Intensive Care Unit (PEPaNIC) study is an investigator-initiated, international, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (RCT) in three tertiary referral pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in three countries on two continents. This study compares early versus late initiation of PN when EN fails to reach preset caloric targets in critically ill children. In the early-PN (control, standard of care) group, PN comprising glucose, lipids and amino acids is administered within the first days to reach the caloric target. In the late-PN (intervention) group, PN completing EN is only initiated beyond PICU-day 7, when EN fails. For both study groups, an early EN protocol is applied and micronutrients are administered intravenously. The primary assessor-blinded outcome measures are the incidence of new infections during PICU-stay and the duration of intensive care dependency. The sample size (n = 1,440, 720 per arm) was determined in order to detect a 5% absolute reduction in PICU infections, with at least 80% 1-tailed power (70% 2-tailed) and an alpha error rate of 5%. Based on the actual incidence of new PICU infections in the control group, the required sample size was confirmed at the time of an a priori- planned interim-analysis focusing on the incidence of new infections in the control group only., Discussion: Clinical evidence in favor of early administration of PN in critically ill children is currently lacking, despite potential benefit but also known side effects. This large international RCT will help physicians to gain more insight in the clinical effects of omitting PN during the first week of critical illness in children., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01536275 on 16 February 2012.

Unlabelled: Cholestatic liver dysfunction (CLD) and biliary sludge often occur during critical illness and are allegedly aggravated by parenteral nutrition (PN). Delaying initiation of PN beyond day 7 in the intensive care unit (ICU) (late PN) accelerated recovery as compared with early initiation of PN (early PN). However, the impact of nutritional strategy on biliary sludge and CLD has not been fully characterized. This was a preplanned subanalysis of a large randomized controlled trial of early PN versus late PN (n = 4,640). In all patients plasma bilirubin (daily) and liver enzymes (alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase [GGT], alkaline phosphatase [ALP], twice weekly; n = 3,216) were quantified. In a random predefined subset of patients, plasma bile acids (BAs) were also quantified at baseline and on days 3, 5, and last ICU-day (n = 280). Biliary sludge was ultrasonographically evaluated on ICU-day 5 (n = 776). From day 1 after randomization until the end of the 7-day intervention window, bilirubin was higher in the late PN than in the early PN group (P < 0.001). In the late PN group, as soon as PN was started on day 8 bilirubin fell and the two groups became comparable. Maximum levels of GGT, ALP, and ALT were lower in the late PN group (P < 0.01). Glycine/taurine-conjugated primary BAs increased over time in ICU (P < 0.01), similarly for the two groups. Fewer patients in the late PN than in the early PN group developed biliary sludge on day 5 (37% versus 45%; P = 0.04)., Conclusion: Tolerating substantial caloric deficit by withholding PN until day 8 of critical illness increased plasma bilirubin but reduced the occurrence of biliary sludge and lowered GGT, ALP, and ALT. These results suggest that hyperbilirubinemia during critical illness does not necessarily reflect cholestasis and instead may be an adaptive response that is suppressed by early PN., (© 2014 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background: Cholestatic liver dysfunction frequently occurs during critical illness. Administration of parenteral nutrition (PN) is thought to aggravate this. Underlying mechanisms are not clear., Methods: In a burn model of prolonged critical illness, rabbits were randomized to a nutritional strategy either accepting caloric deficits (fasted, n = 11) or covering caloric needs by PN (fed, n = 10). At baseline and after 7 days of critical illness, markers of hepatotoxicity, circulating bile acids, and the hepatobiliary transport system were studied., Results: Fasted animals had lower circulating alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase levels than did the fed animals at day 7. Compared with baseline values, fed animals displayed lower serum unconjugated cholic acid (CA) and deoxycholic acid (DCA) levels. Unconjugated DCA remained unaltered in fasted animals. Unconjugated lithocholic acid was increased comparably in all animals, whereas hyodeoxycholic acid was not altered. In contrast, fasting induced a shift from unconjugated CA and DCA to glyco-CA and glyco-DCA. Total bile acids did not correlate with the bile acid-producing enzyme CYP7A1, but with the basolateral efflux transporter MRP3. Fasting increased protein expression of the basolateral (MRP3) and the canalicular (BSEP) transporter, whereas the canalicular efflux pump MRP2 was suppressed. Gene expression levels of the nuclear receptor farnesoid X receptor were lower with fasting and correlated inversely with MRP3. The heterodimer partner of farnesoid X receptor, retinoid X receptor α, was increased with fasting and correlated positively with MRP3., Conclusions: During prolonged critical illness, withholding PN improved markers for hepatocyte injury and accentuated bile acid transport toward the blood. This suggests that the latter is an adaptive rather than a dysfunctional feedback to illness.

