Search

Expression of neuroendocrine (NE) markers in primary ovarian non-NE epithelial tumors has rarely been evaluated. The aim of our study was to evaluate the expression of the most widely used NE markers in these neoplasms and to determine any prognostic significance of NE marker expression. The cohort consisted of 551 primary ovarian tumors, including serous borderline tumors, low-grade serous carcinomas, high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC), clear cell carcinomas, endometroid carcinomas, mucinous borderline tumors, and mucinous carcinomas. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed using antibodies against INSM1, synaptophysin, chromogranin, and CD56 on tissue microarray. Positivity for INSM1, synaptophysin, chromogranin, and CD56 was most frequently observed in mucinous tumors (48.7%, 26.0%, 41.5%, and 100%, respectively). The positivity for these NE markers was mostly restricted to nonmucinous elements distributed throughout the tumor. The mucinous borderline tumor and mucinous carcinomas groups had similar proportions of positivity (mucinous borderline tumor: 53%, mucinous carcinomas: 39%). In the other tumor types, except for HGSC, there was only focal expression (5%-10%) or negativity for NE markers. HGSC showed high CD56 expression (in 26% of cases). Survival analysis was only performed for CD56 in HGSC as this was the only group with sufficient positive cases, and it showed no prognostic significance. Except for mucinous tumors, expression of NE markers in non-NE ovarian epithelial tumors is low. CD56 expression in HGSC occurs frequently but is without diagnostic or prognostic value., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 by the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.)

In gynecological neoplasms, immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of p53 is generally an accurate predictor of TP53 mutation status if correctly interpreted by the pathologist. However, the literature concerning cut-offs, frequency and prognostic significance of p53 staining in ovarian mucinous tumours is limited and heterogeneous. We performed an analysis of 123 primary ovarian mucinous tumours including mucinous borderline tumours (MBT), mucinous carcinomas (MC), and tumours with equivocal features between MBT and MC. We assessed p53 expression for the three recognised patterns of aberrant staining in ovarian carcinoma [overexpression ('all'), null and cytoplasmic] but using a recently suggested cut-off for aberrant overexpression in ovarian mucinous tumours (strong nuclear p53 staining in ≥12 consecutive tumour cells) and correlated the results with next generation sequencing (NGS) in all qualitatively sufficient cases (92/123). Aberrant p53 expression was present in 25/75 (33.3%) MBT, 23/33 (69.7%) MC (75% of MC with expansile invasion and 61.5% with infiltrative invasion), and 10/15 (66.7%) tumours equivocal between MBT and MC. Regarding the 92 tumours with paired IHC and mutation results, 86 showed concordant results and six cases were discordant. Three discordant MBT cases showed aberrant expression but were TP53 wild-type on sequencing. Three cases had normal p53 expression but contained a TP53 mutation. Overall, IHC predicted the TP53 mutation status with high sensitivity (94.1%) and specificity (92.7%). The accuracy of IHC was 93.5% with a positive predictive value of 94.1% and a negative predictive value of 92.7%. When comparing MC cases with wild-type TP53 versus those with TP53 mutation, there were no significant differences concerning disease-free survival, local recurrence-free survival, or metastases-free survival (p>0.05). In the MBT subgroup, there were no events for survival analyses. In conclusion, using an independent large sample set of ovarian mucinous tumours, the results of our study confirm that the suggested refined cut-off of strong nuclear p53 staining in ≥12 consecutive tumour cells reflect high accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for an underlying TP53 mutation but the TP53 mutation status has no prognostic significance in either MC or MBT., (Copyright © 2023 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. All rights reserved.)

