Search

Quadro-iliac plane block (QIPB) is a novel regional anesthesia technique that provides analgesia in the abdominal, lumbar, and hip regions. Case reports about the efficacy of this block in the literature are limited. In this report, we would like to share our successful QIPB experience with a patient with chronic myofascial low back pain., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 International Anesthesia Research Society.)

Objective: Comparison of ultrasound (US)-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) patients. The primary outcome was to compare perioperative and postoperative (48 hours) opioid consumption., Methods: A total of 60 patients were randomized into two groups (N = 30): an ESPB group and an SAPB group. All the patients received intravenous patient-controlled postoperative analgesia and ibuprofen 400 mg intravenously every eight hours. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores, opioid consumption, and adverse events were recorded., Results: Intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption at 0-8, 8-16, and 16-24 hours and rescue analgesic use were significantly lower in the ESPB group (P < 0.05). Static/dynamic VAS scores were significantly lower in the ESPB group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between static VAS scores at the fourth hour. There were no differences between adverse effects. Block procedure time and one-time puncture success were similar between groups (P  > 0.05 each)., Conclusion: US-guided ESPB may provide better pain control than SAPB after VATS., Question: Even though there are studies about analgesia management after VATS, clinicians want to perform the technique that is both less invasive and more effective., Findings: This randomized trial showed that US-guided ESPB provides effective analgesia compared with SAPB., Meaning: Performing single-injection ESPB reduces VAS scores and opioid consumption compared with SAPB., (© 2020 American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Author(s): Hande Güngör [sup.1], Bahadir Ciftci [sup.1], Selcuk Alver [sup.1], Birzat Emre Gölboyu [sup.2], Yasar Ozdenkaya [sup.3], Serkan Tulgar [sup.4] Author Affiliations: (1) grid.411781.a, 0000 0004 0471 9346, Department of [...], Purpose Modified thoracoabdominal nerves block through perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) targets thoracoabdominal nerves. Our primary aim was to compare M-TAPA vs local infiltration on pain management in patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) surgery. Methods Patients with ASA class I-II patients aged between 18 and 65 years scheduled for elective LC under general anesthesia were enrolled in the study. There were two randomized groups: Group M: M-TAPA group (n = 30) and the local infiltration (LI) group (n = 30). M-TAPA was performed with totally 40 ml 0.25% bupivacaine in the M group. LI was performed in infiltration group. The primary outcome of the study was pain score in the PACU, the secondary outcomes were the patient satisfaction scores, rescue analgesic need, and adverse effects during the 24-h postoperative period. Results The static NRS scores were significantly lower in Group M at the postoperative first 4 h (p = 0.001). There was a significant decrease in the dynamic NRS scores in Group M at the postoperative first 16 h (p = 0.001). The incidence of nausea was significantly higher in the LI group (12 vs. 5 patients, p = 0.047). The need for rescue analgesia was significantly lower in Group M (p = 0.009). The patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher in Group M (p = 0.001). Conclusion M-TAPA provides superior analgesia compared to LI in patients undergoing LC.

Purpose: Spinal surgery is associated with severe diffuse pain in the postoperative period. Effective pain management plays an essential role in reducing morbidity and mortality. This study is designed to compare the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block and surgical infiltrative ESP block for postoperative analgesia management after lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Methods: The patients who underwent two or three levels of posterior lumbar spinal fusion surgery were randomly allocated into one of three groups with 30 patients each (Group SE = Surgical ESP block; Group UE = ultrasound-guided ESP block; Group C = Controls). The primary aim was to compare postoperative opioid consumption, and the secondary aim was to evaluate postoperative dynamic and static pain scores and the incidence of opioid-related adverse effects. Results: There was a significant difference in terms of opioid consumption, rescue analgesia on demand, and both static and dynamic pain scores between groups at all time periods (p < 0.05). Group SE and Group UE had lower pain scores and consumed fewer opioids than the controls (p < 0.05). However, the Group UE had lower pain scores and opioid consumption than the Group SE. The sedation level of patients was significantly higher in the control group than in the other two groups. Also, nausea was more common in controls than in the other groups. Conclusion: While both surgical and ultrasound-guided ESP blocks reduced opioid consumption compared to the controls, the patients who received ultrasound-guided ESP blocks experienced better postsurgical pain relief than those in the other groups (surgical ESP and controls). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study objective We report a novel block technique aimed to provide lumbosacral, abdominal, and hip analgesia: The quadro-iliac plane (QIP) block. Design A cadaveric examination that evaluates the spread of QIP block. Setting Cadaver laboratory. Patients One unembalmed cadaver. Interventions Bilateral ultrasound-guided QIP blocks on cadavers with 40 mL of methylene blue %0.5 each side. Measurements Dye spread in cadaver. Main results There was staining in the deep interfascial plane of the erector spinae muscles. Extensive staining of the interfascial plane corresponding to the posterior aspect of the quadratus lumborum muscle (QLM) was observed. There was extensive staining on the anterior surface of the QLM. There was spread of dye traversing along the transversalis fascia and significantly infiltrating retroperitoneal fat tissue. Bilateral staining of the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves was observed. On the right, there was minimal staining over the subcostal nerve. There was dye present bilaterally within the deep regions of the transverse processes. The lumbar plexus was stained on both sides. Conclusion The local anesthetic applied from a place where the QLM reaches its largest volume and the fascial plane creates a closed gap in the caudal area may exhibit a more rounded and extensive spread. Quadro-iliac plane block, involves the administration of local anesthetic to the posterior aspect of the QLM at its origin from the iliac crest. According to our cadaver study, this technique may be a promising option for alleviating acute and chronic pain in the lumbosacral, lower abdominal, and hip regions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided facia iliaca compartment (FIC) and erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks in managing postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty surgery. Methods A total of 60 patients were randomized into 2 groups (n  = 30): one that received FIC blocks and one that received ESP blocks. FIC and ESP blocks were performed with 30 mL 0.25% bupivacaine at the end of the surgery. The patients received intravenous tramadol and patient-controlled postoperative analgesia. The pain scores, opioid consumption, and adverse events were recorded. Results The dynamic pain scores on movement in the postoperative first hour were significantly lower in the ESP block group than in the FIC block group (3 [2–4] vs 4 [2–5], respectively; P  = .035). Data are expressed as median (25th–75th percentiles). Postoperative opioid consumption within the first postoperative 8 hours was significantly higher in the FIC block group than in the ESP block group (80 mg [61–100] vs 100 mg [80–120], respectively; P  = .010). The adverse effects of opioids did not differ between the 2 groups. Conclusion ESP and infrainguinal FIC blocks provided similar postoperative analgesia 24 hours after total hip arthroplasty. The ESP block is more beneficial than the FIC block in terms of pain scores and opioid consumption in the early hours of the postoperative period. Trial registration www.ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05621161). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The immediate postoperative period after total hip arthroplasty can be associated with significant pain. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of pericapsular nerve block on pain management and functional recovery after total hip arthroplasty. Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was conducted on 489 adult patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty, ASA 1–2, operated under spinal analgesia. Participants were assigned to receive either a pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine or a sham block. Results: The primary outcome measure was the postoperative NRS score in motion. The secondary outcomes were cumulative opioid consumption, the time to the first opioid, and functional recovery. Demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. Intraoperative pain scores were significantly lower in patients who received the PENG block than in the control group (p < 0.0001). Also, the time to the first opioid was considerably longer in the PENG group (p < 0.0001). Additionally, 24% of PENG patients did not require opioids (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The pericapsular nerve group showed significantly decreased opioid consumption and improved functional recovery. Pericapsular nerve group block improved pain