Search

Background: Self-sampling for HPV as part of primary screening is a well-tolerated method for women not attending organized Pap smear screening and could increase coverage of cervical cancer screening., Objective: To investigate if the prevalence of HR-HPV varies from day to day in infected women and if one single sample is reliable for detecting an ongoing infection., Study Design: This is a prospective cohort study on 12 premenopausal and 13 postmenopausal women performing daily self-sampling for HR-HPV testing. They were all HR-HPV-positive 1-3 months ago. Postmenopausal women were sampled for 28 days and premenopausal women sampled during bleeding-free days in one menstrual cycle. A possible difference in viral load between the estrogen-dominated proliferative phase and the progesterone-dominated secretory phase was analyzed., Results and Conclusions: Consistent results throughout the sampling period were observed for 19 women, with either a daily presence of HPV (14 women) or no HPV at all during the sampling period (5 women). Of 607 samples from 25 women, 596 were consistently positive or negative for HPV during the sampling period and 11 were inconsistent (2%). There was no difference in HPV copy number between the estrogen dominated proliferative or progesterone dominated secretory menstrual cycle phases. The major finding was a high degree of consistency concerning HR-HPV positivity and negativity of HR-HPV in vaginal fluid during a sustained period of daily self-sampling. It does not appear to matter whether the sample is collected in the proliferative or secretory phase., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is not currently used in primary cervical cancer screening in Sweden, and corresponding cost-effectiveness is unclear., Objective: From a societal perspective, to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of high-risk (HR)-HPV testing using self-collected vaginal samples., Design: A cost-effectiveness analysis., Setting: The Swedish organized cervical cancer screening program., Methods: We constructed a model to simulate the natural history of cervical cancer using Swedish data on cervical cancer risk. For the base-case analysis we evaluated two screening strategies with different screening intervals: (i) cytology screening throughout the woman's lifetime (i.e. "conventional cytology strategy") and (ii) conventional cytology screening until age 35 years, followed by HR-HPV testing using self-collected vaginal samples in women aged ≥35 years (i.e. "combination strategy"). Sensitivity analyses were performed, varying model parameters over a significant range of values to identify cost-effective screening strategies., Main Outcome Measures: Average lifetime cost, discounted and undiscounted life-years gained, reduction in cervical cancer risk, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios with and without the cost of added life-years., Results: Depending on screening interval, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for the combination strategy ranged from €43,000 to €180,000 per life-years gained without the cost of added life-years, and from €74,000 to €206,000 with costs of added life-years included., Conclusion: The combination strategy with a 5-year screening interval is potentially cost-effective compared with no screening, and with current screening practice when using a threshold value of €80,000 per life-years gained., (© 2013 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.)

