Search

Cutaneous leishmaniasis is a parasitic infection that causes significant maternal morbidity, and even fetal mortality, during pregnancy, yet there are limited therapeutic options. Here, we report a case of leishmaniasis in a pregnant immigrant with exuberant mucocutaneous lesions with favorable response to liposomal amphotericin B. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Parasitic infections are likely under-recognized among immigrant populations in the USA. We conducted a cross-sectional study to evaluate if such infections have health impacts among recent immigrants in Chicago and to identify predictive factors for parasitic infections. A total of 133 recent immigrants were enrolled, filling out a standardized medical questionnaire and providing blood and stool samples. Appriximately 12% of subjects (15/125) who provided a blood or stool sample for testing were found to have evidence of current or prior infection with a pathogenic parasite, of which Toxocara spp. (8 subjects, 6.4%) and Strongyloides stercoralis (5 subjects, 4%) were most commonly identified. Parasitic infection was more likely among subjects who had immigrated within the previous 2 years and those with a self-reported history of worms in the stool. The most useful surrogate markers identified for parasitic infections were an elevated immunoglobulin E level (seen in 46.7% (7/15) of subjects with parasitic infections and 20% (22/110) of uninfected individuals, p = 0.04) and the presence of Blastocystis hominis cysts on Ova & Parasite exam (detected in 38.5% (5/13) of subjects with parasitic infections who provided a stool sample and 5.1% (5/98) of uninfected subjects, p = 0.002). Our study found that parasitic infections may be common in recent US immigrants, which highlights an important health disparity among a vulnerable population that merits further study. Additionally, clinical risk factors, symptoms, and laboratory findings traditionally thought to be associated with parasites were commonly found but not predictive of infection in this study population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Molecular-based surveys have indicated that Ancylostoma ceylanicum, a zoonotic hookworm, is likely the second most prevalent hookworm species infecting humans in Asia. Most current PCR-based diagnostic options for the detection of Ancylostoma species target the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) regions of the ribosomal gene cluster. These regions possess a considerable degree of conservation among the species of this genus and this conservation can lead to the misidentification of infecting species or require additional labor for accurate species-level determination. We have developed a novel, real-time PCR-based assay for the sensitive and species-specific detection of A. ceylanicum that targets a non-coding, highly repetitive genomic DNA element. Comparative testing of this PCR assay with an assay that targets ITS sequences was conducted on field-collected samples from Argentina and Timor-Leste to provide further evidence of the sensitivity and species-specificity of this assay. Methods/Principal findings: A previously described platform for the design of primers/probe targeting non-coding highly repetitive regions was used for the development of this novel assay. The assay’s limits of detection (sensitivity) and cross-reactivity with other soil-transmitted helminth species (specificity) were assessed with real-time PCR experiments. The assay was successfully used to identify infections caused by A. ceylanicum that were previously only identified to the genus level as Ancylostoma spp. when analyzed using other published primer-probe pairings. Further proof of sensitive, species-specific detection was provided using a published, semi-nested restriction fragment length polymorphism-PCR assay that differentiates between Ancylostoma species. Conclusions/Significance: Due to the close proximity of people and domestic/wild animals in many regions of the world, the potential for zoonotic infections is substantial. Sensitive tools enabling the screening for different soil-transmitted helminth infections are essential to the success of mass deworming efforts and facilitate the appropriate interpretation of data. This study describes a novel, species-specific, real-time PCR-based assay for the detection of A. ceylanicum that will help to address the need for such tools in integrated STH deworming programs. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Most studies evaluating epidemiologic relationships between helminths and HIV have been conducted in the pre-ART era, and evidence of the impact of helminth infections on HIV disease progression remains conflicting. Less is known about helminth infection and clinical outcomes in HIV-infected adults receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART). We sampled HIV-infected adults for eight gastrointestinal parasites and correlated parasitic infection with demographic predictors, and clinical and immunologic outcomes. Contrasting with previous studies, we measured parasitic infection with a quantitative, highly sensitive and specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. This cohort study enrolled HIV-infected Ugandans from August-September 2013 in Mbale, Uganda and collected stool and blood samples at enrollment. Real-time PCR quantified stool: Ascaris lumbricoides, Ancylostoma duodenale, Necator americanus, Strongyloides stercoralis, Trichuris trichiura, Cryptosporidium spp., Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis infection. Generalized linear models assessed relationships between parasitic infection and clinical or demographic data. 35% of participants (71/202) tested positive for ≥1 helminth, mainly N. americanus (55/199, 28%), and 4.5% (9/202) were