Search

Background: Large, malignant bone tumors and revision limb salvage procedures often result in the resection of extensive lengths of the involved bone segment, leaving a residual segment of bone that may be too short to support a standard intramedullary stem for endoprosthetic reconstruction. Telescope allografting, in which an allograft is used to augment the remaining bone segment by telescoping it into the residual bone segment, was described for situations in which residual bone stock is insufficient after tumor resection or prosthetic revision. Apart from one study that first described the procedure [15], there are no other studies reporting the outcome of this telescopic concept for restoring bone stock., Questions/purposes: For patients younger than 18 years who underwent the telescopic allograft technique to augment a short segment of the proximal femur after resection of bone sarcomas who also underwent endoprosthesis reconstruction of the distal femur, we asked: (1) What is the survivorship free from removal of the telescopic allograft and the endoprosthetic stem at 7 years after surgery? (2) What proportion of these reconstructions will heal to the host bone without delayed union or nonunion? (3) What is the functional outcome based on the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score?, Methods: We retrospectively studied our institutional database and identified 127 patients younger than 18 years who underwent surgery for a primary malignant bone tumor of the distal femur between December 2008 and October 2018. After excluding 16 patients undergoing amputation and rotationplasty and 57 patients undergoing recycled autograft/allograft reconstruction, 54 patients who underwent primary or revision distal femur endoprosthesis reconstruction were identified. Among these patients, we considered 15 patients who underwent telescopic allograft augmentation of the femur for analysis. One patient was lost to follow-up before 2 years but was not known to have died, leaving 14 for analysis at a median (range) 49 months (24 to 136 months) of follow-up. The indications for telescopic allograft augmentation of the femur in our institution were a proximal femur length of less than 120 mm after resection or resection of more than two-thirds of the total length of the femur. Ten of 14 patients underwent telescopic allograft augmentation as a revision procedure (distal femur resorption in five patients, endoprosthesis stem loosening in three patients, implant fracture in one patient, and infection in one patient), and the remaining four patients underwent telescopic allograft augmentation as a primary limb salvage procedure for large malignant bone tumors of the distal femur. The histologic diagnosis in all patients was osteosarcoma. At the time of telescopic allograft augmentation and reconstruction, the median age of the patients was 14 years (7 to 18 years). The size and the type of bone allograft to be used (femoral shaft or proximal femur) was planned before surgery, with consideration of the extent of resection, level of osteotomy, diameter of the host bone at the osteotomy site, and approximate diameter of the endoprosthesis stem to be used. The segment of the cylindrical allograft used for telescoping was thoroughly washed, prepared, and impacted onto the native femur to achieve telescoping and overlap. Serial digital radiographs were performed once a month for the first 6 months after the procedure, every 2 months until 1 year, and then every 6 months thereafter. Two surgeons in the department (at least one of which was involved in the surgery) retrieved and reviewed clinical notes and radiographs to determine the status of the telescopic allograft and endoprosthesis stem. We defined delayed union as radiological union at the osteotomy site more than 6 months after the procedure without additional surgery; we defined nonunion as no radiological evidence of callus formation at the osteotomy site 9 months after the procedure, necessitating additional surgery. The reviewers did not disagree about the definition of healing time. None of the patients missed radiographic follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survivorship free from removal of telescopic allograft and the endoprosthesis stem at 7 years after surgery was estimated. Patient function was assessed using the 1993 version of the MSTS [9], as determined by chart review of the institutional database performed by one of the surgeons from the department., Results: The survivorship free from removal of the telescopic allograft and endoprosthesis stem at 7 years after surgery was 80% (95% confidence interval 22% to 96%). The allograft united with the host bone in 100% (14 of 14) of the patients. Though 21% (3 of 14) had delayed union, no nonunions were seen. The median (range) MSTS score at the final follow-up interval was 27 (22 to 30)., Conclusion: Although this is a small group of patients, we believe that allograft segments help augment short bone stock of the proximal femur after long-segment resections, and the telescopic technique seems to be associated with a low proportion of nonunion or delayed union, which is one of the most common complications of allografts. Maintaining an adequate length of the proximal femur is important in preserving the hip, and this technique may be especially useful for young individuals who may undergo repeated revision procedures., Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study., Competing Interests: All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request. Each author certifies that neither he, nor any member of his immediate family, has funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article., (Copyright © 2021 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Aims: The aim of this study is to assess outcomes of patients ≤12 years who undergo Stanmore noninvasive extendible endoprosthetic replacement of the distal femur (DF NIEPR)., Patients and Methods: A total of 101 children (mean age 9.6 years) were included. All complications which required further surgery were recorded. Clinical and functional outcomes were evaluated with Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores at a mean follow-up of 64 months (range 6-174)., Results: Thirty-one (30.7%) patients died at a mean of 33 months. Forty had prosthesis removed after a mean of 43 months (range, 7-103). Attaining of the full lengthening potential before skeletal maturity was the most frequent reason for revision surgery, particularly in those with smaller lengthening potential (P  =  0.039). Implant survival rate for other causes was 61.7% at 5 years and 45.0% at 10 years. At final follow-up mean MSTS score was 26 (range, 13-29). Twenty-two (21.5%) patients had a final limb-length discrepancy (LLD)  > 2 cm., Conclusions: DF NIEPR produces a good functional outcome, with the prevention of major LLD at skeletal maturity in the majority of the cases. We suggest patient selection criteria to account for the stage of the disease due to the high cost of the NIEPR, and high percentage requiring revision, and a 60% mortality rate in those patients presenting with distant disease burden., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Aims and Background: Information is scarce on systemic treatment of pelvic osteosarcoma because most chemotherapy protocols for osteosarcoma include patients with extremity tumors and aged up to 30-40 years., Methods: Data on patients <41 years of age with high-grade pelvic osteosarcoma were prospectively collected. Patients received two chemotherapy protocols consisting of methotrexate, cisplatin, doxorubicin (MAP) and standard-dose or high-dose ifosfamide., Results: Forty patients between 11 and 36 years were included. The most frequent histological subtype was osteoblastic followed by chondroblastic (37.5%). Complete surgical remission was achieved in 65% of patients. Eighteen patients had MAP/standard-dose ifosfamide, 22 MAP/high-dose ifosfamide. Primary chemotherapy was given to 25 patients and 6 (24%) of them had a good histological response. Median follow-up was 32 months (range, 4-134). Five-year overall survival was 27.5%: 33% in localized and 0 in metastatic patients ( P = 0.02); 45% in patients with complete surgical remission and 0 for patients without complete surgical remission (P = 0.001). Local recurrence rate was 46%. In patients with complete surgical remission, 5-year overall survival was 32% with MAP/standard-dose ifosfamide and 59% with MAP/high-dose ifosfamide regimen (P = 0.3)., Conclusions: Local control is the major issue in the treatment of pelvic osteosarcoma. Poor pathological response and high incidence of chondroblastic variant indicate different characteristics between pelvic and extremity osteosarcoma. Chemotherapy with MAP and high-dose ifosfamide might be beneficial in patients with pelvic osteosarcoma and warrants further investigation.

Purpose: This study was performed to assess the imaging findings in cases of parosteal osteosarcoma dedifferentiated into telangiectatic osteosarcoma. Parosteal osteosarcoma is a low-grade well-differentiated malignant tumor. Dedifferentiation into a more aggressive lesion is frequent and usually visible on imaging as a central lytic area in a sclerotic mass. Only one case of differentiation into a telangiectatic osteosarcoma has been reported. As it has practical consequences, with a need for aggressive chemotherapy, we looked for this rather typical imaging pattern., Materials and Methods: Review of 199 cases of surface osteosarcomas (including 86 parosteal, of which 23 were dedifferentiated) revealed lesions suggesting a possible telangiectatic osteosarcoma on imaging examinations in five cases (cavities with fluid). Histology confirmed three cases (the two other only had hematoma inside a dedifferentiated tumor). There were three males, aged 24, 28, and 32. They had radiographs and CT, and two an MR examination., Results: Lesions involved the distal femur, proximal tibia, and proximal humerus. The parosteal osteosarcoma was a sclerotic, regular mass, attached to the cortex. A purely lytic mass, partially composed of fluid cavities was easily detected on CT and MR. It involved the medullary cavity twice, and remained outside the bone once. Histology confirmed the two components in each case. Two patients died of pulmonary metastases and one is alive., Conclusion: Knowledge of this highly suggestive pattern should help guide the initial biopsy to diagnose the two components of the tumor, and guide aggressive treatment.

