Search

Background: Few studies have investigated the underlying mechanisms for unilateral subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS). Therefore, this study examined (1) if 8-weeks of exercise could modulate clinical pain or temporal summation of pain (TSP), conditioned pain modulation (CPM), and exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH) and (2) if any of these parameters could predict the effect of 8-weeks of exercise in patients with unilateral SAPS., Methods: Thirty-seven patients completed a progressive abduction exercise program every other day for 8-weeks. Worst shoulder pain in full abduction was rated on a numeric rating scale (NRS). Pain pressure thresholds (PPTs), TSP, CPM, EIH, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), PainDETECT questionnaire (PD-Q), Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSE-Q) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were assessed before and after intervention., Results: The intervention improved worst pain intensity (p < 0.001), increased the CPM (p < 0.001), improved the sleep scores (p < 0.005) and reduced the PainDETECT ratings (p < 0.001). No changes were observed in PPT, TSP, EIH, SPADI, PCS and PSE-Q (all p > 0.05). In a linear regression, the combination of all baseline parameters predicted 23.2% variance in absolute change in pain after 8 weeks. Applying backwards elimination to the linear regression yielded that baseline pain intensity combined with TSP predicted 33.8% variance., Conclusion: This explorative study suggested reduction in pain, improved sleep quality and increased CPM after 8-weeks of exercise. Furthermore, the results suggests that low pain intensity and high TSP scores (indicative for pain sensitisation) may predict a lack of pain improvement after exercise., (© 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation - EFIC ®.)

Background: Despite the established relevance of ultrasonography and assessment of pressure pain thresholds in patients with plantar fasciopathy, patient and probe positioning has been mostly ignored and are not necessarily reported in research. The primary aim of this study was to compare plantar fascia thickness in stretched and relaxed positions in patients with plantar fasciopathy. The secondary aim was to compare plantar heel pressure pain thresholds in these positions., Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we measured the plantar fascia thickness with ultrasonography, and localised pressure pain thresholds using pressure algometry of 20 patients with plantar fasciopathy. These were assessed bilaterally, with the plantar fascia in both a stretched and relaxed position. In the stretched position, toes were maximally dorsiflexed, while in the relaxed position participants' feet were hanging freely over the end of the table., Results: The plantar fascia of the most symptomatic foot was significantly thicker when stretched compared with the relaxed position (sagittal: mean difference 0.2 mm, 95%CI: 0.1-0.4, P = 0.013; frontal: mean difference - 0.27, 95%CI: - 0.49 to - 0.06, P = 0.014). The plantar fascia was significantly thinner in the frontal plane compared with the sagittal plane in both positions (stretched: mean difference - 0.2 mm, 95%CI: - 0.42 to - 0.03, P = 0.025; relaxed: mean difference - 0.3 mm, 95%CI:-0.49 to - 0.08, P = 0.008). There was no difference between pressure pain thresholds in stretched or relaxed positions in either foot (P > 0.4)., Conclusions: The plantar fascia was significantly thicker in a stretched compared with a relaxed position and in the sagittal compared with the frontal plane, but differences were smaller than the standard deviation. Pressure pain thresholds were not different between the positions. These results highlight the importance of how ultrasonography is performed and reported in research to allow for replication., Trial Registration: The study was pre-registered September 25th, 2017 on ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03291665 ).