infected with ≥2 stool parasites. Participants with hookworm infection had lower average CD4+ cell counts (-94 cells/mcL, 95%CI: -141, -48 cells/mcL; p<0.001) after adjustment for sex, CD4+ nadir at clinic entry, and time on ART. The high prevalence of parasitic infection and correlation with decreased CD4+ concentrations highlight the need to re-examine the effects of invasive helminth co-infection in rural, HIV-infected populations in the era of widely available ART. Elucidating the relationship between hookworm infection and immune recovery could provide opportunities for health optimization, e.g. integrated deworming, in these vulnerable populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis (S. stercoralis) infection is hampered by the suboptimal sensitivity of fecal-based tests. Serological methods are believed to be more sensitive, although assessing their accuracy is difficult because of the lack of sensitivity of a fecal-based reference ("gold") standard. Methods: The sensitivity and specificity of 5 serologic tests for S. stercoralis (in-house IFAT, NIE-ELISA and NIE-LIPS and the commercially available Bordier-ELISA and IVD-ELISA) were assessed on 399 cryopreserved serum samples. Accuracy was measured using fecal results as the primary reference standard, but also using a composite reference standard (based on a combination of tests). Results: According to the latter standard, the most sensitive test was IFAT, with 94.6% sensitivity (91.2–96.9), followed by IVD-ELISA (92.3%, 87.7–96.9). The most specific test was NIE-LIPS, with specificity 99.6% (98.9–100), followed by IVD-ELISA (97.4%, 95.5–99.3). NIE-LIPS did not cross-react with any of the specimens from subjects with other parasitic infections. NIE-LIPS and the two commercial ELISAs approach 100% specificity at a cut off level that maintains ≥70% sensitivity. Conclusions: NIE-LIPS is the most accurate serologic test for the diagnosis of S. stercoralis infection. IFAT and each of the ELISA tests are sufficiently accurate, above a given cut off, for diagnosis, prevalence studies and inclusion in clinical trials. Author Summary: The diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis infection is usually made by finding larvae of the parasite in the feces. The larval output is orders of magnitude lower than, say, the egg output of Ancylostoma duodenale, therefore the sensitivity of conventional techniques is poor. Sensitivity is enhanced by specific techniques, but the infection can still be missed. Several serologic methods (Strongyloides antibody detection in blood) are considered more sensitive, but they have been assessed so far with fecal tests as the gold standard, which is obviously unsatisfactory considering, precisely, their suboptimal sensitivity. Using a bank of sera from patients surely infected, not infected or doubtful, we assessed the accuracy of five different serologic tests also using a composite reference standard, obtained by combining the results of different tests. The recently developed NIE-LIPS resulted virtually 100% specific, with sensitivity >80%. Two commercially available ELISA tests were also highly specific above a given cut-off. Cross reactions with other parasitic infections were rarer than in previous studies. In conclusion, serologic tests are accurate tools, both for diagnostic purposes and for prevalence studies. Whether or not they can also be reliable markers of cure is currently under study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Strongyloides stercoralis often causes an asymptomatic infection despite continuous autoinfection for the lifetime of the host. Both HIV and recurrent enteric parasitic infections cause gut damage and increased microbial translocation, but little is known about the effects of co-infection. We aimed to evaluate changes in immune activation, mucosal damage, and microbial translocation in people with HIV-1 (PWH) and parasite co-infection. Methods In this pilot prospective cohort study, we enrolled foreign-born PWH on suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART) in an ambulatory clinic in Houston, Texas. We evaluated serum Strongyloides IgG using ELISA with an S. stercoralis -specific recombinant protein. Intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP), soluble CD14 (sCD14), sCD163, IL-6, and sTNFRII were analyzed as markers of enterocyte turnover, inflammation, and immune activation. Non-parametric tests were used for analysis. Results 52 participants born in 14 countries were enrolled February–March 2019. Median CD4 count was 464/uL [95% CI 315–598]. Fourteen (27%) were positive for Strongyloides IgG. Strongyloides IgG levels correlated positively with sCD14 levels [r=0.36; P = 0.008]. Strongyloides + participants had significantly higher sCD14 levels compared with Strongyloides− participants [1.67 vs. 1.48 μg/mL, P = 0.031]. Among the Strongyloides + participants, Strongyloides IgG levels correlated with sCD163 levels [r=0.65, P = 0.026]. There were no difference in the other biomarkers. Logistical regression analysis showed that predictors of Strongyloides + include absolute eosinophil count (AEC) (OR 1.45 for every 100 increase of AEC [95% CI: 1.02, 2.15; P = 0.047]). CD4 count, number of years living in the United States, country of origin, and years from HIV diagnosis were not associated with test positivity. Conclusion Strongyloides co-infection is common among foreign-born PWH and may contribute to chronic monocyte/macrophage activation, a predictor of morbidity and mortality in PWH. Future directions include stool PCR confirmation of these infections, continued enrollment, and follow-up assays 6 months after treatment of Strongyloides to determine the impact on inflammation and risk of co-morbidities. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]