Search

Introduction: Hypoxia‐inducible factor‐2α (HIF‐2α) modulates the hypoxic response pathway in tumors; however, mutations in pathways (including SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, FH, and VHL genes) that are suspected to activate HIF‐2α are poorly understood, with limited understanding of the prevalence and clinical prognosis. Methods: This retrospective observational study used a de‐identified nationwide (US‐based) clinico‐genomic database (CGDB) across 15 available tumor types. Results: Among the 9467 adult patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors included in the analysis, any mutation at the above‐mentioned six genes was observed in 1.8% (95% CI: 1.5–2.1) of patients. The mutation prevalence ranged from 0.05% of SDHD to 0.93% of VHL. When further stratified by tumor type, the prevalence of gene mutation in each tumor type was well below 1%, except for VHL with 44% in renal cell carcinomas (RCC). Excluding RCC, the prevalence of any HIF‐2α gene mutations in the study population was 0.9% (95% CI: 0.8–1.2). The median overall survival (OS) from 1 and 2 L therapy among patients with any HIF‐2α gene mutation was 14.5 (95% CI: 11.5–24.2) and 9.3 (95% CI: 6.0–18.1) months, respectively, compared with 13.4 (95% CI: 12.9–13.9) and 9.8 (95% CI: 9.3–10.4) months among patients without HIF‐2α gene mutations. Discussion and Conclusions: The prevalence of HIF‐2α related gene mutations was generally low (<1%) across the 15 solid tumor types, except for VHL in RCC. No significant association between HIF‐2α gene mutation status and OS was identified among patients evaluated in this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: Mutations in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 (BRCAm), other homologous recombination repair genes (HRRm), and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) lead to an accumulation of genomic alterations that can drive tumorigenesis. The prognostic impact of these HRR pathway defects on overall survival (OS) in patients not receiving poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) or immunotherapy is unclear. We evaluated the association of HRR biomarkers with OS in patients with advanced solid tumors receiving therapy excluding PARPi and immunotherapy. METHODS: Deidentified data were collected through December 31, 2020, from a real-world clinicogenomic database (CGDB) with data originating from approximately 280 cancer clinics in the United States. Patients age 18 years and older with an advanced/metastatic diagnosis between 2018 and 2019 for 1 of 15 solid tumors and available data in the CGDB were included. The primary analysis evaluated the association between HRR pathway biomarkers and OS, using start of second-line therapy as the index date (to reduce immortal time bias). RESULTS: A total of 9,457 patients had available data for BRCA/HRR and 5,792 for HRD status; 4,890 (51.7%) were women and mean (SD) age was 65.9 (11.5) years. For the primary analysis, adjusted hazard ratios for OS were BRCAm (n = 156) versus BRCA wild-type (wt; n = 3,131; 0.83 [95% CI, 0.60 to 1.17]); for HRRm (n = 467) versus HRRwt (n = 282; 0.95 [95% CI, 0.79 to 1.14]); and for HRD-positive (n = 447) versus -negative (n = 1,687; 1.22 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.47]). Results were similar using start of first-line and start of third-line therapy as index dates. CONCLUSION: This large, real-world study found no association between OS and either BRCA or HRR status but identified a possible linkage between HRD positivity and shorter median OS in patients with advanced solid tumors who did not receive PARPi or immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with BRCA1/2 mutations (BRCAm), loss-of-function mutations in other homologous recombination repair (HRRm) genes, or tumors that are homologous recombination deficiency positivity (HRD+) demonstrate a robust response to PARPi therapy. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of BRCAm, HRRm, and HRD+ on overall survival (OS) among those treated by chemotherapy or targeted therapy other than PARPi across tumor types. A total of 135 eligible studies were included. Breast cancer (BC) patients with BRCA1/2m had a similar overall survival (OS) to those with wild-type BRCA1/2 (BRCA1/2 wt) across 18 studies. Ovarian cancer (OC) patients with BRCA1/2m had a significantly longer OS than those with BRCA1/2 wt across 24 studies reporting BRCA1m and BRCA2m, with an HR of 0.7 (0.6–0.8). Less OS data were reported for other tumors: 6 studies for BRCA2m compared with BRCA2 wt in prostate cancer with an HR of 1.9 (1.1–3.2) and 2 studies for BRCA1/2m compared with BRCA1/2 wt in pancreatic cancer with an HR of 1.5 (0.8–3.1). Only 4 studies reported HRD+ by either BRCA m or genomic instability score (GIS) ≥ 42 and OS by HRD status. The HR was 0.67 (0.43–1.02) for OS with HRD+ vs. HRD−. A total of 15 studies reported the association between HRRm and OS of cancers in which one or more HRR genes were examined. The HR was 1.0 (0.7–1.4) comparing patients with HRRm to those with HRR wild-type across tumors. Our findings are useful in improving the precision and efficacy of treatment selection in clinical oncology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]