Search

Background: One of the most widely studied gene therapeutic strategies for cancer is the introduction of tumour-suppressor genes-generally p53-into the target cells. As the genes of p53 and/or retinoblastoma (Rb) are mutated in the major part of osteosarcomas (OS), we aimed to study the effect of p53 and Rb transgenes on a panel of five different osteosarcoma cell lines., Methods: OS cell lines were transduced by adenoviral vectors delivering the transcription units of the wildtype p53 and the Rb gene. Effects of the transgenes alone and at additional cytostatic stress were studied by proliferation, alive/dead and cell cycle assays., Results: The individual cells lines displayed divergent reactions to p53- or Rb-transgene delivery reaching from cell death (SaOs-2, U2OS at p53 transduction) over stopped or lowered cell division (MG-63, K-HOS, SJSA-1 at p53 and Rb transduction) to nearly unhindered cell growth (U2OS at Rb transduction). In those OS cell lines reacting with lowered cell division to p53 or Rb delivery, cytostatics only moderately intensified the transgene effects. Surprisingly, these reactions were apparently not dependent on the functional status of the cellular p53 and/or Rb genes or on differences in the infectability of the cell lines by the adenoviral vectors. Most interestingly, the respective effects of the p53 or Rb transgenes were not multiplied by simultaneous transduction of both tumour-suppressor genes., Conclusions: The application of wildtype tumour-suppressor gene therapy on genetically variable osteosarcomas may be efficient only in yet not identified genetic subgroups of this tumour entity. Hyperactive tumour-suppressor transgenes could be an alternative., (Copyright (c) 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Osteosarcoma (OS), a malignant bone neoplasia in childhood, has poor prognosis if metastases appear in the lung. A novel therapeutic approach could consist in a gene therapeutic treatment of OS metastases. However, if promiscuous viral vectors are applied for the delivery of potentially toxic transgenes, their misdelivery into normal tissues could cause severe complications. This problem could be circumvented by application of OS-specific promoters for transgene expression control. We analysed the function of promoters described to be tumour-, osteosarcoma- or osteoblast-specific. Expression rates driven by osteoblast- specific fragments from the collagen1A1-promoter, the human Osteocalcin-promoter, the bone-sialoprotein promoter and the beta-catenin promoter depending on vitamin supplementation were analysed in five OS cell lines, in normal lung fibroblasts and in a non-osteoblastic prostate cancer cell line (LNCaP) by dual luciferase assays. In addition, an unspecific but doxycyclin-repressible promoter construct (pAd.3r-luc) was examined. We found that all constructs were active in OS cell lines to varying extents. The complete human Osteocalcin promoter and the bone-sialoprotein promoter were partially induced by vitamin D3 or C respectively while the pAd.3r-luc activity could be shut down by doxycyclin. In contrast, the human Osteocalcin-promoter was not activated by vitamin D3 in LNCaP cells; its action remained relatively low. Interestingly, excepting the beta-catenin promoter, we measured strong activities of all promoters in lung fibroblast cells. Our study demonstrates that promoter activity should be evaluated not only for the target cells of the gene therapeutic approaches, but also for neighbouring normal tissues. Unspecific but repressible promoters could represent an alternative.