Search

Depression is higher among spine patients than among the general population. Some small studies, but not others, have suggested that depression may be a predictor of worse outcome after surgery.Determination whether there is an association between depression and worse response to surgery among spine patients.The national, prospective, Canadian Spine Outcome Research Network (CSORN) surgical outcome registry.All patients in the CSORN registry who received surgery for thoracic or lumbar degenerative deformity, stenosis, spondylolisthesis, disc disease, or disc herniation with a minimum of 12 months follow-up postoperation (n = 2310).Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), SF12 Physical Component Score (PCS), European Quality of Life (EuroQoL), and pain scales.Change in preoperative to 12-month postoperative ODI, and secondary measures, were compared to assess if there was an association between preoperative depression, as measured by PHQ9, and smaller response to surgery. Multivariate regression analysis was used to search for preoperative factors which might interact with PHQ9 to predict ODI outcome.Patients with PHQ95, associated with minimal to no depression, had the smallest ODI improvement (-16.8 [95%CI -18.1 to -15.3]) and patients with severe preoperative depression (PHQ9 ≥ 10) had the largest ODI improvement (-22.8 [95%CI -24.1 to -21.5]; p.00001). Similar findings were found in the EQ5D and PCS. Pain improvement was not different between depression levels. Multivariate modeling found worse baseline PHQ9 and ODI, greater age, nicotine use, more operative levels, and worse American Society of Anesthesiology score was predictive of worse ODI outcomes.Depressed patients have similar or better relative improvements in disability, quality of life, and pain, when compared to nondepressed patients, although their preoperative and postoperative levels of disability are higher. Surgeons should not be concerned that depression will reduce the patient-reported beneficial response to surgical intervention.

STUDY DESIGN Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE Among patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), we aimed to evaluate the extent to which: (1) pre-operative cervical sagittal alignment is associated with health-related quality of life, function, and symptoms; (2) surgery leads to changes in cervical sagittal alignment; and (3) post-operative cervical sagittal alignment is associated with health-related quality of life, function, and symptoms at 12 months of follow-up. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The importance of maintaining or improving cervical sagittal alignment in the surgical management of patients with CSM has not been established. METHODS We measured C2-C7 cobb angle, T1 slope, and C2-C7 cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA). We tested for associations with Neck Disability Index, Pain Scales for neck and arm pain, EuroQol 5D, Short Form 12 (SF-12) Physical and Mental Component Summaries (PCS and MCS), and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores. We adjusted for potential confounders using multiple linear regression, and we performed various pre-specified subgroup (cSVA >40 mm, surgical approach) and sensitivity analyses. RESULTS Among 250 patients, adjusted analyses yielded significant inverse associations prior to surgery between each of cSVA and T1 slope with SF12 PCS (T1 slope: -0.14, 95% CI -0.26 to -0.01, p = 0.03; C2-C7 cSVA: -0.13, 95% CI -0.21 to -0.05 p

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Spine patients have a higher rate of depression then the general population which may be caused in part by levels of pain and disability from their spinal disease. PURPOSE Determination whether improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) resulting from successful spine surgery leads to improvements in mental health. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING The Canadian Spine Outcome Research Network prospective surgical outcome registry. OUTCOME MEASURES Change between preoperative and postoperative SF12 Mental Component Score (MCS). Secondary outcomes include European Quality of Life (EuroQoL) Healthstate, SF-12 Physical Component Score (PCS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Patient Health Questionaire-9 (PHQ9), and pain scales. METHODS The Canadian Spine Outcome Research Network registry was queried for all patients receiving surgery for degenerative thoracolumbar spine disease. Exclusion criteria were trauma, tumor, infection, and previous spine surgery. SF12 Mental Component Scores (MCS) were compared between those with and without significant improvement in postoperative disability (ODI) and secondary measures. Multivariate analysis examined factors predictive of MCS improvement. RESULTS Eighteen hospitals contributed 3222 eligible patients. Worse ODI, EuroQoL, PCS, back pain and leg pain correlated with worse MCS at all time points. Overall, patients had an improvement in MCS that occurred within 3 months of surgery and was still present 24 months after surgery. Patients exceeding Minimally Clinically Important Differences in ODI had the greatest improvements in MCS. Major depression prevalence decreased up to 48% following surgery, depending on spine diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Large scale, real world, registry data suggests that successful surgery for degenerative lumbar disease is associated with reduction in the prevalence of major depression regardless of the specific underlaying diagnosis. Worse baseline MCS was associated with worse baseline HRQOL and improved postoperatively with coincident improvement in disability, emphasizing that mental wellness is not a static state but may improve with well-planned spine surgery.

