Search

Purpose: This paper outlines the consensus of the Italian Association for Neuroendocrine Tumors(Itanet), the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN), the Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE), and the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) on treating neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs)with radioligand therapy (RLT)., Methods: A list of 10 questions regarding using RLT ingastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) was addressed after a careful review of theavailable literature. compiling information from the MEDLINE database, augmented with expert opinionsand recommendations, aligns with the latest scientific research and the author's extensive knowledge.The recommendations are evaluated using the GRADE system, showcasing the level of evidence andthe strength of the recommendations., Results and Conclusions: Specifically, this paper focuses on thesubcategories of well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) thatexpress somatostatin receptors and are considered suitable for RLT, according to internationalguidelines., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: MA received honoraria as consultants from AAA, Novartis and Recordati outside the submitted work, CMG received honoraria as consultants from Novartis and ITM outside the submitted work, MC received honoraria as consultants from AAA, Novartis, Advanz, Harpoon Therapeutics, Merck, Harbour Biomedical outside the submitted work, AF received honoraria as support for research project and scientific organization from Novartis and Ipsen, NF received honoraria as consultants and speakers from Novartis and ITM outside the submitted work, FS received honoraria as consultants and speakers from AAA, outside the submitted work, MM received honoraria as consultants and speakers from AAA, outside the submitted work. The other authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of this manuscript., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: In Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) with [ 177 Lu]Lu-DOTATATE of gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP NETs) a question remains open about the potential benefits of personalised dosimetry. This observational prospective study examines the association of individualized dosimetry with progression free survival (PFS) in G1-G2 GEP NETs patients following the standard [ 177 Lu]Lu-DOTATATE therapeutic regimen., Methods: The analysis was conducted on 42 patients administered 4 times, and on 165 lesions. Dosimetry was performed after the first and the forth cycle, with two SPECT/CT scans at day 1 and 7 after administration. Global mean Tumour absorbed Dose of each patient (GTD) was calculated after cycle 1 and 4 as the sum of lesion doses weighted by lesion mass, normalized by the global tumour mass. Cumulative GTD&#95;TOT was calculated as the mean between cycle 1 (GTD&#95;1) and 4 (GTD&#95;4) multiplied by 4. Patients were followed-up for median 32.8 (range 18-45.5) months, through blood tests and contrast enhanced CT (ceCT). This study assessed the correlation between global tumour dose (GTD) and PFS longer or shorter than 24 months. After a ROC analysis, we stratified patients according to the best cut-off value for two additional statistical analyses. At last a multivariate analysis was carried out for PFS > / < 24 months., Results: The median follow-up interval was 33 months, ranging from 18 to 45.5 months. The median PFS was 42 months. The progression free survival rate at 20 months was 90.5%. GTD&#95;1 and GTD&#95;TOT were statistically associated with PFS > / < 24 m (p = 0.026 and p = 0.03 respectively). The stratification of patients on GTD&#95;1 lower or higher than the best cut-off value at 10.6 Gy provided significantly different median PFS of 21 months versus non reached, i.e. longer than 45.5 months (p = 0.004), with a hazard ratio of 8.6, (95% C.I.: [2 - 37]). Using GTD&#95;TOT with the best cut-off at 43 Gy, the same PFS values were obtained as after cycle 1 (p = 0.035). At multivariate analysis, a decrease in GTD&#95;1 and, with lower impact, a higher global tumour volume were significantly associated with PFS < 24 months. We calculated the Tumour Control Probability of obtaining PFS > 24 months as a function of GTD&#95;1., Discussion: Several statistical analyses seem to confirm that simple tumour dosimetry with 2 SPECT/CT scans after the first administration allows to predict PFS values after 4 × 7.4 GBq administrations of 177 Lu[Lu]-DOTATATE in G1-G2 GEP NETs. This result qualitatively confirms recent findings by a Belgian and a French study. However, dosimetric thresholds are different. This probably comes from different cohort baseline characteristics, since the median PFS in our study (42 m) was longer than in the other studies (28 m and 31 m)., Conclusion: Tumour dosimetry after the first administration of [ 177 Lu]Lu-DOTATATE offers an important prognostic value in the clinical decision-making process, especially for the future as alternative emitters or administration schedule may become available., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval: The study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the local ethical committee (protocol name & number: LUTADOSE, INT 28/20). Consent to participate: All patients provided written informed consent at the time of PRRT. Competing interests: Matteo Bauckneht reports personal fees from AAA and General Electric Healthcare outside the submitted work. Federica Scalorbi declares personal fees from AAA outside the submitted work. Carlo Chiesa received a fee as speaker at an online meeting by AAA. Marco Maccauro was supported by AAA for congress fee and he received an honorarium as consultant. The other authors do not report any conflict of interest., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

