Search

This study aimed to investigate the cytotoxicity of a cluster of differentiation 70 antibody‐drug conjugate (CD70‐ADC) against ovarian cancer in in vitro and in vivo xenograft models. CD70 expression was assessed in clinical samples by immunohistochemical analysis. Western blotting and fluorescence‐activated cell sorting analyses were used to determine CD70 expression in the ovarian cancer cell lines A2780 and SKOV3, and in the cisplatin‐resistant ovarian cancer cell lines A2780cisR and SKOV3cisR. CD70 expression after cisplatin exposure was determined in A2780 cells transfected with mock‐ or nuclear factor (NF)‐κB‐p65‐small interfering RNA. We developed an ADC with an anti‐CD70 monoclonal antibody linked to monomethyl auristatin F and investigated its cytotoxic effect. We examined 63 ovarian cancer clinical samples; 43 (68.3%) of them expressed CD70. Among patients with advanced stage disease (n = 50), those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were more likely to exhibit high CD70 expression compared to those who did not (55.6% [15/27] vs 17.4% [4/23], P <.01). CD70 expression was confirmed in A2780cisR, SKOV3, and SKOV3cisR cells. Notably, CD70 expression was induced after cisplatin treatment in A2780 mock cells but not in A2780‐NF‐κB‐p65‐silenced cells. CD70‐ADC was cytotoxic to A2780cisR, SKOV3, and SKOV3cisR cells, with IC50 values ranging from 0.104 to 0.341 nmol/L. In A2780cisR and SKOV3cisR xenograft models, tumor growth in CD70‐ADC treated mice was significantly inhibited compared to that in the control‐ADC treated mice (A2780cisR: 32.0 vs 1639.0 mm3, P <.01; SKOV3cisR: 232.2 vs 584.9 mm3, P <.01). Platinum treatment induced CD70 expression in ovarian cancer cells. CD70‐ADC may have potential therapeutic implications in the treatment of CD70 expressing ovarian cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability profiles of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin (PLDC) with those of gemcitabine and carboplatin (GC) for the treatment of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Methods: Ovarian cancer patients with recurrence > 6 months after first-line platinum and taxane-based therapies were randomly assigned to PLDC [pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 plus carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5 mg/mL/min on day 1] every 4 weeks or GC (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin AUC 4 mg/mL/min on day 1) every 3 weeks for at least 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, and overall response rate, overall survival, toxicity, and dose administration were secondary endpoints. Results: One-hundred patients (49 PLDC; 51 GC) were randomly assigned. Over a median follow-up of 24 months, the median progression-free survival was 12.0 months (95% CI 9.2–15.0) for PLDC and 9.8 months (8.9–12.3) for GC [HR 0.69 (0.455–1.047)] with a difference of 2.2 months. The response rate was 57.1% (41.0–72.3) for PLDC and 56.4% (39.6–72.2) for GC. No obvious differences in toxicity (G3/4) were noted between arms. The median relative dose intensity of planned dose per week was 88.9% for pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and 53.1% for gemcitabine (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: PLDC and GC are both good treatment candidates for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients; however, the dose intensity was lower for GC than for PLDC. PLDC had a more favorable risk–benefit profile than that of GC for patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aims: An intraoperative diagnosis in cases with primary and metastatic ovarian carcinomas is important for adequate treatment. The aim of the present study was to find a reliable method to discriminate primary from metastatic mucinous adenocarcinomas (MACs) of the ovary intraoperatively. Methods: Clinical features of all primary and metastatic mucinous ovarian carcinomas diagnosed from 1994 to 2008 at the Osaka University and Osaka Rosai Hospitals, Osaka, Japan, were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Among the 73 MACs, 51 (70%) and 22 cases (30%) were diagnosed as primary and metastatic ovarian carcinomas, respectively. The distributions of tumor size, patient age, and serum CA125 level were significantly different between primary and metastatic cases. Our algorithm that categorizes patients ≥50 years whose tumor size was <10 cm into metastatic cases, and patients <50 years, or the ones whose tumor size was ≥10 cm, into primary tumors, provided an 84% accuracy in our population. Conclusions: A more reliable method to discriminate primary from metastatic MACs of the ovary by patient age and serum tumor markers was derived from our study population. Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: CRABP1 is a modulator of retinoic acid function. The aim of the present study was to investigate CRABP1 expression and its clinical significance in ovarian carcinoma. Methods: Expression of CRABP1 protein was investigated by immunohistochemical analysis in 100 ovarian carcinomas of various histological sub-types, including serous and clear cell adenocarcinomas. Relationship of CRABP1 expression to clinical features, including prognosis, was analyzed. Results: Reduced expression of CRABP1 protein was detected especially frequently in the serous and clear cell adenocarcinomas sub-types, 50% (20 of 40) and 38% (10 of 26) of cases, respectively. We found that in both serous and clear cell adenocarcinomas overall survival was significantly poorer in the cases with reduced CRABP1 expression compared to similar cases where expression was maintained, irrespective of the disease stage ( P = 0.0073 and 0.049, respectively). Disease-free survival of the serous and clear cell adenocarcinoma cases with reduced CRABP1 expression was significantly poorer, compared to the cases whose CRABP1 expression was maintained ( P = 0.024). Multivariate analysis showed that reduced expression of CRABP1 was a significantly important prognostic factor (adjusted hazard ratio: 8.189 (95% CI, 2.186-30.672, P = 0.0019)). Conclusions: The present study is the first to demonstrate that the reduced expression of CRABP1 has a potential as a prognostic marker for serous adenocarcinoma which is the most frequent histological ovarian tumor type and also for clear cell carcinoma that often exhibits chemo-resistance. Further study is necessary to clarify how CRABP1 protein expression was altered and how CRABP1 affects ovarian carcinoma cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background We compared survival outcomes and risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among patients with advanced and early-stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) and serous ovarian carcinoma (SOC), as well as potential links with interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels. Methods A multicenter case-control study was conducted in 370 patients with OCCC and 938 with SOC. In a subset of 200 cases, pretreatment plasma IL-6 levels were examined. Findings Patients with advanced OCCC had the highest 2-year cumulative VTE rates (advanced OCCC 43.1%, advanced SOC 16.2%, early-stage OCCC 11.9% and early-stage SOC 6.4%, P < 0.0001) and the highest median levels of IL-6 (advanced OCCC 17.8 pg/mL, advanced SOC 9.0 pg/mL, early-stage OCCC 4.2 pg/mL and early-stage SOC 5.0 pg/mL, P = 0.006). Advanced OCCC (hazard ratio [HR] 3.38, P < 0.0001), thrombocytosis (HR 1.42, P = 0.032) and elevated IL-6 (HR 8.90, P = 0.046) were independent predictors of VTE. In multivariate analysis, patients with advanced OCCC had significantly poorer 5-year progression-free and overall survival rates than those with advanced SOC ( P < 0.01), and thrombocytosis was an independent predictor of decreased survival outcomes ( P < 0.01). Elevated IL-6 levels led to poorer 2-year progression-free survival rates in patients with OCCC (50% versus 87.5%, HR 4.89, P = 0.016) than in those with SOC (24.9% versus 40.8%, HR 1.40, P = 0.07). Interpretation Advanced OCCC is associated with an increased incidence of VTE and decreased survival outcomes, which has major implications for clinical management of OCCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: Recent studies have demonstrated that lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) is associated with increased risk of hematogenous and lymphatic metastasis and poor clinical outcome of women with epithelial ovarian cancer. Given the suspected role of estrogen in promoting ovarian cancer metastasis, we examined potential links between estrogen receptor and LVSI in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Methods: Tumoral expression of ER, PR, p53, MDR1, EGFR, HER2, DNA ploidy, and S-phase fraction was examined for 121 cases of stage I–IV high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma samples obtained at primary cytoreductive surgery. Biomarker expression was correlated to LVSI and survival outcomes. Results: LVSI was observed in 101 (83.5%) of all cases. Immunohistochemistry of tested biomarkers showed ER (86.7%) to be the most commonly expressed followed by p53 (71.4%), HER2 (68.3%), EGFR (52.1%), MDR-1 (14.3%), and PR (8.9%). ER expression was positively correlated to PR expression (r=0.31, p=0.001). LVSI was only correlated with ER (odds ratio 6.27, 95%CI 1.93–20.4, p=0.002) but not with other biomarkers. In multivariate analysis, ER remained significantly associated with LVSI (p=0.039). LVSI remained a significant prognostic factor