Search

Introduction: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is an ablation modality that applies short, high-voltage electric pulses to unresectable cancers. Although considered a non-thermal technique, temperatures do increase during IRE. This temperature rise sensitizes tumor cells for electroporation as well as inducing partial direct thermal ablation., Aim: To evaluate the extent to which mild and moderate hyperthermia enhance electroporation effects, and to establish and validate in a pilot study cell viability models (CVM) as function of both electroporation parameters and temperature in a relevant pancreatic cancer cell line., Methods: Several IRE-protocols were applied at different well-controlled temperature levels (37 °C ≤ T ≤ 46 °C) to evaluate temperature dependent cell viability at enhanced temperatures in comparison to cell viability at T = 37 °C. A realistic sigmoid CVM function was used based on thermal damage probability with Arrhenius Equation and cumulative equivalent minutes at 43 °C (CEM43°C) as arguments, and fitted to the experimental data using "Non-linear-least-squares"-analysis., Results: Mild (40 °C) and moderate (46 °C) hyperthermic temperatures boosted cell ablation with up to 30% and 95%, respectively, mainly around the IRE threshold E th,50% electric-field strength that results in 50% cell viability. The CVM was successfully fitted to the experimental data., Conclusion: Both mild- and moderate hyperthermia significantly boost the electroporation effect at electric-field strengths neighboring E th,50% . Inclusion of temperature in the newly developed CVM correctly predicted both temperature-dependent cell viability and thermal ablation for pancreatic cancer cells exposed to a relevant range of electric-field strengths/pulse parameters and mild moderate hyperthermic temperatures., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: K.P.v.L. and T.M.v.G. are paid consultants for Angio-Dynamics. Angio-Dynamics had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: In pancreatic cancer, preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) increases complications compared with surgery without PBD, demonstrated by a recent randomised controlled trial (RCT). This outcome might be related to the plastic endoprosthesis used. Metal stents may reduce the PBD-related complications risk., Methods: A prospective multicentre cohort study was performed including patients with obstructive jaundice due to pancreatic cancer, scheduled to undergo PBD before surgery. This cohort was added to the earlier RCT (ISRCTN31939699). The RCT protocol was adhered to, except PBD was performed with a fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS). This FCSEMS cohort was compared with the RCT's plastic stent cohort. PBD-related complications were the primary outcome. Three-group comparison of overall complications including early surgery patients was performed., Results: 53 patients underwent PBD with FCSEMS compared with 102 patients treated with plastic stents. Patients' characteristics did not differ. PBD-related complication rates were 24% in the FCSEMS group vs 46% in the plastic stent group (relative risk of plastic stent use 1.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.2, p=0.011). Stent-related complications (occlusion and exchange) were 6% vs 31%. Surgical complications did not differ, 40% vs 47%. Overall complication rates for the FCSEMS, plastic stent and early surgery groups were 51% vs 74% vs 39%., Conclusions: For PBD in pancreatic cancer, FCSEMS yield a better outcome compared with plastic stents. Although early surgery without PBD remains the treatment of choice, FCSEMS should be preferred over plastic stents whenever PBD is indicated., Trial Registration Number: Dutch Trial Registry (NTR3142)., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.)