Controversy exists regarding the optimal surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DS). Not all DS patients are the same, and the degree to which inherent stability may dictate treatment is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the variability in surgical approach relative to surgeon classified stability. The secondary objective was to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) across different surgical techniques and grades of stability. Patients prospectively enrolled from eleven tertiary care institutions and followed from 2015 to 2019. The surgical technique was at the surgeon’s discretion. Surgeons were asked to grade the degree of instability based on the degenerative spondylolisthesis instability classification system (DSIC). DSIC categorizes three different types (I-stable, II-potentially unstable, and III-unstable). One-year changes in PROs were compared between each group. Multivariable regression was used to identify any characteristics that explained variability in treatment. There were 323 patients enrolled in this study. Surgeons’ stability classification versus procedure [decompression alone (D)/decompression and posterolateral fusion (D-PL)/and decompression with posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (D-PLIF/TLIF)] were as follows: type I (n = 91): D-41%/D-PL-13%/D-PLIF/TLIF-46%; type II (n = 175): D-23%/D-PL-17%/D-PLIF/TLIF-60%; and type III (n = 57):(D-0%/D-PL-14%/D-PLIF/TLIF-86%). Type I patients undergoing D-PL had some improvements in EQ-5D and NRS versus those undergoing D-PLIF/TLIF but otherwise there were no other significant differences between groups. Regression analysis demonstrated advanced age (OR = 1.06, CI 1.02–10.12) and type I (OR = 2.61, CI 1.17–5.81) were associated with receiving decompression surgery alone. There exists considerable variation in surgical management of DS in Canada. Given similar PROs in two of the three groups, there is potential to tailor surgical intervention and improve resource utilization.

Cervical sagittal alignment is correlated with myelopathy severity and used by spinal surgeons for surgical planification. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for the evaluation of cervical myelopathy but may not be for the assessment of cervical sagittal balance compared to X-rays. The objective of this study was to assess the correlation of cervical alignment between supine MRI and standing radiographs in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Cobb, Jackson and Harrison methods were used to measure cervical sagittal alignment on supine MRI and standing radiographs of CSM adults. Cervical alignment was divided based on Cobb angle values on lordotic (> 4°), kyphotic (

Study Design: Retrospective Cohort Study. Objectives: This study aimed to determine how the surgeon-determined and patient-rated location of predominant pain influences patient-rated outcomes at 1-year after posterior lumbar fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients prospectively enrolled in the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network national registry between 2009 and 2017 that underwent posterior lumbar fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis. Using longitudinal mixed-model repeated-measures analysis the change from baseline in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at 1 year after surgery was compared between surgeon-determined groups (back vs. radicular) and between patient-rated pain groups (back, leg, and equal) derived from preoperative pain scores on the numerical rating scale (NRS). Results: 83/252 (33%) patients had a surgeon-determined chief complaint of back pain, while 103 (41%) patients rated their back pain as the predominant pain location, and 78 (31%) rated their back and leg pain to be equal. At baseline patients in the surgeon-determined radicular group had worse NRS-leg pain than those in the back-pain group but equal NRS-back pain. At baseline patients in the patient-rated equal pain group had similar back pain compared to the patient-rated back pain group and similar leg pain compared to the patient-rated leg pain group. All PROMs improved post-operatively and were not different between the 2 groups at 1 year. Conclusions: Our study found no difference in outcome, irrespective of whether a surgeon determines the patient’s primary pain complaint back or radicular dominant, or the patient rates pain in one location greater than another.

Study design A multicenter ambispective study using the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network to compare clinical outcomes in adult patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis who received surgery. Objective The purpose of this study is to compare 1-year postoperative clinical outcomes between posterior instrumented fusion with and without interbody fusion in patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis. Summary of background data Despite the increased use of interbody fusion in patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis, clinical superiority has not been demonstrated. It remains unclear what the optimal surgical approach is for this population. Materials and methods The primary outcome was changed in leg pain at 1 year. Secondary outcomes were changed in Oswestry Disability Index, Short Form-12 Physical Component Score, and back pain at 1-year postoperative follow-up, estimated intraoperative blood loss, length of surgery, length of stay, number of transfusions, and adverse events. Descriptive statistics, Student t test, χ2 test, and stepwise multivariable regression were used for analysis. Results In total, 300 patients were included in this study. Of the 300 patients, 252 received posterolateral instrumented fusion with interbody fusion and 48 received posterolateral instrumented fusion alone. There were no significant differences in primary and secondary clinical outcomes at 1-year postoperative follow-up between the 2 groups. There were no significant differences in estimated blood loss (441 vs. 356 mL), length of surgery (210 vs. 224 min), length of stay (4 vs. 4 d), rate of transfusions (5.6% vs. 8.3%), and number of adverse events (33% vs. 23%) between patients who received interbody fusion and patients who did not. The addition of interbody fusion was not a significant variable for primary and secondary clinical outcomes in the stepwise multivariable regression analysis. Conclusions There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes at 1 year or in the number of early complications between patients who received posterolateral fusion or posterior/transformational lumbar interbody fusion. Level of evidence Level III.

