Search

Key statements of the Russian clinical guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis are summarized. They were developed by a task force representing the key Russian professional associations involved in the management of osteoporosis and approved by the Russian Ministry of Health., Purpose: To summarize key statements of the Russian clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis., Methods: The Russian clinical guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis were developed by a task force representing the key Russian professional associations involved in the management of osteoporosis: These comprised the Russian Association of Endocrinologists, the Russian Association for Osteoporosis, the Association of Rheumatologists of Russia, the Association of Orthopedic surgeons and Traumatologists of Russia, the Russian Association of Gynecologists-Endocrinologists, and the Russian Association of Gerontologists and Geriatrics. The guidelines are based on a systematic literature review and principles of evidence-based medicine and were compiled in accordance with the requirements for clinical recommendations developed by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation., Results: Key statements included in the Russian guidelines of osteoporosis approved by the Russian Ministry of Health in 2021 are summarized. The statements are graded based on levels of evidence and supported by short comments. The guidelines are focused on the current approach to screening, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and treatment of osteoporosis., Conclusion: These guidelines are a practical tool for general practitioners, as well as medical specialists, primarily endocrinologists, rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, and other physicians who are involved in the management of patients with osteoporosis., (© 2023. International Osteoporosis Foundation and Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation.)

Patients with osteoporosis and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of fracture and associated negative outcomes, including increased mortality. The present post hoc analysis of two randomized, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trials-Fracture Study in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis (FRAME) and Active-Controlled Fracture Study in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis at High Risk (ARCH)-investigated the efficacy and safety of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and mild-to-moderate CKD. The analysis included data from 7147 patients from FRAME and 4077 from ARCH. Eighty-one percent of patients from FRAME and 85% from ARCH had mild or moderate reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline, and part of this reduction is likely age related. During the 1-year double-blind phases of the trials, patients received romosozumab 210 mg sc or placebo monthly in FRAME and romosozumab 210 mg sc monthly or alendronate 70 mg po weekly in ARCH. Bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck and vertebral and nonvertebral fractures were assessed at baseline and month 12. In both trials, the least-square mean percent change from baseline BMD was significantly greater in the romosozumab groups versus controls across all kidney function categories at month 12. Romosozumab reduced the relative risk of new vertebral fractures at month 12 among patients with eGFR of 30-59, 60-89, and ≥90 mL/min by 72% (95% confidence interval [CI] 14-91; p = 0.017), 70% (40-85; p < 0.001), and 84% (30-96; p = 0.005), respectively, in FRAME versus placebo, and by 51% (5-75; p = 0.04), 19% (-28 to 49; p = 0.39), and 57% (1-81, p = 0.04), respectively, in ARCH versus alendronate. Incidences of adverse events, asymptomatic decreases in serum calcium, and evolution of kidney function during the studies were similar across all baseline kidney function groups. Romosozumab is an effective treatment option for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and mild-to-moderate reduction in kidney function, with a similar safety profile across different levels of kidney function. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR)., (© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).)

Purpose: In adults, growth hormone deficiency (GHD) has been associated with low bone mineral density (BMD), an effect counteracted by growth hormone (GH) replacement. Whether GH is beneficial in adults with age-related bone loss and without hypopituitarism is unclear., Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search using Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. We extracted and analyzed data according to the bone outcome included [bone mineral content (BMC), BMD, and bone biomarker, fracture risk]. We performed a meta-analysis when possible., Results: We included eight studies. Seven randomized 272 post-menopausal women, 61-69 years, to GH or control, for 6-24 months, and the eighth was an extension trial. Except for one study, all women received concurrent osteoporosis therapies. There was no significant effect of GH, as compared to control, on BMD at the lumbar spine (Weighted mean difference WMD = -0.01 [-0.04, 0.02]), total hip (WMD = 0 [-0.05, 0.06]) or femoral neck (WMD = 0 [-0.03, 0.04]). Similarly, no effect was seen on BMC. GH significantly increased the bone formation marker procollagen type-I carboxy-terminal propeptide (PICP) (WMD = 14.03 [2.68, 25.38]). GH resulted in a trend for increase in osteocalcin and in bone resorption markers. Patients who received GH had a significant decrease in fracture risk as compared to control (RR = 0.63 [0.46, 0.87]). Reported adverse events were not major, mostly related to fluid retention., Conclusion: GH may not improve bone density in women with age-related bone loss but may decrease fracture risk. Larger studies of longer duration are needed to further explore these findings in both genders, and to investigate the effect of GH on bone quality.