Background: Pancreatic cancer involving the coeliac axis is considered unresectable by most guidelines, with a median survival of 6-11 months. A subgroup of these patients can undergo distal pancreatectomy with coeliac axis resection, but consensus on the value of this procedure is lacking. The evidence for this procedure, including the impact of preoperative hepatic artery embolization and (neo)adjuvant therapy, was evaluated., Methods: A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines until 27 May 2015. The primary endpoint was overall survival; secondary endpoints included morbidity and radical resection rates., Results: A total of 19 retrospective studies, involving 240 patients, were included. The methodological quality of the studies ranged from poor to moderate. A radical resection was reported in 74·5 per cent (152 of 204), major morbidity in 27 per cent (26 of 96), ischaemic morbidity in 9·0 per cent (21 of 223) and 90-day mortality in 3·5 per cent (4 of 113). Overall, 35·5 per cent of patients (55 of 155) underwent preoperative hepatic artery embolization without an apparent beneficial impact on ischaemic morbidity. Overall, 15·7 per cent (29 of 185) had neoadjuvant and 51·0 per cent (75 of 147) had adjuvant therapy. There was a difference in survival between patient series where less than half of patients had (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and series where more than half were receiving this treatment: case-weighted median overall survival was 16 (range 9-48) versus 18 (10-26) months respectively (P = 0·002). Overall median survival for the whole study population was 14·4 (range 9-48) months., Conclusion: Distal pancreatectomy with coeliac axis resection seems a valuable option for selected patients with pancreatic cancer involving the coeliac axis with acceptable morbidity and mortality, and a median survival of 18 months when combined with (neo)adjuvant therapy., (© 2016 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Most survival studies comparing non-radical resections to bypass surgery in patients with pancreatic cancer often do not differentiate between an R1 and R2 resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether non-radical R1 and R2 resections have better postoperative outcomes and survival compared to a palliative bypass., Methods: A single center cohort study was performed analyzing mortality, morbidity and 1-year survival after R1 (tumor cells within 1 mm from the circumferential margin), R2 and bypass surgery in patients with pancreatic cancer. For the systematic review, studies were identified comparing R1 or R2 resections with bypass, in patients with pancreatic cancer. Postoperative outcomes were compared including the cohort study., Results: The cohort study (n=405) showed higher morbidity rates after R1 (n=191) and R2 (n=11) resections compared to bypass (52% and 73% vs. 34%, p < 0.01). In-hospital mortality did not differ (overall 1.7%). 1-year survival rates were 71%, 46% and 32% after R1, R2 resection and bypass (p=0.6 between R2 and bypass). The systematic review identified 8 studies, after including the cohort study 1535 patients were analyzed. Increased morbidity after R1-R2 resection (48%) compared to bypass (30-34%) was found. Median survival was 14-18 months after R1 resection vs. 9-13 months after bypass and 8.5-11.5 months after R2 resection vs. 7.5-10.7 months after bypass., Conclusion: An R2 resection should be avoided in patients with pancreatic cancer due to its poor prognosis. Survival benefit after an R1 resection, as compared to bypass surgery, justifies a resection despite the increased morbidity rate., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: According to some studies, the number of lymph nodes with metastases in relation to the total number of removed lymph nodes, the lymph node ratio (LNR), is one of the most powerful predictors of survival after resection in patients with pancreatic cancer. However, contradictory results have been reported, and small sample sizes of the cohorts and different definitions of a microscopic positive resection margin (R1) hamper the interpretation of data., Methods: The predictive value of LNR for 3-year survival was assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model. From 1992 to 2012, all patients with pancreatic and periampullary cancer operated on with pancreatoduodenectomy were selected from a database. Clinicopathological characteristics were analysed. Microscopic positive resection margin was defined as the microscopic presence of tumour cells within 1 mm of the margins. A nomogram was created., Results: Some 760 patients were included. Predictive factors for death in 350 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma included in the nomogram were: R1 resection (hazard ratio (HR) 1·55, 95 per cent c.i. 1·07 to 2·25), poor tumour differentiation (HR 2·78, 1·40 to 5·52), LNR above 0·18 (HR 1·75, 1·13 to 2·70) and no adjuvant therapy (HR 1·54, 1·01 to 2·34). The C statistic was 0·658 (0·632 to 0·698), and calibration was good (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ(2)  = 5·67, P =0·773). LNR and poor tumour differentiation (HR 4·51 and 3·30 respectively) were also predictive in patients with distal common bile duct (CBD) cancer. LNR, R1 resection and jaundice were predictors of death in patients with ampullary cancer (HR 7·82, 2·68 and 1·93 respectively)., Conclusion: LNR is a common predictor of poor survival in pancreatic, distal CBD and ampullary cancer., (© 2014 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Background: Resection is the only life-prolonging option for pancreatic or periampullary cancer. Cell-mediated immunity might reduce progression of metastasis or local recurrence likelihood, but surgery associated morbidity can suppress this immunity. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of complications on cancer specific survival after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic and periampullary cancer., Method: 517 consecutive patients who underwent PD for pancreatic or periampullary adenocarcinoma were analysed., Results: After median follow-up of 24 (14-44) months, 377 (73%) patients had died from progressive disease, 140 (27%) were alive. Median survival for pancreatic adenocarcinoma was 22 (18-25) months following an uncomplicated postoperative course versus 16 (13-19) months for patients with major surgical complications (p = 0.021). Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that microscopically residual disease (R1), complications, and adjuvant therapy were independent factors for recurrence. Within the R1 group, survival for patients with complications was even more limited, 9.7 (8.3-11.0) versus 18.7 (15.0-22.5) for those without (p < 0.001). For patients with R1 resection complications was the only independent predictor for a shorter time interval to death (hazard ratio 1.96; 95% CI 1.16-3.30). Complications did not influence survival of patients with periampullary adenocarcinoma., Conclusion: Complications after resection are independently related to an impaired survival following PD for pancreatic, but not periampullary cancer. The effect is even more dramatic in patients who had an R1 resection. Although the relation is not causal per se, the findings support the hypothesis of a complication-induced, compromised immunity rendering patients more susceptible for recurrent disease., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

This review is to summarize the current knowledge about preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) in patients with biliary obstruction caused by pancreatic cancer. Most patients with pancreatic carcinoma (85%) will present with obstructive jaundice. The presence of toxic substances as bilirubin and bile salts, impaired liver function and altered nutritional status due to obstructive jaundice have been characterized as factors for development of complications after surgery. Whereas PBD was to yield beneficial effects in the experimental setting, conflicting results have been observed in clinical studies. The meta-analysis from relative older studies as well as more importantly a recent clinical trial showed that PBD should not be performed routinely. PBD for patients with a distal biliary obstruction is leading to more serious complications compared with early surgery. Arguments for PBD have shifted from a potential therapeutic benefit towards a logistic problem such as patients suffering from cholangitis and severe jaundice at admission or patients who need extra diagnostic tests, or delay in surgery due to a referral pattern or waiting list for surgery as well as candidates for neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy. If drainage is indicated in these patients it should be performed with a metal stent to reduce complications after the drainage procedure such as stent occlusion and cholangitis. Considering a change towards more neoadjuvant therapy regimes improvement of the quality of the biliary drainage concept is still important.

Objective: To evaluate the reliability of data registration in calculating the hospital standardised mortality ratio (HSMR)., Design: Retrospective, descriptive., Method: Data were collected from a research database on all patients who had undergone a partial pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer in 2009 and 2010 at our hospital. These data were compared with information about these same patients recorded in the Dutch National Medical Registry (LMR), obtained from the medical administration department of our hospital. The differences between these 2 databases were evaluated on the basis of 3 variables: mortality, main diagnosis and secondary diagnoses (differentiated into complications and co-morbidities). Using the Charlson index, the co-morbidity score from both registries was calculated per patient., Results: A total of 118 patients had been registered in the research database. Of these patients, 103 appeared in the LMR data; 15 had not been registered in this database. There were no differences in patient characteristics or mortality (2.5%) between the registries. In the LMR, the main diagnosis of 5 patients had been incorrectly recorded. This database contained information on 136 complications and 51 co-morbidities, of which 35 comorbities had been correctly recorded. The research database contained information on 188 complications and 99 comorbidities on these same patients. In the research database, comorbidity comprised 34% of all secondary diagnoses; in the LMR, 19% (p < 0.001). The median score on the Charlson index was 0 for all patients in the LMR and 3 in the research database (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Comorbidities in patients with pancreatic carcinoma who undergo a resection are being inadequately recorded in the LMR. This results in insufficient correction in the case mix and a low score on the Charlson index, which could result in an incorrect HSMR.

