Search

Abstract: Endometrioma is known to be an occurrence site of ovarian cancer, but there is no evidence on how to reduce the risk of canceration. Here, we report three cases of ovarian cancer arising from endometrioma during hormone therapies of GnRH analogue and tamoxifen, low‐dose estrogen‐progestin (LEP) and dienogest. In all cases, each hormonal treatment was effective in shrinking the size of the endometrioma. During hormonal treatments, solid parts inside endometrioma were observed, which was followed by surgery. The histology of the solid parts was clear‐cell adenocarcinoma in all cases. An immunohistochemistry study demonstrated that the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) were positive in the endometriosis part but negative in the cancer part, while the human EGF receptor (HER) 2 was negative or very weak in the benign part and positive in the malignant part in all three cases. Even though hormonal treatments seem to be effective to regulate endometrioma, careful observation is needed to follow‐up patients with endometrioma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Intraperitoneal chemotherapy preceded by cytoreductive surgery should be the standard of care in the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. This combination has been extensively examined in both the clinical and preclinical settings with favourable oncologic outcomes. Unfortunately, despite the existence of these evidence-based data, this management strategy remains underutilised. Materials and methods: We review and discuss the role of intraperitoneal chemotherapy with particular emphasis about the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics aspects, the mode of administration, the reported side effects, the compliance of the patients and the clinical ongoing studies. Conclusions: Further studies investigating the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics aspect of IP route may help to reduce toxicity pending more effective treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ovarian cancer is today the most lethal female cancer with an overall survival of only 49.9%. The currently available screening modalities are disappointing in detecting highly curable early stage ovarian cancer. Natural history of ovarian cancer is unknown; it appears it can develop quickly from normal looking ovaries. Timely referral of women with non-specific symptoms (such as abdominal bloating, pelvic pain) for an ultrasound scan or blood CA125 assessments may help in the early diagnosis. Patients with Stage IA or IB disease with grade 1 tumors have a cure rate of >90%; this is likely to be compromised by laparoscopic surgery. In selected patients fertility preservation with good obstetric outcome is possible. However, the relapse rate in ‘high risk’ early stage ovarian cancers is 40–45%; adjuvant chemotherapy is needed. Only 20–25% of those with stage III and IV disease are cured. Despite a high primary response (70%) majority (70–75%) will relapse and all are likely to succumb. Optimal debulking surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy are needed for stages III and IV disease; the outcome is superior if managed by gynecologic oncologists. Where cost of drugs is an important consideration, an alternative is carboplatin (an affordable and equally effective drug). The role of vaccines needs further study. When relapses occur palliation will be the aim in most instances. Oral contraceptives, breast feeding, tubal sterilization and hysterectomy also have a protective effect. Risk-reducing salpingo-oopherectomy has been suggested in women with BRCA mutations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. Currently, no prospective study supports or refutes the value of secondary cytoreductive surgery in patients with ovarian cancer. We therefore reviewed the surgical data of patients who underwent second-look laparotomy (SLL) with or without secondary cytoreductive surgery at our department. Methods. Analysis is based on the data of 179 patients who had FIGO stage II (suboptimally staged), stage III or IV ovarian cancer, who received a platinum-based first-line chemotherapy, who were clinically considered to be tumor-free or had at least a clinically partial response to first-line chemotherapy, and who underwent SLL. In patients with macroscopic tumor the diagnostic SLL was followed by a secondary cytoreductive surgery in order to remove as much tumor as possible. Patients with a positive SLL were given second-line chemotherapy. Survival from SLL until death was considered the primary statistical endpoint. Results. In 78 out of 179 (43.5%) a negative SLL could be confirmed pathologically. Patients with negative findings, with microscopic, and macroscopic disease at SLL had a median survival of 66.6, 57.2, and 19.0 months, respectively (p =0.0001). In patients who underwent a secondary cytoreductive operation and in whom residual tumor was none, less than 2 cm, or more than 2 cm, the median survival was 22.9, 17.8, and 15.5 months, respectively (p =0.325). Conclusions. The presence of macroscopic tumor at SLL is an adverse prognostic factor whereas the role of secondary cytoreductive surgery at SLL appears to be limited in the routine management of ovarian cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Focuses on the early detection of cancer. Pathologic entity; Biostatistical considerations; Diagnostic techniques; Clinical applications.