Objective: The goal of enhanced nutrition in critically ill patients is to improve outcome by reducing lean tissue wasting. However, such effect has not been proven. This study aimed to assess the effect of early administration of parenteral nutrition on muscle volume and composition by repeated quantitative CT., Design: A preplanned substudy of a randomized controlled trial (Early Parenteral Nutrition Completing Enteral Nutrition in Adult Critically Ill Patients [EPaNIC]), which compared early initiation of parenteral nutrition when enteral nutrition was insufficient (early parenteral nutrition) with tolerating a pronounced nutritional deficit for 1 week in ICU (late parenteral nutrition). Late parenteral nutrition prevented infections and accelerated recovery., Setting: University hospital., Patients: Fifteen EPaNIC study neurosurgical patients requiring prescheduled repeated follow-up CT scans and six healthy volunteers matched for age, gender, and body mass index., Intervention: Repeated abdominal and femoral quantitative CT images were obtained in a standardized manner on median ICU day 2 (interquartile range, 2-3) and day 9 (interquartile range, 8-10). Intramuscular, subcutaneous, and visceral fat compartments were delineated manually. Muscle and adipose tissue volume and composition were quantified using standard Hounsfield Unit ranges., Measurements and Main Results: Critical illness evoked substantial loss of femoral muscle volume in 1 week's time, irrespective of the nutritional regimen. Early parenteral nutrition reduced the quality of the muscle tissue, as reflected by the attenuation, revealing increased intramuscular water/lipid content. Early parenteral nutrition also increased the volume of adipose tissue islets within the femoral muscle compartment. These changes in skeletal muscle quality correlated with caloric intake. In the abdominal muscle compartments, changes were similar, albeit smaller. Femoral and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue compartments were unaffected by disease and nutritional strategy., Conclusions: Early parenteral nutrition did not prevent the pronounced wasting of skeletal muscle observed over the first week of critical illness. Furthermore, early parenteral nutrition increased the amount of adipose tissue within the muscle compartments.

Background: Patients who are critically ill can develop so-called intensive-care unit acquired weakness, which delays rehabilitation. Reduced muscle mass, quality, or both might have a role. The Early Parenteral Nutrition Completing Enteral Nutrition in Adult Critically Ill Patients (EPaNIC) trial (registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00512122) showed that tolerating macronutrient deficit for 1 week in intensive-care units (late parenteral nutrition [PN]) accelerated recovery compared with early PN. The role of weakness was unclear. Our aim was to assess whether late PN and early PN differentially affect muscle weakness and autophagic quality control of myofibres., Methods: In this prospectively planned subanalysis of the EPaNIC trial, weakness (MRC sum score) was assessed in 600 awake, cooperative patients. Skeletal muscle biopsies, harvested from 122 patients 8 days after randomisation and from 20 matched healthy controls, were studied for autophagy and atrophy. We determined the significance of differences with Mann-Whitney U, Median, Kruskal-Wallis, or χ(2) (exact) tests, as appropriate., Findings: With late PN, 105 (34%) of 305 patients had weakness on first assessment (median day 9 post-randomisation) compared with 127 (43%) of 295 patients given early PN (absolute difference -9%, 95% CI -16 to -1; p=0·030). Weakness recovered faster with late PN than with early PN (p=0·021). Myofibre cross-sectional area was less and density was lower in critically ill patients than in healthy controls, similarly with early PN and late PN. The LC3 (microtubule-associated protein light chain 3) II to LC3I ratio, related to autophagosome formation, was higher in patients given late PN than early PN (p=0·026), reaching values almost double those in the healthy control group (p=0·0016), and coinciding with less ubiquitin staining (p=0·019). A higher LC3II to LC3I ratio was independently associated with less weakness (p=0·047). Expression of mRNA encoding contractile myofibrillary proteins was lower and E3-ligase expression higher in muscle biopsies from patients than in control participants (p≤0·0006), but was unaffected by nutrition., Interpretation: Tolerating a substantial macronutrient deficit early during critical illness did not affect muscle wasting, but allowed more efficient activation of autophagic quality control of myofibres and reduced weakness., Funding: UZ Leuven, Research Foundation-Flanders, the Flemish Government, and the European Research Council., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: Early parenteral nutrition to supplement insufficient enteral feeding during intensive care (early PN) delays recovery as compared with withholding parenteral nutrition for 1 week (late PN)., Objectives: To assess whether deleterious effects of early PN relate to severity of illness or to the dose or type of macronutrients., Methods: Secondary analyses of a randomized controlled trial (EPaNIC; n = 4,640) performed in seven intensive care units from three departments in two Belgian hospitals. In part 1, all patients were included to assess the effect of the randomized allocation to early PN or late PN in subgroups of patients with increasing-on-admission severity of illness. In part 2, observationally, the association of the amount and type of macronutrients with recovery was documented in those patient cohorts still present in intensive care on Days 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14., Measurements and Main Results: The primary end point was time to live discharge from the intensive care unit. For part 1, a secondary end point, acquisition of new infections, was also analyzed. All statistical analyses were performed by univariable and adjusted multivariable methods. In none of the subgroups defined by type or severity of illness was a beneficial effect of early PN observed. The lowest dose of macronutrients was associated with the fastest recovery and any higher dose, administered parenterally or enterally, was associated with progressively more delayed recovery. The amount of proteins/amino acids rather than of glucose appeared to explain delayed recovery with early feeding., Conclusions: Early combined parenteral/enteral nutrition delayed recovery irrespective of severity of critical illness. No dose or type of macronutrient was found to be associated with improved outcome. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00512122).