Background: Recent studies have shown that a selective group of patients with primary cystic neoplasms of the pancreas can be managed conservatively by radiological follow-up. The aim of this study was to analyze if such a strategy is efficient and safe., Patients and Methods: A retrospective analyses was performed of patients who underwent resection between January 1992 and January 2006 for primary cystic neoplasms of the pancreas in an era of aggressive management (i.e. all patients underwent resection) in order to analyze if the selective algorithm as proposed by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center is efficient and safe., Results: One hundred patients underwent a resection for pancreatic cysts. Thirty-five percent of the patients with symptomatic cysts had a (pre)malignant lesion compared with 15% of the patients with an incidental cysts. In hospital mortality occurred in 1% of the patients and a postoperative complications in 39%. The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center nomogram was able to correctly identify all patients with a benign incidental cyst., Conclusion: A selective management strategy can be implemented and algorithm proposed by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center nomogram is safe and efficient., (Copyright © 2011 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Comparison of operative morbidity rates after pancreatoduodenectomy between units may be misleading because it does not take into account the physiological variable of the condition of the patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) for pancreatoduodenectomy patients and to look for risk factors associated with morbidity in a high-volume center., Methods: Between January 1993 and April 2006, 652 patients underwent a pancreatoduodenectomy, 502 of them for malignant disease. POSSUM performance was evaluated by assessing the "goodness-of-fit" with the linear analysis method., Results: Overall, 332 of the 652 patients (50.9%) had one or more complication after pancreatoduodenectomy, and 9 patients (1.4%) died. POSSUM had a significant lack of fit using goodness-of-fit analysis. In multivariate analysis, one statistically significant factor associated with morbidity and not incorporated in POSSUM (P < 0.05) was identified: ampulla of Vater adenocarcinoma (OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.07-2.80)., Conclusions: Overall, there is a lack of calibration of POSSUM among patients who undergo pancreatoduodenectomy.

Background: This study examined the clinical outcome of patients with pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC)., Methods: A systematic literature search produced individual data for 311 surgically and 73 non-surgically treated patients with pancreatic RCC metastases. A further ten patients underwent resection at the authors' institution., Results: In the resected group, pancreatic metastases were solitary in 65.3 per cent, symptomatic in 57.4 per cent, and were preceded and/or accompanied by extrapancreatic disease in 22.3 per cent. Respective values in the unresected group were 59, 60 and 58 per cent. Disease-free survival rates were 76.0 and 57.0 per cent respectively at 2 and 5 years after resection, and overall survival rates were 80.6 and 72.6 per cent. The only significant risk factor for disease-free survival after pancreatic resection was extrapancreatic disease (P = 0.001), and that for overall survival was symptomatic RCC metastasis (P = 0.031). Two- and 5-year overall survival rates were 41 and 14 per cent respectively in unresected patients., Conclusion: The actuarial 5-year overall survival rate following pancreatic surgery for RCC metastases was 72.6 per cent, as determined by pooled analysis from published series. Extrapancreatic disease was an independent risk factor for recurrence, but had no significant impact on overall survival., ((c) 2009 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.)

Background: Nomograms are statistical tools providing the overall probability of a specific outcome; they have shown better individual discrimination than the tumour node metastasis staging system in several cancers. The pancreatic nomogram, originally developed in the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) in the USA, combines clinicopathological and operative data to predict disease-specific survival at 1, 2 and 3 years from initial resection., Methods: An external patient cohort from a retrospective pancreatic adenocarcinoma database at the Academic Medical Centre in Amsterdam was used to test the validity of the pancreatic adenocarcinoma nomogram. The cohort included 263 consecutive patients who had surgery between January 1985 and December 2004., Results: Data for all the necessary variables were available for 256 patients (97.3 per cent). At the last follow-up, 35 patients were alive, with a median follow-up of 27 (range 3-114) months. The 1-, 2- and 3-year disease-specific survival rates were 60.8, 30.4 and 16.0 per cent respectively. The nomogram concordance index was 0.61. The calibration analysis of the model showed that the predicted survival did not significantly deviate from the actual survival., Conclusion: The MSKCC pancreatic cancer nomogram provided an accurate survival prediction. It may aid in counselling patients and in stratification of patients for clinical trials., ((c) 2009 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Rationale: Preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) has been introduced to improve outcome after surgery in patients suffering from obstructive jaundice due to a potentially resectable proximal or distal bile duct/pancreatic head lesion. In experimental models, PBD is almost exclusively associated with beneficial results: improved liver function and nutritional status; reduction of systemic endotoxemia; cytokine release; and, as a result, an improved immune response. Mortality was significantly reduced in these animal models. Human studies show conflicting results., Findings: For distal obstruction, currently the "best-evidence" available clearly shows that routine PBD does not yield the appreciated improvement in postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing resection. Moreover, PBD harbors its own complications. However, most of the available data are outdated or suffer from methodological deficits., Conclusion: The highest level of evidence for PBD to be performed in proximal obstruction, as well as over the preferred mode, is lacking but, nevertheless, assimilated in the treatment algorithm for many centers. Logistics and waiting lists, although sometimes inevitable, could be factors that might influence the decision to opt for PBD, as well as an extended diagnostic workup with laparoscopy (on indication) or scheduled preoperative chemotherapy.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer and to analyze whether POSSUM can predict the long-term outcome in these patients. Such a scoring system could be useful to aid in the decision between surgical and endoscopic palliation., Methods: Between January 1993 and December 2004, 241 patients were found to have unresectable pancreatic cancer during exploratory laparotomy and underwent a double bypass procedure consisting of a gastrojejunostomy and a hepaticojejunostomy., Results: Overall, 64 of 240 patients (27%) had one or more complications after bypass surgery and 4 patients (2%) died. POSSUM predicted morbidity in 114 patients (47%). The observed:predicted (O:P) ratio for morbidity was 0.56 and the model had a significant lack of fit (p < 0.001) using a goodness-of-fit analysis. The overall median survival was 7 months. The POSSUM scoring system was, however, an independent predictor of survival in multivariate analysis., Conclusions: Overall, POSSUM overpredicted morbidity but was an independent predictor of survival., (Copyright (c) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) of the pancreas are increasingly diagnosed, but the exact surgical management in terms of extent of the resection is not well defined., Materials and Methods: Patients operated on in our hospital between January 1993 and March 2005 formed the study groups., Results: From 659 consecutive resections for pancreatic neoplasms, 12 female patients (1.8%) with a median age of 21 years who underwent resection for (SPN) are compared with the remaining 647 pancreatic resection patients. Jaundice (SPN 0 versus PR 73%, p < 0.001) and weight loss (SPN 0 versus PR 49%, p = 0.001) occurred significantly less often. Neoplasms were distributed equally among the pancreatic head (SPN 5 out of 12 patients versus PR 88%, p < 0.001) and corpus/tail (SPN 6 out of 12 patients versus PR 8%, p < 0.001). The operative time was significantly shorter (SPN 233 min versus PR 280 min, p = 0.012), and there were significantly fewer complications (SPN 1 of 12 patients versus PR 48%, p = 0.007). The mortality was not different (SPN 0 versus PR 1.6%, p = 1.000), and the hospital stay was significantly shorter (SPN 9 days versus PR 15 days, p = 0.012). The median size of the neoplasms was significantly larger (SPN 6.9 cm versus PR 2.5 cm). The median number of lymph nodes harvested was significantly fewer (SPN 1 versus PR 6, p = 0.001), and lymph node metastases occurred significantly less often (SPN 0 versus PR 64%, p < 0.001). The 5-year survival of SPN patients was 100% and is significantly better compared with survival of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (12%, p < 0.001) and ampulla of Vater adenocarcinoma (22%, p = 0.005)., Conclusions: Patients with solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas present differently and the course of the disease is more benign. These patients can be adequately managed by pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy or spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with excellent early and long-term results.

