Search

Computational, in silico prediction of resistance-conferring escape mutations could accelerate the design of therapeutics less prone to resistance. This article describes how to use the Resistor algorithm to predict escape mutations. Resistor employs Pareto optimization on four resistance-conferring criteria—positive and negative design, mutational probability, and hotspot cardinality—to assign a Pareto rank to each prospective mutant. It also predicts the mechanism of resistance, that is, whether a mutant ablates binding to a drug, strengthens binding to the endogenous ligand, or a combination of these two factors, and provides structural models of the mutants. Resistor is part of the free and open-source computational protein design software OSPREY. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Computational protein design (CPD) algorithms that compute binding affinity, Ka, search for sequences with an energetically favorable free energy of binding. Recent work shows that three principles improve the biological accuracy of CPD: ensemble-based design , continuous flexibility of backbone and side-chain conformations, and provable guarantees of accuracy with respect to the input. However, previous methods that use all three design principles are single-sequence (SS) algorithms, which are very costly: linear in the number of sequences and thus exponential in the number of simultaneously mutable residues. To address this computational challenge, we introduce BBK* , a new CPD algorithm whose key innovation is the multisequence (MS) bound: BBK* efficiently computes a single provable upper bound to approximate Ka for a combinatorial number of sequences , and avoids SS computation for all provably suboptimal sequences. Thus, to our knowledge, BBK* is the first provable, ensemble-based CPD algorithm to run in time sublinear in the number of sequences. Computational experiments on 204 protein design problems show that BBK* finds the tightest binding sequences while approximating Ka for up to 105-fold fewer sequences than the previous state-of-the-art algorithms, which require exhaustive enumeration of sequences. Furthermore, for 51 protein–ligand design problems, BBK* provably approximates Ka up to 1982-fold faster than the previous state-of-the-art iMinDEE/ \documentclass{aastex}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{bm}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{pifont}\usepackage{stmaryrd}\usepackage{textcomp}\usepackage{portland, xspace}\usepackage{amsmath, amsxtra}\usepackage{upgreek}\pagestyle{empty}\DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6}\begin{document} $${\curr A^*}$$ \end{document} / \documentclass{aastex}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{bm}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{pifont}\usepackage{stmaryrd}\usepackage{textcomp}\usepackage{portland, xspace}\usepackage{amsmath, amsxtra}\usepackage{upgreek}\pagestyle{empty}\DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6}\begin{document} $${\curr K^*}$$ \end{document} algorithm. Therefore, BBK* not only accelerates protein designs that are possible with previous provable algorithms, but also efficiently performs designs that are too large for previous methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Protein design algorithms that model continuous sidechain flexibility and conformational ensembles better approximate the in vitro and in vivo behavior of proteins. The previous state of the art, iMinDEE-A*-K*, computes provable ɛ-approximations to partition functions of protein states (e.g., bound vs. unbound) by computing provable, admissible pairwise-minimized energy lower bounds on protein conformations, and using the A* enumeration algorithm to return a gap-free list of lowest-energy conformations. iMinDEE-A*-K* runs in time sublinear in the number of conformations, but can be trapped in loosely-bounded, low-energy conformational wells containing many conformations with highly similar energies. That is, iMinDEE-A*-K* is unable to exploit the correlation between protein conformation and energy: similar conformations often have similar energy. We introduce two new concepts that exploit this correlation: Minimization-Aware Enumeration and Recursive K*. We combine these two insights into a novel algorithm, Minimization-Aware Recursive K* (MARK*), which tightens bounds not on single conformations, but instead on distinct regions of the conformation space. We compare the performance of iMinDEE-A*-K* versus MARK* by running the Branch and Bound over K* (BBK*) algorithm, which provably returns sequences in order of decreasing K* score, using either iMinDEE-A*-K* or MARK* to approximate partition functions. We show on 200 design problems that MARK* not only enumerates and minimizes vastly fewer conformations than the previous state of the art, but also runs up to 2 orders of magnitude faster. Finally, we show that MARK* not only efficiently approximates the partition function, but also provably approximates the energy landscape. To our knowledge, MARK* is the first algorithm to do so. We use MARK* to analyze the change in energy landscape of the bound and unbound states of an HIV-1 capsid protein C-terminal domain in complex with a camelid VHH, and measure the change in conformational entropy induced by binding. Thus, MARK* both accelerates existing designs and offers new capabilities not possible with previous algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sparse energy functions that ignore long range interactions between residue pairs are frequently used by protein design algorithms to reduce computational cost. Current dynamic programming algorithms that fully exploit the optimal substructure produced by these energy functions only compute the GMEC. This disproportionately favors the sequence of a single, static conformation and overlooks better binding sequences with multiple low-energy conformations. Provable, ensemble-based algorithms such as A* avoid this problem, but A* cannot guarantee better performance than exhaustive enumeration. We propose a novel, provable, dynamic programming algorithm called Branch-Width Minimization* (BWM*) to enumerate a gap-free ensemble of conformations in order of increasing energy. Given a branch-decomposition of branch-width w for an n-residue protein design with at most q discrete side-chain conformations per residue, BWM* returns the sparse GMEC in O(nw²q3/2w) time and enumerates each additional conformation in merely O(n log q) time. We define a new measure, Total Effective Search Space (TESS), which can be computed efficiently a priori before BWM* or A* is run. We ran BWM* on 67 protein design problems and found that TESS discriminated between BWM*-efficient and A*- efficient cases with 100% accuracy. As predicted by TESS and validated experimentally, BWM* outperforms A* in 73% of the cases and computes the full ensemble or a close approximation faster than A*, enumerating each additional conformation in milliseconds. Unlike A*, the performance of BWM* can be predicted in polynomial time before running the algorithm, which gives protein designers the power to choose the most efficient algorithm for their particular design problem. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]