Search

Plain Language Summary What is this summary about? This PLSP provides a short summary of an original scientific article that presented results from the PRIMA study after 3.5 years of follow-up time. The original article was published in the European Journal of Cancer in 2023. The PRIMA study included adult patients with newly diagnosed advanced high-risk ovarian cancer whose tumors shrunk or became undetectable after treatment with chemotherapy with or without surgery. The PRIMA study evaluated how well the drug niraparib, also known as Zejula, worked at delaying or preventing ovarian cancer from coming back (recurring) or getting worse (progressing) compared with placebo (a substance with no effects that a doctor gives to a patient instead of a drug). The first results from the PRIMA study were published in 2019, when patients had participated in the PRIMA study for about 1.2 years. The article this PLSP is based on reports longer-term data from the PRIMA study, when patients had participated in the PRIMA study for about 3.5 years. Patients were monitored (or followed) for a longer time to understand how well niraparib continued to work and to evaluate whether the safety of niraparib changed with additional time being monitored. What were the results? Patients who took niraparib had more time before their cancer came back or got worse than patients who took placebo. In terms of safety, no new types of side effects with niraparib treatment were observed with additional time being monitored as part of the PRIMA study. What do the results mean? These results support that niraparib remains an important treatment option to help delay the cancer from coming back or getting worse in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer that responded to initial treatment. Clinical Trial Registration:NCT02655016 (PRIMA study) (ClinicalTrials.gov) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PurposeTrebananib, a peptibody that blocks binding of angiopoietin-1 and -2 to Tie2, significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer in the phase 3 TRINOVA-1 study. We report overall survival (OS) in the intent-to-treat population and clinically relevant subgroups and time to second disease progression (PFS-2).Patients and methodsWomen with recurrent disease (platinum-free interval

BackgroundAngiogenesis is a valid target in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. Trebananib inhibits the binding of angiopoietins 1 and 2 to the Tie2 receptor, and thereby inhibits angiogenesis. We aimed to assess whether the addition of trebananib to single-agent weekly paclitaxel in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer improved progression-free survival.MethodsFor this randomised, double-blind phase 3 study undertaken between Nov 10, 2010, and Nov 19, 2012, we enrolled women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer from 32 countries. Patient eligibility criteria included having been treated with three or fewer previous regimens, and a platinum-free interval of less than 12 months. We enrolled patients with a computerised interactive voice response system, and patients were randomly assigned using a permuted block method (block size of four) in a 1:1 ratio to receive weekly intravenous paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) plus either weekly masked intravenous placebo or trebananib (15 mg/kg). Patients were stratified on the basis of platinum-free interval (≥0 and ≤6 months vs >6 and ≤12 months), presence or absence of measurable disease, and region (North America, western Europe and Australia, or rest of world). The sponsor, investigators, site staff, and patients were masked to the treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01204749, and is no longer accruing patients.Findings919 patients were enrolled, of whom 461 were randomly assigned to the trebananib group and 458 to the placebo group. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the trebananib group than in the placebo group (7·2 months [5·8-7·4] vs 5·4 months [95% CI 4·3-5·5], respectively, hazard ratio 0·66, 95% CI 0·57-0·77, p

Objective: Our aim was to reach a consensus on the management of the most controversial issues of advanced ovarian cancer. Methods: Nominal group and Delphi techniques were used. A steering committee of 5 experts analyzed current management of advanced ovarian cancer, identified controversies, critically analyzed the evidence, and formulated guiding statements for clinicians. Subsequently, a panel of 15 experts was selected to test agreement with the statements through two Delphi rounds. Items were scored on a 4-point Likert scale from 1 (totally disagree) to 4 (totally agree). In the first and second rounds, consensus was considered if ≥70% of answers pertained to category 1 or category 4. Results: Overall, 112 statements were incorporated in the following areas: 1) biomarkers and hereditary ovarian cancer; 2) first-line treatment; 3) recurrent disease when platinum might be the best option; and 4) post-poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors setting. In the first Delphi round, 37 statements reached consensus and did thus not pass to the second round. After the second round, another 18 statements reached consensus. Forty-six of the consensus were with the agreement and 9 with the disagreement. Conclusion: Through the methodology used, a consensus was reached in approximately half of the statements. The results of this work may be useful in addressing the most controversial issues on the management of advanced ovarian cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: the association between ovarian endometriosis (OE) and endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC) is extensively documented, and misfunction of the immune system might be involved. The primary objective of this study was to identify and compare the spatial distribution of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) in OE and EAOC. Secondary objectives included the analysis of the relationship between immunosuppressive populations and T-cell exhaustion markers in both groups. Methods: TILs (CD3, CD4, and CD8) and macrophages (CD163) were assessed by immunochemistry. Exhaustion markers (PD-1, TIM3, CD39, and FOXP3) and their relationship with tumour-associated macrophages (CD163) were assessed by immunofluorescence on paraffin-embedded samples from n = 43 OE and n = 54 EAOC patients. Results: we observed a predominantly intraepithelial CD3+ distribution in OE but both an intraepithelial and stromal pattern in EAOC (p < 0.001). TILs were more abundant in OE (p < 0.001), but higher TILs significantly correlated with a longer overall survival and disease-free survival in EAOC (p < 0.05). CD39 and FOXP3 significantly correlated with each other and CD163 (p < 0.05) at the epithelial level in moderate/intense CD4 EAOC, whereas in moderate/intense CD8+, PD-1+ and TIM3+ significantly correlated (p = 0.009). Finally, T-cell exhaustion markers FOXP3-CD39 were decreased and PD-1-TIM3 were significantly increased in EAOC (p < 0.05). Conclusions: the dysregulation of TILs, TAMs, and T-cell exhaustion might play a role in the malignization of OE to EAOC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Early stages are under-represented in studies on the molecular and immune features of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), and specific studies focused on early-stage HGSOC are required for a better prognostic stratification and to personalize chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic significance of CD8+ and CD4+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), tumoral cell PD-L1 expression, BRCA mutational status and tumor mutation burden (TMB) in early-stage HGSOC. A retrospective study was performed on stage I and II HGSOC from the Molecular Reclassification of Early Stages of Ovarian Cancer (RECLAMO) cohort from the Spanish Group of Ovarian Cancer Research (GEICO). Centralized histological typing was performed based on morphological and immunohistochemical features. Intraepithelial (i) and stromal (s) CD8+ and CD4+ T cells and PD-L1 were evaluated on tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status and TMB were analyzed in tumor DNA using next-generation sequencing. The study included 124 tumors. High iCD8+ (>20 TILs/core), low/intermediate CD4+ (<20 TILs/core) and high CD8+/CD4+ ratio (>35/core) were associated with favorable outcomes. Tumor cell PD-L1 expression (TPS ≥ 1) was present in only 8% of tumors. In total, 11 (16%) and 6 (9%) out of 69 HGSOC tested carried pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, respectively. Median TMB of 40 tumors analyzed was 5.04 mutations/Mb and only 6 tumors had 10 or more mutations/Mb. BRCA status and TMB were not associated with TILs or prognosis. When compared with studies on advanced HGSOC, our results suggested that prognostic variables differed according to stage and that more studies focused on early stages of HGSOC are needed to better stratify these tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The PRIMA phase 3 trial showed niraparib significantly prolongs median progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (OC) responsive to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, including those who had tumors with homologous recombination deficiency (HRd). This analysis of PRIMA examined the qualityadjusted PFS (QA-PFS) and quality-adjusted time without symptoms of disease or toxicity (Q-TWiST) of patients on maintenance niraparib versus placebo. Methods: Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive once-daily maintenance niraparib (n = 487) or placebo (n = 246). QA-PFS was defined as the PFS of patients adjusted for their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) prior to disease progression, measured using European Quality of Life Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire index scores from the PRIMA trial. Q-TWiST was calculated by combining data on PFS, duration of symptomatic grade X2 adverse events (fatigue or asthenia, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and abdominal bloating) prior to disease progression, and EQ-5D index scores. Analyses used data collected up to the last date of PFS assessment (May 17, 2019). Results: The restricted mean QA-PFS was significantly longer with niraparib versus placebo in the HRd (n = 373) and overall intention-to-treat (ITT; n = 733) populations (mean gains of 6.5 [95% confidence interval; CI, 3.9-8.9] and 4.1 [95% CI, 2.2-5.8] months, respectively). There were also significant improvements in restricted mean Q-TWiST for niraparib versus placebo (mean gains of 5.9 [95% CI, 3.5-8.6] and 