Search

In bone, depletion of osteoclasts reduces bone formation in vivo, as does osteal macrophage depletion. How osteoclasts and macrophages promote the action of bone forming osteoblasts is, however, unclear. Since recruitment and differentiation of multi-potential stromal cells/mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) generates new active osteoblasts, we investigated whether human osteoclasts and macrophages (generated from cord blood-derived hematopoietic progenitors) induce osteoblastic maturation in adipose tissue-derived MSC. When treated with an osteogenic stimulus (ascorbate, dexamethasone and β-glycerophosphate) these MSC form matrix-mineralising, alkaline phosphatase-expressing osteoblastic cells. Cord blood-derived progenitors were treated with macrophage colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) to form immature proliferating macrophages, or with M-CSF plus receptor activator of NFκB ligand (RANKL) to form osteoclasts; culture medium was conditioned for 3 days by these cells to study their production of osteoblastic factors. Both osteoclast- and macrophage-conditioned medium (CM) greatly enhanced MSC osteoblastic differentiation in both the presence and absence of osteogenic medium, evident by increased alkaline phosphatase levels within 4 days and increased mineralisation within 14 days. These CM effects were completely ablated by antibodies blocking gp130 or oncostatin M (OSM), and OSM was detectable in both CM. Recombinant OSM very potently stimulated osteoblastic maturation of these MSC and enhanced bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) actions on MSC. To determine the influence of macrophage activation on this OSM-dependent activity, CM was collected from macrophage populations treated with M-CSF plus IL-4 (to induce alternative activation) or with GM-CSF, IFNγ and LPS to cause classical activation. CM from IL-4 treated macrophages stimulated osteoblastic maturation in MSC, while CM from classically-activated macrophages did not. Thus, macrophage-lineage cells, including osteoclasts but not classically activated macrophages, can strongly drive MSC-osteoblastic commitment in OSM-dependent manner. This supports the notion that eliciting gp130-dependent signals in human MSC would be a useful approach to increase bone formation.

Background: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are widely used antidepressants and one of the most commonly used medications. There is growing concern that SSRIs, which sequester in bone marrow at higher concentrations than brain or blood, increase bone fragility and fracture risk. However, their mechanism of action on human osteoclasts (OC) and osteoblasts (OB) differentiation remains unclear., Methods: Expression of serotonin receptors (5-HTR), transporter (5-HTT), and tryptophan hydroxylase 1 (TPH1) was assessed in human OC (precursors and mature) and OB (nonmineralizing and mineralizing) by polymerase chain reaction. OC formation and resorption was measured in the presence of 5 SSRIs. OBs cultured with SSRIs for 28 days were assessed for alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and bone mineralization. Cell viability and apoptosis were determined by annexin V flow cytometry., Results: OCs and OB expressed TPH1, 5-HTT, and 5-HTR1B. The 5-HTR2A was expressed only in OB, whereas 5-HTR2B expression increased from precursor to mature OC. All SSRIs (except citalopram) dose-dependently inhibited OC formation and resorption between 1 μmol/L and 10 μmol/L; order of potency: sertraline > fluoxetine > paroxetine > fluvoxamine > citalopram. Similarly, SSRIs (except citalopram) inhibited ALP and bone mineralization by OB but only at 30 μmol/L. Apoptosis was induced by SSRIs in OC and OB in an identical pattern to inhibitory effects. Serotonin treatment had no effect on either OC or OB parameters., Conclusions: These data demonstrate that SSRIs differentially inhibit bone cell function via apoptosis. This may explain the mechanisms of bone loss with chronic use and aid clinical choices., (Crown Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)