This study aims to assess the predictive capability of cylindrical Tumor Growth Rate (cTGR) in the prediction of early progression of well-differentiated gastro-entero-pancreatic tumours after Radio Ligand Therapy (RLT), compared to the conventional TGR. Fifty-eight patients were included and three CT scans per patient were collected at baseline, during RLT, and follow-up. RLT response, evaluated at follow-up according to RECIST 1.1, was calculated as a percentage variation of lesion diameters over time (continuous values) and as four different RECIST classes. TGR between baseline and interim CT was computed using both conventional (approximating lesion volume to a sphere) and cylindrical (called cTGR, approximating lesion volume to an elliptical cylinder) formulations. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were employed for Progressive Disease class prediction, revealing that cTGR outperformed conventional TGR (area under the ROC equal to 1.00 and 0.92, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed the superiority of cTGR in predicting continuous RLT response, with a higher coefficient for cTGR (1.56) compared to the conventional one (1.45). This study serves as a proof of concept, paving the way for future clinical trials to incorporate cTGR as a valuable tool for assessing RLT response., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Importance: Data about the optimal timing for the initiation of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) for advanced, well-differentiated enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are lacking., Objective: To evaluate the association of upfront PRRT vs upfront chemotherapy or targeted therapy with progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with advanced enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors who experienced disease progression after treatment with somatostatin analogues (SSAs)., Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study analyzed the clinical records from 25 Italian oncology centers for patients aged 18 years or older who had unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic, well-differentiated, grades 1 to 3 enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and received either PRRT or chemotherapy or targeted therapy after experiencing disease progression after treatment with SSAs between January 24, 2000, and July 1, 2020. Propensity score matching was done to minimize the selection bias., Exposures: Upfront PRRT or upfront chemotherapy or targeted therapy., Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the difference in PFS among patients who received upfront PRRT vs among those who received upfront chemotherapy or targeted therapy. A secondary outcome was the difference in overall survival between these groups. Hazard ratios (HRs) were fitted in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model to adjust for relevant factors associated with PFS and were corrected for interaction with these factors., Results: Of 508 evaluated patients (mean ([SD] age, 55.7 [0.5] years; 278 [54.7%] were male), 329 (64.8%) received upfront PRRT and 179 (35.2%) received upfront chemotherapy or targeted therapy. The matched group included 222 patients (124 [55.9%] male; mean [SD] age, 56.1 [0.8] years), with 111 in each treatment group. Median PFS was longer in the PRRT group than in the chemotherapy or targeted therapy group in the unmatched (2.5 years [95% CI, 2.3-3.0 years] vs 0.7 years [95% CI, 0.5-1.0 years]; HR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.28-0.44; P < .001]) and matched (2.2 years [95% CI, 1.8-2.8 years] vs 0.6 years [95% CI, 0.4-1.0 years]; HR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.27-0.51; P < .001]) populations. No significant differences were shown in median overall survival between the PRRT and chemotherapy or targeted therapy groups in the unmatched (12.0 years [95% CI, 10.7-14.1 years] vs 11.6 years [95% CI, 9.1-13.4 years]; HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.62-1.06; P = .11]) and matched (12.2 years [95% CI, 9.1-14.2 years] vs 11.5 years [95% CI, 9.2-17.9 years]; HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.56-1.24; P = .36]) populations. The use of upfront PRRT was independently associated with improved PFS (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.26-0.51; P < .001) in multivariable analysis. After adjustment of values for interaction, upfront PRRT was associated with longer PFS regardless of tumor functional status (functioning: adjusted HR [aHR], 0.39 [95% CI, 0.27-0.57]; nonfunctioning: aHR, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.16-0.56]), grade of 1 to 2 (grade 1: aHR, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.12-0.34]; grade 2: aHR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.29-0.73]), and site of tumor origin (pancreatic: aHR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.24-0.61]; intestinal: aHR, 0.19 [95% CI, 0.11-0.43]) (P < .001 for all). Conversely, the advantage was not retained in grade 3 tumors (aHR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12-1.37; P = .13) or in tumors with a Ki-67 proliferation index greater than 10% (aHR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.29-1.43; P = .31)., Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, treatment with upfront PRRT in patients with enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors who had experienced disease progression with SSA treatment was associated with significantly improved survival outcomes compared with upfront chemotherapy or targeted therapy. Further research is needed to investigate the correct strategy, timing, and optimal specific sequence of these therapeutic options.