In this consensus paper, the Belgian Bone Club aims to provide a state of the art on the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of osteoporosis in frail individuals, including patients with anorexia nervosa, patients on dialysis, cancer patients, persons with sarcopenia, and the oldest old. All these conditions may indeed induce bone loss that is superimposed on physiological bone loss and often remains under-recognized and under-treated. This is of particular concern because of the major burden of osteoporotic fractures in terms of morbidity, mortality, and economic cost. Therefore, there is an urgent need to appreciate bone loss associated with these conditions, as this may improve diagnosis and management of bone loss and fracture risk in clinical practice.

Estrogens and androgens influence the growth and maintenance of the mammalian skeleton and are responsible for its sexual dimorphism. Estrogen deficiency at menopause or loss of both estrogens and androgens in elderly men contribute to the development of osteoporosis, one of the most common and impactful metabolic diseases of old age. In the last 20 years, basic and clinical research advances, genetic insights from humans and rodents, and newer imaging technologies have changed considerably the landscape of our understanding of bone biology as well as the relationship between sex steroids and the physiology and pathophysiology of bone metabolism. Together with the appreciation of the side effects of estrogen-related therapies on breast cancer and cardiovascular diseases, these advances have also drastically altered the treatment of osteoporosis. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of action of estrogens and androgens on bone, their influences on skeletal homeostasis during growth and adulthood, the pathogenetic mechanisms of the adverse effects of their deficiency on the female and male skeleton, as well as the role of natural and synthetic estrogenic or androgenic compounds in the pharmacotherapy of osteoporosis. We highlight latest advances on the crosstalk between hormonal and mechanical signals, the relevance of the antioxidant properties of estrogens and androgens, the difference of their cellular targets in different bone envelopes, the role of estrogen deficiency in male osteoporosis, and the contribution of estrogen or androgen deficiency to the monomorphic effects of aging on skeletal involution., (Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.)

Background: Osteoporosis is a chronic disease that presents a large economic burden both on the affected individual and on society. Osteoporotic fractures are a cause of significant morbidity and mortality. Given the high prevalence of osteoporosis and related costs, understanding the factors that determine the cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis therapy is important for physicians and managed-care organizations. Bisphosphonates are considered first-line therapy for osteoporosis, and pharmacological differences between them relate not only to differences in efficacy and safety, but also have an impact on health economics. Efficacy and persistence with therapy influence fracture risk-reduction and should be considered when determining the best osteoporosis therapy for each patient., Scope: This article synthesizes recent health economic data, assessing the impact of drug efficacy and persistence or dosing frequency on the cost-effectiveness of bisphosphonates as therapeutic agents for osteoporosis treatment. The author's interpretation of the available evidence is also discussed, from the perspective of a 'Commentary' article., Findings: Although treatment persistence is an important factor in reducing fracture risk, when comparing the health economic data of several treatment options, studies have shown that the cost-effectiveness of bisphosphonate therapy is mainly dependent on drug efficacy rather than persistence or dosing frequency. It should also be noted that fractures at different skeletal sites have different economic impacts. Non-vertebral fractures (and particularly those of the hip) are more costly than vertebral fractures., Conclusions: Although persistence with osteoporosis therapy is an important factor in reducing fracture risk, it has less of an impact on cost-effectiveness than treatment efficacy, in particular efficacy at non-vertebral sites.

