Search

Introduction: It is unclear whether kidney/pancreas (KP) transplantation will prevent the progression of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in patients with insulin dependent diabetes (IDDM) and end-stage renal disease. We sought to determine the pre- and posttransplant prevalence of symptomatic PAD and changes in carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) in KP recipients., Methods: In this single center study, outcomes were compared between KP recipients with and without a history of PAD. A subset of recipients underwent pre- and posttransplant IMT measurements., Results: Among the study group (N = 107), 18 (17%) recipients admitted to a pretransplant history of symptomatic PAD, comprised 11 foot infections and 7 amputations (5 minor and 2 major). Baseline characteristics of age, gender, race, years of diabetes, dialysis history, smoking history, years of hypertension, and history of coronary artery disease (CAD) were equivalent between PAD and non-PAD cohorts. At a median follow-up of 60 months (IQR: 28, 110), 16 (15%) KP recipients had suffered a PAD event. In multivariate analysis, a pretransplant history of PAD (hazard ratio [HR] 9.66, p < 0.001) and CAD (HR 3.33, p = 0.04) were independent predictors of posttransplant PAD events. Among a subset of 20 recipients (3 with PAD), mean IMT measurements pretransplant and at a median of 24 (range 18-24) months posttransplant, showed no evidence of disease progression., Conclusion: Based on IMT measurements and clinical results, KP transplantation stabilized PAD in most patients, but did not alter outcomes of symptomatic PAD recipients. A pretransplant history of PAD and CAD was an independent predictor of posttransplant PAD events., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Excessive weight (EW) gain is common after solid organ transplantation, but there is little information concerning obesity after pancreas transplantation. The study goal was to characterize EW gain after kidney-pancreas (KP) transplantation., Methods: This was a retrospective single-center review of 100 KP recipients transplanted between September 2007 and June 2015., Results: The median percent weight gain for all recipients at 1 year posttransplant was 10% (interquartile range, 2.7%-19.3%) of baseline weight. EW gain, defined as greater than or equal to a 19% 1-year increase in weight, included all recipients (n = 26) above the upper limit of interquartile range for weight gain at 1 year. In multivariate analysis, recipient age <40 years, the use of tacrolimus/mammalian target of rapamycin immunosuppression, and an acute rejection event were independent risk factors for EW gain. At a mean follow-up of 43±23 months, there was no difference in patient or graft survival between the EW and non-EW cohorts. Although mean hemoglobin A1c levels between groups were equivalent, the EW versus non-EW cohort displayed a significant increase in mean insulin levels and a trend towards higher C-peptide levels. Criteria for posttransplant metabolic syndrome was met in 34.6% of EW versus 17.6% of non-EW cohorts (P = 0.07)., Conclusions: At intermediate-term follow-up, EW gain after KP transplantation was not associated with an increased risk of death or graft loss, although there was a trend toward a greater risk of posttransplant metabolic syndrome. There may be a metabolic consequence of successful pancreas transplantation that results in EW gain in a proportion of recipients, leading to an increased risk of long-term cardiovascular complications.

