Search

Background: The pandemic Era has forced palliative care professionals to use a dignity-in-care approach in different settings from the classic ones of palliative care: acute and intensive care. We explored the meanings of dignity for patients, their family members, and clinicians who have experienced COVID-19 in the acute and intensive care setting. Methods: A qualitative, prospective study by means of semi-structured interviews with patients hospitalized for COVID-19, family members, and clinicians who care for them. Findings: Between March 2021 and October 2021, we interviewed 16 participants: five physicians, three nurses, and eight patients. None of the patients interviewed consented for family members to participate: they considered it important to protect them from bringing the painful memory back to the period of their hospitalization. Several concepts and themes arose from the interviews: humanity, reciprocity, connectedness, and relationship, as confirmed by the literature. Interestingly, both healthcare professionals and patients expressed the value of informing and being informed about clinical conditions and uncertainties to protect dignity. Conclusions: Dignity should be enhanced by all healthcare professionals, not only those in palliative care or end-of-life but also in emergency departments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Research in PC (Palliative Care) is frequently challenging for patient's frailty, study design, professional misconceptions, and so on. Little is known about specificity in PC research on Hematologic cancer patients, who have distinct characteristics that might influence the enrollment process. Aims: What works, how and for whom, in increasing enrollment in studies in PC on patients with hematologic malignancies? Methods: Realist review: a qualitative review whose goal is to identify and explain the interaction between Contexts, Mechanisms, and Outcomes (CMOs). The theory was informed by a narrative, theory-based literature research, including an initialsystematic research, and the addition of papers suggested by experts of the field. We also used 7 interviews with experts in PC about patients with hematologic malignancies research and our own experience from a PC pilot study on patients with hematologic malignancies to refine the initial theory. Results: In our initial theory we hypothesize that: - Access to palliative care could be beneficial to hematologic patients, even in early stages - Hematologists tend to under-use palliative care services in general, due to unpredictable disease trajectories and cultural barriers. - These factors may negatively impact the patients' enrollment in PC research We included secondary literature as narrative reviews, if they presented interesting propositions useful for our theoretical construction. 23 papers met our inclusion criteria. We also searched for relevant CMOs impacting referral in palliative care, and we selected a list of CMOs that could be relevant also in hematology. We accordingly theorized a group of interventions that could increase the enrollment in PC research and presented them using "social exchange theory" (SET) as a theoretical framework. Prominent researchers in PC in hematologic malignancies were interviewed on their opinion on our results, and additional CMOs. Conclusions: Before conducting research in PC on patients with hematologic malignancies, it's probably advisable to assess: - The perception of the different actors (physicians, nurses, other professionals involved), in particular the hematologists, in terms of pros and cons of referral to PC and enrollment in PC trials - The existing relationship between PC and the Hematology department Accordingly, it's possible to tailor different interventions on the various actors and choose a model of trial to increase the perception of benefits from PC and, consequently, enrollment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Planned, multidisciplinary teams' discussions of cases are common in cancer care, but their impact on patients' outcome is not always clear. Palliative care (PC) needs might emerge long before the last weeks of life. Many palliative care patients could be managed from the usual care staff, if appropriately trained; specialist palliative care should be provided to patients with more complex needs. Staff needs adequate training, so that only patients presenting a higher complexity are properly referred to the second level ("specialized") PC services. In the considered hospital setting, "tumour boards" (multidisciplinary discussions) refer often to a low number of patients. Overall complexity of patients' needs is hardly considered. Methods: A mixed method pilot study with data triangulation of professionals' interviews and an independently structured evaluation of complexity of referred patients, before and after the intervention, using the PALCOM instrument. We trained four teams of professionals to deliver first-level palliation and to refer patients with complex needs detected in multidisciplinary discussions. A multicomponent, first level PC educational intervention, including information technology's adaptation, a training course, and bedside training was offered from the specialized PC Services, to all the HPs involved in multidisciplinary pancreas, lung, ovarian, and liver tumour boards. Results: While the level of complexity of referred patients did not increase, trainees seemed to develop a better understanding of palliative care and a higher sensitivity to palliative needs. The number of referred patients increased, but patients' complexity did not. Qualitative data showed that professionals seemed to be more aware of the complexity of PC needs. A "meaning shift" was perceived, specifically on the referral process (e.g., "when" and "for what" referring to specialist PC) and on the teams' increased focus on patients' needs. The training, positively received, was adapted to trainees' needs and observations that led also to organizational modifications. Conclusions: Our multicomponent intervention positively impacted the number of referrals but not the patients' complexity (measured with the PALCOM instrument). Hospital staff does not easily recognize that patients may have PC needs significantly earlier than at the end of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Palliative care is an emotionally and spiritually high-demanding setting of care. The literature reports on the main issues in order to implement self-care, but there are no models for the organization of the training course. We described the structure of training on self-care and its effects for a Hospital Palliative Care Unit. Method: We used action-research training experience based mostly on qualitative data. Thematic analysis of data on open-ended questions, researcher's field notes, oral and written feedback from the trainer and the participants on training outcomes and satisfaction questionnaires were used. Results: Four major themes emerged: (1) "Professional role and personal feelings"; (2) "Inside and outside the team"; (3) "Do I listen to my emotions in the care relationship?"; (4) "Death: theirs vs. mine." According to participants' point of view and researchers' observations, the training course resulted in ameliorative adjustments of the program; improved skills in self-awareness of own's emotions and sharing of perceived emotional burden; practicing "compassionate presence" with patients; shared language to address previously uncharted aspects of coping; allowing for continuity of the skills learned; translation of the language learned into daily clinical practices through specific facilitation; a structured staff's support system for emotional experiences. Discussion: Self-care is an important enabler for the care of others. The core of our intervention was to encourage a meta-perspective in which the trainees developed greater perspicacity pertaining to their professional role in the working alliance and also recognizing the contribution of their personal emotions to impasse experienced with patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A correction is presented to the article "Consultations' demand for a hospital palliative care unit: how to increase appropriateness? Implementing and evaluating a multicomponent educational intervention aimed at increase palliative care complexity perception skill."

Context: Generativity is a process whereby patients nearing the end of life invest in those they will soon leave behind. In recent years, the trajectory of cancer has changed, as new therapies have prolonged survival and patients often live with metastatic disease for several years. For these patients and for the healthcare professionals who care for them it can be useful to understand if the concept of generativity is clinically salient.Objectives: To explore the meanings emerging from two dignity therapy questions, particularly salient to generativity, amongst cancer patients in different care settings.Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, qualitative study in 1) home palliative care (life expectancy < 3 months); 2) specialized palliative care provided by team within an oncology hospital (life expectancy > 9-12 months); and 3) oncological day hospital (potentially curable disease). We thematically analyzed the answers of two dignity therapy questions.Results: Three themes and related meanings emerged from 37 dignity therapy sessions with respect to the two questions: 1) Meanings concerning the present life and illness, including the experience of suffering; 2) Thoughts and actions towards the self, including ways in which the patients have felt alive; 3) Thoughts and actions towards significant others, especially values that are based mainly on love for oneself and for others. No notable differences across stages and care settings emerged in terms of the meanings emerging from two dignity therapy questions.Conclusion: Conversations about generativity could inform clinicians on how to communicate about existential and meaning-based issues across different stages of illness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]