Background: Because mortality and morbidity of pancreatic surgery have decreased to acceptable levels, the complex question arises whether pancreatic resection should be performed in patients with preoperatively doubtful resectable pancreatic cancer., Methods: Perioperative parameters and outcome of 80 patients who underwent a microscopically incomplete (R1) resection were compared with those of 90 patients who underwent a bypass for locally advanced disease for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. All patients initially underwent exploratory laparotomy with the intention to perform a resection. Quality of life was assessed by analyzing readmissions and their indications., Results: Groups were similar with respect to age, presenting symptoms, and preoperative health status. Tumors were significantly larger in the bypass group (3.5 cm vs 2.9 cm, P < .01). Hospital mortality was comparable: zero after R1 resection and 2% after bypass. Of all severe complications, only intra-abdominal hemorrhage occurred significantly more frequently after resection (10% vs 2%; P = .03). Hospital stay after resection was significantly longer than after bypass (16 vs 10 days; P < .01). Survival was significantly longer after R1 resection (15.8 vs 9.5 months, P < .01). Sixty-one percent of patients were readmitted for a total of 215 admissions, equally distributed between groups. After R1 resection, 0.58% of the total survival time after initial discharge was spent in the hospital, after bypass, 0.69%, which was not significantly different., Conclusions: R1 pancreatic resection and bypass for locally advanced disease can be performed with comparable low mortality and morbidity rates. Readmission rates are also comparable between groups and time spent in the hospital after initial discharge is low. Because resection offers adequate palliation in pancreatic cancer, a more aggressive surgical approach in patients who are found to have a doubtfully resectable tumor could be advocated, even if only an R1 resection can be achieved.

Survival data of patients with pancreatic carcinoma are often overestimated because of incomplete follow-up. Therefore, the aim of this study was to approach complete follow-up and to analyse survival and prognostic factors of patients who underwent surgical treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Between 1992 and 2002, 343 patients underwent surgical treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. One hundred and sixty patients underwent a resection with a curative intention and 183 patients underwent bypass surgery for palliation. Follow-up was complete for 93% of patients. Median survival after resection and bypass was 17.0 and 7.5 months, and 5-year survival was 8% and 0, respectively. In multivariate analysis, tumour-positive lymph nodes, non-radical surgery, poor tumour differentiation, and tumour size were independent prognostic factors for survival after resection. For patients treated with bypass surgery, metastatic disease and tumour size independently predicted survival. In conclusion, actual survival of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma is disappointing compared with the actuarial survival rates reported in the literature. The independent prognostic factors for survival of patients who underwent surgical treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma are tumour-related.

Objective: To provide an embryological explanation for the presence of ovarian stroma in cystadenomas of the liver and pancreas., Design: Investigation of patients and embryos., Method: From 1997 to 2001 in the Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, nine women were treated for a cystadenoma with ovarian stroma, six of which were situated in the liver and three in the tail of pancreas. In one patient with a cystadenoma in the liver, malignant changes had taken place. In embryos at 5-8 weeks development, the regional differences in the morphology of the epithelium of the peritoneal cavity and the position of the gonads in relation to the embryonic liver, pancreas and spleen were examined., Results: In the foetal period before the gonads begin to descend, they are situated directly dorsal to the liver, tail of pancreas and spleen, but are separated from these by the peritoneal cavity. The cells that cover the urogenital folds distinguish themselves from those elsewhere in the peritoneal cavity as they are bulging in shape as opposed to flattened. This activated morphology suggests that on physical contact with a neighbouring organ the cells covering the gonads may become detached and lodge in that organ., Conclusion: It is likely that cystadenomas of the liver and pancreas have their origin in the cells that cover the embryonic gonads. The anomalous morphology of these covering cells in fact suggests that they are relatively easily mobilized. They are probably comparable with inoculation metastasis in the coelomic cavity. Taking the chance of malignant transformation of a cystadenoma into account, the treatment of choice is radical resection of the abnormality.

