Search

The impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still unclear. The present study aims to draw a firm conclusion in terms of evaluating the impact of DM on the prognosis of HCC after hepatectomy. The pattern of recurrence for HCC was often stratified into early-stage (<2 years) and late-stage (≥2 years) recurrence. Because the early-stage recurrence was mainly attributed to aggressive tumor pathological characteristics, patients who recurrence or die within 2 years were excluded. Cumulative overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were determined by the method of Kaplan–Meier, and the independent risk factors of OS/RFS were determined by Cox regression analysis. A total of 426 patients were eventually included. The 3- and 5-year OS in patients with and without DM was 83.7%, 55.1%; and 90.9%, 77.4%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that DM was an independent risk factor for OS (HR 1.166, 95% CI 1.056–2.036, P = 0.022) and RFS (HR 1.365, 95% CI 1.043–1.787, P = 0.023). DM is an independent risk factor for long-term prognosis in patients with HCC. Patients with DM after hepatectomy for HCC, thus, need to actively control DM and closer follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Postoperative morbidity following hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is common and its impact on long-term oncological outcome remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate if postoperative morbidity impacts long-term survival and recurrence following hepatectomy for HCC. The data from a multicenter Chinese database of curative-intent hepatectomy for HCC were analyzed, and independent risks of postoperative 30-day morbidity were identified. After excluding patients with postoperative early deaths (≤90 days), early (≤2 years) and late (>2 years) recurrence rates, overall survival (OS), and time-to-recurrence (TTR) were compared between patients with and without postoperative morbidity. Among 2,161 patients eligible for the study, 758 (35.1%) had postoperative 30-day morbidity. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that diabetes mellitus, obesity, Child-Pugh grade B, cirrhosis, and intraoperative blood transfusion were independent risks of postoperative morbidity. The rates of early and late recurrence among patients with postoperative morbidity were higher than those without (50.7% vs. 38.8%, P < 0.001; and 41.7% vs. 34.1%, P = 0.017). Postoperative morbidity was associated with decreased OS (median: 48.1 vs. 91.6 months, P < 0.001) and TTR (median: 19.8 vs. 46.1 months; P < 0.001). After adjustment of confounding factors, multivariable Cox-regression analyses revealed that postoperative morbidity was associated with a 27.8% and 18.7% greater likelihood of mortality (hazard ratio 1.278; 95% confidence interval: 1.126–1.451; P < 0.001) and recurrence (1.187; 1.058–1.331; P = 0.004). This large multicenter study provides strong evidence that postoperative morbidity adversely impacts long-term oncologic prognosis after hepatectomy for HCC. The prevention and management of postoperative morbidity may be oncologically important. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most serious consequences of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. This study sought to investigate long-term outcomes after liver resection for HCC among patients with HBV/HCV co-infection (HBV/HCV-HCC) compared with patients with HBV infection (HBV-HCC). Methods: Patients who underwent curative-intent liver resection for HCC were identified from a multicenter Chinese database. Using propensity score matching (PSM), patients with HBV/HCV-HCC were matched one-to-one to patients with HBV-HCC. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared between the two groups before and after PSM. Results: Among 2,467 patients identified, 93 (3.8%) and 2,374 (96.2%) patients had HBV/HCV-HCC and HBV-HCC, respectively. Compared with patients with HBV-HCC, patients with HBV/HCV-HCC were older, have poorer liver-related characteristics but better tumor-related characteristics. PSM created 88 pairs of patients with comparable liver- and tumor-related characteristics (all P > 0.2). In the PSM cohort, the 3- and 5-year RFS rates in patients with HBV/HCV-HCC were 48.3% and 38.9%, which were significantly poorer than patients with HBV-HCC (61.8% and 49.2%, P = 0.037). Meanwhile, the 3- and 5-year OS rates in patients with HBV/HCV-HCC were also poorer than patients with HBV-HCC (65.4% and 51.1% vs. 73.7% and 63.0%), with a difference close to be significant between them (P = 0.081). Conclusion: Comparing to patients with HBV-HCC, liver resection resulted in relatively poorer long-term surgical outcomes in patients with HBV/HCV-HCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Data on prognostic factors associated with outcome following resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma vary. We sought to define and characterize current available evidence on prognostic factors associated with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma after resection. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library were systematically searched for relevant studies published before December 2019. Prognostic factors were identified from multivariate regression analyses in studies. Only high-quality studies were included (Newcastle–Ottawa Scale > 6 stars). A total of 45 studies involving 7338 patients were analyzed. The meta-analysis demonstrated that serum bilirubin levels (hazard ratio: 1.76, 95% confidence interval: 1.27–2.44), serum CA19-9 levels (hazard ratio: 1.32, 95% confidence interval: 1.05–1.65), tumor size (hazard ratio: 1.27, 95% confidence interval: 1.04–1.55), major vascular involvement (hazard ratio: 1.61, 95% confidence interval: 1.09–2.38), distance metastasis (hazard ratio: 17.60, 95% confidence interval: 2.01–154.09), perioperative blood transfusion (hazard ratio: 1.36, 95% confidence interval: 1.15–1.62), T-stage (hazard ratio: 1.96, 95% confidence interval: 1.47–2.61), lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio: 2.06, 1.83–2.31), resection margin status (hazard ratio: 2.34, 95% confidence interval: 1.89–2.89), not-well histology differentiation (hazard ratio: 2.03, 95% confidence interval: 1.69–2.44), perineural invasion (hazard ratio: 2.37, 95% confidence interval: 1.59–3.55), and lymphovascular invasion (hazard ratio: 1.