BACKGROUND Understanding patient expectations is a critical component of patient-centered care; however, little is known about which expectation(s) are most important to patients as they relate to their sense of post-operative success. PURPOSE To investigate patient's preoperative expectations of change in symptoms, function and well-being resulting from surgical intervention and to examine the associations between socio-demographic, lifestyle, health status and clinical characteristics with patient outcome expectations. STUDY DESIGN Observational cross-sectional study. SAMPLE Pre-operative data from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network national registry of patients of patients (n=4333) undergoing surgery for degenerative spinal conditions between 2012 and 2017. OUTCOME MEASURES Patients reported their expectations as a result of the surgery (0 (no change), 1 (somewhat better), 2 (better) or 3 (much better)) for seven items: leg/arm pain, back/neck pain, independence in everyday activities, sporting activities/recreation, general physical capacity, frequency and quality of social contacts and mental well-being. Patients also reported the single most important change expected. METHODS Data on demographic, lifestyles, health status, clinical factors and reasons for having surgery were also collected. Factor analysis was used to examine the multidimensionality of expectations. Multivariate linear regression was used to examine factors associated with expectations. RESULTS Over 80% of patients reported expectation for improvements (at least somewhat better) in all items with the exception of social contacts (75.8%). Expectations are multidimensional; a two factor structure emerged indicating two expectation dimensions (pain relief and overall functional well-being). Two expectation scores were calculated corresponding to the two dimensions (0-100), with higher scores reflecting higher expectations. The mean ± standard deviation pain relief expectation score was 78.5 ± 24.7 and the mean overall functional well-being expectation score was 69.7 ± 24.4. In multivariate analysis, the variables associated with these dimensions either differed or differed in degree of influence. For example, higher pain and disability scores, thoraco-lumbar location and diagnosis of spondylolisthesis were associated with higher expectations in both dimensions, while longer disease duration was only associated with lower overall functional well-being expectations. The top three most important expected change items were pain (improvement of leg or arm pain (29.1%) / improvement in back/neck pain (26.0%)), improvement in general capacity/function (21.0%), and improvement of independence in everyday activities (15.9%). Rankings of the most important expected change were similar across socio-demographic, lifestyle, health status and clinical variables examined. CONCLUSIONS Our findings highlight the need to identify and address specific individual expectations as part of the shared decision-making and pre-surgery education process.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Traumatic spinal cord injury can have a dramatic effect on a patient's life. The degree of neurologic recovery greatly influences a patient's treatment and expected quality of life. This has resulted in the development of machine learning algorithms (MLA) that use acute demographic and neurologic information to prognosticate recovery. The van Middendorp et al. (2011) (vM) logistic regression (LR) model has been established as a reference model for the prediction of walking recovery following spinal cord injury as it has been validated within many different countries. However, an examination of the way in which these prediction models are evaluated is warranted. The area under the receiver operators curve (AUROC) has been consistently used when evaluating model performance, but it has been shown that AUROC overemphasizes the most common event resulting in an inaccurate assessment when the data are imbalanced. Furthermore, there is evidence that the use of more advanced MLA, such as an unsupervised k-means model, may show superior performance compared to LR as they can handle a larger number of features. PURPOSE The first objective of the study was to assess the performance of both an unsupervised MLA and LR model with complete admission neurologic information against the vM and Hicks models. Second, a comparison between the accuracy of the AUROC and the F1-score will be made to determine which method is superior for the assessment of diagnostic performance of prediction models on large-scale datasets. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of a prospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE The Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR) was used in this study. All patients enrolled between 2004 and 2017 with complete neurologic examination and Functional Independence Measure outcome data at ≥1 year follow-up or who could walk at discharge were included. The prognostic variables included age (dichotomized at ≥65 years old); American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade; and individual motor, light touch, and pinprick score from L2 to S1. OUTCOME MEASURES The Functional Independence Measure locomotor score was used to assess independent walking ability at discharge or 1-year follow-up. METHODS An unsupervised MLA with k=2 was chosen in order to identify a “walk” cluster and a “not walk” cluster. Model performance was assessed through the development of a receiver operating characteristic curve with associated AUROC and a precision-recall curve with associated F1-score. The study and the RHSCIR are supported by funding from Health Canada, Western Economic Diversification Canada, and the Governments of Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, and Ontario. These funders had no role in the study or study reporting and the authors have no conflicts of interest to report. RESULTS No clinically relevant differences were found between with the use of an unsupervised MLA with a greater amount of initial neurologic information compared to the established standards for any AIS classification. Although demonstrated for all separate AIS classifications, most notably, the AUROC for the vM (0.78) and Hicks models (0.76) were found to be superior to that of the new LR model (0.72); however, the vM and Hicks models had more than double the amount of false negative classifications compared to the LR. The F1-scores between these three models were also found to be different but with the vM and Hicks models being lower than the LR (0.85, 0.81, and 0.89, respectively). CONCLUSIONS No clinically relevant differences were found between the use of an unsupervised MLA with complete admission neurologic information compared to the previously validated standards; however, when comparing the performance of the AUROC and F1-score, the AUROC showed inaccurate prognostic performance when there was an imbalance toward a greater amount of false negatives. Importantly, the F1-score did not succumb to this imbalance. As AUROC has been used as the standard when evaluating performance of prediction models, consideration as to whether this is the most appropriate method is warranted. Future work should focus on comparing AUROC and F1-scores with other previously validated models.