Aim: Survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary tumours is limited. Over the last decade peri-operative management has improved and morbidity and mortality decreased. The aim of the study was to analyse recent survival data after pancreaticoduodenectomy and to determine factors that influence survival., Methods: From October 1992 to September 1998, 204 patients with a ductal adenocarcinoma in the pancreatic head (108), distal bile duct (32), and ampulla (64) who underwent standard pancreaticoduodenectomy, were analysed with regard to histology and tumour status. Survival was calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. Risk factors were identified in a univariate and multivariate analysis., Results: Median survival after resection for carcinoma of the pancreatic head, distal bile duct, and ampulla were 16, 25 and 24 months, respectively (P=0.008). In the univariate analysis vein resection, blood transfusion of more than four packed red cells, the presence of tumour positive resection margins, lymph-node metastases and poor tumour differentiation significantly decreased survival. In the multivariate analysis positive resection margins, lymph-node metastases, and poor tumour differentiation independently influenced survival., Conclusions: Resection margins, lymph-node status and tumour differentiation are independent prognostic factors. Survival after standard pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary tumours has not improved., (Copyright 2001 Harcourt Publishers Limited.)

Background: Resection of the portal/superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) during pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is disputed. Although morbidity and mortality are acceptable, survival is limited after PV/SMV resection. In this study, we evaluate the effect of PV/SMV resection., Methods: Between 1992 and 1998, there were 215 consecutive patients who underwent PD for malignant disease. Thirty-four patients underwent a PV/SMV resection. Resection was only performed when minimal venous ingrowth was found perioperatively. Surgical techniques, perioperative parameters, and survival were analyzed., Results: The percentage of PV/SMV resections was 16%. Extensive (segment) resections were performed in 6 patients. The median blood loss was 1.8 L and resection margins were microscopically tumor free in 41% of the patients. The median hospital stay was 15 days, and mortality was 0%. Median survival after PV/SMV resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma was 14 months., Conclusions: Limited PV/SMV resection for perioperatively encountered minimal venous ingrowth during PD can be performed safely without increased morbidity and mortality but also results in a high frequency of tumor-positive resection margins.

Discrimination between chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma can be complicated, particularly in brush cytology specimens. Previous studies have shown that the oxygen insensitivity of the histochemical reaction to detect glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity based on neotetrazolium reduction can be used for discriminating malignant cells from nonmalignant cells. In the present study, we investigated the value of the assay for differential diagnosis between the two pancreatic diseases. Oxygen insensitivity in ductal epithelial cells in normal human pancreas, chronic pancreatitis, and pancreatic carcinoma was determined by quantitative image analysis in sections of biopsies and in brush cytology preparations. In sections, the reaction in the absence of oxygen was a proper reflection of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity, whereas in the presence of oxygen only malignant cells showed a significant reaction. Of 39 brush cytology specimens, diagnosis of all 11 cases of pancreatitis and 28 cases of cancer with the oxygen insensitivity test were in agreement with independent measures of chronic pancreatitis and cancer. The oxygen insensitivity test is a simple and valuable tool in addition to conventional pathology for differential diagnosis between pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer, both in biopsies and in brush cytology specimens.

Controversy exists about the indication for a palliative pancreatoduodenectomy. A palliative resection for patients with a pancreatic carcinoma can be performed safely nowadays with low mortality and acceptable morbidity in centers with experience. The early results in terms of mortality and morbidity are not different from resections with curative intent or even after bypass surgery. The procedure seems effective for controlling symptoms of the disease, and the quality of life after a palliative resection is acceptable and not worse than after bypass surgery. It is, however, still doubtful whether the incidence of symptom recurrence, such as jaundice, obstruction, and pain, is lower after resection than after bypass surgery. The longer survival after palliative resection could also be due to patient selection and postoperative treatment. There are no randomized trials to prove the superiority of palliative resection over bypass surgery. The safety of pancreatic resection for cancer has already changed the policy in centers with experience, and surgeons are more willing to perform a resection because the results are better or at least the same as after bypass surgery. There are, however, no results to confirm that a palliative resection should be performed routinely or to justify resection as a debulking procedure.

Objective: To assess the efficacy of monoclonal antibody (MoAb) B72.3 for in vivo-immunoscintigraphy of pancreatic carcinoma in nude mice., Design: Experimental controlled animal study., Setting: University hospital, The Netherlands., Subjects: 11 nude mice with subcutaneously xenografted human pancreatic carcinoma., Interventions: Specific MoAb B72.3 and non-specific MoAb MOPC21 were iodinated with 131I and injected intraperitoneally in nude mice. Scintigrams were taken on days 1-10 and tumour:non-tumour ratios of the regions of interest (tumour, thorax, abdomen, background) were calculated. The mice were then killed for in vitro tissue counts., Main Outcome Measures: Tumour:non-tumour ratios in vivo and in vitro., Results: Results of immunoscintigraphy on days 1, 2, and 6 were compared. In the B72.3-group all ratios were only moderately raised, the tumour:background ratio being the highest (2.35 (SD 0.67)) on day 6. There were no obvious differences between the ratios of the B72.3-group and the MOPC21-group. The results of tissue counts done at the end of the study, showed that tumour:non-tumour ratios were twice as high in the B72.3-group, suggesting some specificity of this MoAb., Conclusion: The results of our study suggest that MoAb B72.3 is not powerful enough for in vivo detection of pancreatic cancer as assessed in this xenograft model in nude mice.

Most patients with bilio-pancreatic malignancy are no candidate for curative resection and will need palliative treatment. Palliation in these patients is focussed on relief symptoms such as obstructive jaundice, duodenal obstruction and pain. It has been suggested that non surgical treatment (stenting) is the optimal palliation for patients with short survival and surgical bypass for those surviving more than 6 months. Unfortunately valid criteria for estimating survival are not available except for metastases. A prognostic score chart to predict survival probabilities for 3,6 and 9 months after diagnosis has been developed. The use of this prognostic score chart may help clinicians to select optimal palliative treatment for individual patients. Surgical biliary drainage can be performed by a simple cholecystoenterostomy; a choledochoduodenostomy or a choledocho/hepaticojejunostomy with Roux-Y jejunal limb reconstruction. The present data available in the literature do not give sufficient guidance to make a well deliberated selection between the different types of bypass surgery but choledochojejunostomy is generally preferred. Gastroentero-stomy is performed routinely during the biliary bypass procedure in our institution because gastric outlet obstruction has been described between 9-21% of the patients who underwent only a surgical biliary bypass but there is still controversy. Recently it was also suggested that there is an indication to perform palliative resections. No results are available to justify resections as a debulking procedure.