Introduction: The EPaNIC randomized controlled multicentre trial showed that postponing initiation of parenteral nutrition (PN) in ICU-patients to beyond the first week (Late-PN) enhanced recovery, as compared with Early-PN. This was mediated by fewer infections, accelerated recovery from organ failure and reduced duration of hospitalization. Now, the trial's preplanned cost analysis (N = 4640) from the Belgian healthcare payers' perspective is reported., Methods: Cost data were retrieved from individual patient invoices. Undiscounted total healthcare costs were calculated for the index hospital stay. A cost tree based on acquisition of new infections and on prolonged length-of-stay was constructed. Contribution of 8 cost categories to total hospitalization costs was analyzed. The origin of drug costs was clarified in detail through the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system. The potential impact of Early-PN on total hospitalization costs in other healthcare systems was explored in a sensitivity analysis., Results: ICU-patients developing new infection (24.4%) were responsible for 42.7% of total costs, while ICU-patients staying beyond one week (24.3%) accounted for 43.3% of total costs. Pharmacy-related costs represented 30% of total hospitalization costs and were increased by Early-PN (+608.00 EUR/patient, p = 0.01). Notably, costs for ATC-J (anti-infective agents) (+227.00 EUR/patient, p = 0.02) and ATC-B (comprising PN) (+220.00 EUR/patient, p = 0.006) drugs were increased by Early-PN. Sensitivity analysis revealed a mean total cost increase of 1,210.00 EUR/patient (p = 0.02) by Early-PN, when incorporating the full PN costs., Conclusions: The increased costs by Early-PN were mainly pharmacy-related and explained by higher expenditures for PN and anti-infective agents. The use of Early-PN in critically ill patients can thus not be recommended for both clinical (no benefit) and cost-related reasons., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00512122.

Background: Controversy exists about the timing of the initiation of parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults in whom caloric targets cannot be met by enteral nutrition alone., Methods: In this randomized, multicenter trial, we compared early initiation of parenteral nutrition (European guidelines) with late initiation (American and Canadian guidelines) in adults in the intensive care unit (ICU) to supplement insufficient enteral nutrition. In 2312 patients, parenteral nutrition was initiated within 48 hours after ICU admission (early-initiation group), whereas in 2328 patients, parenteral nutrition was not initiated before day 8 (late-initiation group). A protocol for the early initiation of enteral nutrition was applied to both groups, and insulin was infused to achieve normoglycemia., Results: Patients in the late-initiation group had a relative increase of 6.3% in the likelihood of being discharged alive earlier from the ICU (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00 to 1.13; P=0.04) and from the hospital (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.13; P=0.04), without evidence of decreased functional status at hospital discharge. Rates of death in the ICU and in the hospital and rates of survival at 90 days were similar in the two groups. Patients in the late-initiation group, as compared with the early-initiation group, had fewer ICU infections (22.8% vs. 26.2%, P=0.008) and a lower incidence of cholestasis (P<0.001). The late-initiation group had a relative reduction of 9.7% in the proportion of patients requiring more than 2 days of mechanical ventilation (P=0.006), a median reduction of 3 days in the duration of renal-replacement therapy (P=0.008), and a mean reduction in health care costs of €1,110 (about $1,600) (P=0.04)., Conclusions: Late initiation of parenteral nutrition was associated with faster recovery and fewer complications, as compared with early initiation. (Funded by the Methusalem program of the Flemish government and others; EPaNIC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00512122.).