Search

Current therapies to treat skeletal fracture pain are extremely limited. Some non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been shown to inhibit bone healing and opiates induce cognitive dysfunction and respiratory depression which are especially problematic in the elderly suffering from osteoporotic fractures. In the present report, we developed a closed femur fracture pain model in the mouse where skeletal pain behaviors such as flinching and guarding of the fractured limb are reversed by 10mg/kg morphine. Using this model we showed that the administration of a monoclonal antibody against nerve growth factor (anti-NGF) reduced fracture-induced pain-related behaviors by over 50%. Treatment with anti-NGF reduced c-Fos and dynorphin up-regulation in the spinal cord at day 2 post-fracture. However, anti-NGF treatment did not reduce p-ERK and c-Fos expression at 20 and 90 min, respectively, following fracture. This suggests NGF is involved in maintenance but not the acute generation of fracture pain. Anti-NGF therapy did not inhibit bone healing as measured by callus formation, bridging of the fracture site or mechanical strength of the bone. As the anti-NGF antibody does not appreciably cross the blood-brain barrier, the present data suggest that the anti-hyperalgesic action of anti-NGF therapy results from blockade of activation and/or sensitization of the CGRP/trkA positive fibers that normally constitute the majority of sensory fibers that innervate the bone. These results demonstrate that NGF plays a significant role in driving fracture pain and that NGF sequestering therapies may be efficacious in attenuating this pain.

Bone cancer pain can be difficult to control, as it appears to be driven simultaneously by inflammatory, neuropathic and tumorigenic mechanisms. As nerve growth factor (NGF) has been shown to modulate inflammatory and neuropathic pain states, we focused on a novel NGF sequestering antibody and demonstrated that two administrations of this therapy in a mouse model of bone cancer pain produces a profound reduction in both ongoing and movement-evoked bone cancer pain-related behaviors that was greater than that achieved with acute administration of 10 or 30 mg/kg of morphine. This therapy also reduced several neurochemical changes associated with peripheral and central sensitization in the dorsal root ganglion and spinal cord, whereas the therapy did not influence disease progression or markers of sensory or sympathetic innervation in the skin or bone. Mechanistically, the great majority of sensory fibers that innervate the bone are CGRP/TrkA expressing fibers, and if the sensitization and activation of these fibers is blocked by anti-NGF therapy there would not be another population of nociceptors, such as the non-peptidergic IB4/RET-IR nerve fibers, to take their place in signaling nociceptive events.

Bone is the most common site of chronic pain in patients with metastatic cancer. What remains unclear are the mechanisms that generate this pain and why bone cancer pain can be so severe and refractory to treatment with opioids. Here we show that following injection and confinement of NCTC 2472 osteolytic tumor cells within the mouse femur, tumor cells sensitize and injure the unmyelinated and myelinated sensory fibers that innervate the marrow and mineralized bone. This tumor-induced injury of sensory nerve fibers is accompanied by an increase in ongoing and movement-evoked pain behaviors, an upregulation of activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) and galanin by sensory neurons that innervate the tumor-bearing femur, upregulation of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and hypertrophy of satellite cells surrounding sensory neuron cell bodies within the ipsilateral dorsal root ganglia (DRG), and macrophage infiltration of the DRG ipsilateral to the tumor-bearing femur. Similar neurochemical changes have been described following peripheral nerve injury and in other non-cancerous neuropathic pain states. Chronic treatment with gabapentin did not influence tumor growth, tumor-induced bone destruction or the tumor-induced neurochemical reorganization that occurs in sensory neurons or the spinal cord, but it did attenuate both ongoing and movement-evoked bone cancer-related pain behaviors. These results suggest that even when the tumor is confined within the bone, a component of bone cancer pain is due to tumor-induced injury to primary afferent nerve fibers that innervate the tumor-bearing bone. Tumor-derived, inflammatory, and neuropathic mechanisms may therefore be simultaneously driving this chronic pain state.

Patients with metastatic breast, lung or prostate cancer frequently have significant bone cancer pain. In the present report we address, in a single in vivo mouse model, the effects the bisphosphonate alendronate has on bone cancer pain, bone remodeling and tumor growth and necrosis. Following injection and confinement of green fluorescent protein-transfected murine osteolytic tumor cells into the marrow space of the femur of male C3H/HeJ mice, alendronate was administered chronically from the time the tumor was established until the bone cancer pain became severe. Alendronate therapy reduced ongoing and movement-evoked bone cancer pain, bone destruction and the destruction of sensory nerve fibers that innervate the bone. Whereas, alendronate treatment did not change viable tumor burden, both tumor growth and tumor necrosis increased. These data emphasize that it is essential to utilize a model where pain, skeletal remodeling and tumor growth can be simultaneously assessed, as each of these can significantly impact patient quality of life and survival.

