Search

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) principles have emerged as the template for e-waste policies, centered on establishing regulated collection and recycling channels. Originating in the global North, these policies are increasingly adopted in the global South where e-waste is primarily 'managed' by the informal sector, centered in spatially defined hubs. These formal systems fail to achieve collection quotas, while further marginalizing informal recyclers by delegitimizing their access to e-waste. We suggest an alternative hub-centered approach to e-waste reform based on eight years of research and advocacy within the Israel-West Bank e-waste system. We offer several converging rationales for centralizing hubs in e-waste policies and a case study demonstrating an integrated hub-driven package of business, enforcement, and cleanup measures. While the unique complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian case offer an exceptional window into the dynamics of a hub-driven approach, similar packages might shape e-waste policy reform throughout the global South. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite increasing academic attention and the pressing development and environmental importance of informal e‐waste economies in the global South, there remains a dearth of reliable quantitative data to guide theory and appropriate policy responses. We illustrate this problem through a review of the thin and patchy data presented in existing studies that attempt to quantify the flows and economic impact of informal e‐waste hubs. We then describe a way forward through our analysis of a less well known e‐waste hub in south‐west Hebron, Palestine, which provides a methodological model for robust and systematic quantification. We achieved this by leveraging the relatively closed regional‐geographic nature of this hub, triangulating several approaches used in studies of the informal economy (anecdotal/ethnographic, micro‐ and macro‐level data), and contrasting data before and after a key shift in the sector. Our study shows how this hub, though barely registering in official economic and trade data, houses a large, vital and differentiated cluster of businesses, which have processed almost half of Israel's e‐waste for over a decade, and constitute an important export sector and local economic contributor. In 2015, even operating at levels 40% below those sustained over the prior decade, the hub imported and processed 16–25,000 tonnes of e‐waste, creating 381 enterprises, 1,098 jobs and US$28.5 million gross value added to the Palestinian economy. This study demonstrates methodological approaches for studying informal e‐waste flows and economies and the substantive insights these produce, and argues for the relevance of both to analogous hubs across the global South. Despite increasing academic attention and the pressing development and environmental importance of informal e‐waste hubs in the global South, there remains a dearth of careful quantitative data to guide theory and appropriate policy responses. We illustrate this problem through a review of the thin and patchy data presented in existing studies, and describe a way forward through a systematic analysis of a less known e‐waste hub in south‐west Hebron, Palestine. Our study triangulated detailed data from a stratified sample drawn from a comprehensive sampling frame of all businesses in the hub, with data collected at key input and output nodes, thereby producing a robust quantification of volumes, sources, and economic contribution of the industry, with important policy implications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article describes an unconventional participatory development approach carried out in an informal e‐waste hub in South‐West Hebron, an area that has collected and processed the bulk of Israeli e‐waste for over a decade. Our approach contributes to the critique and recovery of community representation in participatory development and the search for ways to facilitate representative community engagement. Specifically, we describe our use of a novel Delphi‐like method that allowed us to facilitate a broadly endorsed development trajectory within a heterogeneous and conflicted community. We show how the results yielded by this approach diverged from those that were likely to emerge from more facile forms of participation in ways that are important for other similar e‐waste hubs internationally, which face a destructive status quo on the one hand, or the economically ruinous international policies that ban e‐waste trade from "developed" to "developing" countries on the other. Despite real tensions and cleavages within the affected communities, the process described facilitated a shift from deadlocked environmental versus livelihood positions towards building capacity and regulating existing informal e‐waste trades to preserve livelihoods dependent on these. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]