Biliopancreatic tumors that are potentially amenable to local resection include proximal bile duct tumors (Klatskin tumors), mid-choledochal duct tumors and tumors arising from the papilla of Vater. This paper reviews our experience in the AMC, with local resection of these conditions. From 1983-1997, 112 patients underwent surgical resection of a carcinoma of the hepatic duct confluence (Klatskin tumor). Local resection was undertaken in 80 patients (52 patients with type I and II tumors, and 28 patients with type III tumors) whereas in 32 patients with type III tumors, hilar resection was performed with liver resection. Negative surgical margins were achieved in 10 patients after local resection of type I and II tumors (19.2%), in 1 patient after local resection of a type III tumor (3.6%), and in 5 patients after hilar resection and liver resection (15.6%). Middle-third carcinomas of the extra-hepatic biliary tract are less common than proximal or distal bile duct tumors. From 1993-1998, 12 patients underwent resection of a mid-choledochal duct carcinoma. In 8 patients, local resection was performed and in 4 patients, subtotal pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) because of the close relationship of the tumor and the pancreas. Four patients had negative surgical margins, 2 after local resection (25%) and 2 after PPPD (50%). Although accepted for villous adenomas located in the ampulla, local resection for ampullary carcinoma is controversial. Nine patients underwent local resection of a presumed adenoma that proved to be an ampullary carcinoma. In 4 patients with T1 tumors, resection of the carcinoma was locally complete (44%). Additional PPPD was performed in 6 patients, including the 4 patients with complete local resections, showing no residual tumor at the previous site of excision, but, lymphnode metastases in two resection specimens (both of patients with presumed T1 tumors). Hence, local resection of a T1 ampullary carcinoma might result in tumor free margins, but does not deal with (usually retropancreatic) lymphnode metastases. In conclusion, local resection is applicable to Klatskin type I and II tumors. Local resection may be considered in the proximally located, mid-choledochal duct carcinomas but, when located closer to the pancreas, PPPD is the preferred treatment. For ampullary adenomas, local resection is feasible unless frozen section examination raises suspicion on a malignancy. Local resection of even limited ampullary carcinomas is not advisable because of lymphatic dissemination of the tumor and consequently, inadequate clearance.

During the past decade the mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy decreased to 0-4% in centers with experience. The morbidity however remains high although a decrease has also been demonstrated. Leakage of the pancreatic anastomosis is the most severe complication associated with a high mortality reported between 8-40%. Resection of the pancreatic remnant is the most radical treatment but unfortunately associated with insulin dependent diabetes. Subtotal resection of the pancreas tail seems an alternative. The incidence of postoperative bleeding is decreasing in particular bleeding from ulcers. Bleeding from a pseudoaneurysm (2%) is leading to a high mortality up to 50% and early aggressive intervention is mandatory. Delayed gastric emptying is reported between 20-30%, the pathophysiology is still unknown but postoperative intra-abdominal complications proved to be a risk factor. It is now evident that mortality is strongly related with hospital experience and regionalization reduced overall mortality. These findings are arguments to favour centralization of surgery for biliopancreatic cancer.

Unlabelled: The differentiation of focal, chronic pancreatitis (CP) and pancreatic cancer (PAC) poses a diagnostic dilemma. Both conditions may present with the same symptoms and signs. The complexity of differential diagnosis is enhanced because PAC is frequently associated with secondary inflammatory changes and CP may develop into PAC. The aim of this study was tot analyze two sets of patients (group A and B) who were misdiagnosed to have either CP or PAC. The clinical and radiographical features of these patients were reviewed. Group A consisted of 22 patients (median age 54.5 years) who were referred with PAC after a previous diagnosis of PC. Eleven patients had a history of CP of > 12 mths (mean 40.2 mths) whereas in 11 patients, PAC became apparent within 12 mths (mean 4.9 mths) after the diagnosis of CP was made. The etiology of CP was alcohol abuse in 9 patients, pancreas divisum in 3 patients and was undefined in the remaining 10 patients. Imaging studies showed features of CP (parenchymal calcifications, irregularities and stenoses of the pancreatic duct wall). Pseudocysts were present in 13 patients. A mass lesion was detected in 13 patients. At the time of diagnosis, 20 patients had unresectable tumors and 2 patients underwent a Whipple resection which proved non-radical. Group B consisted of 14 patients (median age 53 years) who underwent a Whipple resection for a presumed PAC that on histopathology of the lesion proved to be CP. These patients accounted for 6% of all 220 patients who had undergone resection for PAC in the same period. Reassessment of clinical presentation and all imaging studies confirmed a high index of suspicion on PAC in these patients., Conclusion: In patients known with CP, misdiagnosis of PAC is a potential pitfall leading to delay of treatment. For any lesion suspicious of PAC an aggressive surgical approach is justified lest a potentially curable lesion is missed. As a consequence, there is at least a 5% chance of resecting a lesion based on CP, mimicking PAC.

Background: Recent reports suggest a better postoperative weight gain after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) compared with standard pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Factors that could also influence postoperative weight gain, such as tumour-positive resection margins and tumour recurrence, have not been taken into account in these studies. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate weight gain in the first 15 months after PD or PPPD and to investigate the influence of other tumour-related factors., Methods: From 1991 to 1995, 140 patients underwent subtotal pancreatoduodenectomy; 125 patients underwent resection for malignant disease of the pancreatic head region (56 had PD and 69 PPPD). Patients' weights were evaluated in the pre-illness phase, before operation and during four postoperative phases (at 3, 7, 11 and 15 months). Weight was calculated as a percentage of the pre-illness weight. Patients were subdivided according to tumour status: PD with positive and PD with negative tumour status; PPPD with positive and PPPD with negative tumour status. Tumour-positive status was defined as either microscopically tumour-positive resection margins or radiologically or cytologically proven tumour recurrence within 2 years of surgery., Results: Five patients died during the hospital stay (PD, four; PPPD, one) (overall mortality rate 4 per cent). There was no difference in overall weight gain between patients having PD and PPPD. There was, however, a difference in patients with positive and negative tumour status for PD (P = 0.0003) and PPPD (P< 0.0001)., Conclusion: There is only a minimal difference in postoperative weight gain between patients having PD and PPPD. Differences in postoperative weight gain are related more to positive resection margins and tumour recurrence than to the type of resection.

