Search

Background: The unique clinical role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in diagnosing and treating biliary tree diseases cannot be completely replaced by other modern imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. However, post-ERCP pancreatitis is one of the most common and life-threatening complications. Prophylactic medication in the prevention of pancreatitis during ERCP is still controversial. The objective of the present study was to investigate the role of different regimens of somatostatin in the prevention of acute pancreatitis after ERCP and analyze the risk factors contributing to post-ERCP complications., Methods: From July 1999 to September 2000, 133 patients with benign biliary disease who received ERCP for diagnosis or treatment were enrolled. Group A patients received a bolus of somatostatin infusion before ERCP, followed by continuous infusion for 12 hours. Group B patients received a bolus of somatostatin before ERCP only, and group C patients were the controls who did not receive somatostatin treatment. Serum amylase levels before and 24 hours after ERCP, and abdominal pain were recorded., Results: There were no significant differences in bile duct and pancreatic duct visualization, ratio of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP, procedure time, post-procedural hyperamylasemia and pancreatitis among the 3 groups. For patients with visualization of the pancreatic duct, the incidences of hyperamylasemia (serum amylase > or = 220 U/L) were higher than in patients without visualization of the pancreatic duct (p < 0.001). All 6 patients with post-ERCP pancreatitis had pancreatic duct visualization, and recovered after conservative treatment., Conclusion: Continuous infusion of somatostatin after ERCP does not seem to be helpful in the prevention of pancreatic complications after ERCP. Pancreatic duct visualization is a risk factor for pancreatic complications.

Background: Less than 67% of patients with intermediate risk for common bile duct (CBD) stones require therapeutic intervention. It is important to have an accurate, safe, and reliable method for the definitive diagnosis of CBD stones before initiating therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Few publications detail the diagnostic efficacy of linear echoendoscopy (EUS) for CBD stones. Methods: 30 patients with biliary colic, pancreatitis, unexplained derangement of liver function tests, and/or dilated CBD without an identifiable cause were enrolled in the study. When a CBD stone was disclosed by linear EUS, ERCP with stone extraction was performed. Patients who failed ERCP were referred for surgical intervention. If no stone was found by EUS, ERCP would not be performed and patients were followed-up for possible biliary symptoms for up to three months. Results: The major reason for enrollment was acute pancreatitis. The mean predicted risk for CBD stones was 47% (28-61). Of the 12 patients who were positive for CBD stones by EUS, nine had successful ERCP, one failed ERCP (later treated successfully by surgical intervention) and two were false-positive cases. No procedure-related adverse events were noted. For those 18 patients without evidence of CBD stones by EUS, no false-negative case was noted during the three-month follow-up period. Linear EUS had sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predicted values for the detection of CBD stones of 1, 0.9, 0.8 and 1, respectively. Conclusion: Linear EUS is safe and efficacious for the diagnosis of occult CBD stones in patients with intermediate risk for the disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Endoscopic methods are currently the treatment of choice for patients with common bile duct (CBD) stones, but subsequent management of the intact gallbladder for patients following endoscopic treatment is still controversial. The primary aim of this study was to discover the association between gallbladder status and recurrent biliary complications for patients with CBD stones after endoscopic treatment. Additionally, we also sought to determine risk factors for recurrent biliary complications in these patients. Methods: The records of 1625 patients with CBD stones following endoscopic treatment were reviewed. A total of 681 patients were enrolled and subsequently categorized into four groups: Group 1 (n = 201), calculous gallbladder; Group 2 (n = 140), acalculous gallbladder; Group 3 (n = 175), elective cholecystectomy after endoscopic treatment; and Group 4 (n = 165), prior cholecystectomy. The basic demographics and recurrent biliary complications during follow-up among these four groups were analyzed by Chi-square test, ANOVA, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and log-rank test. Results: During the median follow-up period of 34 months, 133 patients (20%) with recurrent biliary complications were identified. The recurrence rates of Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 29%, 11%, 15%, and 19%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with calculous gallbladder had a significantly higher rate of recurrent biliary complication. In multivariate analysis, patients with a history of cirrhosis, juxta-papillary diverticulum, calculous gallbladder, CBD size ≥1.5 cm, and endoscopic management with endoscopic sphincterotomy were at a higher risk for developing biliary complications (p = 0.029, p = 0.039, p < 0.001, p = 0.002, p = 0.021, respectively.) Conclusion: Patients with cholecystolithiasis and CBD stones had a higher incidence of recurrent biliary complications. For some of these patients, elective cholecystectomy following endoscopic treatment may be considered. However, routine elective cholecystectomy in patients with normal gallbladder is not appropriate because of the low recurrence of biliary complications. Whether gallbladder function affects the biliary clearance and biliary complications requires further research. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]