Objective: The present study was conducted to examine the value of screening for high-risk HPV in post-menopausal women., Methods: A cohort of post-menopausal women (n=2113), age range 55-76 years, from Uppsala County, Sweden, were offered testing for both high-risk HPV and a Pap smear in the gynaecological screening during 2008-2010. For the HPV test the cervical smear sample was applied to a filter paper matrix, an indicating FTA elute card and HPV typing performed using a real-time PCR assay. Histological verified CIN2+ lesion was used as an end-point measurement., Results: High-risk HPV were found in 6.2% (95% CI 5.2-7.3%) of the women (n=130) and 22% (95% CI 14-32%) (n=17) of these had CIN2+ lesions based on histology. The Pap smear taken in conjunction with the HPV test was abnormal in 9.7% (95% CI 5.7-16.3%) (n=12) of HPV positive women. Among HPV positive women with an abnormal Pap smear, the frequency of histology verified CIN2+ lesions was 67% (95% CI 38-86%) (n=8), as compared to 14% (95% CI 7-24%) (n=9) in HPV positive women with a normal smear. The prevalence of HPV16 in CIN2+ lesions (29%, 95% CI 22-37%) in post-menopausal women was less than half of previous estimates in pre-menopausal women from this population., Conclusions: Most histological CIN2+ lesions in post-menopausal women are not recognized by a single Pap smear. A large fraction of pre-invasive cervical cancer cases in post-menopausal women result from infections by HPV types not included in the present vaccine formulas., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To study the value of self-sampling of vaginal fluid at home in combination with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in a cohort of older women not attending Papanicolaou (Pap) smear screening., Design: Women (n = 3618), aged 50-65 years, who had not attended screening for at least 6 years were offered self-sampling of vaginal fluid at home (study cohort). The collected material was analysed for the presence of high-risk HPV (using Hybrid capture 2; Hc2). Women with a positive HPV test were referred for colposcopy. These results were compared with the results of Pap smear screening in a corresponding age group of women (controls). The end point of the study was identification of a histological cervical intraepithelial neoplasia stage 2 (CIN2) and above (CIN2+)., Results: In all, 39.4% (n = 1426) women participated and 4.6% (n = 66) were high-risk HPV positive. Of the HPV-positive women 56 chose to attend a surgery (84.8%) after a mean time of 2.1 months and ten of these women (17.9%) showed CIN2+, corresponding to 0.70% of all participating women. In the controls, who participated in organised Pap smear screening, the prevalence of CIN2+ was 0.25% (15/6048). The odds ratio for identification of CIN2+ in women aged 50 years or older performing self-sampling and HPV test in comparison with Pap smear was: 2.84 (95% CI 1.14-6.77, P = 0.0174). In older women primary high-risk HPV testing (Hc2) and Pap smear screening showed equal specificity of around 96%., Conclusions: Self-sampling of vaginal fluid in combination with high-risk HPV testing appears to be an attractive method to improve screening coverage and decrease the prevalence of cervical cancer in women aged 50 years or older., (© 2011 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology © 2011 RCOG.)

Background: Testing for high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) in primary screening for cervical cancer is considered more sensitive, but less specific, in comparison with Pap-smear cytology. Women with persistent HPV infections have a higher risk of developing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ (CIN2+) lesions. This study was performed to evaluate the gain in specificity for detection of histologically confirmed CIN2+ lesions achieved by short-time repeat testing for high-risk HPV in women aged 30-65 years, with the primary sample for HPV analysis taken by self-sampling., Methods: A total of 8000 women in Uppsala County, aged 30-65 years, who had not attended organised screening for 6 years or longer, were offered self-sampling of vaginal fluid at home and the samples sent for HPV typing. Of these, 8% (669) were not possible to contact or had performed hysterectomy. Women positive for high-risk HPV in the self-sampling test were invited for a follow-up HPV test and a cervical biopsy on average 3 months after the initial HPV test., Results: In all, 39% (2850/7331) of invited women chose to perform self-sampling of vaginal fluid at home. High-risk HPV infection was found in 6.6% (188) of the women. In all, 89% of the women testing HPV positive performed a follow-up examination, on average 2.7 months, after the first test and 59% of these women were HPV positive in the follow-up test. The prevalence of CIN2+ lesions in women with an initial HPV-positive test was 23% (95% CI 18-30%) and in women with two consecutive HPV-positive tests was 41% (95% CI 31-51%). In women with two positive HPV tests, the prevalence of CIN2+ lesions varied from 49% in women at age 30-39 years to 24% in women at age 50-65 years. Short-time repeat HPV testing increased the specificity for detection of CIN2+ lesions from about 94.2% to 97.8%. The most prevalent HPV types were HPV16 (32%), followed by HPV18/45 (19%) and HPV 33/52/58 (19%)., Conclusion: The short-time persistence of high-risk HPV infection in this age group was about 60%. Repeat testing for high-risk HPV using self-sampling of vaginal fluid can be used to increase the specificity in the screening for cervical cancer in women aged 30-65 years.