Study Design Ambispective cohort study. Objective Canada has a government-funded universal health care system. The United States utilizes a multitier public and private system. The objective is to investigate differences in clinical outcomes between those surgically treated for lumbar disc herniation in a universal health care and multitier health system. Methods Surgical lumbar disc herniation patients enrolled in the Canadian Spine Outcome Research Network (CSORN) were compared with the surgical cohort enrolled in the Spine Patients Outcome Research Trial (SPORT) study. Baseline demographics and spine-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were compared at 3 months and 1 year post-operatively. Results The CSORN cohort consisted of 443 patients; the SPORT cohort had 763 patients. Patients in the CSORN cohort were older (46.4 ± 13.5 vs 41.0 ± 10.8, P < .001) and were more likely to be employed (69.5% vs 60.3%, P = .003). The CSORN cohort demonstrated significantly greater rates of satisfaction after surgery at 3 months (87.2% vs 64.8%, P < .0001) and 1 year (85.6% vs 69.6%, P < .0001). Improvements in back and leg pain followed similar trajectories in the two cohorts, but there was less improvement on ODI in the CSORN cohort ( P < .01). On multivariable logistic regression, the CSORN cohort was a significant independent predictor of patient satisfaction at 1-year follow-up ( P < .001). Conclusions Despite less improvement on ODI, patients enrolled in CSORN, as part of a universal health care system, reported higher rates of satisfaction at 3 months and 1 year post-operatively compared to patients enrolled within a multitier health system.

BACKGROUND Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis is a common condition, predominantly affecting middle-aged and elderly people. This study focused on patients with neurogenic claudication secondary to lumbar stenosis without spondylolisthesis or deformity. PURPOSE To determine whether the addition of fusion to decompression resulted in improved clinical outcomes at 3, 12, and 24 months postsurgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING The Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) prospective database that includes pre- and postoperative data from tertiary care hospitals. PATIENT SAMPLE The CSORN database was queried for consecutive spine surgery cases of degenerative lumbar stenosis receiving surgical decompression for neurogenic claudication or radiculopathy. Neurogenic claudication patients with baseline and 2-year follow-up data, from four sites, formed the study sample (n=306). The sample was categorized into two groups: (1) those that had decompression alone, and (2) those that underwent decompression plus fusion. OUTCOME MEASURES Change in modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), numerical rating scale for back/leg pain, the EuroQol EQ5D, the SF-12 physical, and mental component scores. The primary outcome measure was the ODI at 2 years postoperative. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, ambispective review of consecutive spine surgery patients enrolled between October 2012 and January 2018. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups except for female sex and multilevel pathology (both with greater proportion in the decompression plus fusion group). The decompression plus fusion group had clinically meaningfully more operative time, blood loss, rate of perioperative complication, and length of hospital stay (p Both decompression and decompression plus fusion had a large clinically meaningful impact on generic and disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures within 3 months of surgery which was maintained out to 24-month follow-up. At any follow-up time point, there was no statistical evidence of a difference in these effects favoring decompression plus fusion over decompression alone. CONCLUSIONS The addition of fusion to decompression did not result in improved outcomes at 3-, 12-, or 24-month follow-up. The addition of fusion to decompression provides no advantage to decompression alone for the treatment of patients with neurogenic claudication secondary to lumbar stenosis without spondylolisthesis or deformity.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Lumbar degenerative stenosis is one of the most common spine pathologies for which surgical intervention is indicated. There is some evidence that a prolonged duration of neurological compression could lead to a failure of surgery to alleviate symptoms. PURPOSE Determination of whether longer symptom duration was associated with worse postoperative disability outcomes after decompressive surgery for lumbar degenerative stenosis. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING The Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) prospective database includes pre- and postoperative data from 18 tertiary care hospitals. PATIENT SAMPLE The CSORN database was queried for all cases of degenerative lumbar stenosis receiving surgical decompression for neurogenic claudication or radiculopathy. Patients with tumor, infection, fracture, or previous surgery were excluded. Patients were divided into groups based on symptom duration ( 2 years). OUTCOME MEASURES Change between preoperative and 12-month postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was compared between symptom duration groups. Secondary outcomes included SF12 physical component score (PCS), and numeric rating scales for leg and back pain. Outcomes were also assessed at 3 months and 24 months postoperatively. METHODS Change in ODI, and secondary outcome measures, were compared between different symptom duration groups. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify factors interacting with symptom duration to predict change in ODI. RESULTS Four hundred and seventy-eight cases of lumbar stenosis with 12-month postoperative data were identified. Longer symptom duration correlated with less improvement in ODI (p 1 year of symptoms were less likely to achieve a Minimal Clinically Significant Difference in ODI (54.4% vs. 66.1%; p=.03) and were more likely to experience no improvement or worse disability, postoperatively (22.1% vs. 11.3%; p=.008). Similar results were found at 3- and 24-month timepoints. Smaller postoperative improvements in SF12 PCS and leg pain scales were also correlated with longer symptom duration (p CONCLUSIONS Multicenter registry data provides important real-world evidence to guide consent, surgical planning, and health resource management. Longer symptom duration was found to correlate with less improvement in pain and disability after lumbar stenosis surgery suggesting that these patients may benefit from earlier treatment.