management and postoperative functional recovery following total hip arthroplasty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim: Postoperative pain after scoliosis surgery is severe and usually requires long-term intravenous opioid therapy. Local anesthetic options, such as wound infiltration, are limited and include neuraxial analgesia. However, they are rarely used due to side effects and inconsistent efficacy. We report an opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia regimen with bilateral erector spinae plane blocks. This case series evaluated the analgesic effect of the bilateral bi-level erector spinae plane blocks (ESP) in congenital and neurogenic scoliosis surgery. Patients and Methods: Six pediatric patients with congenital or neurogenic scoliosis underwent posterior spinal fusion involving 5 to 12 vertebral levels. Bilateral single-injection ESPB was performed at one or two levels before incision. Preoperatively, patients received intravenous dexamethasone. General anesthesia with endotracheal intubation and volume-controlled ventilation was performed via TIVA with remifentanil and propofol. During and after the procedure, the basic hemodynamic parameters, opioid consumption, pain scores (numerical rating scale/NRS), and possible block complications were monitored. Results: All the patients experienced minimal postoperative pain levels. In addition, on the first day after surgery, they had low opioid requirements with no side effects. Conclusions: ESPB in patients undergoing congenital and neurogenic scoliosis correction surgery seems to be an essential analgesic technique that may reduce both severities of pain and opioid consumption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Although breast‐conserving surgery‐axillary dissection (BCS‐AD) is a minimally invasive surgery, patients may suffer from moderate‐to‐severe pain. Several regional techniques can be used for pain control. The type II pectoral nerve block (PECS II) and the rhomboid intercostal block (RIB) are interfascial plane blocks that have been reported to provide effective analgesia after breast surgery. This study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of the PECS II block and the RIB after breast surgery. Patients and Methods: Ninety female patients aged 18 to 65 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classes I and II physical status who underwent unilateral BCS‐AD surgery were included. Patients were divided into three groups (n = 30 in each): the PECS II group, the RIB group, or the control group. PECS II block and RIB were performed with 30 mL 0.25% bupivacaine. Ibuprofen 400 mg IV 3 × 1 was given in the postoperative period. A patient control analgesia device included a dose of 10 µg/mL fentanyl, which was prepared and connected to the patients. Results: There were no statistical differences between groups in terms of demographical data. Postoperative fentanyl consumption was significantly lower in the PECS II and RIB groups than the control group. The need for rescue analgesia use was significantly higher in the control group than the other groups. At all times, visual analog scale scores were significantly lower in the PECS II and RIB groups than the control group. Conclusions: The PECS II block and the RIB provide similar effective analgesia after BCS‐AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to compare the ultrasound (US)-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and modified-thoracolumbar interfascial plane (mTLIP) block for postoperative pain management in lumbar discectomy surgery patients. A total of 90 patients scheduled for lumbar discectomy were randomly assigned into 3 groups (n = 30 per group): an ESPB group, an mTLIP group, and a control group. In the ESPB and mTLIP groups, a single-shot US-guided block was administered with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine bilaterally. All patients received intravenous patient-controlled postoperative analgesia with fentanyl, and 1 g intravenous paracetamol every 6 hours. Fentanyl consumption, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, rescue analgesia, block procedure time, and side-effects were evaluated. Postoperative opioid consumption at all time intervals were significantly lower both in ESPB and mTLIP groups compared with the control group (P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed concerning intra- and postoperative opioid consumption between the ESPB and the mTLIP group (P < 0.001). Passive VAS score at the postanesthesia care unit, second, fourth, and eighth hours, and active VAS score at the postanesthesia care unit, second, fourth, eighth, and 16th hours were significantly lower in the ESPB and mTLIP groups compared with the control group (P < 0.05). The use of rescue analgesia was significantly lower in the ESPB and mTLIP groups than in the control group (9/30, 7/30, and 21/30, respectively, P < 0.001). The block procedure time was similar between groups (P = 0.198). US-guided ESPB and mTLIP block may provide adequate pain control after discectomy surgery. However, there is a nonsuperiority between ESPB and the mTLIP groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Keywords: Modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane (mTLIP) block; Multi-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery; Postoperative analgesia Surgery for lumbar spinal fusion causes severe pain postoperatively, and the mobilization and rehabilitation of patients are very important after surgery (Kim et al. [3]). While Ohgoshi et al. reported the effectiveness of TLIP block for multi-level laminectomy, the surgery in our case involved a multi-level spinal fusion, which is associated with the possibility of more pain after surgery. [Extracted from the article]

Highlights from the article: Neuropathic pain is a common chronic pain condition, which can develop due to a variety of etiologies such as surgery, trauma, herpes zoster, diabetes, and cancer [1]. ESP block catheter procedure can be used as an alternative in postoperative pain and chronic pain management since it is easy to use, a central block-like analgesia can be obtained with, and has no risk of serious complications such as pneumothorax.