Background: Most procedures for self-sampling of cervical cells are based on liquid-based media for transportation and storage. An alternative is to use a solid support, such as dry filter paper media., Objectives: To evaluate if self-sampling of cervicovaginal fluid using a cytobrush (Viba-brush; Rovers Medical Devices B.V., Oss, The Netherlands) and a solid support such as the Whatman Indicating FTA Elute cartridge (GE Healthcare, United Kingdom) can be used for reliable typing of human papillomavirus (HPV), as compared to cervical samples obtained by a physician using a cytobrush and the indicating FTA Elute Micro card and biopsy analysis., Study Design: A total of 50 women with a previous high-risk (HR) HPV positive test were invited to perform self-sampling using the Viba-brush and the FTA cartridge and thereafter a physician obtained a cervical sample using the cytobrush and a FTA card, together with a cervical biopsy for histology and HPV typing. Detection of HR-HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58 and 59 was performed using three multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays., Result: All samples contained sufficient amounts of genomic DNA and the self-samples yielded on average 3.5 times more DNA than those obtained by the physician. All women that were positive for HR-HPV in the biopsy sample also typed positive both by self-sampling and physician-obtained sampling. For women with a histological diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2-3 (CIN 2-3) all three HPV samples showed 100% concordance. A higher number of women were HPV positive by self-sampling than by physician-obtained sampling or by biopsy analysis., Conclusion: The Viba-brush and the FTA cartridge are suitable for self-sampling of vaginal cells and subsequent HR-HPV typing., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Most women with cervical cancer have not participated in Pap-smear screening. Self-sampling of vaginal fluid in combination with high-risk HPV testing may be a method to increase the attendance rate., Methods: A total of 4060 women, 39-60 years old, who had not attended the organised Pap-smear screening for 6 years or more were randomised into two equal groups. A study group was offered to self-sample vaginal fluid (Qvintip) at home and/or recommended to attend the Pap-smear screening. The collected fluid after self-sampling was examined for the presence of high-risk HPV (Hybrid Capture 2 method). Controls were only recommended to attend the Pap-smear screening. The end point was a histological identification of CIN2-3., Results: The participation rate was 39% (771 out of 2000) in the self-sampling group and 9% (188 out of 2060) in the conventional cytology (P<0.001). The number of histological CIN2-3 alterations detected was 0.4% (8 out of 2000) among women offered self-sampling of vaginal fluid and 0.07% (3 out of 4060) in women offered Pap-smears. The odds ratio (OR) for offering self-sampling and HPV testing instead of Pap-smear screening for detection of CIN2-3 was OR=5.42 (95% CI: 1.30-31.8)., Conclusion: Offering self-sampling of vaginal fluid followed by a high-risk HPV test was considerably more effective for detection of histological CIN2-3 lesions in comparison with offering Pap-test in a midwife reception in women not regularly attending organised screening.

Information on HPV type distribution in cervical cancer in situ in different populations is needed for evaluation of prophylactic vaccination programs targeting HPV 16 and 18. In our study, the HPV type prevalence in 1,079 Swedish women from multicase families diagnosed with cervical cancer in situ 1965-1993 was investigated using real-time PCR and archival tissue material. HPV type information was obtained for 974 samples. Among these, HPV 16 (61%) was the dominant type followed by HPV 33/52/58 (24%), HPV 31 (13%) and HPV 18/45 (12%). The detected prevalence of HPV 16 among cancer in situ decreased by 13% over the study period while the group of low frequency high-risk types increased. Related women were not prone to infection by the same type. These data suggest that the prevalence of individual HPV types has changed over time in Swedish patients with cervical cancer in situ. Large-scale studies of pathology biobank materials will enable further insight into the temporal changes of individual HPV types, as baseline information to properly evaluate the effect of vaccine programs. The findings also indicate that genetic susceptibility to cervical cancer operates through general and not type specific susceptibility to HPV infection., (Copyright (c) 2009 UICC.)

Background: Around 65% of women with cervical carcinoma in Sweden have not attended an organised screening. We therefore investigated the value of using self-sampling at home in combination with a test for high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) to increase participation., Methods: A total of 2829 women 30-58 years old, who had not attended the organised screening for > or = 6 years, were recruited. They were offered self-sampling at home (Qvintip) and recommended to send the collected vaginal fluid to a laboratory for analysis of the presence of high-risk HPV (Hybrid Capture 2 method)., Results: A total of 39.1% of the women accepted home sampling. These women disclosed a relatively high prevalence of high-risk HPV, which decreased with age, from 11.1% in women 30-39 years old to 2.9% in women > or =50 years . Follow-up disclosed histological cervical intraepithelial neoplasm (CIN) 2-3 lesions in 43.2% of the women with a persistent HPV infection, corresponding to 2.0% of the total number of participating women. The sensitivity of a single smear to detect the histological CIN 2-3 lesions were only 52.6%, even if all abnormal smears (atypical squamous cells of unknown significance (ASCUS)-CIN 3)) were included., Conclusion: The use of self-sampling at home in combination with testing for high-risk HPV increases the participation rate of the organised screening and detects almost twice as many women with pre-malignant cell alterations (CIN 2-3) in comparison those with a single cytological smear.

Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is an important part of cervical carcinoma screening, and the most widely used assay for detection of HPV is Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2)., Objectives: We compare the HC2 with the real-time PCR hpVIR assay for detection of HPV in follow-up smears of 398 women diagnosed with atypical squamous cells of unknown significance (ASCUS) or low grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 1) in their initial smear., Study Design: The two assays target the same set of high-risk (HR) HPVs with exception of HPV68. hpVIR identify individual or groups of HPV types as well as their viral load, while HC2 identify HR HPVs without specification of type., Results: 34% (131/391) of the women were positive with HC2 and 45% (175/391) with hpVIR. 16% (63/391) were positive only with hpVIR and among those with cytology available 6% (3/52) had a CIN 2. The 3% (13/391) of women positive only with HC2 either contained low-risk HPVs or copy numbers below the cut-off for the hpVIR assay., Conclusion: The hpVIR assay has a similar sensitivity and specificity as HC2, but hpVIR detect a higher frequency of high-risk HPV infections.

Unlabelled: OBJECTIVE. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) cells, occurring in organized cytological screening, may be either high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) positive or negative. To refine the assessment of women with ASCUS, a high-risk HPV-DNA test is recommended as triage in Sweden., Methods: A total of 197 consecutive women (mean age 39 years, range 21-60) with a diagnosis of ASCUS from the primary screening were selected for triage. Their cervical smears were collected and evaluated by using conventional cytological examination in combination with a high-risk HPV-DNA test (hybrid capture 2). The women were categorized into four groups: Group A, Cytology + /HPV + ; Group B, Cytology-/HPV + ; Group C, Cytology + /HPV-; and Group D, Cytology-/ HPV-. Women within Groups A-C were admitted for colposcopy and cervical biopsy. The women in Group D were considered as a low-risk group for tumor development, and were re-examined after three years in the next round of the organized screening., Results: In women in Group A (n=58) the prevalence of histological verified CIN2-3 was 41%, in Group B (n=41) 20%, and in Group C (n=9) 0%. In Group D (n=89), repeated primary screening three years later revealed CIN2-3 in two biopsies from 74 women studied (<3%). The prevalence of a high-risk HPV infection decreased with age in women with ASCUS. It was 74% in women <30 years and 19% in women > or =50 years., Conclusions: Adding a high-risk HPV test in secondary screening increased the identification of women with CIN2-3 lesions by 33% in comparison with repeat cytology (p=0.01). The clinical significance of the ASCUS diagnosis varied with age of the women.

Since the introduction of organized cytological screening in Sweden, most women currently presenting with cervical cancer are those who have not attended the programme and who have no cytological screening history. The aims of this study were: (i) to measure the response rate among women not attending organized cytological screening who were offered a device for self-sampling a vaginal smear at home; (ii) to examine the prevalence of high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) among women performing self-sampling. Women aged 35-50 years, who had not participated in organized cytological screening for more than 6 years, were offered the opportunity to collect vaginal samples at home using a self-sampling device (Qvintip). The material collected was analysed for high-risk HPV using the Hybrid Capture 2 method. Of 369 women included in the study, 179 (49%) ordered the self-sampling device and 117 (32%) performed self-sampling at home and sent the sample to our laboratory for analysis. The mean prevalence of high-risk HPV was 26% (30/117), 31% (25/80) in women aged 35-42 years and 14% (5/37) in women aged 43-50 years. There was no significant difference in the participation rate with regard to age. The prevalence of high-risk HPV in women not covered by organized screening was considerably higher than in the general population; therefore they may represent a category at high risk of cervical cancer. The study shows that the use of a disposable self-sampling device for HPV testing is a relevant method to increase the participation rate in countries with organized cytological screening.