Background: The differentiation between cancer and benign disease in the pancreatic head is difficult. The aim of this study was to examine common features in a group of patients that had undergone pancreatoduodenectomy for a benign, inflammatory lesion misdiagnosed as pancreatic head cancer., Methods: Among 220 pancreatoduodenectomies performed on the suspiscion of pancreatic head cancer, an inflammatory lesion in the pancreas or distal common bile duct was diagnosed in 14 patients (6%). Of these patients, all preoperative clinical information and radiologic images (ultrasound, endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreaticography [ERCP]) were critically reassessed. For each examination, the suspicion of cancer was scored on a 0/+/++ scale., Results: Clinical presentation (pain, weight loss, jaundice) raised a suspicion of cancer in 12 patients. On ultrasound, a tumor (mean size: 2.8 cm) was found in the pancreatic head in 13 patients; 12 of 14 ultrasound examinations raised a suspicion of cancer. ERCP showed a distal common bile duct stenosis (length: 1 to 4 cm), stenosis of the pancreatic duct (length: 1 to 5 cm), or a "double duct" stenosis, suspicious for cancer in 13 evaluable patients. The overall index of suspicion was + in seven patients and ++ in seven patients, confirming the initial interpretation of preoperative data., Conclusion: When undertaking pancreatoduodenectomy for a suspicious lesion in the pancreatic head, it is necessary to expect at least a 5% chance of resecting a benign, inflammatory lesion masquerading as cancer.

Background: Recent reports of decreased morbidity and mortality following palliative surgery for patients with irresectable pancreatic head carcinoma prompted a review of the results in 126 patients (median age 64 (range 39-90) years) who had undergone palliative biliary and gastric bypass surgery., Methods: The indication for surgical palliation was the finding of an irresectable tumour at laparotomy (n = 44), failure of endoscopic treatment (n = 43), clinical symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction (n = 28) and miscellaneous (n = 11). Biliary and gastric bypass was performed in 118 patients, biliary bypass alone in six and gastrojejunostomy alone in two. The indication for gastrojejunostomy was symptoms in 28 patients (23 per cent) and prophylaxis in 92 patients (77 per cent)., Results: Postoperative local complications occurred in 17 per cent of patients, general complications in 10 per cent and delayed gastric emptying in 14 per cent of patients. The 30-day mortality rate was 1 per cent and overall hospital mortality rate 2 per cent. Median hospital stay was 17 (range 5-80) days. Median overall postoperative survival was 190 (range 14-830) days. Late obstructive gastrointestinal symptoms occurred in 14 patients (11 per cent) after a median of 141 (range 21-356) days., Conclusion: Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy combined with gastrojejunostomy offers effective palliation for irresectable pancreatic head cancer and can be performed with low mortality and acceptable morbidity rates.

Objective: To analyse hospital mortality, complications and survival of patients after subtotal pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1983-1996., Design: Partly retrospective (1983-August 1987), partly prospective (September 1987-1996)., Method: Patient characteristics, indication for surgery, postoperative complications, mortality and survival of patients who underwent subtotal pancreaticoduodenectomy were recorded in a computer database. Patients were subdivided into three groups (1983-September 1992; October 1992-1994; 1995-September 1996) to analyse the influence of change in surgical technique and the increase of experience., Results: From 1983-to September 1996, 312 consecutive patients underwent a subtotal pancreaticoduodenectomy. Hospital mortality decreased from 4.9% to 1.4% in the last period (1995-1996). The complication rate decreased from 60% to 41%. The hospital stay decreased from median 24 days to 16 days. The actualized 5-year survival analysed for patients operated from 1983-to September 1992 was 31%. Patients with ampullary tumours had a 5-year survival of 50%. The 5-year survival of patients with bile duct and pancreatic carcinoma was 24% and 15% respectively., Conclusions: Subtotal pancreaticoduodenectomy can be performed safely with a low mortality (< 2%) in specialised centres. The morbidity is still substantial (40%). The survival is mainly dependent on type of tumour and patient selection and is approximately 50% for patients with ampullary tumours. The pylorus preserving procedure has become the standard operation.

Objective: To analyse the outcome of preoperative biliary drainage in patients being operated on for a tumour in the pancreatic head., Design: Retrospective study., Setting: University hospital, The Netherlands., Subjects: Consecutive series of 241 patients., Main Outcome Measures: Decline in bilirubin concentrations and bacterial contamination of bile as a result of preoperative drainage. Incidence of postoperative complications in patients who underwent preoperative drainage and those who did not., Results: 184/241 patients underwent preoperative biliary drainage. Endoscopic drainage was the most effective, shown by a median reduction in bilirubin concentrations of 82%, 74%, and 50% after endoscopic drainage (n = 149), papillotomy (n = 25) and external drainage (n = 10), respectively. Bacterial contamination of bile was significantly more common when an endoprosthesis was used, but did not result in a higher rate of infective complications. 163 Whipple's resections, 33 total pancreatectomies, and 45 biliary-enteric bypasses were performed. 137/241 (57%) patients had postoperative complications. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between patients who had preoperative biliary drainage and those who did not (p = 0.4).