Retrospective review of results from a prospectively collected Canadian cohort in comparison to published literature.(1) To investigate whether patients in a universal health care system have different outcomes than those in a multitier health care system in surgical management of degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). (2) To identify independent factors predictive of outcome in surgical DS patients.Canada has a national health insurance program with unique properties. It is a single-payer system, coverage is universal, and access to specialist care requires referral by the primary care physician. The United States on the other hand is a multitier public/private payer system with more rapid access for insured patients to specialist care.Surgical DS patients treated between 2013 and 2016 in Canada were identified through the Canadian Spine Outcome Research Network (CSORN) database, a national registry that prospectively enrolls consecutive patients with spinal pathology from 16 tertiary care academic hospitals. This population was compared with the surgical DS arm of patients treated in the Spine Patients Outcome Research Trial (SPORT) study. We compared baseline demographics, spine-related, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes at 3 months and 1 year. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors predictive of outcome in surgical DS patients.The CSORN cohort of 213 patients was compared with the SPORT cohort of 248 patients. Patients in the CSORN cohort were younger (mean age 60.1 vs. 65.2; p.001), comprised fewer females (60.1% vs. 67.7%; p=.09), and had a higher proportion of smokers (23.3% vs. 8.9%; p.001). The SPORT cohort had more patients receiving compensation (14.6% vs. 7.7%; p.001). The CSORN cohort consisted of patients with slightly greater baseline disability (Oswestry disability index scores: 47.7 vs. 44.0; p=.008) and had more patients with symptom duration of greater than 6 months (93.7% vs. 62.1%; p.001). The CSORN cohort showed greater satisfaction with surgical results at 3 months (91.1% vs. 66.1% somewhat or very satisfied; p.01) and 1 year (88.2% vs. 71.0%, p.01). Improvements in back and leg pain were similar comparing the two cohorts. On multivariate analysis, duration of symptoms, treatment group (CSORN vs. SPORT) or insurance type (public/Medicare/Medicaid vs. Private/Employer) predicted higher level of postoperative satisfaction. Baseline depression was also associated with worse Oswestry disability index at 1-year postoperative follow-up in both cohorts.Surgical DS patients treated in Canada (CSORN cohort) reported higher levels of satisfaction than those treated in the United States (SPORT cohort) despite similar to slightly worse baseline HRQOL measures. Symptom duration and insurance type appeared to impact satisfaction levels. Improvements in other patient-reported health-related quality of life measures were similar between the cohorts.

Study Design: Uncontrolled retrospective observational study. Objectives: Surgery for patients with back pain and degenerative disc disease is controversial, and studies to date have yielded conflicting results. We evaluated the effects of lumbar fusion surgery for patients with this indication in the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN). Methods: We analyzed data that were prospectively collected from consecutive patients at 11 centers between 2015 and 2019. Our primary outcome was change in patient-reported back pain at 12 months of follow-up, and our secondary outcomes were satisfaction, disability, health-related quality of life, and rates of adverse events. Results: Among 84 patients, we observed a statistically significant improvement of back pain at 12 months that exceeded the threshold of Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) (mean change -3.7 points, SD 2.6, p < 0.001, MCID = 1.2; 77% achieved MCID), and 81% reported being “somewhat” or “extremely” satisfied. We also observed improvements of Oswestry Disability Index (-17.3, SD 16.6), Short Form-12 Physical Component Summary (10.3, SD 9.6) and Short Form-12 Mental Component Summary (3.1, SD 8.3); all p < 0.001). The overall rate of adverse events was 19%. Conclusions: Among a highly selective group of patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative disc disease, most experienced a clinically significant improvement of back pain as well as significant improvements of disability and health-related quality of life, with high satisfaction at 1 year of follow-up. These findings suggest that surgery for this indication may provide some benefit, and that further research is warranted.