Background: The major problem with the cytological screening is the non-optimal participation rate among women invited for cervical smear collection. The aim of the present investigation was to examine the attitudes of the non-responding women to perform self-sampling of vaginal smear at home as a method to increase the coverage of the screening and to examine the prevalence of high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) among the responding women., Methods: From the database of the Department of Cytology, University Hospital of Uppsala 198 women, aged 35-55 years, who had not attended the organized gynaecological screening for over 6 years were identified. They were sent a letter of information about the study and one week later a self-sampling device aimed to collect vaginal smear. The vaginal smear of the women responding to the offer of self-sampling was analysed for high-risk HPV using Hybrid Capture 2 method or polymerase chain reaction amplification of HPV DNA. All women in the study also received a questionnaire in order to investigate their attitudes towards self-sampling as an alternative in the organized screening., Results: Of the 198 women 15 women had to be excluded. Fifty-eight per cent of the women responded and collected vaginal smear at home and among them 7% were positive for high-risk HPV. The questionnaire revealed no significant difference of age, country of birth and occupation or marital status, on using self-sampling of vaginal smear at home. The attitudes among responding and non-responding women differed. The responding women who contributed by sampling vaginal smear were more positive to self-sampling of vaginal smear (p<0.01)., Conclusions: Offering self-sampling of vaginal smear in women not attending the organized cytological screening increases the coverage and identifies an additional group of women with an increased risk to develop cervical cancer. The attitude towards self-sampling was mainly positive.

Objective: To examine the effect of Pspanicolaou staining of cervical smears on the sensitivity of molecular biologic HPV tests., Study Design: Two sensitive HPV tests were used, HPV DNA sequence analysis after polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and the Hybrid Capture II method (HC II) (Digene Diagnostics Inc., Silver Spring, Maryland, USA). Papanicolaou-stained and unstained smears taken simultaneously were examined from 265 women readmitted for examination due to an atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance diagnosis., Results: After an HPV test with the PCR method on unstained slides, 66% of the women were HPV positive, whereas the same women were HPVpositive in 54% when Papanicolaou-stained slides were analyzed. However, this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.1). With the HC II method, 55% of unstained smears were HPV positive whereas 29% were HPV positive, when Papanicolaou-stained slides were examined. This difference was significant (p < 0.001). The same strong differences in sensitivity were observed when both the PCR and HC II methods were studied on the same Papanicolaou stained glass slides, whereas on unstained slides no significant difference was found., Conclusion: The results demonstrate that Papanicolaou staining of a cervical smear significantly decreases the sensitivity of an HPV test performed with the HC II method, whereas the PCR method is less affected. With the Papanicolaou method, the hematoxylin bath is followed by HCl treatment, and strong acid treatment destroys DNA.

The aim of the present investigation was to define the spectrum of oncogenic types of human papillomavirus (HPV) present in benign, pre-malignant (low-grade and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, LSIL and HSIL) and malignant cervical lesions. The study comprises 215 HPV-positive biopsies, analysed with PCR, followed by sequence analyses of the HPV DNA. Fifeteen oncogenic types of HPV were identified. In 170 benign or pre-maligant alterations, the most common being HPV 16 (51%), HPV 31 (8%), HPV 18 (7%) and HPV 45 (6%). HPV 33, 35, 51, 56, 58, 66, and 70 occurred in about 1-4%. The prevalence of HPV 39, 52, 56, 59 and 73 was <1%. All the observed types of HPV, except 39 and 52, occurred in SIL lesions. The most common oncogenic HPV types (16 and 18), occurring in 45 invasive squamous carcinomas, comprised 76 per cent of the tumours, whereas less frequent HPV types (31, 33, 52, 56, 67, 70 and 73) were each found in about 2-4%. Double HPV infections were not observed. In conclusion, a total of 15 different oncogenic HPV types were identified, of which 13 types were present in pre-malignant cervical lesions and 9 in malignant lesions. This information may have some relevance when HPV analyses are considered as an adjunct to the organised screening of cervical cancer and for those working with the development of HPV vaccines for the prevention of cervical cancer.

