Search

Previous antiresorptive treatment may influence the anabolic response to teriparatide. The OPTAMISE (Open-label Study to Determine How Prior Therapy with Alendronate or Risedronate in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis Influences the Clinical Effectiveness of Teriparatide) study reported greater increases in biochemical markers of bone turnover and volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) when 12 months of teriparatide treatment was preceded by 2 years or more of risedronate versus alendronate treatment. The objective of this study was to use quantitative computed tomography (CT)-based nonlinear finite element modeling to evaluate how prior therapy with alendronate or risedronate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis influences the biomechanical effectiveness of teriparatide. Finite element models of the L1 vertebra were created from quantitative CT scans, acquired before and after 12 months of therapy with teriparatide, from 171 patients from the OPTAMISE study. These models were subjected to uniaxial compression. Total BMD-derived bone volume fraction (BV/TV(d), i.e., bone volume [BV]/total volume [TV]), estimated from quantitative CT-based volumetric BMD, vertebral stiffness, and failure load (strength) were calculated for each time measurement point. The results of this study demonstrated that 12 months of treatment with teriparatide following prior treatment with either risedronate or alendronate increased BMD-derived BV/TV(d), the predicted vertebral stiffness, and failure load. However, the effects of teriparatide were more pronounced in patients treated previously with risedronate, which is consistent with the findings of the OPTAMISE study. The mean (+/-standard error) increase in stiffness was greater in the prior risedronate group than the prior alendronate group (24.6+/-3.2% versus 14.4+/-2.8%, respectively; p=0.0073). Similarly, vertebral failure load increased by 27.2+/-3.5% in the prior risedronate group versus 15.3+/-3.1% in the prior alendronate group (p=0.0042). The mechanical variables increased in greater proportion than BV/TV(d), which increased by 6.9+/-0.9% versus 4.6+/-0.8% in the prior-risedronate and prior-alendronate groups, respectively (p=0.0290). Our finding indicated that while teriparatide can be used with success on patients who have previously undergone treatment with risedronate and alendronate, it demonstrated greater anabolic effect on biomechanical properties in prior-risedronate patients in the first year of teriparatide treatment., (Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

With the proportion of elderly people increasing in many countries, osteoporosis has become a growing public health problem, with rising medical, social, and economic consequences. It is well recognized that a combination of low bone mass and the deterioration of the trabecular architecture underlies osteoporotic fractures. A comprehensive understanding of the relationships between bone mass, the three-dimensional (3D) architecture of bone and bone function is fundamental to the study of new and existing therapies for osteoporosis. Detailed analysis of 3D trabecular architecture, using high-resolution digital imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance microimaging (MRmicroI), micro-computed tomography (microCT), and direct image analysis, has become feasible only recently. Rapid prototyping technology is used to replicate the complex trabecular architecture on a macroscopic scale for visual or biomechanical analysis. Further, a complete set of 3D image data provides a basis for finite element modeling (FEM) to predict mechanical properties. The goal of this paper is to describe how we can integrate three-dimensional microimaging and image analysis techniques for quantitation of trabecular bone architecture, FEM for virtual biomechanics, and rapid prototyping for enhanced visualization. The integration of these techniques provide us with an unique ability to investigate the role of bone architecture in osteoporotic fractures and to support the development of new therapies., (Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Abstract: The objective of the study was to assess the time course of changes in bone mineralization and architecture using sequential triple biopsies from women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) who received long-term treatment with risedronate. Transiliac biopsies were obtained from the same subjects (n = 7) at baseline and after 3 and 5 years of treatment with 5 mg daily risedronate. Mineralization was measured using 3-dimensional (3D) micro-computed tomography (CT) with synchrotron radiation and was compared to levels in healthy premenopausal women (n = 12). Compared to the untreated PMO women at baseline, the premenopausal women had higher average mineralization (Avg-MIN) and peak mineralization (Peak-MIN) by 5.8% (P = 0.003) and 8.0% (P = 0.003), respectively, and lower ratio of low to high-mineralized bone volume (BMR-V) and surface area (BMR-S) by 73.3% (P = 0.005) and 61.7% (P = 0.003), respectively. Relative to baseline, 3 years of risedronate treatment significantly increased Avg-MIN (4.9 ± 1.1%, P = 0.016) and Peak-MIN (6.2 ± 1.5%, P = 0.016), and significantly decreased BMR-V (−68.4 ± 7.3%, P = 0.016) and BMR-S (−50.2 ± 5.7%, P = 0.016) in the PMO women. The changes were maintained at the same level when treatment was continued up to 5 years. These results are consistent with the significant reduction of turnover observed after 3 years of treatment and which was similarly maintained through 5 years of treatment. Risedronate restored the degree of mineralization and the ratios of low- to high-mineralized bone to premenopausal levels after 3 years of treatment, suggesting that treatment reduced bone turnover in PMO women to healthy premenopausal levels. Conventional micro-CT analysis further demonstrated that bone volume (BV/TV) and trabecular architecture did not change from baseline up to 5 years of treatment, suggesting that risedronate provided long-term preservation of trabecular architecture in the PMO women. Overall, risedronate provided sustained benefits on mineralization and architecture, two key determinants of bone strength, over 5 years lending support for its long-term efficacy in fracture risk reduction. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]