Male osteoporosis is increasingly recognized as a major public health issue. This multinational, 2-yr, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of 35 mg once-a-week risedronate in men with osteoporosis. Patients had to be men >or=30 yr old, with lumbar spine T-score

We examined the association between bone mineral density (BMD) and cardiovascular risk in a group of premenopausal women selected from the Southern province of Sri Lanka. One hundred six previously healthy premenopausal volunteers (aged 30-54 yr) were recruited by open invitations. Subjects with previous history of diabetes, hypertension, epilepsy, chronic renal or liver disease, hyperlipidemia, ischemic heart disease, endocrine diseases, or prolonged inflammatory conditions were excluded. Subjects who were taking medications that can affect bone density, blood sugar, serum lipids, or blood pressure (BP) were also excluded. Women with the history of previous fractures were not excluded. BMDs in the spine, hip, and total body (TB) were measured using a Hologic Discovery scanner (Hologic Inc, Bedford, MA). BP, fasting glucose, and fasting lipids were also measured. Independent of body mass index (BMI) and age, TB bone mineral content (BMC) and spine BMD showed inverse and significant correlations with total cholesterol (TC), low density cholesterol, and the ratio between TC and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (r ranged from -0.24 to -0.27, p<0.05 for all). The highest mean lipid levels were seen among the women in the lowest third of spine BMD, whereas women in the upper third of spine BMD had the lowest lipid levels. The number of women with metabolic syndrome in the 3 tirtiles of spine BMD was not significantly different. Fasting glucose or BP had no association with either BMD or BMC. In conclusion, our data demonstrates an association, independent of age and BMI, between BMD and BMC or lipid levels among previously healthy, premenopausal women. This may explain the high cardiovascular risk seen in women with osteoporosis in old age.

Background: Osteoporosis is a major and costly global public health problem. It is a chronic disease in which fracture is the main outcome, and the impact of these fractures can vary depending on the age of the individual and the severity of the fracture., Scope: Using literature review, this paper discusses and summarizes the information available regarding the individual and socio-economic consequences associated with the several types of osteoporotic fractures., Findings: Different types of osteoporotic fractures are generally associated with different age groups. The health-economic impact of vertebral and hip fractures has been extensively explored and it is well known that these fractures are associated with morbidity/disability and increased mortality; they also account for a substantial portion of the direct fracture costs. However, to accurately estimate the individual and socio-economic burden of the disease, further research is needed on the morbidity/disability, mortality, and costs associated with non-hip, nonvertebral fractures, which account for more than half of the total fractures. More data are also required on the indirect costs associated with all fracture types., Conclusions: Understanding the socio-economic consequences of each fracture type will be important to fully estimate the burden of osteoporosis and may help clinicians tailor management plans for individual patients.

Combined calcium and vitamin D supplementation is an essential component of the management of osteoporosis, supported by a strong scientific rationale. The types of individuals who should receive calcium and vitamin D supplements are those: (i) patients with documented osteoporosis receiving antiresorptive or anabolic treatment; (ii) patients receiving glucocorticoids; and (iii) individuals with or at high risk of calcium and/or vitamin D insufficiencies, in particular older women and men. This article describes the evidence base that supports targeting these groups. Benefits are most apparent when 800 IU day(-1) vitamin D is complemented with a dose of 1000-1200 mg day(-1) elemental calcium. Compliance is also key to optimizing clinical efficacy.

Osteoporotic fractures are an extremely common and serious health problem in the elderly. This article presents the rationale for calcium and vitamin D supplementation in the prevention and treatment of osteoporotic fractures and reviews the literature evidence on the efficacy of this strategy. Two musculoskeletal risk factors are implicated in osteoporotic fractures in the elderly: the loss of bone mass due to secondary hyperparathyroidism and the increased propensity to falls. Calcium and vitamin D reverse secondary hyperparathyroidism with resultant beneficial effects on bone mineral density (BMD). Additionally, calcium and vitamin D supplementation significantly improves body sway and lower extremity strength, reducing the risk of falls. The effects of combined calcium and vitamin D on parathyroid function and BMD provide a strong rationale for the use of this therapy in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. There is general agreement that, in patients with documented osteoporosis, calcium and vitamin D supplementation should be an integral component of the management strategy, along with antiresorptive or anabolic treatment. Frail elderly individuals constitute another major target population for calcium and vitamin D because evidence from randomized studies in institutionalized elderly subjects demonstrates that these supplements reduce osteoporotic fracture risk, particularly in the presence of dietary deficiencies. However, the results of trials in community-dwelling subjects have been equivocal. Within the primary-care setting, further research is required to establish appropriate target subgroups for calcium and vitamin D supplementation; overall, the data are consistent with a benefit individuals with insufficient calcium and/or vitamin D, although patients with documented osteoporosis will derive further benefit in terms of fracture prevention from the addition of an antiresorptive agent.