Background: Effective screening programs have contributed to a decrease in the incidence of cervical squamous cell carcinomas but have had a limited sensitivity in the detection of adenocarcinoma precursor lesions. The aim of our study was to analyze cervical adenocarcinoma in greater detail: symptoms preceding the detection, the method of detection and the prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) with respect to age at diagnosis., Material and Methods: Clinical data were abstracted from the medical records of 82 women with pure invasive cervical adenocarcinomas. As diagnostic tools we used polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) and/or direct DNA sequencing for HPV detection., Results: Age at diagnosis predicting factors were HPV status, positive lymph nodes, histology and stage. HPV-negativity, lymph node metastases, advanced stage and poor differentiation were all associated with a high diagnostic age. In the multivariate analysis only HPV status was shown to have an independent impact on age at diagnosis, while stage showed only borderline significance. Twenty-three percent of the cancers were detected by screening and the remaining were due to different symptoms. Among the women considered, 93% had a normal Papanicolaou (Pap) smear 3 years before diagnosis and 60% within 1 year. There was no significant correlation between smoking, oral contraceptives and HPV-positivity., Conclusions: The absence of HPV was significantly associated with a high age at diagnosis. Pap screening had a limited effect in detecting adenocarcinoma at an early stage.

In a collection of 173 cervical adenocarcinomas, the prevalence of HPV in relation to the age of women and the distribution of the various oncogenic types of HPV were evaluated. The tumour material was analysed by PCR of the HPV L1 gene followed by direct DNA sequencing and/or the polymerase chain reaction and single-strand conformation polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) technique for the identification and typing of HPV. In 68% (117/173) of the adenocarcinomas, HPV was present. A significant correlation was observed between the prevalence of HPV and age: in women younger than 40 years, HPV was present in 88%, whereas in women 60 years and older, it was found in only 39% (p<0.001). Among the HPV-positive tumours, type 18 predominated (52%) followed by type 16 (35%) and type 45 (7.7%) while other oncogenic types of HPV (31 and 59) were rarely found. HPV 16 was relatively more frequent in older women but this observation was not significant (p=0.06). HPV-typing by PCR and direct DNA sequence analysis is more specific than analysis by PCR-SSCP, especially among the less frequently occurring types of HPV. Our results further show that the prevalence of HPV in women with cervical adenocarcinomas is age-related and that the most frequently occurring types of HPV are 18, followed by 16 and 45. We have concluded that the oncogenic role of HPV in cervical squamous carcinomas and adenocarcinomas is, in some respects, discrepant.

Background: Infertile women in Sweden are offered in vitro fertilization (IVF) within the frame of the social security system. The present investigation was undertaken to evaluate the prevalence of genital human papilloma virus (HPV) infection in relation to the results of cytologic screening and to the infertility in these women., Material and Methods: Two hundred and fourteen women, mean age 32 years (range 20-40), admitted to the Center for Reproduction at Uppsala University Hospital for investigation of infertility and IVF were studied. Human papilloma virus tests were performed by a sensitive polymerase chain reaction-based technique in cervical smears obtained at a medical examination or during oocyte retrieval. Cytologic screening results were obtained from medical records or at the time of investigation. The infertile women were compared with 197 healthy female controls., Results: Infertility resulted from female factors in 47% and male factors in 29% of the cases, and remained unexplained in 24%. Seven percent of the infertile women were HPV-positive compared with 9.1% of the controls. Only genital and oncogenic HPV types were identified. Human papilloma virus type 16 was most prevalent, and examination of the HPV 16 E6 gene showed that this prototype predominated over variants. No correlation was found between HPV infection and cause of infertility. Abnormal cytology was observed in 2.3% of the infertile women and 4.1% of the controls., Conclusions: Human papilloma virus infections might appear somewhat less frequently in infertile women admitted for IVF than in a control population. In both groups HPV infection was more common than cytologic abnormalities, possibly indicating that present HPV tests are more sensitive in detecting HPV infections than cytologic screening.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is considered the single most important co-factor in the development of cervical squamous cell carcinomas. Adenocarcinomas of the cervix are also related to HPV, but the correlation is reported to be less pronounced. In the present study, 131 cervical adenocarcinomas were identified through the Swedish Cancer Registry, examined morphologically and then analysed with sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based HPV methods for a study of age-related prevalence of HPV. HPV was identified in 64% of the tumours after PCR amplification of the HPV L1 gene only and in 71% following PCR amplification of both the L1 and E6 genes of HPV. HPV 18 was the most prevalent (52%), followed by HPV 16 (33%) and other types of HPV (15%). The prevalence of HPV was shown to be age-dependent. In women younger than 40 years, HPV was present in 89%, whereas in women 60 years and older, HPV was observed in only 43%. The difference was statistically significant, P<0.005. The HPV-positive adenocarcinomas were represented by an age distribution similar to that of cervical squamous carcinomas with a maximum age, in the 40-49 year old group, whereas the frequency of HPV-negative adenocarcinomas increased with age, typical of most carcinomas occurring in elderly women.