We investigated for potential predictors of outcome following degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis surgery. In this longitudinal study of 529 patients, approximately one in three patients experienced a poor clinical outcome. Demographic, health, and clinical factors were more predictive of clinical outcome than surgery-related factors., Study Design. Longitudinal analysis of prospectively collected data. Objective. Investigate potential predictors of poor outcome following surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Summary of Background Data. LSS is the most common reason for an older person to undergo spinal surgery, yet little information is available to inform patient selection. Methods. We recruited LSS surgical candidates from 13 orthopedic and neurological surgery centers. Potential outcome predictors included demographic, health, clinical, and surgery-related variables. Outcome measures were leg and back numeric pain rating scales and Oswestry disability index scores obtained before surgery and after 3, 12, and 24 postoperative months. We classified surgical outcomes based on trajectories of leg pain and a composite measure of overall outcome (leg pain, back pain, and disability). Results. Data from 529 patients (mean [SD] age = 66.5 [9.1] yrs; 46% female) were included. In total, 36.1% and 27.6% of patients were classified as experiencing a poor leg pain outcome and overall outcome, respectively. For both outcomes, patients receiving compensation or with depression/depression risk were more likely, and patients participating in regular exercise were less likely to have poor outcomes. Lower health-related quality of life, previous spine surgery, and preoperative anticonvulsant medication use were associated with poor leg pain outcome. Patients with ASA scores more than two, greater preoperative disability, and longer pain duration or surgical waits were more likely to have a poor overall outcome. Patients who received preoperative chiropractic or physiotherapy treatment were less likely to report a poor overall outcome. Multivariable models demonstrated poor-to acceptable (leg pain) and excellent (overall outcome) discrimination. Conclusion. Approximately one in three patients with LSS experience a poor clinical outcome consistent with surgical non-response. Demographic, health, and clinical factors were more predictive of clinical outcome than surgery-related factors. These predictors may assist surgeons with patient selection and inform shared decision-making for patients with symptomatic LSS. Level of Evidence: 2

Study design: Retrosepctive analysis of prospectively collected data from the multicentre Canadian Surgical Spine Registry (CSORN). Objective: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in North America. Few studies have evaluated return to work (RTW) rates after DCM surgery. Our goals were to determine rates and factors associated with postoperative RTW in surgically managed patients with DCM. Methods: Data was derived from the prospective, multicenter Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN). From this cohort, we included all nonretired patients with at least 1-year follow-up. The RTW rate was defined as the proportion of patients with active employment at 1 year from the time of surgery. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses were used to identify patient characteristics, disease, and treatment variables associated with RTW. Results: Of 213 surgically treated DCM patients, 126 met eligibility, with 49% working and 51% not working in the immediate period before surgery; 102 had 12-month follow-up data. In both the unadjusted and the adjusted analyses working preoperatively and an anterior approach were associated with a higher postoperative RTW ( P < .05), there were no significant differences between the postoperative employment groups with respect to age, gender, preoperative mJOA (modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association) score, and duration of symptoms ( P > .05). Active preoperative employment (odds ratio = 15.4, 95% confidence interval = 4.5, 52.4) and anterior surgical procedures (odds ratio = 4.7, 95% confidence interval = 1.2, 19.6) were associated with greater odds of RTW at 1 year. Conclusions: The majority of nonretired patients undergoing surgery for DCM had returned to work 12 months after surgery; active preoperative employment and anterior surgical approach were associated with RTW in this analysis.

Study Design: Ambispective cohort study. Objective: Limited data exists comparing surgeon and patient expectations of outcome following spine surgery. The objective of this study was to elicit whether any differences exist between patient and surgeon expectations for common spine surgeries. Methods: Ten common age-appropriate clinical scenarios were generated and sent to Canadian spine surgeons to determine surgeon expectations for standard spine surgeries. Patients in the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) registry matching the clinical scenarios were identified. Aggregated patient expectations were compared with surgeon responses for each scenario. A χ2 analysis was then completed to determine discrepancies between surgeon and patient expectations for each scenario. Results: A total of 51 Canadian spine surgeons completed the survey on surgical expectations. A total of 919 patients from multiple centers were identified within the CSORN database that matched the clinical scenarios. Our results demonstrated that patients tend to be more optimistic about the expected outcomes of surgery compared with the treating surgeon. The majority of patients in all clinical scenarios anticipated improvement in back or neck pain after surgery, which differed from surgeon expectations. Results also highlighted the effect of patient age on both patient and surgeon expectations. Discrepancies between patient and surgeon expectations were higher for older patients. Conclusion: We present data on patient and surgeon expectations for spine surgeries and show that differences exist particularly concerning the improvement of neck or back pain. Patient age plays a role in the agreement between the treating physicians and patients in regard to surgical expectations. The reasons for the discrepancies remain unclear.

Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) has traditionally been indicated for patients with neurogenic claudication. Surgery improves patients' disability and lower extremity symptoms, but less is known about the impact on back pain.To evaluate changes in back pain after surgery and identify factors associated with these changes in surgically-treated DLS.Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.There were 486 consecutive patients with surgically-treated DLS who were enrolled in the Canadian Spine Outcomes Research Network prospective registry and identified for this study. Patients had demographic data, clinical information, disability (Oswestry Disability Index), and back pain rating scores collected prospectively at baseline, and 12 months follow-up RESULTS: Of the 486 DLS patients, 376 (77.3%) were successfully followed at 12 months. Mean age at baseline was 66.7 (standard deviation [SD] 9.2) years old, and 63% were female. Back pain improved significantly at 12 months, compared with baseline (p.001). Improvement in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-back pain ratings was on average 2.97 (SD 2.5) points at one year and clinically significant improvement in back pain was observed in 75% of patients (minimal clinically important difference (MCID) NRS-Pain 1.2 points). Multivariable logistic regression revealed five factors associated with meeting MCID NRS-back pain at 12 month follow up: higher baseline back pain, better baseline physical function (higher SF-12 Physical Component Score), symptoms duration less than 1 to 2 years, and having no intraoperative adverse events.Back pain improved significantly for patients treated surgically for DLS at 1-year follow-up.

Study Design Retrospective cohort. Objectives To compare outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) vs open surgery (OPEN) for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in patients with diabetes. Methods Patients with diabetes who underwent spinal decompression alone or with fusion for LSS within the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) database were included. MIS vs OPEN outcomes were compared for 2 cohorts: (1) patients with diabetes who underwent decompression alone (N = 116; MIS n = 58 and OPEN n = 58), (2) patients with diabetes who underwent decompression with fusion (N = 108; MIS n = 54 and OPEN n = 54). Modified Oswestry Disability Index (mODI) and back and leg pain were compared at baseline, 6–18 weeks, and 1-year post-operation. The number of patients meeting minimum clinically important difference (MCID) or minimum pain/disability at 1-year was compared. Results MIS approaches had less blood loss (decompression alone difference 100 mL, P = .002; with fusion difference 244 mL, P < .001) and shorter length of stay (LOS) (decompression alone difference 1.2 days, P = .008; with fusion difference 1.2 days, P = .026). MIS compared to OPEN decompression with fusion had less patients experiencing adverse events (AEs) (difference 13 patients, P = .007). The MIS decompression with fusion group had lower 1-year mODI (difference 14.5, 95% CI [7.5, 21.0], P < .001) and back pain (difference 1.6, 95% CI [.6, 2.7], P = .002) compared to OPEN. More patients in the MIS decompression with fusion group exceeded MCID at 1-year for mODI (MIS 75.9% vs OPEN 53.7%, P = .028) and back pain (MIS 85.2% vs OPEN 70.4%, P = .017). Conclusions MIS approaches were associated with more favorable outcomes for patients with diabetes undergoing decompression with fusion for LSS.

Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating condition with limited treatment options for neurologic or functional recovery. The ability to predict the prognosis of walking post injury with emerging prediction models could aid in rehabilitation strategies and reintegration into the community.To revalidate an existing clinical prediction model for independent ambulation (van Middendorp et al., 2011) using acute and long-term post-injury follow-up data, and to investigatethe accuracy of a simplified model using prospectively collected data from a Canadian multicenter SCI database, the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR).Prospective cohort study.The analysis cohort consisted of 278 adult individuals with traumatic SCI enrolled in the RHSCIR for whom complete neurologic examination data and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) outcome data were available.The FIM locomotor score was used to assess independent walking ability (defined as modified or complete independence in walk or combined walk and wheelchair modality) at 1-year follow-up for each participant.A logistic regression (LR) model based on age and four neurologic variables was applied to our cohort of 278 RHSCIR participants. Additionally, a simplified LR model was created. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test was used to check if the predictive model is applicable to our data set. The performance of the model was verified by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The accuracy of the model was tested using a cross-validation technique. This study was supported by a grant from The Ottawa Hospital Academic Medical Organization ($50,000 over 2 years). The RHSCIR is sponsored by the Rick Hansen Institute and is supported by funding from Health Canada, Western Economic Diversification Canada, and the provincial governments of Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, and Ontario. ET and JP report receiving grants from the Rick Hansen Institute (approximately $60,000 and $30,000 per year, respectively). DMR reports receiving remuneration for consulting services provided to Palladian Health, LLC and Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc ($20,000-$30,000 annually), although neither relationship presents a potential conflict of interest with the submitted work. KEH received a grant for involvement in the present study from the Government of Canada as part of the Canada Summer Jobs Program ($3,000). JP reports receiving an educational grant from Medtronic Canada outside of the submitted work ($75,000 annually). TM reports receiving educational fellowship support from AO Spine, AO Trauma, and Medtronic; however, none of these relationships are financial in nature. All remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.The fitted prediction model generated 85% overall classification accuracy, 79% sensitivity, and 90% specificity. The prediction model was able to accurately classify independent walking ability (AUC 0.889, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.846-0.933, p.001) compared with the existing prediction model, despite the use of a different outcome measure (FIM vs. Spinal Cord Independence Measure) to qualify walking ability. A simplified, three-variable LR model based on age and two neurologic variables had an overall classification accuracy of 84%, with 76% sensitivity and 90% specificity, demonstrating comparable accuracy with its five-variable prediction model counterpart. The AUC was 0.866 (95% CI 0.816-0.916, p.01), only marginally less than that of the existing prediction model.A simplified predictive model with similar accuracy to a more complex model for predicting independent walking was created, which improves utility in a clinical setting. Such models will allow clinicians to better predict the prognosis of ambulation in individuals who have sustained a traumatic SCI.