Background: IMP2 and IMP3 are mRNA binding proteins involved in carcinogenesis. We examined a large cohort of ovarian tumors with the aim to assess the value of IMP2 and IMP3 for differential diagnosis, and to assess their prognostic significance., Methods: Immunohistochemical analyses with antibodies against IMP2 and IMP3 were performed on 554 primary ovarian tumors including 114 high grade serous carcinomas, 100 low grade serous carcinomas, 124 clear cell carcinomas, 54 endometrioid carcinomas, 34 mucinous carcinomas, 75 mucinous borderline tumors, and 41 serous borderline tumors (micropapillary variant). The associations of overall positivity with clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated using the chi-squared test or Fisher's Exact test., Results: We found IMP2 expression (in more than 5% of tumor cells) in nearly all cases of all tumor types, so the prognostic meaning could not be analyzed. The positive IMP3 expression (in more than 5% of tumor cells) was most common in mucinous carcinomas (82%) and mucinous borderline tumors (81%), followed by high grade serous (67%) and clear cell carcinomas (67%). The expression was less frequent in endometrioid carcinomas (39%), low grade serous carcinomas (23%), and micropapillary variant of serous borderline tumors (20%). Prognostic significance of IMP3 could be evaluated only in low grade serous carcinomas in the case of relapse-free survival, where negative cases showed better RFS (p = 0.033)., Conclusion: Concerning differential diagnosis our results imply that despite the differences in expression in the different ovarian tumor types, the practical value for diagnostic purposes is limited. Contrary to other solid tumors, we did not find prognostic significance of IMP3 in ovarian cancer, with the exception of RFS in low grade serous carcinomas. However, the high expression of IMP2 and IMP3 could be of predictive value in ovarian carcinomas since IMP proteins are potential therapeutical targets., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Primary ovarian mucinous tumors represent a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, and their diagnosis may be challenging. We analyzed 124 primary ovarian mucinous tumors originally diagnosed as mucinous borderline tumors (MBTs) or mucinous carcinomas (MCs), with an emphasis on interobserver diagnostic agreement and the potential for diagnostic support by molecular profiling using a next-generation sequencing targeted panel of 727 DNA and 147 RNA genes. Fourteen experienced pathologists independently assigned a diagnosis from preset options, based on a review of a single digitized slide from each tumor. After excluding 1 outlier participant, there was a moderate agreement in diagnosing the 124 cases when divided into 3 categories (κ = 0.524, for mucinous cystadenoma vs MBT vs MC). A perfect agreement for the distinction between mucinous cystadenoma/MBT as a combined category and MC was found in only 36.3% of the cases. Differentiating between MBTs and MCs with expansile invasion was particularly problematic. After a reclassification of the tumors into near-consensus diagnostic categories on the basis of the initial participant results, a comparison of molecular findings between the MBT and MC groups did not show major and unequivocal differences between MBTs and MCs or between MCs with expansile vs infiltrative pattern of invasion. In contrast, HER2 overexpression or amplification was found only in 5.3% of MBTs and in 35.3% of all MCs and in 45% of MCs with expansile invasion. Overall, HER2 alterations, including mutations, were found in 42.2% of MCs. KRAS mutations were found in 65.5% and PIK3CA mutations in 6% of MCs. In summary, although the diagnostic criteria are well-described, diagnostic agreement among our large group of experienced gynecologic pathologists was only moderate. Diagnostic categories showed a molecular overlap. Nonetheless, molecular profiling may prove to be therapeutically beneficial in advanced-stage, recurrent, or metastatic MCs., (Copyright © 2022 United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We assessed the value of cytokeratin 17 (CK17) expression for the differential diagnosis between primary ovarian mucinous tumors and metastases from the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and the significance of CK17 expression in a broad spectrum of primary ovarian tumors with respect to their prognosis. The sample set consisted of 554 primary ovarian tumors and 255 GIT tumors. In the primary ovarian tumors, a higher CK17 expression (in > 10% of tumors cells) was present only in 0-11.4% of all tumors (including mucinous tumors, micropapillary serous borderline tumors, clear cell, endometrioid, and high-grade serous carcinomas). The only exception was low-grade serous carcinoma, where higher CK17 expression was present in 24% of cases. Concerning GIT tumors, the higher levels of CK 17 expression (in > 10% of tumor cells) were observed in the upper GIT tumors (68.5% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, 61.6% of gallbladder adenocarcinoma, and 46% of gastric adenocarcinoma), which differs substantially not only from most of the primary ovarian tumors, but also from colorectal carcinoma (3.7%; p < 0.001). The results of our study suggest that expression of CK17 can potentially be used as an adjunct marker in differential diagnosis between primary ovarian mucinous tumors and metastases from the upper GIT, but not from colorectal carcinoma. However, in GIT tumors, CK17 can be used in the differential diagnosis between adenocarcinomas of the upper and lower GIT. Statistical analysis did not reveal strong association of CK17 expression with clinicopathological variables or patient outcomes in any primary ovarian tumors., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) are considered a biological category with increased epithelial proliferation and cellular atypia in the absence of invasive growth. Since BOT occur often in young patients fertility sparing surgery (FSS) is an important issue. With this study we aimed to evaluate risk factors for relapses and fertility of patients after FSS., Methods: Patients diagnosed with BOT and treated between 2000 and 2018 were included. External pathological review was done in all patients. FSS was performed after individual discussion and a complete surgical staging according to FIGO, without lymphadenectomy and with a waiver for preservation of uterus and one ovary., Results: Among 352 Patients 80.2% had FIGO I and 63.9% had a serous BOT. Eighteen patients (5.1%) relapsed and 4 cases of malignant transformation were reported (1.1%). One patient of the latter died, all others have no evidence of disease. The overall recurrence-rate was 1.1% in FIGO-Stage I and 25.5% in FIGO III-IV (HR = 27; 95%-CI 7.7-95; p ≤.001). 