Search

Context Inflammation is proposed to influence tumor response in radiotherapy (RT). Clinical studies to investigate the relationship between inflammatory markers and RT response is warranted to understand the variable RT efficacy in patients with painful bone metastases. Objectives To evaluate the association between inflammatory markers and analgesic response to RT in patients with painful bone metastases. Methods Adult patients from 7 European study sites undergoing RT for painful bone metastases were included in this prospective and longitudinal analysis. The association between RT response and 17 inflammatory markers at baseline, as well as the association between RT response and the changes observed in inflammatory markers between baseline and three and eight weeks after RT, was analyzed with univariate regression analyses. Baseline analyses were adjusted for potential clinical predictors of RT response. Results None of the inflammatory markers were significantly associated with an upcoming RT response in the analysis of 448 patients with complete baseline data. In patients available for follow-up, the three-week change in TNF (P 0.017), IL-8 (P 0.028), IP-10 (P 0.032), eotaxin (P 0.043), G-CSF (P 0.033) and MCP-1 (P 0.002) were positively associated with RT response, while the three-week change in CRP (P 0.006) was negatively associated. Conclusion Results from this study show an association between RT response and change in pro-inflammatory mediators and indicate that inflammation may be important to achieve an analgesic RT response in patients with painful bone metastases. None of the investigated inflammatory markers were found to be pre-treatment predictors of RT response.

Background Radiationtherapy (RT) provide pain reduction in about 60% of patients with painful bone metastases. Studies have identified demographic and clinical characteristics to predict RT response, but no model is clinical useful. Tumor characteristics and inflammation can influence cancer induced bone pain, but the association with RT response are not studied. We test if tumor characteristics and the inflammation marker CRP improve prediction of RT response. Methods We included adult patients receiving RT for painful bone metastases in a multicenter, multinational longitudinal observational study. The primary endpoint was analgesic response within 8 weeks after RT defined according to current guidelines. Seventeen independent potential predictor variables assessed at baseline included patient demographics, RT administration, pain characteristics and treatment, cancer diagnosis, tumor characteristics, depression and inflammation (CRP). Multivariate logistic regression analysis with multiple imputation of missing data were applied to identify predictors of RT response. Results are reported as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results 565 eligible patients were enrolled, 424 patients (75%) had complete data on the variables of interest and multiple imputation allowed the final regression models to be carried out on 513 patients (91%). 232 patients (41%, CI 37%-45%) responded to RT. Higher Karnofsky performance status (OR 1.45, CI 1.21-1.73), breast cancer (OR 2.61, CI 1.20-5.69) and prostate cancer (OR 2.64, CI 1.24-5.63) (compared to GI cancer), presence of soft tissue expansion (OR 1.78, CI 1.13-2.81) and higher maximum pain intensity at the radiated site (OR 1.1, CI 1.00-1.21) were significant predictors of positive RT response, while the use of steroids was a negative predictor (OR 0.62, CI 0.42-0.93). The discriminative ability of the model was moderate, with C-statistics 0.70. Conclusions This study supports previous findings that higher performance status, cancer diagnosis and higher baseline pain intensity predict analgesic RT response. The study presents new data showing that presence of soft tissue expansion predicts RT response and that CRP is not significantly associated with analgesic RT response. Clinical trial identification NCT02107664 (Date of registration April 8, 2014). Legal entity responsible for the study Pal Klepstad. Funding The European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC). Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Objective. The study objective was to evaluate whether there are clinical or genetic differences between patients with cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP) and patients with non-CIBP, and, in the CIBP group, in those with good versus poor opioid response. Materials and Methods. A total of 2,294 adult patients with cancer who were receiving opioids for moderate or severe pain were included in the European Pharmacogenetic Opioid Study. Pain intensity and pain relief were measured using the Brief Pain Inventory. Linkage disequilibrium of 112 single nucleotide polymorphisms was evaluated in 25 candidate genes, and 43 haplotypes were assessed. Correlations among demographical factors, disease-related factors, genetic factors, CIBP, and pain relief were analyzed by logistic regression models corrected for multiple testing. Patients with bone metastases and bone/soft tissue pain were defined as having prevalent bone pain (CIBP population). This population was compared with patients who had other types of cancer pain (non-CIBP). Results. A total of 577 patients (26.2%) had CIBP, and 1,624 patients (73.8%) had non-CIBP. Patients with CIBP had more breakthrough cancer pain episodes (64.2% vs. 56.4%, p = .001), had significantly higher pain interference in “walking ability in the past 24 hours” (p < .0001), used more adjuvant drugs (84.1% vs. 78.3%, p = .003), and had a higher, albeit nonsignificant, median overall survival (3.8 vs. 2.9 months, p = .716) than patients with non-CIBP. None of the examined haplotypes exceeded p values corrected for multiple testing for the investigated outcomes. Conclusion. Patients with CIBP who were taking opioids had a clinical profile slightly different from that of the non-CIBP group. However, no specific genetic pattern emerged for CIBP versus non-CIBP or for responsive versus nonresponsive patients with CIBP.

Background: Radiation therapy (RT) results in pain relief for about 6 of 10 patients with cancer induced bone pain (CIBP) caused by bone metastases. The high number of non-responders, the long median time from RT to pain response and the risk of adverse effects, makes it important to determine predictors of treatment response. Clinical features such as cancer type, performance status and pain intensity, and biomarkers for osteoclast activity are proposed as predictors of response to RT. However, results are inconsistent and there is a need for better predictors of RT response. A similar argument can be stated for the development of cachexia; there are currently no predictors that can identify patients who will develop cachexia later in the cancer disease trajectory. Experimental and preclinical studies show that pain, depression and cachexia are related to inflammation. However, it is not known if inflammatory biomarkers can predict CIBP, depression or development of cachexia. Methods: This multicenter, multinational longitudinal observational study will include 600 adult patients receiving RT for CIBP. Demographic data, clinical variables, osteoclast and inflammatory biomarkers will be assessed before start of RT, and 3, 8, 16, 24 and 52 weeks after last course of RT. The primary aim of the study is to identify potential predictors for pain relief from RT. Secondary aims are to explore potential predictors for development of cachexia, the longitudinal relationship between pain intensity and depression, and if inflammatory biomarkers are associated with changes in pain intensity, cachexia and depression during one-year follow up. Discussion: The immediate clinical implication of the PRAIS study is to identify potential predictive factors for a RT response on CIBP, and thereby reduce non-efficacious RT. Patient benefits are fewer hospital visits, reduced risk of adverse effects and more individualized pain treatment. The long-term clinical implication of the PRAIS study is to improve the knowledge about inflammation in relation to CIBP, cachexia and depression and potentially identify associations and mechanisms that can be targeted for treatment. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02107664 , date of registration April 8, 2014 (retrospectively registered). Trial sponsor: The European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU, Faculty of medicine and Health Sciences, Trondheim, N-7491, Norway. The Palliative Radiotherapy and Inflammation Study (PRAIS) is funded by a non-restricted grant given by the Norwegian Cancer Society (NCS) to the European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC). In addition, the study has financing for a PhD scholarship from the Liaison Committee for Education, Research and Innovation in Central Norway. The study sponsors and funders are not involved in data collection, analyses, interpretation or publication of data