The influence of age and sex on chemotherapy-related toxicity was evaluated in children and adults with non metastatic osteosarcoma. treatment consisted of methotrexate (MTX, 12 g/m(2)), cisplatin (CDP 120 mg/m(2)) and doxorubicin (ADM 75-90 mg/m(2)) and high-dose ifosfamide (HDIFO). toxicity data from 1,051 courses (295 with MTX, 756 based on doxorubicin, cisplatin and high-dose ifosfamide) were analyzed. Children (4-14 yrs) and females showed a higher incidence of grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia and were more frequently hospitalized for neutropenic fever compared to adolescents and young adults (AYA, 15-19 yrs) and adults (>20-40 yrs). Delayed MTX excretion was higher in adults than AYA and children. Adults (up to 40 years) can be treated with pediatric protocols for osteosarcoma and they experience lower hematologic toxicity compared to pediatric population. further investigations on sex-related susceptibility to chemotherapy in osteosarcoma patients are recommended.

Background: Ezrin is a membrane-cytoskeleton linker protein involved in regulating growth and metastatic behaviour of cancer cells. The study evaluated ezrin expression and its prognostic value in patients with non-metastatic osteosarcoma., Procedures: Ezrin expression and pattern of staining (cytoplasmic or membraneous and cytoplasmic) were assessed using immunohistochemistry on slides from tumour biopsy. We studied 95 patients (median 16 years, range: 4-39 years) with primary non-metastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on methotrexate, cisplatin, doxorubicin and ifosfamide., Results: Seventy-six patients (80%) showed ezrin immunoreactivity: in cytoplasm (37, 47%) and in cytoplasm and membrane (42, 53%) of tumour cells. Immunohistochemical staining score was: 1+ (16, 24%), 2+ (10, 13%), 3+ (17, 21.5%) and 4+ (36, 45.5%). Ezrin and score expression were not related to gender, site, alkaline phosphatase (AP), LDH serum levels, chemotherapy-induced tumour necrosis or patient outcome. A significant association was seen between expression pattern and prognosis. The 3-year probability of disease-free survival was 80% for patients with only cytoplasmic immunostaining and 54% for patients with cytoplasmic and membranous immunostaining (P < 0.02)., Conclusion: Ezrin immunoreactivity can be detected in the majority of patients with non-metastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity. The pattern of ezrin staining can identify patients with different risks of relapse. In patients who only have ezrin cytoplasmic expression, a probability of EFS >80% at 5 years can be expected. These results suggest further investigations to define the relation between expression pattern, ezrin functional status and outcome in patients with non-metastatic osteosarcoma., ((c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Malignant giant cell tumor is a confusing term that in the past has been used to describe different types of giant cell-rich tumors. We try to clarify this term in this report. We consider two types of malignancy in giant cell tumor of bone: "primary" when it arises in juxtaposition to a benign giant cell tumor and 'secondary' when it arises at the site of a previously treated giant cell tumor. Here we present a case of primary malignancy in giant cell tumor that was initially not recognized as a malignancy. On radiography and histology of frozen sections the lesion had the appearance of a conventional giant cell tumor of bone. After curettage, the permanent histology slides showed areas of highly malignant osteosarcoma juxtaposed to areas of benign giant cell tumor. The patient was treated with chemotherapy and wide resection of the tumor.