Search

Background: The highly metastatic nature of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and the difficulty to achieve favorable patient outcomes emphasize the need for novel therapeutic solutions. For preclinical evaluations, genetically engineered mouse models are often used to mimic human PDAC but frequently fail to replicate synchronous development and metastatic spread. This study aimed to develop a transplantation model to achieve synchronous and homogenous PDAC growth with controlled metastatic patterns in the liver., Methods: To generate an orthotopic PDAC model, the DT6606 cell line was injected into the pancreas head of C57BL/6 mice, and their survival was monitored over time. To generate a heterotopic transplantation model, growing doses of three PDAC cell lines (DT6606, DT6606lm, and K8484) were injected into the portal vein of mice. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to monitor metastatic progression, and histologic analysis was performed., Results: Orthotopically injected mice succumbed to the tumor within an 11-week period (average survival time, 78.2 ± 4.45 days). Post-mortem examinations failed to identify liver metastasis. In the intraportal model, 2 × 10 5 DT6606 cells resulted in an absence of liver metastases by day 21, whereas 5 × 10 4 DT6606lm cells and 7 × 10 4 K8484 cells resulted in steady metastatic growth. Higher doses caused significant metastatic liver involvement. The use of K8484 cells ensured the growth of tumors closely resembling the histopathologic characteristics of human PDAC., Conclusions: This report details the authors' efforts to establish an "optimal" murine model for inducing metastatic PDAC, which is critical for advancing our understanding of the disease and developing more effective treatments., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aim: More than 40% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients have glucose intolerance or diabetes. The association has led to two hypotheses: PDAC causes diabetes or diabetes shares risk factors for the development of PDAC. In order to elucidate the relationship between diabetes and PDAC, we investigated the glucose metabolism during tumorigenesis in the LSL-Kras G12D/+ ; LSL-Trp53 R172H/+ ; and Pdx-1-Cre (KPC) mouse, a genetically engineered model of PDAC., Methods: Male and female KPCs have been fed with standard diet (SD) or high-fat diet (HFD). The imaging-based 4-class tumor staging was used to follow pancreatic cancer development. Not fasting glycemia, 4-h fasting glycemia, insulin, C-peptide, glucose tolerance after OGTT and abdominal fat volume were measured during tumorigenesis., Results: PDAC development did not lead to an overt diabetic phenotype or to any alterations in glucose tolerance in KPC fed with SD. Consumption of HFD induced higher body weight/abdominal fat volume and worsened glucose homeostasis both in control CRE mice and only in early tumorigenesis stages of the KPC mice, excluding that the cancer development itself acts as a trigger for the onset of dysmetabolic features., Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that carcinogenesis in KPC mice is not associated with paraneoplastic diabetes.

Background: The widely used genetically engineered mouse LSL-KrasG12D/+; LSL-Trp53R172H/+; Pdx-1-Cre, termed KPC, spontaneously develops pancreatic cancer mirroring all phases of the carcinogenesis but in asynchronous manner. Preclinical studies need defined criteria for the enrollment of the KPC sharing the same stage of carcinogenesis., Aim: To define a tumor-staging criteria using magnetic resonance (MR) and ultrasound (US) and then to correlate the imaging stage with overall survival of KPC mice., Methods: Forty KPC (2- to 5-month-old mice) were imaged by axial fat-saturated T2-weighted sequences at MR and by brightness mode US to establish criteria for tumor staging. Immunohistopathology was used to validate imaging. A second cohort of 25 KPC was used to correlate imaging stage with survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis., Results: We defined a four-class tumor staging system ranking from stages 1 to 4. Stage 1 was described as radiologically healthy pancreas; precursor lesions were detectable in histology only. Cystic papillary neoplasms, besides other premalignant alterations, marked stage 2 in the absence of cancer nodules. Stages 3 and 4 identified mice affected by overt pancreatic cancer with size <5 or ≥5 mm, respectively. Regarding the prognosis, this staging system correlated with disease-related mortality whatever may be the KPC age when they staged., Conclusion: This imaging-based four-class tumor staging is an effective and safe method to stage pancreatic cancer development in KPC. As a result, regardless of their age, KPC mice can be synchronized based on prognosis or on a specific phase of tumorigenesis, such as the early but already radiologically detectable one (stage 2).