3.5 [95% CI, 1.7-5.6] months, respectively) in the HRd and ITT populations. Conclusions: In patients with advanced OC, first-line niraparib maintenance was associated with significant gains in QA-PFS and Q-TWiST versus placebo. These findings demonstrate that niraparib maintenance treatment is associated with a PFS improvement and that treatment benefit is maintained even when HRQoL and/or toxicity data are combined with PFS in a single measure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The PENELOPE trial evaluated pertuzumab added to chemotherapy for biomarker-selected platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. As previously reported, pertuzumab did not statistically significantly improve progression-free survival (primary end point: HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.11), although results in the paclitaxel and gemcitabine cohorts suggested activity. Here, we report final overall survival and patient-reported outcomes. Patients and methods: Eligible patients had ovarian carcinoma that progressed during/within 6 months of completing ≥4 platinum cycles, low tumor human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3) mRNA expression, and ≤2 prior chemotherapy lines. Investigators selected single-agent topotecan, gemcitabine or weekly paclitaxel before patients were randomized to either placebo or pertuzumab (840→420 mg every 3 weeks), stratified by selected chemotherapy, prior anti-angiogenic therapy, and platinum-free interval. Final overall survival analysis (key secondary end point) was pre-specified after 129 deaths. Patient-reported outcomes (secondary end point) were assessed at baseline and every 9 weeks until disease progression. Results: At database lock (June 9, 2016), 130 (83%) of 156 randomized patients had died. Median follow-up was 27 months in the pertuzumab arm versus 26 months in the control arm. In the intent-to-treat population there was no overall survival difference between treatment arms (stratified HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.32; p=0.60). Results in subgroups defined by stratification factors indicated heterogeneity similar to previous progression-free survival results. Updated safety was similar to previously published results. Compliance with patient-reported outcomes questionnaire completion was >75% for all validated patient-reported outcomes measures. Pertuzumab demonstrated neither beneficial nor detrimental effects on patient-reported outcomes compared with placebo, except for increased diarrhea symptoms. Discussion: Consistent with the primary results, adding pertuzumab to chemotherapy for low tumor HER3 mRNA-expressing platinum-resistant ovarian cancer did not improve overall survival, but showed trends in some cohorts. Except for increased diarrhea symptoms, pertuzumab had no impact on patient-reported outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov:: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01684878. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of the study was to assess the feasibility, toxicity, and reasons for early discontinuation of a modified outpatient intraperitoneal/intravenous (IP/IV) chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of patients with optimally debulked stage III ovarian cancer.Between February 2006 and November 2008, 51 consecutive patients from Institutions of the Spanish Ovarian Cancer Group (GEICO) were treated with a modified outpatient IP chemotherapy regimen. Patients received IV paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over 3 hours on day 1, followed by IP cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (or 75 mg/m2 according to the principal investigator's criteria) on day 2. On day 8, patients received IP paclitaxel 60 mg/m2. To homogenize the IP administration and supportive measures, a GEICO guideline for IP chemotherapy was established. Patients were treated with the intention to receive 6 courses of chemotherapy every 21 days.The median age of the patients was 49 years (range, 36-75 years), and most of them had papillary serous ovarian cancer (78%), International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC (76%). Thirty-nine patients completed 4 or more IP cycles, and 28 (61%) completed all 6 IP cycles. Twenty-two patients discontinued the IP/IV treatment, mainly because of chemotherapy toxicity (10 patients) and catheter-related complications (5 patients). The most prevalent grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (14 patients; 30%) and gastrointestinal events (12 patients; 26%).The GEICO outpatient modified regimen resulted in a lesser toxicity and a greater rate of treatment completion than previously reported. The accurate selection of patients and the administration following well-defined guidelines can increase the feasibility of IP chemotherapy administration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: We investigated the expression of Aurora kinases A and B by immunohistochemistry in 68 ovarian carcinomas to analyze their prognostic value. The amplification of AURKA gene by fluorescence in situ hybridization was also assessed. Overall, 58.8% and 85.3% of ovarian carcinomas showed expression of Aurora A and B, respectively. Amplification of AURKA was found in 27.6% of cases examined. Tumors with Aurora A expression showed a lower rate of recurrence than those tumors without Aurora A expression (65% versus 91.7%, P = .019). In the univariate analysis, patients with Aurora A and B expression showed an increased progression-free survival (P = .023 and .06, respectively, log-rank test) and overall survival (P = .03 and .02, respectively, log-rank test). The multivariate analysis adjusted to optimal surgery by Cox proportional hazards regression showed Aurora A expression as an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (P = .03) and overall survival (P = .02). In conclusion, Aurora A expression seems to have a prognostic value in ovarian carcinoma. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Ovarian carcinoma is the most important cause of gynecological cancer-related mortality in Western societies. Despite the improved median overall survival in patients receiving chemotherapy regimens such as paclitaxel and carboplatin combination, relapse still occurs in most advanced diseased patients. Increased angiogenesis is associated with rapid recurrence and decreased survival in ovarian cancer. This study was planned to identify an angiogenesis-related gene expression profile with prognostic value in advanced ovarian carcinoma patients. Methodology/Principal Findings: RNAs were collected from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of 61 patients with III/IV FIGO stage ovarian cancer who underwent surgical cytoreduction and received a carboplatin plus paclitaxel regimen. Expression levels of 82 angiogenesis related genes were measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction using TaqMan low-density arrays. A 34-gene-profile which was able to predict the overall survival of ovarian carcinoma patients was identified. After a leave-one-out cross validation, the profile distinguished two groups of patients with different outcomes. Median overall survival and progression-free survival for the high risk group was 28.3 and 15.0 months, respectively, and was not reached by patients in the low risk group at the end of follow-up. Moreover, the profile maintained an independent prognostic value in the multivariate analysis. The hazard ratio for death was 2.3 (95% CI, 1.5 to 3.2; p<0.001). Conclusions/Significance: It is possible to generate a prognostic model for advanced ovarian carcinoma based on angiogenesis-related genes using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. The present results are consistent with the increasing weight of angiogenesis genes in the prognosis of ovarian carcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To estimate the cost-effectiveness of olaparib after being funded by the Spanish National Health Service (SNHS) as first-line monotherapy maintenance treatment in patients with advanced high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) and BRCA mutations in Spain. A semi-Markov model with one-month cycles was adapted to the Spanish healthcare setting, using the perspective of the SNHS, and a time horizon of 50 years. Two scenarios were compared: receiving olaparib vs. no maintenance treatment. The model comprised four health states and included the clinical results of the SOLO1 study, along with the direct healthcare costs associated with the use of first-line and subsequent treatment resources (2020 €). A discount rate of 3% was applied for future cost and quality-of-life outcomes. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was also carried out and a cost-effectiveness threshold of €25,000 per quality adjusted life year (QALY) was considered. The introduction of olaparib as a first-line maintenance treatment for advanced HGSOC patients with BRCA mutations implied a cost of €131,614.98 compared to €102,369.54 without olaparib (difference: €29,245.44), with an improvement of 2.00 QALYs (5.56 and 3.57, respectively). Therefore, olaparib is cost-effective for advanced HGSOC patients with BRCA mutations, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €14,653.2/QALY. The results from the PSA showed that 92.1% of the simulations fell below the €25,000/QALY threshold. The model showed that olaparib could improve the overall survival by 2 years, vs. no maintenance treatment. Olaparib as first-line maintenance treatment is cost-effective in advanced HGSOC patients with BRCA mutations in Spain. • Our results suggest that olaparib could delay disease progression and improve OS by 2 years vs. no maintenance treatment. • Treatment with olaparib resulted in a gain of 2.00 QALYs vs. no maintenance treatment, at an ICER of €14,653,2/QALY. • First-line maintenance with olaparib is cost-effective in advanced HGSOC patients with BRCA mutations in Spain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA study, maintenance therapy with niraparib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC) regardless of germline BRCA mutation (g BRCA m) or homologous recombination deficiency (HRd) biomarker status. This analysis updates long-term safety and available data on secondary efficacy outcomes. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial, pts with PSROC were enrolled into 1 of 2 independent cohorts by g BRCA m status (g BRCA m or non-g BRCA m). Stratification factors were PFS after the penultimate platinum therapy (6 to <12 months vs ≥12 months), best response to the last platinum-based therapy (complete or partial), and prior bevacizumab (Y/N). Pts were randomized 2:1 to niraparib 300 mg QD or placebo. The primary endpoint was PFS as assessed by blinded independent central review. Progression-free survival 2 (PFS2) and overall survival (OS) were exploratory secondary endpoints. A total of 553 pts were randomized in the NOVA study. Median follow-up was 66 months at the time of the current analysis. Hematologic treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) primarily occurred in the first year of niraparib treatment: incidence of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia decreased from 33.8% to 2.8%, anemia decreased from 25.6% to 0.7%, and neutropenia decreased from 19.3% to 2.1% from year 1 to year 2–3, respectively. A total of 13 (3.5%; 9 g BRCA m, 4 non-g BRCA m) pts who received niraparib developed MDS/AML vs 3 (1.7%) placebo pts. Survival status could not be obtained for ~15% of pts. Data on post-progression therapy, including PARP inhibitors, were not available for 25% of the study pts. Based on data cut-off on October 2020, 127 and 238 deaths occurred in the g BRCA m and non-g BRCA m cohorts, respectively. For pts with available data, placebo pts received subsequent PARP inhibitor therapy (crossover) after disease progression: 46% (30/65) in the g BRCA m cohort and 13% (15/116) in the non-g BRCA m cohort. Hazard ratios for PFS2 were 0.67 (95% CI: 0.48, 0.95) in the g BRCA m cohort and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.62, 1.05) in the non-g BRCA m cohort. Restricted mean survival time analyses for OS up to 72 months were 43.2 months in placebo vs 45.9 months in niraparib (Δ of 2.7m, 95% CI: -4.1, 9.5) in the g BRCA m cohort and 39.1 months in placebo vs 38.5 months in niraparib (Δ of -0.6m, 95% CI: -6.0, 4.7) in the non-g BRCA m cohort. These final data support the safe long-term use of niraparib for maintenance treatment in pts with PSROC. PFS2 analysis indicates that the benefit of niraparib maintenance therapy extends beyond first progression. No difference in survival was observed. The NOVA study was not powered for OS, and analysis is confounded by a high rate of crossover and missing data thus limiting its interpretation. GlaxoSmithKline. NCT01847274. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Lucitanib is a potent, selective inhibitor of the tyrosine kinases VEGFR1-3, PDGFRα/ß, and FGFR1-3 that is being investigated in combination with the programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) inhibitor nivolumab in four recurrent gynecologic malignancies (cervical, endometrial, ovarian, and ovarian/endometrial clear-cell cancers) in an ongoing phase II study, using a Simon's two-stage design. To maximize lucitanib exposure and potential clinical benefit of the combination, individualized lucitanib dose titration is utilized. We presented initial data from the cervical cancer cohort. Methods: Patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer of squamous carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma histology, who received ≥1 prior platinum-based chemotherapy regimen, with or without bevacizumab, were enrolled. Prior treatment with a PD-1 or programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitor was prohibited. All patients-initiated treatment with lucitanib 6 mg orally once daily (QD) + nivolumab 480 mg intravenously every 28 days. Lucitanib dose was escalated from 6 mg to 8 mg and up to 10 mg QD in patients who met safety-based titration criteria. Tumor response was assessed by investigators per RECIST v1.1. Data cut-off was September 1, 2021. Results: Twenty patients have been treated to date (median treatment duration: 85 days, range: 1-343+); 15 (75%) remain on treatment (13 remain on the combination and two on nivolumab monotherapy). Eleven (55%) patients received ≥2 prior anticancer regimens; nine (45%) had prior bevacizumab. To date, 17 (85%) patients have completed ≥1 cycle; two patients have escalated lucitanib to a dose of 8 mg, and three to the maximum dose of 10 mg. The most frequent anygrade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) have been hypertension (n =13, 65%), decreased appetite (n =11, 55%), asthenia/fatigue (n =10, 50%), and nausea (n =10, 50%). The most frequent grade ≥3 TEAE has been hypertension (n =4, 20%). Three (15%) patients discontinued lucitanib due to a related TEAE (colonic fistula, hypertension, and proteinuria). As of the data cut-off, 17 patients had at least one post-baseline tumor assessment, with four confirmed partial responses (PRs), eight patients with stable disease (7 remain ongoing), and five patients with the best response of progressive disease reported. The durations of PR range from 1.8+ to 9.3+ months. Of the four responding patients, three had received prior bevacizumab. Conclusions: Promising signs of antitumor activity in patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer were noted in this initial analysis. Toxicity has been manageable and is consistent with that previously reported for lucitanib and nivolumab, and other agents of both classes. Having met Simon's two-stage stage I requirements (≥3 confirmed responses), study accrual continues in stage II of the cervical cancer cohort. Additional and more mature data, including biomarker analyses, will be presented at the meeting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]