Search

The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the response of bone tissue after osteotomy carried out with either rotating cutters or with piezoelectric terminals.Bioptic samples of bone tissue were taken during operations with rotating burs and piezoelectric terminals to increase bone volume before implantology. Samples first underwent histomorphometric analysis. Subsequently, osteoblastic cells, obtained from different samples, were placed in culture and allowed to proliferate to in vitro evaluate the time to initiate growth and to reach confluence. Finally, a molecular biologic study by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction was performed to evaluate the expression of typical osteoblastic molecular markers, such as osteoprotegerin and osteopontin.Histomorphometric analysis showed that the width of necrotic line on the osteotomic margins from samples taken using different techniques did not vary significantly. Moreover, the times of initial growth and of confluence in cells from the 2 groups did not show any statistically significant differences. However, a highly significant correlation was revealed between the age of the patient and the initial growth time and the confluence. Similarly, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction showed that the osteoprotegerin and osteopontin expression levels did not change significantly according to the surgical technique used.In conclusion, osteotomies carried out with either instrument do not seem to substantially influence the vitality of the bone tissue. The variability of the expression levels of typical osteoblastic markers seems to be linked more to other factors than to the surgical technique used.

The purpose of this study is to characterise the expression of matrix extracellular phosphoglycoprotein (MEPE) in cultured mesenchymal cells isolated from human dental papilla (PaMCs) of impacted third molars either before or during differentiation of these cells into osteo/odontoblasts. PaMCs, like mesenchymal cells deriving from human dental pulp (DPMCs), resulted positive for a number of mesenchymal markers including CD146 and STRO-1. During the first week in culture they showed a faster proliferation rate than DPMCs, coupled to an earlier down-regulation of MEPE. Also when the cells were further cultured in osteogenic medium (containing beta-glycerophosphate, ascorbic acid and dexamethasone) for 40 days, MEPE down-regulation coupled to an increased expression of osteogenic markers, such as osteocalcin and alkaline phosphatase, occurred earlier in PaMCs than in DPMCs. Thus, our data, indicating that also in PaMCs MEPE expression is higher when cells proliferate, whereas it is downregulated as cells differentiated, are in favour of a role of MEPE as an early regulator of odontogenic differentiation. We also confirm the superior proliferative potential of PaMCs in comparison with DPMCs, coupled to a more rapid induction of osteogenic differentiation. Therefore, these cells represent an optimal source to be conveniently used for dental tissue engineering and tooth regeneration.