Search

Background: Nursing homes (NHs) are faced with a myriad of challenges to provide quality palliative care to residents who are at their end of life. Objectives: To describe and examine the impact of the GeriCare Palliative Care Program, which comprises telemedicine, on-site clinical preceptorship, palliative care education program, and Advance Care Planning (ACP) advocacy in reducing emergency department (ED) transfers from NHs. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting/Subjects: A total of 217 telemedicine consults were conducted for 187 unique NH residents across 5 NHs in Singapore over a 27-month period from April 2018 to June 2020. Measurement: Records of all enrolled palliative care residents who were triaged by telemedicine consultations were examined. Results: Our findings revealed that 82% of our urgent telemedicine consultations have successfully averted ED transfers. Gender and completion of ACP were statistically significant between ED transfer group and non-ED transfer group. Among those who completed their ACP, 78.3% of the ED transfer group chose limited intervention as their main goals of care compared with 30% in the non-ED transfer group. Conclusions: The GeriCare Palliative Care Program is a novel program, which is developed to improve the quality of palliative care in NHs. The comprehensive GeriCare model comprises a systematic framework, an integration of clinical support, ACP advocacy, and education program. Our findings demonstrated that these interventions synergistically led to a reduction in ED transfers while optimizing the residents' quality of care. By carrying out the targeted initiatives to support NHs, the residents could age-in-place comfortably.

Objective: There are few studies concerning the differences in quality-of-life (QOL) between palliative care patients with and without dysphagia to date. We aimed to compare the QOL and symptoms in palliative patients with and without dysphagia using Swallowing Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL). Methods: Eighty-one palliative patients with and without dysphagia underwent the SWAL-QOL questionnaire. A series of Mann Whitney U tests were performed between non-dysphagic and dysphagic groups for the total SWAL-QOL score and the 11 SWAL-QOL domains. Results: Dysphagia significantly impacted patients' QOL in the dysphagic group (mean, 69.5; SD 21.9) than non-dysphagic group (mean, 83.2; SD 14.8) (P = 0.006). Significant differences were observed between both groups for the domains of burden, eating desire, eating duration, symptoms, food selection, communication and mental health. The results also showed that the dysphagic group had lower symptom score across all symptoms, suggesting higher symptom burdens. Conclusions: This study is the first to examine QOL and swallow symptoms in palliative care patients with and without dysphagia. Dysphagia causes significantly worse QOL in palliative care patients. Screening for dysphagia and managing its impact on symptoms and QOL domains is important in palliative care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]