Search

This study investigated whether visual attention affects the reliability (i.e., repeatability) of transiently evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) magnitudes or of medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) estimates. TEOAEs were measured during three visual attentional conditions: control (subject were seated with eyes closed); passive (subjects looked at a pattern of squares on a computer screen); and active (subjects silently counted an occasionally inverted pattern). To estimate reliability, the whole recording session was repeated the next day. The results showed that visual attention does not significantly affect TEOAE or MOCR magnitudes—or their reliability. It is therefore possible to employ visual stimuli (e.g., watching a silent movie) during TEOAE experiments, a procedure sometimes used during testing to prevent subjects from falling asleep or to keep children still and quiet. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The medial olivocochlear (MOC) system is thought to be responsible for modulation of peripheral hearing through descending (efferent) pathways. This study investigated the connection between peripheral hearing function and conscious attention during two different modality tasks, auditory and visual. Peripheral hearing function was evaluated by analyzing the amount of suppression of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) by contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS), a well-known effect of the MOC. Simultaneously, attention was evaluated by event-related potentials (ERPs). Although the ERPs showed clear differences in processing of auditory and visual tasks, there were no differences in the levels of OAE suppression. We also analyzed OAEs for the highest magnitude resonant mode signal detected by the matching pursuit method, but again did not find a significant effect of task, and no difference in noise level or number of rejected trials. However, for auditory tasks, the amplitude of the P3 cognitive wave negatively correlated with the level of OAE suppression. We conclude that there seems to be no change in MOC function when performing different modality tasks, although the cortex still remains able to modulate some aspects of MOC activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Cortical activity may reach inner ear through medial olivocochlear (MOC) neurons. • We investigated whether attending to auditory tasks modulated inner ear function. • The effect of attention is not directly visible in the MOC reflex. • The MOC reflex grows with the amount of cortical resources used in task processing. • This suggests a mutual compensation mechanism between periphery and cortex. The medial olivocochlear (MOC) system is thought to be responsible for modulation of peripheral hearing through descending (efferent) pathways. This study investigates the connection between peripheral hearing function and auditory attention tasks of different degrees of difficulty. Peripheral hearing function was evaluated by analyzing the amount of change in otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) by contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS), a well-known effect of the MOC system. Simultaneously, levels of attention were evaluated by event-related potentials (ERPs). The ERPs showed clear differences in processing tasks of different difficulty, but paradoxically there was no difference in the amount of OAE change brought about by CAS. There was also no effect on OAE latency, nor was there any difference in noise level or number of rejected trials. However, we observed that the changes in OAEs by CAS for easy and hard tasks were correlated with the magnitude of the P3 wave in the ERP. This suggests there might be some sort of mutual compensation mechanism – presently unknown – between periphery and cortex. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]