Osteoporosis is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. The socioeconomic burden of osteoporosis is likely to increase dramatically if improvements in prevention are not made. Calcium supplementation effectively reduces the rate of bone loss in postmenopausal women, yet most women do not achieve an adequate calcium intake. In fact, use of calcium supplementation appears to have declined as the more effective antiresorptive therapies, such as bisphosphonates, have become available. Among patients prescribed bisphosphonates, calcium intake is often insufficient, despite the fact that adequate calcium intake may be necessary to gain the maximum benefits from antiresorptive therapy. In addition, because calcium interferes with bisphosphonate absorption, incorrect use of calcium may limit the efficacy of bisphosphonate therapy. This underscores the need for new initiatives to reduce the confusion surrounding appropriate calcium use during antiresorptive therapy. Co-packaging of bisphosphonates with calcium supplements is one strategy to help ensure that patients taking bisphosphonates not only achieve adequate calcium intake but also gain the maximum benefit from bisphosphonate therapy.

Most osteoporosis treatments have proven efficacy in reducing the risk of vertebral fractures, whereas evidence is less straightforward for prevention of non-vertebral fractures. Conclusions as to the efficacy of a treatment should be based primarily on analyses of the intention to treat (ITT) population rather than on exploratory subgroup analyses; however, non-vertebral anti-fracture efficacy has been largely derived by post-hoc subgroup analyses. This review and meta-analysis was performed to assess non-vertebral anti-fracture efficacy of several osteoporosis therapies, including a more stringent assessment of the ITT populations. Data on non-vertebral anti-fracture efficacy, a defined endpoint of the ITT analyses and confirmed by radiographs, were obtained from randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III clinical trials of at least 3-year duration. Meta-analyses were performed for the two bisphosphonates, alendronate and risedronate. Relative risks (RR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and statistical significance for active treatment compared with placebo were calculated. Eleven clinical trials met the criteria for review, three of which showed statistically significant ( P < or =0.05) non-vertebral anti-fracture efficacy in the ITT population: two trials with risedronate and one trial with strontium. A meta-analysis showed significant reductions in the relative risk of non-vertebral fracture for both alendronate (RR=0.86; 95% CI: 0.76-0.97, P =0.012) and risedronate (RR=0.81; 95% CI: 0.71-0.92, P =0.001). Risedronate and strontium ranelate were the only treatments to show non-vertebral anti-fracture efficacy in this robust assessment of anti-fracture efficacy of osteoporosis therapy using ITT populations in trials of 3 years or more in duration. Risedronate was the only agent shown to demonstrate efficacy in more than one trial. Meta-analysis showed that both alendronate and risedronate provide non-vertebral anti-fracture efficacy.

It is recommended that the hip joints be flexed to 90 degrees during dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning of the lumbar spine in the anteroposterior projection; however, some patients are unable to maintain this position because of the presence of degenerative changes in lower limb joints. This study examines the effect of a lesser degree of hip flexion on the lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) measurement and its interpretation. Fifty women were scanned on the Norland Eclipse XR, initially in the standard position with the hips flexed to 90 degrees and then in the adjusted position after allowing for some degree of hip extension to keep them comfortable (hip flexion of 60 degrees -70 degrees ). Higher bone mineral content (BMC), surface area, and BMD values were seen in the standard position compared to the adjusted position, but none of the differences was statistically significant. There were strong correlations for BMC,surface area, and BMD measured in the two positions. In the standard position, 26 women were found to have osteoporosis and 18 had osteopenia. In the adjusted position, osteoporosis was noted in 27 women, and 18 had osteopenia. Four women showed a reduction, whereas 12 women showed an increase in BMD in excess of the least significant change at the 95% confidence level, defined as 2.77 times the precision error (0.008 g/cm(2) x 2.77 = 0.120 g/cm(2)). Our study demonstrates that a lesser degree of hip flexion in women who find it difficult to maintain the recommended 90 degrees hip flexion during the lumbar spine BMD measurement would not affect the patient classification based on T-scores recommended by the World Health Organization; however, variation in hip flexion can be a major confounding factor when interpreting a change in BMD over time.