A previous Swedish study revealed that both prototype and variant HPV16 E6 oncoprotein, occur in about equal numbers in high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (HCIN), whereas variant HPV16 predominates in invasive cervical squamous carcinoma. Most of the malignant HPV16 variants contain a common mutation, L83V, in the E6 oncoprotein. In the present investigation, 28 HPV16 positive, invasive cervical adenocarcinomas were collected from a total number of 131 adenocarcinomas. These HPV16-positive cases were evaluated with analysis of the E6 gene, using a recently described PCR-SSCP method for identification of the specific mutation (L83V) in the E6 gene. The results obtained were correlated to findings in 103 preinvasive, HCIN, and 31 invasive cervical squamous carcinomas also infected with HPV16. The HPV16 E6 variant L83V was present in 40% of the HCIN lesions, in 54% of the invasive adenocarcinomas, in comparison to 81% of the invasive squamous carcinomas. The difference between HCIN and squamous carcinomas was statistically significant, P < 0.001, whereas the difference between HCIN and invasive adenocarcinomas was not statistically significant, P = 0.604. Prototype HPV16 and its E6 variant L83V are both prevalent in preinvasive and invasive cervical lesions in Swedish women. However, the obvious predominance of HPV16 variant in squamous carcinomas was not seen in adenocarcinomas. A single amino-acid shift in the HPV16 E6 gene appears to result in a different transforming potential in squamous and glandular cervical lesions.

Anal warts are, from an aetiological point of view, a diverse category of lesions including condylomata acuminata, fibroepithelial polyps and seborrhoeic keratosis. Human papillomavirus induced anal warts, in contrast to other types of warts, are contagious and not infrequently sexually transmitted, they therefore need to be accurately identified. A total of 24 anal warts were randomly collected and the histopathological diagnoses based on microscopy, alone or in combination with a sensitive PCR-based human papillomavirus test, were compared using the SHARP Signal system for detection. Three lesions were identified as condyloma acuminatum by morphology alone due to the obvious presence of koiloytotic atypia; 11 warts without koilocytes were identified only after a positive test for anogenital human papillomavirus. One additional lesion contained human papillomavirus DNA of cutaneous type and 9 papillomas were human papillomavirus-negative and tentatively diagnosed as fibroepithelial polyps or seborrhoeic keratosis. All 14 condylomas contained human papillomavirus of low-risk type. Of these, 12 warts showed a positive human papillomavirus reaction with in situ hybridization. Morphology alone cannot reveal the true nature of most anal papillomas, even when koilocytotic atypia is considered as a diagnostic hallmark. An optimal diagnosis of anal warts requires a sensitive PCR-based human papillomavirus DNA test. A test for identification of cutaneous human papillomavirus DNA is also worthwhile.

The polymerase chain reaction is being increasingly used for human papillomavirus (HPV) detection in routine diagnostics and in research. Recently, a nonisotopic, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based sandwich capture hybridization assay was introduced as a commercial kit. This hybrid capture system can be used directly on extracted DNA or on polymerase chain reaction products. The latter approach, the SHARP Signal System, uses the consensus primers MY09/MY11, MY11 being biotinylated at its 5' end. We applied the SHARP Signal System to 72 neutral-buffered, formaldehyde-fixed, cervical biopsy specimens to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the kit compared with an earlier established, highly sensitive HPV detection method, GP+/GP6+ and single-stranded conformation polymorphism (SSCP). With the MY09/MY11/SHARP Signal System, 38% of the cases proved positive and with GP5+/GP6+/SSCP, 35%. Correlation of the two methods was 94% for the negative and positive cases and 100% for low- and high-risk HPV. We concluded that the MY09/MY11/ SHARP Signal System is suitable for amplified HPV DNA detection in research and for clinical purposes.

The prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA sequences in 45 cervical cancer biopsies was examined with the hot-start polymerase chain reaction (PCR), employing HPV consensus primers from the L1 region. The cases comprised 38 squamous cell carcinomas, three adenosquamous carcinomas, and four adenocarcinomas. PCR products were typed with single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) and the HPV types detected were correlated with tumour type. Forty-three biopsies were HPV-positive, HPV16 being the most prevalent type. HPV18/33/45/58 were also detected, but no low-risk or multiple types. Keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma was invariably associated with HPV16 and adenosquamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma with HPVs 18/45. Non-keratinizing squamous cell carcinomas harboured all five detected types. Our data corroborate the view that malignant cervical tumours are almost invariably associated with high-risk HPV and that certain malignant cervical tumour phenotypes correlate with specific HPV types.

Background: Knowledge about the natural course of HPV infection is still limited. In this study we investigated the presence of HPV DNA after treatment and clinical clearance of infection., Methods: Eighty-two women treated for genital HPV infection at the STD clinic in Uppsala were consecutively selected for the study. After treatment with podophyllotoxin, and in some cases laser vaporization, a cell sample was taken at the follow-up visit 6-12 months after clinical clearance of the lesions as evaluated by colposcopy. Samples were analysed with PCR to detect HPV DNA. As a reference group, women treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with laser surgery, either with cone biopsy or vaporization, were followed-up after 6 months for the presence of HPV DNA., Results: Six to 12 months after clinical clearance of HPV infection, 39 (48%) of the women showed detectable HPV DNA in cell samples from the cervix. Of these, 26 (67%) were found to harbor high risk HPV, six (15%) low risk, and seven (18%) either had more than one HPV type or HPV that could not be classified. All but three of the women treated for CIN (90%) were negative for HPV DNA., Conclusion: After clinical clearance of genital HPV infection half of the women had detectable HPV DNA. This does not necessarily imply that transmission to a new partner may occur, but indicates this possibility. Only 10% of the CIN treated women harbored HPV DNA in the cell samples in spite of showing high risk HPV infection before treatment.

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR), used to detect human papillomavirus (HPV), is finding increasing applications in clinical laboratories. The standard method of analysis to detect amplified PCR products is ethidium bromide gel electrophoresis combined with labor intensive blot hybridization. In this study, we describe single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) to detect and genotype simultaneously general primer GP5+/GP6+ amplified HPV DNA using semiautomated electrophoresis on polyacrylamide gels (PAGE) combined with sensitive silver staining. To establish a standard for the band patterns of the various HPV types, we used HPV plasmid DNA, which allowed us to distinguish HPV 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 45, 51, 52, 56, and 58, covering the most frequently recognized types. All the types tested are separated from each other, demonstrating diverse band patterns, HPV 16 being the most distinct. We also investigated PCR-SSCP for HPV detection and typing of 86 cervical biopsies diagnosed as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) I-III and known to be HPV positive by PCR-slot blot hybridization and in situ hybridization. The correlation with SSCP was 91% for in situ hybridization and 98% for PCR-slot blot hybridization. SSCP is reproducible and specific. Its sensitivity is comparable to slot-blot hybridization. The interval to SSCP is approximately 2 h after PCR compared with several days' work when using conventional blot hybridization. We concluded that SSCP may be more advantageous than other PCR-based typing technologies.

In order to estimate the prevalence of HPV infection in male partners of women with squamous intraepithelial lesions and/or high risk HPV, we examined 25 men. In situ hybridisation or polymerase chain reaction was used to detect HPV DNA in biopsied tissue or cell samples from the genital epithelium. Twenty (80%) of the male consorts had clinical features suggestive of HPV infection. Of these, 18 (90%) had detectable HPV DNA, 11 (65%) of the high risk type. In 9 cases HPV DNA was detected by in situ hybridisation and in 9 by polymerase chain reaction. Concordance between female and male HPV type was found in 8 cases (32%), but regarding high-risk HPV carriage as such, 10 (40%) couples corresponded. A search for HPV infection in male partners of women known to be infected with high-risk HPV seems worthwhile.