Search

Simple Summary: Chronic alcoholic pancreatitis displays a cumulative risk of pancreatic cancer estimated at 4% after 15 to 20 years, this risk being higher for hereditary pancreatitis with 19% and 12% in the case of PRSS1 and SPINK1 mutations, respectively, and at an age of 60 years. Oncogene and tumor suppressor gene mutations associated with chronic inflammation are key promoters of this complication, tobacco being an additional co-factor. This event underlines two practical problems from a clinical point of view: diagnosis is difficult due clinical symptoms and radiological features shared by the two diseases; and screening of cancer in chronic pancreatitis patients. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy can be contributive with the help of molecular biology by next generation sequencing, including for KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, and DPC4 mutation assays. A short-term follow-up of patients is necessary in cases with clinical and/or radiological suspicion of cancer. Pancreatic surgery is sometimes necessary if there is any doubt. Chronic pancreatitis is one of the main risk factors for pancreatic cancer, but it is a rare event. Inflammation and oncogenes work hand in hand as key promoters of this disease. Tobacco is another co-factor. During alcoholic chronic pancreatitis, the cumulative risk of cancer is estimated at 4% after 15 to 20 years. This cumulative risk is higher in hereditary pancreatitis: 19 and 12% in the case of PRSS1 and SPINK1 mutations, respectively, at an age of 60 years. The diagnosis is difficult due to: (i) clinical symptoms of cancer shared with those of chronic pancreatitis; (ii) the parenchymal and ductal remodeling of chronic pancreatitis rendering imaging analysis difficult; and (iii) differential diagnoses, such as pseudo-tumorous chronic pancreatitis and paraduodenal pancreatitis. Nevertheless, the occurrence of cancer during chronic pancreatitis must be suspected in the case of back pain, weight loss, unbalanced diabetes, and jaundice, despite alcohol withdrawal. Imaging must be systematically reviewed. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy can contribute by targeting suspicious tissue areas with the help of molecular biology (search for KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, DPC4 mutations). Short-term follow-up of patients is necessary at the clinical and paraclinical levels to try to diagnose cancer at a surgically curable stage. Pancreatic surgery is sometimes necessary if there is any doubt. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Hépato-Gastro & Oncologie Digestive is the property of John Libbey Eurotext Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is divided into two separate entities. In the type 1 AIP, the pancreatic involvement is associated with an elevated level of serum IgG4 (≥ 2ULN) and, in near 50% of cases, extra-pancreatic lesions mainly on biliary tract, salivary glands, retro-peritoneum, kidneys, and lungs. Type 2 AIP is confined to pancreas except an association with chronic inflammatory bowel disease in 20 to 30% of cases. The main clinical signs are jaundice due to a pseudotumoral form within the pancreatic head and/or sclerosing cholangitis, chronic pancreatic pain, recurrent acute pancreatitis. Diagnosis of AIP is setup upon CT and MRI imaging displaying a focal or diffuses hypo-attenuating swelling (often with a peri-pancreatic "halo" of inflammation), a vanishing main pancreatic duct or segmental stenosis without upstream dilatation. EUS detects diffuse or localized inflammatory aspect of the pancreatic parenchyma together with stenosis of main duct associated with a hyper/hypoechoic wall thickening. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy may sometimes contribute for the positive and differential diagnosis especially with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. After a therapeutic test with prednisolone during 12 weeks, it is necessary to obtain a rapid (two weeks) regression of both clinical and radiological signs of AIP. If a complete response is obtained in near 90% of cases, a recurrence occurs in 10 to 30% of cases especially for type 1 AIP with a diffuse pancreatic involvement and/or with extra-pancreatic lesions (≥2 such as cholangitis), with a baseline elevated level of serum IgG4 (>4 ULN). In these cases, a second treatment with corticoids is then proposed together with an immunosuppressive maintenance treatment (azathioprine, rituximab) to avoid a subsequent recurrence. The prognosis of AIP is good despite exocrine and endocrine insufficiencies in near 30% of cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration-biopsy is a safe and effective technique in diagnosing and staging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. However its predictive negative value does not exceed 50% to 60%. Unfortunately, the majority of pancreatic cancer patients have a metastatic and/or a locally advanced disease (i.e., not eligible for curative resection) which explains the limited access to pancreatic tissue specimens. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration-biopsy is the most widely used approach for cytological and histological material sampling in these situations used in up to two thirds of patients with pancreatic cancer. Based on this unique material, we and others developed strategies to improve the differential diagnosis between carcinoma and inflammatory pancreatic lesions by analysis of KRAS oncogene mutation, microRNA expression and methylation, as well as mRNA expression using both qRT-PCR and Low Density Array Taqman analysis. Indeed, differentiating pancreatic cancer from pseudotumoral chronic pancreatitis remains very difficult in current clinical practice, and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration-biopsy analysis proved to be very helpful. In this review, we will compile the clinical and molecular advantages of using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration-biopsy in managing pancreatic cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is typically associated with an extremely poor prognosis; however, small PDAC tumors show good prognosis. High-grade pancreatic intra-epithelial neoplasia (PanIN), which precedes invasive PDAC, is a primary target for improving the prognosis of PDAC. However, detection of high-grade PanIN without invasive carcinoma by existing imaging modalities is difficult because the lesions are only microscopically detectable. Recent studies have reported the characteristics of imaging findings associated with localized high-grade PanIN and the usefulness of serial pancreatic-juice aspiration cytologic examination as a method to confirm the pre-operative histopathology. In this review, we aimed to clarify recent clinical findings regarding detection of localized high-grade PanIN, which may contribute to improvement of the prognosis of patients with PDAC. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) arises from precursor lesions, such as pancreatic intra-epithelial neoplasia (PanIN) and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). The prognosis of high-grade precancerous lesions, including high-grade PanIN and high-grade IPMN, without invasive carcinoma is good, despite the overall poor prognosis of PDAC. High-grade PanIN, as a lesion preceding invasive PDAC, is therefore a primary target for intervention. However, detection of localized high-grade PanIN is difficult when using standard radiological approaches. Therefore, most studies of high-grade PanIN have been conducted using specimens that harbor invasive PDAC. Recently, imaging characteristics of high-grade PanIN have been revealed. Obstruction of the pancreatic duct due to high-grade PanIN may induce a loss of acinar cells replaced by fibrosis and lobular parenchymal atrophy. These changes and additional inflammation around the branch pancreatic ducts (BPDs) result in main pancreatic duct (MPD) stenosis, dilation, retention cysts (BPD dilation), focal pancreatic parenchymal atrophy, and/or hypoechoic changes around the MPD. These indirect imaging findings have become important clues for localized, high-grade PanIN detection. To obtain pre-operative histopathological confirmation of suspected cases, serial pancreatic-juice aspiration cytologic examination is effective. In this review, we outline current knowledge on imaging characteristics of high-grade PanIN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Surgery remains the only curative treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Therefore, a predictive score for resectability on diagnosis is needed. A total of 814 patients were included between 2014 and 2017 from 15 centers included in the BACAP (the national Anatomo-Clinical Database on Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma) prospective cohort. Three groups were defined: resectable (Res), locally advanced (LA), and metastatic (Met). Variables were analyzed and a predictive score was devised. Of the 814 patients included, 703 could be evaluated: 164 Res, 266 LA, and 273 Met. The median ages of the patients were 69, 71, and 69, respectively. The median survival times were 21, 15, and nine months, respectively. Six criteria were significantly associated with a lower probability of resectability in multivariate analysis: venous/arterial thrombosis (p = 0.017), performance status 1 (p = 0.032) or ≥ 2 (p = 0.010), pain (p = 0.003), weight loss ≥ 8% (p = 0.019), topography of the tumor (body/tail) (p = 0.005), and maximal tumor size 20–33 mm (p < 0.013) or >33 mm (p < 0.001). The BACAP score was devised using these criteria with an accuracy of 81.17% and an area under the receive operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78; 0.86). The presence of pejorative criteria or a BACAP score < 50% indicates that further investigations and even neoadjuvant treatment might be warranted. Trial registration: NCT02818829. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pancreatic cancer is a public health problem because of its increasing incidence, the absence of early diagnostic tools, and its aggressiveness. Despite recent progress in chemotherapy, the 5-year survival rate remains below 5%. Liquid biopsies are of particular interest from a clinical point of view because they are non-invasive biomarkers released by primary tumours and metastases, remotely reflecting disease burden. Pilot studies have been conducted in pancreatic cancer patients evaluating the detection of circulating tumour cells, cell-free circulating tumour DNA, exosomes, and tumour-educated platelets. There is heterogeneity between the methods used to isolate circulating tumour elements as well as the targets used for their identification. Performances for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer vary depending of the technique but also the stage of the disease: 30–50% of resectable tumours are positive and 50–100% are positive in locally advanced and/or metastatic cases. A significant prognostic value is demonstrated in 50–70% of clinical studies, irrespective of the type of liquid biopsy. Large prospective studies of homogeneous cohorts of patients are lacking. One way to improve diagnostic and prognostic performances would be to use a combined technological approach for the detection of circulating tumour cells, exosomes, and DNA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mutation of the KRAS oncogene in pancreatic cancer is responsible for permanent activation of the P21 RAS protein and the cascade of signalling pathways. Consequently, multiple cellular processes, such as transformation, proliferation, invasion, and survival are activated. The aim of this review was to present all potential clinical applications of targeting KRAS in terms of diagnosis and management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction technology provides reliable assessment of KRAS mutations, both in tissues and from fine-needle aspiration biopsies. Numerous studies report that the combination of endoscopic ultrasound-guided cytopathology and a KRAS mutation assay can improve the positive and differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, differentiating between benign versus malignant solid pancreatic cancer, and reducing false-negative results compared to cytopathology alone. In addition, the presence of a KRAS mutation is frequently associated with a worse prognosis, both in cases of advanced and resected tumours. However, the KRAS mutation assay is not as efficient at predicting a response to both anti-epidermal growth factor receptor treatments and/or chemotherapy. Targeting of KRAS to treat pancreatic adenocarcinoma has been applied at different stages of RAS molecular intracellular processes: at the transcription level with antisense or interference RNA, at the posttranslational level with inhibitors of farnesyl transferase or anti-RAS vaccination peptides, and to target multiple signalling pathways using inhibitors of mitogen-activated protein kinase, phosphoinositide 3-kinase, AKT, mammalian target of rapamycin, RAF. Despite some encouraging results at pre-clinical and phase I stages, no significant clinical benefits have been observed. Combinatory approaches with standard chemotherapy will be welcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]