From 1983 to 1992 a total of 240 patients with a pancreatic head tumor underwent laparotomy to assess the resectability of the tumor. In 44 patients the tumor was not resected because of distant metastases (n = 20) or major vascular involvement or local tumor infiltration (n = 24) not detected during the preoperative workup. A palliative biliary and gastric bypass was performed in these patients. All other patients underwent a subtotal (Whipple's resection, n = 164) or total (n = 32) pancreaticoduo-denectomy. However, in 56 cases after Whipple's resection, microscopic examination of the specimen showed tumor invasion in the dissection margins. For this reason, these resections were considered palliative. We compared hospital mortality, morbidity, and long-term survival of patients who had undergone a biliary and gastric bypass for a locally advanced tumor (group A, n = 24) with a matched group of patients who had undergone a macroscopically radical Whipple's resection that on microscopic examination proved to be nonradical (group B, n = 36). Both groups were comparable with regard to age (mean 61 years in both groups), duration of symptoms (8 weeks in group A and 10 weeks in group B), and tumor size (mean 4.25 cm in group A and 4.30 cm in group B). Median postoperative hospital stay was 18 days in group A and 25 days in group B. Postoperative complications (intraabdominal abscess, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, anastomotic leakage, delayed gastric emptying) occurred in 33% of patients in group A and in 44% of patients in group B. Hospital mortality was 0% and 3% in group A and group B, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Background: The aim of this study was to determine prognostic factors for survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for carcinoma of the pancreatic head region., Methods: From 1983 to 1992. 176 patients underwent PD for ampullary carcinoma (n = 67), distal bile duct carcinoma (n = 42), or pancreatic carcinoma (n = 67). The first choice for resection was subtotal PD (n = 146), but patients with a tumor-positive pancreatic margin or a brittle pancreatic duct underwent total PD (n = 30)., Results: Hospital mortality was 4.7% after subtotal PD and 20% after total PD. Overall 5-year survival was 31%. Survival after PD for ampullary carcinoma care. (5-year, 50%) was significantly better (P < 0.001) than for distal bile duct carcinoma (24%) and pancreatic carcinoma (14%). Independent negative prognostic factors for survival (multivariate analysis) were involved resection margins (hazard rate ratio [HRR] 4.08), major vascular involvement (HRR 2.20), distal bile duct or pancreatic origin of carcinoma (HRR 1.93), and perioperative blood transfusion of more than 4 U (HRR 1.76). Tumor size (> 2 cm), regional lymph node involvement, and a poor differentiation grade were overall negative factors in univariate analysis but not in the subgroup of ampullary carcinoma., Conclusion: Involvement of resection margins, major vascular ingrowth, site of origin of carcinoma, and perioperative blood transfusion were independent prognostic factors for survival after PD. Overall 5-year survival was 31%, and subtotal PD is advocated for all patients with a macroscopically resectable tumor in the pancreatic head region without major vascular involvement, even for those with larger tumors or local lymph node metastasis. Care should be taken to limit the need for perioperative blood transfusions.

Of 176 patients with carcinoma of the pancreatic head region 156 underwent standard pancreatoduodenectomy (group 2) and 20 with macroscopic suspicion of invasion of the portal vein or superior mesenteric vein (SMV) underwent pancreatoduodenectomy with partial resection of the portal vein or SMV (group 1). In 16 patients in group 1 end-to-end anastomosis was used for reconstruction of the vein. The morbidity rate in groups 1 and 2 was similar (55 versus 63 per cent). The hospital mortality rate was 15 per cent in group 1 and 7 per cent in group 2 (P = 0.22). Histological examination confirmed tumour invasion of the portal vein or SMV in ten patients in group 1. Invasion of the portal vein or SMV was significantly more frequent in patients with pancreatic cancer than in those with distal bile duct or ampullary carcinoma. Of the 20 patients in group 1 only three underwent curative resection with tumour-free margins. The median survival time after resection of the portal vein or SMV was 8 months; the 2-year survival rate was 19 per cent. Comparison of survival in group 1 with survival in subgroups of patients undergoing standard pancreatoduodenectomy, matched for all histological parameters, showed no significant difference. It is concluded that partial resection of the portal vein or SMV in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy who are suspected of having tumour invasion of the portal vein or SMV does not improve either the rate of curative resection or survival.

The morphologic changes of the extrahepatic biliary tract during obstruction and the effects of biliary decompression by means of an endoprosthesis on the bile duct wall were studied by light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Common hepatic duct biopsy specimens and bile cultures were obtained during surgery from 30 patients with a distal common bile duct obstruction caused by a tumor. Thirteen patients had obstructed bile ducts of 3 weeks' duration (group A). Seventeen patients had had jaundice for a period of 4 weeks and had subsequently undergone preoperative endoscopic biliary stenting for a period of 4 weeks (group B). Three autopsy specimens from patients without hepatobiliary disease served as controls. The results showed that the initial dilatation and thickening of the obstructed ducts in group A were associated with a mild inflammation, a moderate degree of fibrosis, and local epithelial disintegration. The presence of an endoprosthesis, however (group B), induced severe inflammatory changes with considerable fibrosis and ulcerative lesions, resulting in markedly thickened ducts with lumina approximating the diameter of the stent. Three of 13 (24%) bile cultures in group A were positive and 14 of 17 (82%) in group B were positive.

From September 1983 to December 1985 40 patients from a total of 55 with periampullary and pancreatic head carcinoma underwent resectional surgery in our department. Following a policy of precise evaluation of each patient's operative findings, six patients underwent a Whipple duodenopancreatectomy, 29 patients underwent regional subtotal pancreatectomy, and five underwent regional total pancreatectomy. Five patients underwent vascular reconstruction of their regional vascular structures after transection of the invaded segments of their vessels and eight had positive lymph nodes. Lymph node involvement was confined to the regional area. Patients with distant lymph node involvement (paraaortic) were not considered eligible to resection. Three patients died and 10 required reoperation. Thirty-one had radical resection, one palliative and eight equivocal resection. From the survived patients (n = 37) 33 are alive and doing well at the time of this report (overall mean survival 18 months). The results of this study demonstrate that a radical approach based on a precise evaluation of operative findings of the individual patient might well offer a higher resectability rate and is probably the only chance for radical resection and for a longer survival in patients with periampullary and pancreatic head carcinoma.