Background: Fever occurs frequently early after pancreas transplant, however, the exact cause is often undetermined. Limited data are available on pancreas recipients experiencing unexplained, noninfectious fever. This study aims to characterize unexplained fever (UF) in pancreas recipients and its effect on patient and graft outcomes., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of UF among consecutive pancreas or simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients from 1 January 2011 to 31 August 2015. Classification of UF was based on the absence of positive cultures, radiologic findings, and other diagnostic features of infection or rejection., Results: Twenty-three of 92 (25%) patients experienced UF. The UF episode first occurred at a mean of 31 ± 17 days post-transplant and accounted for 34 admissions with an average length of stay of 5.1 ± 3.4 days. Intravenous corticosteroid was administered following confirmation of negative diagnostic tests in 77% of patients, with fever resolution occurring in all. No differences were seen in rates of biopsy-proven rejection, graft loss, death, or documented infections compared to UF-free patients during the first-year post-transplant., Conclusion: UF is a common cause for readmission following pancreas transplantation. While the etiology of UF remains difficult to identify, UF occurrence was not associated with adverse outcomes during the first-year post-transplant., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: We sought to determine whether conversion from tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (TAC-MMF) into tacrolimus/mTOR inhibitor (TAC-mTOR) immunosuppression would reduce the incidences of BK and CMV viremia after kidney/pancreas (KP) transplantation., Methods: In this single-center review, the TAC-mTOR cohort (n = 39) was converted at 1 month post-transplant to an mTOR inhibitor and reduced-dose tacrolimus. Outcomes were compared to a cohort of KP recipients (n = 40) maintained on TAC-MMF., Results: At 3 years post-transplant, KP survivals and incidences of kidney/pancreas rejection were equivalent between mTOR and MMF-treated cohorts. (P = ns). BK viremia-free survival was better for the mTOR vs MMF-treated group (P = .004). In multivariate analysis, MMF vs mTOR immunosuppression was an independent risk factor for BK viremia (hazard ratio 12.27, P = .02). Similarly, mTOR-treated recipients displayed better CMV infection-free survival compared to the MMF-treated cohort (P = .01). MMF vs mTOR immunosuppression (hazard ratio 18.77, P = .001) and older recipient age (hazard ratio 1.13 per year, P = .006) were independent risk factors for CMV viremia. Mean estimated GFR and HgbA1c levels were equivalent between groups at 1, 2, and 3 years post-transplantation., Conclusion: Conversion from TAC/MMF into TAC/mTOR immunosuppression after KP transplantation reduced the incidences of BK and CMV viremia with an equivalent risk of acute rejection and similar renal/pancreas function., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Previously transplanted patients are more likely to be sensitized, leading to prolonged waitlist times and decreased graft survival. This analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing kidney/pancreas transplant database investigates factors at the time of first transplant associated with increased sensitization in patients undergoing second transplantation., Methods: Records of nonsensitized patients (panel reactive antibodies [PRA] <20%) receiving a primary transplant in 1999 or later were analyzed to determine whether immunosuppressive agents at the time of first transplant were associated with a change in PRA from first to second transplant. Variables included gender, race, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch, rabbit antithymocyte globulin (RATG), interleukin-2 receptor antagonists, tacrolimus (FK), cyclosporine A (CSA), and mycophenolate mofetil/sodium (MMF)., Results: For the primary endpoint of increase in PRA greater than or equal to 20%, African Americans (AA) versus non-AA (OR 2.63, P<0.0001) and HLA nonzero mismatch versus zero mismatch (OR 2.90, P<0.0001) were associated with increased sensitization. The effect of immunosuppressive regimen depended on race and HLA status. In non-AAs/HLA mismatch (1-6), interleukin-2 receptor antagonists versus RATG (OR 1.40, P=0.001), CSA versus FK (OR 1.69, P<0.001) and no MMF versus MMF (OR 1.39, P<0.001) were also associated with increased sensitization. In AAs/HLA mismatch (1-6), no induction versus RATG (OR 1.59, P=0.031) and CSA versus FK (OR 1.68, P=0.006) were associated with increased sensitization., Conclusions: These data suggest a reduced risk of sensitization at the time of second transplant when using more potent immunosuppression with RATG, FK, and MMF for nonsensitized primary kidney or kidney/pancreas transplant patients. These effects seem to be related to race and HLA mismatch.

Background: Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation is an important replacement therapy for individuals with diabetes and end-stage renal disease. Kidney-alone (KA) transplantation is associated with a high incidence of post-transplant diabetes., Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. We studied 48-h glucose concentrations in eight subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus after SPK transplantation, six subjects post-KA transplantation, and nine healthy controls using the CGMS (Medtronic Minimed, Northridge, CA) continuous glucose monitoring system., Results: The 48-h mean glucose concentration was 101 +/- 7 mg/dL in the SPK subjects, 105 +/- 12 mg/dL in the KA subjects, and 99 +/- 7 mg/dL in the healthy controls. The glycemic excursions were higher in the KA group compared to the SPK cohort and healthy controls (P < 0.0001). No differences in the incidence of hypoglycemia were detected among the three groups. Significant postprandial hyperglycemia was uncovered in four of the six KA subjects., Conclusions: SPK transplantation is very effective at normalizing glycemic excursions. Unsuspected hyperglycemia was identified in the KA group. The CGMS was a useful ambulatory tool to study glucose profiles in the post-transplant period and may help uncover hyperglycemia undetected by routine laboratory testing.

Aim: A prednisone and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free protocol was compared with a sirolimus, cyclosporine A (CsA), and prednisone-based immunosuppressive regimen for simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK)., Methods: A nonrandomized, single-center, sequential study enrolled low-immune responder SPK transplant recipients. The prednisone/CNI-free (minimization) group of 22 patients received thymoglobulin followed by sirolimus and reduced-dose CsA. Prednisone was withdrawn on day 5, and recipients were converted from CsA to mycophenolic acid at 6 months posttransplantation. The sirolimus/CsA group of 20 consecutive recipients transplanted immediately before this series received thymoglobulin followed by sirolimus, reduced-dose CsA, and prednisone., Results: Donor and recipient demographic variables were equivalent between groups. The 24-month actual patient, kidney, and pancreas survivals for the minimization group were 100%, 100%, and 91% vs. 100%, 95%, and 95% for the sirolimus/CsA group (P=not significant [NS] for patient, kidney, and pancreas survivals). One acute rejection occurred in the minimization group and none in the sirolimus/CsA group. After withdrawal of CsA at 6 months, the minimization group showed an increase in mean estimated glomerular filtration rate, resulting in a significant improvement in renal function compared with the sirolimus/CsA group. At 24 months, the mean glomerular filtration rate of the minimization and sirolimus/CsA groups was 71.6+/-11.2 mL/min/1.73 m and 60.1+/-13.4 mL/min/1.73 m, respectively (P<0.05). Mean fasting blood glucose levels were equivalent between groups at all time points studied., Conclusion: Low-immune responder SPK recipients receiving a prednisone/CNI-free protocol achieved similar 2-year graft survivals and improved renal function compared with those treated with a sirolimus, CsA, and prednisone regimen.