Osgood–Schlatter disease is an overuse musculoskeletal pain condition. The pain mechanism is considered nociceptive, but no studies have investigated nociplastic manifestations. This study investigated pain sensitivity and inhibition evaluated through exercise-induced hypoalgesia in adolescents with and without Osgood–Schlatter. Cross-sectional study. Adolescents underwent a baseline assessment comprising clinical history, demographics, sports participation, and pain severity rated (0–10) during a 45-second anterior knee pain provocation test, consisting of an isometric single leg squat. Pressure pain thresholds were assessed bilaterally at the quadriceps, tibialis anterior muscle, and the patella tendon before and after a three-minute wall squat. Forty-nine adolescents (27 Osgood–Schlatter, 22 controls) were included. There were no differences in the exercise-induced hypoalgesia effect between Osgood–Schlatter and controls. Overall, an exercise-induced hypoalgesia effect was detected at the tendon only in both groups with a 48 kPa (95 % confidence interval 14 to 82) increase in pressure pain thresholds from before to after exercise. Controls had higher pressure pain thresholds at the patellar tendon (mean difference 184 kPa 95 % confidence interval 55 to 313), tibialis anterior (mean difference 139 kPa 95 % confidence interval 24 to 254), and rectus femoris (mean difference 149 kPa 95 % confidence interval 33 to 265). Higher anterior knee pain provocation severity was associated with lower exercise-induced hypoalgesia at the tendon (Pearson correlation = 0.48; p = 0.011) in participants with Osgood–Schlatter. Adolescents with Osgood–Schlatter display increased pain sensitivity locally, proximally, and distally but similar endogenous pain modulation compared to healthy controls. Greater Osgood–Schlatter severity appears to be associated with less efficient pain inhibition during the exercise-induced hypoalgesia paradigm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Variable eligibility criteria across studies on plantar heel pain may result in compromising the generalisability of meta-analyses when heterogeneity is not accounted for. We aimed to explore: (i) heterogeneity of participant eligibility criteria in studies that have investigated plantar heel pain, and (ii) associations between key eligibility criteria and the characteristics of the participants included in the study. Methods: In this systematic review with narrative synthesis, we extracted participant eligibility criteria, and participants' age, body mass index (BMI), symptom duration and pain level from published studies on plantar heel pain. We performed a content analysis of criteria and aligned overarching criteria to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). We pooled studies that used the same thresholds for participant eligibility criteria into sub-groups. We also pooled and reported studies that did not have any eligibility criteria for the quantitative characteristics to use their data for reference values and pooled studies that did not have any eligibility criteria for the characteristics as reference. Results: Two hundred and fourteen articles were included. The most reported participant eligibility criteria (as aligned to the ICF) related to body structures/function and personal factors. Age, BMI, symptom duration and pain level were used with various ranges and/or thresholds across studies (age was reported in 23 different ways across 97 studies; BMI 7/13; symptom duration 14/100; and pain level 8/31). When eligibility criteria included thresholds close to the reference value of a participant characteristic, characteristics were associated with criteria (e.g., younger participants when an upper age threshold was used). Conclusion: Participant eligibility criteria in studies on plantar heel pain vary widely; studies differed substantially in their use of quantitative thresholds. Participant characteristics of samples in studies were associated with the criteria used. This study emphasises a need for adjusting for participant heterogeneity in systematic reviews to improve their validity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the acute effects of isometric versus dynamic resistance exercise on pain during a pain-provoking activity, and exercise-induced hypoalgesia in participants with patellar tendinopathy.Design: This study was a pre-registered randomised crossover study. Participants were blinded to the study hypothesis.Methods: Participants (N = 21) performed a single session of high load isometric resistance exercise or dynamic resistance exercise, in a randomised order separated by a 7-day washout period. Outcomes were assessed before, immediately after, and 45 min post-exercise. The primary outcome was pain intensity scored on a numeric pain rating scale (NRS; 0-10) during a pain-provoking single leg decline squat (SLDS). Secondary outcomes were pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) locally, distally and remotely, as well as tendon thickness.Results: There was a significant decrease in pain NRS scores (mean reduction 0.9, NRS 95%CI 0.1-1.7; p = 0.028), and increase in PPTs at the tibialis anterior muscle (mean increase 34 kPa 95%CI 9.5-58.5; p = 0.009) immediately post-exercise. These were not sustained 45 min post-exercise for pain (NRS) or PPTs (p > 0.05). There were no differences between exercise on any outcome.Conclusions: While patients with patellar tendinopathy decreased pain during SLDS in response to resistance training, but the magnitude was small. Contraction mode may not be the most important factor in determining the magnitude of pain relieving effects. Similarly, there were only small increases in PPTs at the tibialis anterior which were not superior for isometric exercise. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Isometric exercise is commonly recommended for immediate pain relief in individuals suffering from lower limb tendinopathies, despite the limited evidence supporting its analgesic effect. Due to the similarities between plantar fasciopathy and tendinopathies, the aim of this trial was to investigate the acute effect of isometric exercise on pain, compared to isotonic exercise, or walking, in individuals with plantar fasciopathy. We recruited 20 individuals with plantar fasciopathy for this prospectively‐registered, participant‐blinded, randomized, superiority crossover trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03264729). Participants attended three exercise sessions (isometric, isotonic, or walking) in a randomized order, within a 2‐week period. Both isometric and isotonic exercises were performed standing with the forefoot on a step bench, while walking was performed barefoot. The primary outcome was pain (measured on a 0‐100‐mm VAS) during a pain‐aggravating activity. Secondary outcomes included pressure pain threshold (PPT) under the heel, and plantar fascia thickness (PFT). All outcomes were measured before and after each exercise session. There were no significant differences between the three exercises on pain (P = 0.753), PPTs (P = 0.837), or PFT (P = 0.718). Further, there was no change in pain from before to after any of the exercises (isometric exercise 2.7 mm [95% CI: −12.2; 6.8], isotonic exercise −3.4 mm [95% CI: −5.0; 11.8], or walking 1.6 mm [95% CI: −16.1; 12.9]). Contrary to expectations, isometric exercise was no better than isotonic exercise or walking at reducing pain in individuals with plantar fasciopathy. None of the exercises induced any systematic analgesic effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]