95 patients underwent FSS. Thirteen (13.7%) of these patients relapsed, all as BOT. In multivariate analysis FIGO stages II-IV (HR = 27; 95%-CI: 8.1-102; p ≤.001) and FSS (HR = 12; 95%-CI: 2.9-47; p = .001) remained significant risk factors for recurrent disease. Pregnancy rate among forty-one patients attempting to conceive was 82.9%. 29 patients experienced at least one life-birth, in total 38 life-births were reported., Conclusion: FSS in stage I is a safe procedure and life-birth-rates after FSS are high. More advanced FIGO stages have to be discussed individually and relapse rates have to be weighed against FSS. A central review of pathology, as we performed routinely, is mandatory and may have contributed to our low rate of invasive relapses., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest H. Plett: nothing to disclose; P.Harter: Honoraria: Astra Zeneca, Roche, Sotio, Tesaro, Stryker, ASCO, Zai Lab, MSD; Advisory Board: Astra Zeneca, Roche, Tesaro, Lilly, Clovis, Immunogen, MSD/Merck; Research funding (Inst): Astra Zeneca, Roche, GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medac, DFG, European Union, DKH, Tesaro, Genmab; F. Heitz: Honoraria: AstraZeneca, Roche, Tesaro, Clovis; Advisory Board: Astra Zeneca, Roche, Tesaro, Clovis; A. du Bois: personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Astra Zeneca, personal fees from Tesaro, personal fees from Clovis, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Genmab, personal fees from Pharmar, personal fees from Biocad, outside the submitted work; B. Ataseven: Roche Advisory board, lecture, travel/accommodation expenses Tesaro Advisory board, travel/accommodation expenses Amgen Advisory board Celgene lecture PharmaMar travel/accommodation expenses Clovis lecture Astra Zeneca lecture; S. Schneider: Roche: lecture Tesaro: Advisory board,lecture, travel/accommodation expenses Clovis: lecture Astra: Zeneca lecture A. Traut, S. Prader, S. Lax, A. Staebler, F. Kommoss and S. Heikaus: nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Most ovarian carcinomas (OC) are characterized by poor prognosis, particularly the most frequent type high-grade serous carcinoma. Besides PARP inhibitors, target-based therapeutic strategies are not well established. We asked the question which other therapeutic targets could be of potential value and, therefore, analyzed a large cohort of OC for several predictive factors. Two hundred eighty-eight (288) cases of OC including the major histological types were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for PD-L1HER2, ALK, and the mismatch repair (MMR) proteins MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6. HER2 amplification and ALK/EML4 fusion were assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. The most frequent finding was PD-L1 expression ≥ 1% in 19.5% of the cases, which correlated with a significantly better overall survival in multivariate analysis (p < 0.001). HER2 amplification was detected in 11 cases (4%), all high-grade serous carcinomas. Amplification of HER2 did not correlate with patients' survival. ALK/EML4 fusion was found in two cases (0.74%): one high-grade serous and one endometrioid carcinoma. MMR deficiency was only present in one case of stage IV high-grade serous carcinoma. Subsets of high-grade serous carcinomas show PD-L1 expression and HER2 amplification, respectively, and, therefore, could qualify for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy or anti HER2 therapy. PD-L1 is also of prognostic impact. ALK/EML4 fusion is very rare in OC and not a putative therapeutic target.

Background: Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are associated with better survival in ovarian cancer (OC) patients due to a better response to platinum-based chemotherapy. However, the impact of the BRCA1/2 mRNA-expression is not well characterized in OC., Patients and Methods: We investigated BRCA1/2 mRNA-expression in 12 non-neoplastic fallopian tubes and 201 epithelial OCs in relation to their clinical characteristics., Results: We found higher BRCA1/2 mRNA-expression in OCs compared to controls (P = 0.011, P < 0.001, respectively). BRCA1 mutated OCs exhibited lower BRCA1 (P = 0.014) but higher BRCA2 mRNA-expression (P = 0.001). Low BRCA1-expression was associated with favorable overall survival (OS) (P = 0.012) and low BRCA2-expression with better progression-free survival (PFS) and OS (P = 0.004, P = 0.001, respectively). A subgroup-analysis showed that this effect was confined only to the BRCA1-wildtype cancers. Cox-regression confirmed the prognostic significance of BRCA1-expression for OS (P = 0.028). Independency of the prognostic value of BRCA2-expression for PFS (P = 0.045) and OS (P = 0.015) was restricted to high-grade serous OCs. Fully platinum-sensitivity was characterized by lower BRCA1/2 mRNA-expression in BRCA1-wildtype cancers in comparison to platinum-refractory OC., Conclusion: Our findings may reflect higher platinum-sensitivity due to reduced capacity of DNA damage repair in tissues with low BRCA1/2-expression. In this context, especially in BRCA-wildtype cancers both parameters could also be potential predictors for PARP-sensitivity.