Background: This study aims to determine the impact of thymoglobulin-sirolimus-cyclosporine immunosuppression on the alloimune response of pancreas-kidney transplant recipients., Methods: Thirty-six pancreas transplant recipients received an induction protocol of thymoglobulin, sirolimus, reduced-dose cyclosporine, and corticosteroids. Ten recipients were also enrolled in a study to measure immune responsiveness. Flow PRA determined HLA antibody, donor-specific flow cytometry crossmatching (FCXM), T-cell subset, and suppressor cell assays were performed during the first posttransplant year., Results: One-year patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survivals were 97%, 94%, and 92%, respectively. There was one death and three graft losses. There were no acute rejection episodes. Recipients in the immune-monitoring study (n=10) displayed>80% depression of CD3, CD4, and CD8 (+) cell counts up to 3 months posttransplant. At transplantation 9/10 patients displayed<10% class I and no class II HLA antibody. By 3 months, 7/10 monitored recipients showed a transient elevation in class I HLA antibodies, including 2 patients who expressed>80% Flow PRA. One patient was pretransplant FCXM positive, whereas by 3 months posttransplant 2/10 patients demonstrated a positive FCXM. There were no clinical consequences of the presence of HLA antibody or the positive FCXMs. By 6 months, 7/9 patients demonstrated immunoregulatory suppressor cells., Conclusions: The absence of acute rejection events was likely due to inhibition of donor-specific immunity by the immunosuppressive regimen. Seventy percent of patients demonstrated an early, non-donor-directed HLA antibody response that had no adverse effect on graft function and 78% of the monitored patients displayed immunoregulatory cells probably contributing to the successful outcomes.

Background: A questionnaire study was designed to determine whether the quality of life benefit provided by receiving a kidney-pancreas (KP) transplant increased the incentive to return to work, compared with patients receiving a kidney alone (KA) transplant., Methods: A confidential questionnaire was sent to 58 patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus who had functioning grafts at least 6 months post-transplant. Thirty-eight patients had received a KP transplant and 20 patients, a KA transplant., Results: Eighty-three percent of patients returned the questionnaire (87% of KP and 75% of KA patients [p: non-significant (ns)]. The pre-transplant demographic variables of age, gender, educational status, and need for dialysis, were equivalent between the KP and KA groups, respectively (p: ns). At the time of transplantation 39% of KP patients and 33% of KA patients were employed at least 20 h/wk (p: ns). However, post-transplant significantly more KP patients (73%) were working compared with KA patients (27%, p: 0.04). Additionally, pre-transplant employment was independently associated with post-transplant work status (p: 0.01)., Conclusion: These data suggest that the improvement in quality of life associated with pancreas transplantation provide an added incentive for diabetics with renal insufficiency to seek employment.

Background: We investigated a novel immunosuppressive protocol including thymoglobulin induction in combination with sirolimus and corticosteroids, followed by introduction of markedly reduced exposures to cyclosporine to prevent pancreas-transplant rejection., Methods: A 7-day course of thymoglobulin (1.5 mg/kg per day) was begun on postoperative day (POD) 0, together with 15 mg of sirolimus on POD 1, and followed by 5 mg per day, targeting these doses to achieve a trough of 10 to 20 ng/mL. When the serum creatinine was below 2.5 mg/dL, cyclosporine was introduced at 50 mg twice daily with dose adjustment to maintain a trough concentration of 100 to 125 ng/mL., Results: The 18 patients included 14 simultaneous pancreas-kidney and 4 pancreas-after-kidney transplant recipients. Two patients were African-American, three patients had a pretransplant panel reactive antibody greater than 20%, and the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch was 4.5+/-1 (mean+/-standard deviation). With a mean follow-up of 13.6+/-4.7 months, patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survivals are 100%, 100%, and 94%, respectively. A single pancreas graft was lost to thrombosis. There were no acute rejection episodes and no opportunistic infections. Mean hospital stay was 9+/-3 days. At 3 months posttransplantation, the mean value of serum creatinine was 1.2+/-0.3 mg/dL, fasting glucose was 88+/-15 mg/dL, and sirolimus dose at month 3 was 6.3+/-3 mg per day and at month 12 2.7+/-1 mg per day. The average total daily cyclosporine A dose at month 3 was 208+/-62 mg per day and 133+/-13 mg per day at 1 year., Conclusions: This immunosuppressive regimen provided excellent prophylaxis against acute rejection with no opportunistic infections. We believe that careful monitoring of sirolimus and cyclosporine levels was critical to success of this protocol.