1. What Can We Learn from Bone Biology for the Treatment for Osteoporosis?
- Author
-
G. R. Mundy
- Subjects
Drug ,Aging ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,media_common.quotation_subject ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Osteoporosis ,Osteoclasts ,Bone and Bones ,Fluorides ,Order (exchange) ,medicine ,Humans ,Raloxifene ,Bone Resorption ,Growth Substances ,Intensive care medicine ,Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal ,health care economics and organizations ,Aged ,media_common ,Pharmaceutical industry ,Osteoblasts ,Modalities ,business.industry ,Middle Aged ,Bisphosphonate ,medicine.disease ,Parathyroid Hormone ,Managed care ,Female ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
There does not exist an entirely satsifactory drug for patients with established osteoporosis. No currently available drug is either universally acceptable or leads to substantial formation of new bone. Moreover, in spite of the recent introduction of newer bisphosphonates, intranasal calcitonin and estrogen-related compounds, there is still room for new preventive treatments for bone loss associated with the menopause and hormone withdrawal. There is an even greater need for acceptable and efficacious therapies for patients with established osteoporosis who have severe bone deficits. This is the reason that the pharmaceutical industry is now spending billions of dollars in a search for better modalities of treatment than those currently available. Specific problems can be found with all existing therapies, and drugs under development. The task that confronts the industry in identifying new therapies is particularly difficult. Although bringing a new drug to the market is very expensive in any pharmaceutical arena, it is particularly so in osteoporosis. This is because the Food and Drug Administration in the United States and many other regulatory agencies require evidence of beneficial effects on fracture rates. This problem is compounded somewhat by the expense involved in clinical studies in osteoporosis (requiring large numbers of patients from multiple centers), and the decline in research and development budgets associated with reduced profits due to managed care and price controls on drugs in some countries. Establishing practice guidelines for osteoporosis may also limit the use of drugs, particularly those that are expensive, or require treatment in many patients to see benefits in one. In the European Community, price controls on drugs already exist in many countries. A pharmaceutical company entering this field must consider the size of the therapeutic market, as well as the competition. For example, the bisphosphonate market is likely to be shared by a number of similar compounds during the next decade, and the same appears likely for estrogenrelated compounds. The lag time between discovery of a new lead for osteoporosis and the introduction of a new drug in the clinic may be 10–15 years. This certainly seems to have been the experience with resorption inhibitors such as alendronate and raloxifene. This means that there must be an enormous investment by the pharmaceutical company, possibly in the order of $500 million in today’s dollars, so that the eventual market must be substantial to accommodate this risk.
- Published
- 1999