Prospective studies have demonstrated that low bone mass correlates well with increased risk of osteoporotic fractures at various skeletal sites. Trials have likewise confirmed that enhancing bone mass with antiresorptive therapy reduces fracture incidence in individuals at risk. However, correlation of bone mineral density (BMD) increases with therapeutic risk reduction has proved less consistent than correlation of BMD decreases with greater fracture risk in the untreated. Indeed, various analyses have indicated that - even during treatment with potent bisphosphonates like alendronate and risedronate - BMD changes from baseline account for <30% of the reduction in vertebral fractures in treated women. It is clearly, therefore, that factors other than BMD are involved in the reduction of fracture risk achieved by antiresorptive therapies. According to recent micro-computed tomography imaging and other studies, antiresorptive therapy can help rebuild the microarchitecture of bone as well as strengthen the materials that go into it. When treating individuals with osteoporosis, these microarchitectural changes contribute to the reduction of fracture risk achieved by antiresorptive therapies.

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) devices from the three main manufacturers provide different bone mineral density (BMD) values, due in part to technical differences in the algorithms for bone mineral content (BMC) and area measurements and in part to the use of different manufacturer-derived reference databases. As a result, significant differences exist between Hologic, Lunar and Norland systems in the reported young normal standard deviation scores or T-scores. In a number of European countries, including Belgium, a T-score below -2.5 is one of the key criteria for reimbursement of osteoporosis treatments. This paper addresses the first attempt to implement a nationwide, uniform expression of BMD in patients, in order to harmonize drug reimbursement. To this end, measures were taken to implement a uniform expression of BMD in Belgian patients, by converting each manufacturer's absolute BMD to standardized BMD (sBMD) values and by establishing a single national reference range.

Both a decrease in bone formation and an increase in bone resorption have been implicated in the pathogenesis of age-related (type II) femoral neck osteoporosis. While the increase in the bone resorption rate has been shown to be partially related to secondary hyperparathyroidism, the mechanisms underlying the decline in bone formation have not yet been identified. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that the bone formation deficit associated with type II osteoporosis might be due to secondary hyperparathyroidism and/or to a deficiency of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system. Circulating concentrations of IGF-I, IGF-II, IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-3, IGFBP-4, IGFBP-5, 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25(OH)D3), and intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) were measured in 50 elderly women after sustaining a hip fracture and in 50 healthy age-matched controls. In addition, serum levels of osteocalcin (OC), skeletal alkaline phosphatase, and N-terminal procollagen peptide and urinary pyridinium cross-links were determined as markers of bone remodeling, and bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed at the proximal femur. In the patient group, serum was drawn within 18 h of the fracture and prior to surgery. Circulating protein concentrations did not change over this time frame. No difference was found between mean IGFBP-4 serum levels in the two groups studied, while mean levels of IGF-I, IGF-II, IGFBP-3, IGFBP-5, 25(OH)D3, and markers of bone formation were significantly lower (p < 0.006) in patients as compared with healthy subjects. Serum PTH and urinary pyridinium cross-links, however, were markedly increased (p < 0.001) in the osteoporotic group. In pooled data from the normal and osteoporotic populations, age-adjusted multiple regression models based on IGF-I, IGF-II, IGFBP-3, and IGFBP-5 were found to be highly predictive of serum OC (R2 = 19%, p < 0.001) and BMD of femoral neck (R2 = 49%, p < 0.0001), consistent with an effect of the anabolic IGF components on overall bone formation rate. Similar models based on 25(OH)D3 and PTH, however, were statistically unrelated to OC. To address further the potential impact of trauma on circulating IGF system components, we measured IGF system component levels in 10 male patients within 18 h following tibial fracture and in 10 age-matched normal male subjects. There was no significant difference in serum level of any of the IGF system components between the two groups. Although limited by its cross-sectional design, the present study suggests that, in addition to bone resorption resulting from secondary hyperparathyroidism, impaired bone formation associated with deficiency of the IGF system might predispose elderly women to fragility fracture of the proximal femur.