Tumors including sarcomas and breast, prostate, and lung carcinomas frequently grow in or metastasize to the skeleton where they can induce significant bone remodeling and cancer pain. To define products that are released from tumors that are involved in the generation and maintenance of bone cancer pain, we focus here on endothelin-1 (ET-1) and endothelin receptors as several tumors including human prostate and breast have been shown to express high levels of ETs and the application of ETs to peripheral nerves can induce pain. Here we show that in a murine osteolytic 2472 sarcoma model of bone cancer pain, the 2472 sarcoma cells express high levels of ET-1, but express low or undetectable levels of endothelin A (ETAR) or B (ETBR) receptors whereas a subpopulation of sensory neurons express the ETAR and non-myelinating Schwann cells express the ETBR. Acute (10 mg/kg, i.p.) or chronic (10 mg/kg/day, p.o.) administration of the ETAR selective antagonist ABT-627 significantly attenuated ongoing and movement-evoked bone cancer pain and chronic administration of ABT-627 reduced several neurochemical indices of peripheral and central sensitization without influencing tumor growth or bone destruction. In contrast, acute treatment (30 mg/kg, i.p.) with the ETBR selective antagonist, A-192621 increased several measures of ongoing and movement evoked pain. As tumor expression and release of ET-1 has been shown to be regulated by the local environment, location specific expression and release of ET-1 by tumor cells may provide insight into the mechanisms that underlie the heterogeneity of bone cancer pain that is frequently observed in humans with multiple skeletal metastases., (Copyright 2004 IBRO)

More than half of all chronic cancer pain arises from metastases to bone, and bone cancer pain is one of the most difficult of all persistent pain states to fully control. Several tumor types including sarcomas and breast, prostate, and lung carcinomas grow in or preferentially metastasize to the skeleton where they proliferate, and induce significant bone remodeling, bone destruction, and cancer pain. Many of these tumors express the isoenzyme cycloxygenase-2 (COX-2), which is involved in the synthesis of prostaglandins. To begin to define the role COX-2 plays in driving bone cancer pain, we used an in vivo model where murine osteolytic 2472 sarcoma cells were injected and confined to the intramedullary space of the femur in male C3HHeJ mice. After tumor implantation, mice develop ongoing and movement-evoked bone cancer pain-related behaviors, extensive tumor-induced bone resorption, infiltration of the marrow space by tumor cells, and stereotypic neurochemical alterations in the spinal cord reflective of a persistent pain state. Thus, after injection of tumor cells, bone destruction is first evident at day 6, and pain-related behaviors are maximal at day 14. A selective COX-2 inhibitor was administered either acutely [NS398; 100 mg/kg, i.p.] on day 14 or chronically in chow [MF. tricyclic; 0.015%, p.o.] from day 6 to day 14 after tumor implantation. Acute administration of a selective COX-2 inhibitor attenuated both ongoing and movement-evoked bone cancer pain, whereas chronic inhibition of COX-2 significantly reduced ongoing and movement-evoked pain behaviors, and reduced tumor burden, osteoclastogenesis, and bone destruction by >50%. The present results suggest that chronic administration of a COX-2 inhibitor blocks prostaglandin synthesis at multiple sites, and may have significant clinical utility in the management of bone cancer and bone cancer pain.

The endothelins (ETs) are peptides that have a diverse array of functions mediated by two receptor subtypes, the endothelin A receptor (ET(A)R) and the endothelin B receptor (ET(B)R). Pharmacological studies have suggested that in peripheral tissues, ET(A)R expression may play a role in signaling acute or neuropathic pain, whereas ET(B)R expression may be involved in the transmission of chronic inflammatory pain. To begin to define the mechanisms by which ET can drive nociceptive signaling, autoradiography and immunohistochemistry were used to examine the distribution of ET(A)R and ET(B)R in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and peripheral nerve of the rat, rabbit, and monkey. In DRG and peripheral nerve, ET(A)R-immunoreactivity was present in a subset of small-sized peptidergic and nonpeptidergic sensory neurons and their axons and to a lesser extent in a subset of medium-sized sensory neurons. However, ET(B)R-immunoreactivity was not seen in DRG neurons or axons but rather in DRG satellite cells and nonmyelinating ensheathing Schwann cells. Thus, when ETs are released in peripheral tissues, they could act directly on ET(A)R-expressing sensory neurons and on ET(B)R-expressing DRG satellite cells or nonmyelinating Schwann cells. These data indicate that ETs can have direct, nociceptive effects on the peripheral sensory nervous system and that peripheral glia may be directly involved in signaling nociceptive events in peripheral tissues.