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.15–1.73) were prognostic factors for poorer overall survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio: 0.37, 95% confidence interval: 0.25–0.55) had a positive effect on prolonged overall survival. In addition, positive resection margin status (hazard ratio: 1.96, 95% confidence interval: 1.47–2.61) and lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio: 2.06, 95% confidence interval: 1.83–2.31) were associated with poorer disease-free survival. The prognostic factors identified in the present meta-analysis can be used to characterize patients in clinical practice and enrich prognostic tools, which could be included in future trial designs and generate hypotheses to be tested in future research to promote personalized treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been used to prevent recurrence after surgery in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the survival benefits from adjuvant TACE remain controversial. We sought to systematically evaluate the data on the effectiveness of adjuvant TACE for HCC, as well as identify patient populations that might benefit from adjuvant TACE. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane library were systematically searched for studies published before July 2019 that compared adjuvant TACE versus surgery alone for HCC. The study endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Patients with large HCC (⩾5 cm), multinodular HCC, microvascular invasion (MVI), or portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) were analyzed in subgroup analyses. Results: Twenty-four studies with 6977 patients were included in the analytic cohort. The pooled analysis demonstrated that adjuvant TACE was associated with a better OS and DFS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.67 and 0.67, both p < 0.01]. In subgroup analyses, pooled results revealed that adjuvant TACE was associated with an improved OS and DFS in patients with multinodular HCC (HR: 0.79 and 0.31, both p < 0.01), MVI (HR: 0.62 and 0.67, both p < 0.01), or PVTT (HR: 0.49 and 0.58, both p < 0.01), but not among patients with large HCC (⩾5 cm). Conclusion: Postoperative adjuvant TACE may be effective to improve OS and DFS in patients with multinodular HCC, or HCC with MVI or PVTT. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to better define the benefit of adjuvant TACE in subset patients with HCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Eastern Staging System, which was specially developed for patients undergoing surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), has been proposed for more than ten years. To prospectively validate the predictive accuracy of the Eastern staging on long-term survival after HCC resection. Patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC from 2011 to 2020 at 10 Chinese hospitals were identified from a prospectively collected database. The survival predictive accuracy was evaluated and compared between the Eastern Staging with six other staging systems, including the JIS, BCLC, Okuda, CLIP, 8th AJCC TNM, and HKLC staging. Among 2365 patients, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 84.2%, 64.5%, and 52.6%, respectively. Among these seven staging systems, the Eastern staging was associated with the best monotonicity of gradients (linear trend χ2: 408.5) and homogeneity (likelihood ratio χ2: 447.3), and the highest discriminatory ability (the areas under curves for 1-, 3-, and 5-year mortality: 0.776, 0.787, and 0.768, respectively). In addition, the Eastern staging was the most informative staging system in predicting survival (Akaike information criterion: 2982.33). Using a large multicenter prospectively collected database, the Eastern Staging was found to show the best predictive accuracy on long-term overall survival in patients with resectable HCC than the other 6 commonly-used staging systems. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: R0 resection with a wide surgical margin is the gold standard for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), yet R0 resection with narrow margins and even R1 resection is not uncommon in real-world clinical practice. We sought to use a propensity-matched analysis to characterize the efficacy of adjuvant radiation therapy on long-term oncological survival after hepatectomy for HCC with narrow or positive margins.Methods and Materials: Using a multi-institutional database, patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy with negative margins of 0.1 to 1.0 cm or pathologically positive margins were analyzed. Using propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariate Cox-regression analysis, the effect of adjuvant radiation therapy on long-term overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was evaluated.Results: Among 683 patients who met inclusion criteria, 82 patients received adjuvant radiation therapy within 10 weeks after surgery. Radiation therapy-related major toxic effects were minimal among patients receiving adjuvant radiation therapy. PSM analysis created 78 matched pairs of patients. In the PSM cohort, median OS and RFS among patients treated with adjuvant radiation therapy were more favorable than individuals who were not treated (72.5 and 37.3 months versus 52.5 and 24.0 months, both P < .05). After adjustment for other confounding factors on multivariate analyses, adjuvant radiation therapy remained independently associated with favorable OS and RFS after hepatectomy with close/positive surgical margins for HCC (hazard ratios, 0.821 and 0.827, respectively).Conclusions: Despite the lack of consensus on the role of adjuvant radiation therapy after HCC resection, this PSM analysis suggested improved OS and RFS with adjuvant radiation therapy after hepatectomy with close/positive surgical margins for HCC. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to further define the survival benefit of adjuvant radiation therapy for patients with HCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]