1. Survivorship and Risk Factors for Re-Revision after Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Aged ≤55 Years
- Author
-
Nana O. Sarpong, Austin C. Kaidi, Marie Syku, Curtis Mensah, Jason L. Blevins, and Brian P. Chalmers
- Subjects
Male ,Reoperation ,Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ,Middle Aged ,Prosthesis Design ,Prosthesis Failure ,Treatment Outcome ,Risk Factors ,Humans ,Female ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Hip Prosthesis ,Follow-Up Studies ,Retrospective Studies - Abstract
There is a relative paucity of literature on the outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) in young patients. This study reports the survivorship and risk factors for re-revision in patients aged ≤55 years.We identified 354 patients undergoing aseptic nononcologic rTHA at mean follow-up of 5 years after revision, with mean age of 48 years, body mass index of 28 kg/mSixty-two patients (18%) underwent re-revision THA at the mean time of 2.5 years, most commonly for instability (37%), aseptic loosening (27%), and prosthetic joint infection (15%). The rTHA survivorship from all-cause re-revision and reoperation was 83% and 79% at 5 years, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients undergoing femoral component only (hazard ratio 4.8, P = .014) and head/liner exchange rTHA (hazard ratio 2.5, P = .022) as risk factors for re-revision THA.About 1 in 5 patients aged ≤55 years undergoing rTHA required re-revision THA at 5 years, most commonly for instability. The highest risk group included patients undergoing head/liner exchanges and isolated femoral component revisions.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF