Search

Some noise exposures resulting in temporary threshold shift (TTS) result in cochlear synaptopathy. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate a human population that might be at risk for noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy (i.e., “hidden hearing loss”). Participants were firearm users who were (1) at-risk for prior audiometric noise-induced threshold shifts, given their history of firearm use, (2) likely to have experienced complete threshold recovery if any prior TTS had occurred, based on this study’s normal-hearing inclusion criteria, and (3) not at-risk for significant agerelated synaptopathic loss, based on this study’s young-adult inclusion criteria. 70 participants (age 18–25 yr) were enrolled, including 33 firearm users experimental (EXP), and 37 non-firearm users control (CNTRL). All participants were required to exhibit audiometric thresholds ≤20 dB HL bilaterally, from 0.25 to 8 kHz. The study was designed to test the hypothesis that EXP participants would exhibit a reduced cochlear nerve response compared to CNTRL participants, despite normal-hearing sensitivity in both groups. No statistically significant group differences in auditory performance were detected between the CNTRL and EXP participants on standard audiom to etry, extended high-frequency audiometry, Words-in-Noise performance, distortion product otoacoustic emission, middle ear muscle reflex, or auditory brainstem response. Importantly, 91% of EXP participants reported that they wore hearing protection either “all the time” or “almost all the time” while using firearms. The data suggest that consistent use of hearing protection during firearm use can effectively protect cochlear and neural measures of auditory function, including suprathreshold responses. The current results do not exclude the possibility that neural pathology may be evident in firearm users with less consistent hearing protection use. However, firearm users with less consistent hearing protection use are also more likely to exhibit threshold elevation, among other cochlear deficits, thereby confounding the isolation of any potentially selective neural deficits. Taken together, it seems most likely that firearm users who consistently and correctly use hearing protection will exhibit preserved measures of cochlear and neural function, while firearm users who inconsistently and incorrectly use hearing protection are most likely to exhibit cochlear injury, rather than evidence of selective neural injury in the absence of cochlear injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Significance: Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is an important public health issue resulting in decreased quality of life for affected individuals, and significant costs to employers and governmental agencies. Recent Advances: Advances in the mechanistic understanding of NIHL have prompted a growing number of proposed, in-progress, and completed clinical trials for possible protections against NIHL via antioxidants and other drug agents. Thirty-one clinical trials evaluating prevention of either temporary or permanent NIHL were identified and are reviewed. Critical Issues: This review revealed little consistency in the noise-exposed populations in which drugs are evaluated or the primary outcomes used to measure NIHL prevention. Changes in pure-tone thresholds were the most common primary outcomes; specific threshold metrics included both average hearing loss and incidence of significant hearing loss. Changes in otoacoustic emission (OAE) amplitude were relatively common secondary outcomes. Extended high-frequency (EHF) hearing and speech-in-noise perception are commonly adversely affected by noise exposure but are not consistently included in clinical trials assessing prevention of NIHL. Future Directions: Multiple criteria are available for monitoring NIHL, but the specific criterion to be used to define clinically significant otoprotection remains a topic of discussion. Audiogram-based primary outcome measures can be combined with secondary outcomes, including OAE amplitude, EHF hearing, speech-in-noise testing, tinnitus surveys, and patient-reported outcomes. Standardization of test protocols for the above primary and secondary outcomes, and associated reporting criterion for each, would facilitate clinical trial design and comparison of results across investigational drug agents. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 36, 1171–1202. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The previous 30 years have provided information on the mechanisms of cell death in the inner ear after noise exposure, ototoxic drug injury, and during aging, and clinical trials have emerged for all of these acquired forms of hearing loss. Sudden hearing loss is less well understood, but restoration of hearing after sudden hearing loss is also a long-standing drug target, typically using steroids as an intervention but with other agents of interest as well. Purpose The purpose of this review was to describe the state of the science regarding clinical testing of investigational medicinal products for the inner ear with respect to treatment or prevention of acquired hearing loss. Data Collection and Analysis Comprehensive search and summary of clinical trials listed in the National Library of Medicine (www.ClinicalTrials.gov) database identified 61 clinical trials. Results Study phase, status, intervention, and primary, secondary, and other outcomes are summarized for studies assessing prevention of noise-induced hearing loss, prevention of drug-induced hearing loss, treatment of stable sensorineural hearing loss, and treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Conclusion This review provides a comprehensive summary of the state of the science with respect to investigational medicinal products for the inner ear evaluated in human clinical trials, and the current challenges for the field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Amplification from natural ear canal resonance has been documented as highly variable across individuals. However, individual variability in total pre-cochlear amplification (i.e., combined external and middle ear mechanisms) remains understudied in relevance to noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). It is well-known that more noise means more risk of hearing loss, yet the current risk-models do not consider individually variable pre-cochlear amplification, also referred to as the transfer function of the open ear (TFOE). The present study principally documented individual TFOE variability and explored the feasibility and accuracy of simple proxy metrics, which could be used to estimate TFOE. Participants' TFOE values were used to estimate their NIHL risk in hypothetical free-field exposures. Forty-eight adult participants (42 female, 6 male, ages 21–60 years) met inclusion criteria of 2 healthy pinnae and ear canals (<10% cerumen occlusion) and type-A tympanometric examination. Participants underwent otoscopy, tympanometry, pinna size measurement, real-ear-to-coupler-difference, and TFOE measurement. TFOE ranged from 5 to 15 dB-A (mean = 10 dB-A); given that NIHL risk is estimated to double in either 3 or 5 dB-A increments, the observed variability could explain a substantial portion of individual vulnerability to NIHL. A simple regression model with eardrum compliance (ml) was correlated with individual TFOE (p < 0.05). TFOE variability has the potential to substantially explain why two individuals with the same noise-exposure can develop significantly different degrees of NIHL. Eardrum compliance (ml) was a correlated proxy measurement of TFOE in this principally adult, female dataset; additional research is needed to confirm this relationship in a unique, heterogeneous dataset. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Short-term noise exposure that induces transient changes in thresholds has induced permanent cochlear synaptopathy in multiple species. Here, the literature was reviewed to gain translational insight into the relationships between noise exposure, ABR metrics, speech-in-noise performance and TTS in humans. Design: PubMed-based literature search, retrieval and review of full-text articles. Study Sample: Peer-reviewed literature identified using PubMed search. Results: Permanent occupational noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is frequently accompanied by abnormal ABR amplitude and latency. In the absence of NIHL, there are mixed results for relationships between noise exposure and ABR metrics. Interpretation of speech-in-noise deficits is difficult as both cochlear synaptopathy and outer hair cell (OHC) loss can drive deficits. Reductions in Wave I amplitude during TTS may reflect temporary OHC pathology rather than cochlear synaptopathy. Use of diverse protocols across studies reduces the ability to compare outcomes across studies. Conclusions: Longitudinal ABR and speech-in-noise data collected using consistent protocols are needed. Although speech-in-noise testing may not reflect cochlear synaptopathy, speech-in-noise testing should be completed as part of a comprehensive test battery to provide the objective measurement of patient difficulty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Noise exposure that causes a temporary threshold shift but no permanent threshold shift can cause degeneration of synaptic ribbons and afferent nerve fibers, with a corresponding reduction in wave I amplitude of the auditory brainstem response (ABR) inanimals.This formof underlying damage, hypothesized to also occur in humans, has been termed synaptopathy, and it has been hypothesized that there will be a hidden hearing loss consisting of functional deficits at suprathreshold stimulus levels. This study assessed whether recreational noise exposure history was associated with smaller ABR wave I amplitude and poorer performance on suprathreshold auditory test measures.Noise exposure historieswere collected from 26 men and 34women with hearing thresholds ≤ 25 dB hearing loss (HL; 250 Hz to 8 kHz), and a variety of functional suprathreshold hearing tests were performed. Wave I amplitudes of click-evoked ABR were obtained at 70, 80, 90, and 99 dB (nHL) and tone-burst evoked ABR were obtained at 90 dB nHL. Speech recognition performance was measured in quiet and in competing noise, using theWords in Noise test, and the NU-6 word list in broadband noise (BBN). In addition, temporal summation to tonal stimuli was assessed in quiet and in competing BBN. To control for the effects of subclinical conventional hearing loss, distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitude, an indirect measure of outer hair cell integrity, was measured. There was no statistically significant relationship between noise exposure history scores andABRwave I amplitude in eithermen or women for any of the ABR conditions. ABR wave I amplitude and noise exposure history were not reliably correlated with suprathreshold functional hearing tests. Taken together, this study found no evidence of noise-induced decreases inABR wave I amplitude or signal processing in noise in a cohort of subjects with a history of recreational noise exposure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The functional consequences of selectively lesioning the lateral olivocochlear efferent system in guinea pigs were studied. The lateral superior olive (LSO) contains the cell bodies of lateral olivocochlear neurons. Melittin, a cytotoxic chemical, was injected into the brain stem using stereotaxic coordinates and near-field evoked potentials to target the LSO. Brain stem histology revealed discrete damage to the LSO following the injections. Functional consequences of this damage were reflected in depressed amplitude of the compound action potential of the eighth nerve (CAP) following the lesion. Threshold sensitivity and N1 latencies were relatively unchanged. Onset adaptation of the cubic distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) was evident, suggesting a reasonably intact medial efferent system. The present results provide the first report of functional changes induced by isolated manipulation of the lateral efferent pathway. They also confirm the suggestion that changes in single-unit auditory nerve activity after cutting the olivocochlear bundle are probably a consequence of disrupting the more lateral of the two olivocochlear efferent pathways. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study had two objectives. First, baseline audiometric data was assessed for associations with noise exposure history. Seconds, subjects were followed prospectively to assess potential auditory effects of new loud recreational activities. Material and methods: Testing included tympanometry, pure-tone and speech reception thresholds, word-in-noise tests, and ABR and DPOAE measurements. All tests were completed at baseline, and repeated the day after a "loud" recreational event and one week later. Results: There was no reliable relationship between recreational noise history and auditory test metrics. After acute event exposures, a variety of dose-dependent temporary changes were observed across metrics. Final tests one week later showed recovery. Conclusions: Recreational noise was not correlated with chronic or acute changes in function or evoked potential amplitude. However, two subjects with 16-hr exposures had changes in function, indicating hazardous exposures for which hearing protection was needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Noise exposures that produce robust temporary threshold shift (TTS) reduce auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave-I amplitude. This study evaluated whether these ABR reductions were associated with functional hearing-in-noise deficits. Material and methods: ABR threshold and amplitude, otoacoustic emissions, and hearing-in-noise were assessed in rats before and after noise exposure (106 or 109 dB SPL octave band noise, 8-16 kHz, 2 h). Hearing-in-noise was assessed at various signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). Results: The 106 dB SPL exposure had no effect on ABR or hearing-in-noise after 2 weeks. In contrast, the 109-dB SPL noise reduced ABR wave-1 amplitude at 16-24 kHz and showed hearing-in-noise deficits in the poorest SNR condition, despite threshold recovery. Conclusions: Reduced wave-I amplitude and poorer hearing- in-noise were observed after noise exposure producing robust (>30 dB) TTS at 24 hrs post exposure. Future studies should assess effects of lower level, repeated, exposures that model occupational noise. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]