Search

Unlabelled: Pain is often undetected in older people with dementia partly due to a deterioration of cognitive functioning. Observational scales enable the measurement of pain by registering physiological changes, facial expressions, or behaviors. Previous research showed that the Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC) is especially useful to measure pain in older people with dementia. PACSLAC was recently translated into Dutch and refined, thus forming PACSLAC-D. The current study uses a different approach to refining PACSLAC by (1) selecting items on the basis of ratings of nursing personnel and (2) applying confirmatory robust maximum likelihood factor analysis and (3) item response theory to investigate the psychometric properties of the selected items. Of the items that nursing personnel frequently registered, 18 valid and reliable items remained. Fourteen of these 18 items were also selected for PACSLAC-D, which confirms that these items are valid and reliable indicators of pain in older people with dementia. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that a 3-factor model is most adequate to describe the data. Differential item functioning analyses indicated that 2 items were biased. Ultimately, a refined version of PACSLAC was created that nursing personnel with different educational backgrounds might use to assess pain in older people with varying degrees of dementia., Perspective: This article describes the selection of items of PACSLAC on the basis of ratings of nursing personnel. By comparing this item selection with the items selected for PACSLAC-D, one can confirm that certain items are sound indicators of pain, whereas others need some attention (eg, through the training of raters).

Background: Studies on pain and pain prevalence in older people with dementia are limited compared to those on cognitively intact older people. Pain prevalence rates in older people with dementia are estimated to be between 28% and 83%., Aims: This study aimed to explore pain prevalence in nursing home residents with dementia using observational scale PACSLAC-D, and to identify the association between pain prevalence and (dementia) demographic parameters such as cognitive status, gender, analgesic use and co-morbidity., Methods: Using an observational study design, 117 residents were observed and assessed for pain during personal morning care. Prevalence data were calculated and regression analyses applied., Results: This study showed that almost half of the participants (47%) experienced pain to some extent. However, overall pain intensity scores were relatively mild. Among the independent variables, co-morbidities, analgesic use and the adjusted interaction term 'co-morbidities+analgesic use' had the strongest associations with pain and were thus shown to be valid significant predictors., Conclusion: With its relatively new approach of measuring pain using an observational scale, this study confirms the expectation gleaned from other studies on less impaired older populations: namely, that pain prevalence in older residents with dementia in Dutch nursing homes is high.

Background: Aging is known to be associated with a high prevalence (up to 80%) of persistent pain among residents of nursing homes. However, even with high pain prevalence rates, nursing home residents are at risk for undertreatment. Knowledge deficits and beliefs among nurses influence staff behaviour in pain assessment and management., Objectives: To develop a psychometrically sound questionnaire and to gather information about knowledge and beliefs of nursing staff regarding various aspects of pain in elderly patients with dementia. In addition, the differences among several categories of nurses (based on educational level and work experience) with respect to beliefs about pain were investigated., Methods: Participants were 123 staff members of psychogeriatric wards in two nursing homes in the Netherlands (mean of 11.4 years of experience). Their results were compared with those of two groups of nurses, one consisting of 25 registered nurse PhD students in nursing science and the other consisting of 20 trainee pain nurse specialists., Results: The main findings indicate that nursing home staff respondents showed knowledge deficits about several aspects of pain, even though they were satisfied about the way pain was assessed and treated at their wards. Specific knowledge deficits were found regarding pain treatment and medication in elderly nursing home residents. Staff educational level seemed to influence their beliefs and knowledge about pain in elderly nursing home patients.

In view of the need for valid, reliable, and clinically useful scales to assess pain in elderly people with dementia, this study evaluated the psychometric properties of translated versions of the PAINAD, PACSLAC, and DOLOPLUS-2 scales. In an observational study design, two raters simultaneously assessed the nursing home residents (n=128) for pain during influenza vaccination and care situations. The PACSLAC was valued as the most useful scale by nurses. Cronbach's alpha was high (>.80) for the total scale at T2 and T3 and adequate for the 'Facial expression' and 'Social/personality/mood' subscales. IC scores for the 'Activity/body movement' and 'Physiological indicators/eating/sleeping changes/vocal behaviors' subscales were low. It demonstrated good validity and reliability, although the scale should be further refined. This refinement should increase homogeneity. The PAINAD showed good psychometric qualities in terms of reliability, validity, and homogeneity (alpha ranged .69-.74 at T2 and T3) (except for the 'Breathing' item). The PAINAD scale had lower scores for clinical usefulness in this sample. The Dutch version of the DOLOPLUS-2 was considered more difficult to use but showed acceptable psychometric qualities in terms of the issues assessed, except for the 'psychosocial reactions' subscale. IC of the DOLOPLUS were adequate for the total scale (alpha ranged .74-.75) and almost all subscales (alpha ranged .58-.80). Findings of this study provide evidence of validity and reliability of the three pain assessment scales. Now that a pain scale is available, future studies also need to focus on its implementation in nursing practice.

Background: Pain is a common and major problem among nursing home residents. The prevalence of pain in elderly nursing home people is 40-80%, showing that they are at great risk of experiencing pain. Since assessment of pain is an important step towards the treatment of pain, there is a need for manageable, valid and reliable tools to assess pain in elderly people with dementia., Methods: This systematic review identifies pain assessment scales for elderly people with severe dementia and evaluates the psychometric properties and clinical utility of these instruments. Relevant publications in English, German, French or Dutch, from 1988 to 2005, were identified by means of an extensive search strategy in Medline, Psychinfo and CINAHL, supplemented by screening citations and references. Quality judgement criteria were formulated and used to evaluate the psychometric aspects of the scales., Results: Twenty-nine publications reporting on behavioural pain assessment instruments were selected for this review. Twelve observational pain assessment scales (DOLOPLUS2; ECPA; ECS; Observational Pain Behavior Tool; CNPI; PACSLAC; PAINAD; PADE; RaPID; Abbey Pain Scale; NOPPAIN; Pain assessment scale for use with cognitively impaired adults) were identified. Findings indicate that most observational scales are under development and show moderate psychometric qualities., Conclusion: Based on the psychometric qualities and criteria regarding sensitivity and clinical utility, we conclude that PACSLAC and DOLOPLUS2 are the most appropriate scales currently available. Further research should focus on improving these scales by further testing their validity, reliability and clinical utility.