for decreased progression-free survival (HR 3.01, 95%CI 1.54–5.88, p=0.001) and overall survival (HR 2.69, 95%CI 1.18–6.23, p=0.021) while ER-expression did not remain as a significant variable in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Our data demonstrated that estrogen receptor was positively correlated with LVSI that was an independent prognostic indicator of poor survival outcomes of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. This study emphasizes the importance of estrogen pathway in promoting lymphatic or vascular spread of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Sex-cord stromal tumors (SCSTs) are rare ovarian cancers and their behavior during pregnancy is not well understood. To evaluate the maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnancy complicated by ovarian SCST, a systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE using entry key words “pregnancy” and each type of ovarian SCST (“sex cord stromal tumor,” “granulosa cell tumor,” “thecoma,” “Sertoli–Leydig cell tumor,” or “gynandroblastoma”) between 1955 and 2012 that identified 46 cases eligible for the analysis. Clinical characteristics, pregnancy outcome, tumor characteristics, and survival outcomes were evaluated. Serious adverse events were defined as complications related to the SCST that resulted in severe morbidity or mortality for mother, fetus, or both. The most common histology was granulosa cell tumor (22.0%), followed by thecoma (18.6%) and Sertoli–Leydig cell tumor (8.5%). Abdomino-pelvic pain (45.7%), palpable mass (30.4%), and virilization (26.1%) were the three most common symptoms. The majority were stage I (76.1%), tumor size <15cm (64.9%), and underwent unilateral adnexectomy (80.4%). Fetal conservation surgery was seen in 54.3%. Most cases had live births (78.3%) at full term (60.9%). Among cases proceeded expectant delay of delivery (45.7%), most cases resulted in live birth (95.2%) with median expectant interval of 20.7 weeks. Maternal and/or fetal serious adverse events (SAEs) were observed in 41.3% with maternal shock/hemoperitoneum being the most common complication (13.0%). Logistic regression test identified younger age (<30 versus ≥30, 73.3% versus 26.7%, odds ratio [OR] 11.7, 95%CI 1.35–101, p =0.026), large tumor (size ≥15cm versus <15cm, 64.9% versus 35.1%, OR 10.0, 95%CI 1.29–26.2, p =0.004), and advanced-stage (stages II–IV versus I, 76.1% versus 23.9%, OR 5.82, 95%CI 2.05–48.9, p =0.022) as risk factors of increased SAE. Overall survival of patients diagnosed with ovarian SCST during pregnancy was comparable to ovarian SCST not related to pregnancy (5-year rate, stages I and II–IV, 100% and 70.0%, respectively). In conclusion, although the majority of cases resulted in live birth, ovarian SCST-complicated pregnancy falls into the category of high-risk pregnancy. Risk factors for SAE identified in our study will help to guide strategic management of pregnancy complicated by ovarian SCST. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objective: To analyze the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy of docetaxel and irinotecan for paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) -refractory or -resistant ovarian carcinomas and for first treatment of primary clear cell and mucinous ovarian carcinomas. Study design: Between 2002 and 2009, we conducted a prospective Phase II study of the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy using docetaxel and irinotecan in 62 patients with TC-refractory or -resistant ovarian carcinoma cases (GOGO-OV2) and 15 patients with primary clear cell and mucinous ovarian carcinoma cases (GOGO-OV3). The dose of docetaxel and irinotecan was determined during our previous Phase I study. Results: A docetaxel plus irinotecan regimen provided a 53% response rate, 6 months progression-free survival (PFS), and 12 months overall survival (OS) for primary clear cell and mucinous ovarian carcinomas (similar to TC therapy). The differences of anti-tumor and survival effects between refractory and resistant cases were not statistically significant. The regimen also provided a 15% response rate, 5 months PFS, and 15 months OS for TC-refractory or TC-resistant cases, when used as a second-line chemotherapy. These data are similar to previous reports, however, our study provides the first data exclusively for the cases refractory or resistant to a gold standard TC therapy as a second-line chemotherapy. The regimen was demonstrated to be well tolerable. Conclusion: Combination chemotherapy of docetaxel and irinotecan may be a useful option to treat TC-refractory/resistant cases and primary clear cell and mucinous adenocarcinoma cases of ovarian carcinoma. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]