Aim: Data from 69 well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors treated with peptide receptor radionucleotide therapy + somatostatin analogs (SSAs) after SSA treatment failure were evaluated. Methods: We identified two groups: S1 - patients who kept the same SSA treatment beyond progression; S2 - patients who switched the SSA with another SSA after progression. Results: Median progression-free survival was 53 and 127 months in S1 and S2, respectively (p = 0.001; hazard ratio: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.15-0.63). Median overall survival was 69 versus 150 months in S1 and S2, respectively (p = 0.004; hazard ratio: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.14-0.71). Conclusion: In patients with advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors treated with peptide receptor radionucleotide therapy plus SSA after SSA failure, the 'switch' strategy of SSA after progression improve progression-free survival and overall survival.

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a relatively rare group of heterogeneous neoplasms. The most significant advance in therapy of NETs has been the advent of the somatostatin analog octreotide, which represents a cornerstone in their management and dramatically changed the therapeutic landscape. Octreotide long-acting release (LAR) was developed to overcome some of the limitations of octreotide. Several clinical studies, including PROMID and RADIANT-2, have validated the clinical benefits of octreotide LAR in NETs, with tumor shrinkage in about 10% of patients and tumor stabilization in roughly half of cases. While the use of octreotide LAR is well-consolidated in NETs, some open questions remain. These include the use of high-dose octreotide LAR, as there is evidence that higher dose may provide longer disease control, and nonstandard treatment schedules, with administration every 21 days instead of 28 days, as well as their use in combination with targeted agents or peptide receptor radiotherapy in clinical practice. After 3 decades of clinical experience with octreotide LAR, the drug has a well-established safety profile. It is well-tolerated and treatment discontinuations due to adverse events are uncommon. One exception is cholelithiasis, which may increase with longer duration of treatment. According to the literature data, octreotide LAR is currently recommended in both functioning and nonfunctioning advanced NETs. This review summarizes the available clinical data with octreotide LAR and also provides future perspectives on its possible uses in patients with NETs.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is an effective, well-tolerated, treatment for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, resulting in a significant survival benefit and improvement of quality of life. Very few data are available on peptide receptor radionuclide therapy effectiveness in grade 3 neuroendocrine carcinomas with high somatostatin receptor expression. We report the case of a 70-year-old woman with metastatic pancreatic grade 3 neuroendocrine carcinoma who underwent 6 cycles of tandem treatment with investigational radiopharmaceuticals Y-DOTATOC and Lu-DOTATOC achieving an impressive response.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a group of heterogeneous tumors. The present review discusses current therapeutic strategies for the treatment of gastro-entero-pancreatic NEN. Several systemic options are currently available, including medical systemic chemotherapy, biological drugs, somatostatin analogs and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. The carcinoid syndrome can be adequately controlled with somatostatin analogs; chemotherapy has shown positive outcomes in poor prognosis patients, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is a promising treatment based on the use of radioisotopes for advanced disease expressing somatostatin receptors. Targeted therapies, such as multikinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies are also recommended or under evaluation for the treatment of advanced NENs, but some critical issues in clinical practice remain unresolved. Depending upon the development of the disease, a multimodal approach is recommended. The treatment strategy for metastatic patients should be planned by a multidisciplinary team in order to define the optimal sequence of treatments.