Study Design: Ambispective cohort study. Objective: Patients spend on average 3 to 7 days in hospital after lumbar fusion surgery. Patients who are unable to be discharged home may require a prolonged hospital stay while awaiting a bed at a rehabilitation facility, adding cost and imposing a considerable burden on the health care system. Our objective is to identify patient or procedure related predictors of discharge destination for patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion. Methods: Analysis of data from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network. Patients who underwent lumbar fusion for degenerative pathology between 2008 and 2015 were identified. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of the discharge destination. Results: A total of 643 patients were identified from the database, 87.1% of the patients (N = 560) were discharged home while 12.9% (N = 83) required discharge to nonhome facilities. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, the predictors for discharge to a facility rather than home were identified including: increasing age (odds ratio [OR] 1.045, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.017 -1.075, P < .002), increasing body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.069, 95% CI 1.021 -1.118, P < .004), increasing disability score (OR 1.025, 95% CI 1.004 -1.046, P < .02), living alone preoperatively (OR 1.916, 95% CI 1.004-3.654, P < .05), increasing operating time (OR 1.005, 95% CI 1.003 -1.008, P < .0001), need for blood transfusion (OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.687-6.528, P < .001), and multilevel fusion surgery (OR 1.142, 95% CI 1.007 -1.297, P < .04). Conclusions: Older age, high BMI, living alone, high disability score, extended surgical time, blood transfusion, and multilevel fusion are significant factors that increase the odds of being discharged to facilities other than home. Level of Evidence: Level 3.

Prospective Cohort OBJECTIVE.: The aim of this study was to evaluate which demographic, clinical, or radiographic factors are associated with selection for surgical intervention in patients with mild cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).Surgery has not been shown superior to best conservative management in mild CSM comparative studies; trials of conservative management represent an acceptable alternative to surgical decompression. It is unknown what patients benefit from surgery.This is a prospective study of patients with mild CSM, defined as modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score (mJOA) ≥15. Patients were recruited from seven sites contributing to the Canadian Spine Outcomes Research Network. Demographic, clinical, radiographic and health related quality of life data were collected on all patients at baseline. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to identify factors associated with surgical intervention.There were 122 patients enrolled, 105 (86.0%) were treated surgically, and 17 (14.0%) were treated nonoperatively. Overall mean age was 54.8 years (SD 12.6) with 80 (65.5%) males. Bivariate analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between surgical and nonoperative groups with respect to age, sex, BMI, smoking status, number of comorbidities and duration of symptoms; mJOA scores were significantly higher in the nonoperative group (16.8 [SD 0.99] vs. 15.9 [SD 0.89], P 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in Neck Disability Index, SF12 Physical Component, SF12 Mental Component Score, EQ5D, and PHQ-9 scores between groups; those treated surgically had worse baseline questionnaire scores (P 0.05). There was no difference in radiographic parameters between groups. Multivariable analysis revealed that lower quality of life scores on EQ5D were associated with selection for surgical management (P 0.018).Patients treated surgically for mild cervical myelopathy did not differ from those treated nonoperatively with respect to baseline demographic or radiographic parameters. Patients with worse EQ5D scores had higher odds of surgical intervention.3.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the leading cause of spinal cord impairment worldwide. Recent evidence suggests that patients with CSM benefit from surgical intervention regardless of their preoperative disease severity. PURPOSE The goals of this study are (1) to validate previous results and (2) to assess the impact of surgery on neurologic and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcome measures at 12 months after surgery in a prospective cohort of patients. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING In this multicenter, prospective cohort study, patients were recruited by 35 surgeons from seven Canadian centers between 2015 and 2018. PATIENT SAMPLE Eligible patients had a clinical diagnosis of CSM with evidence of spinal cord compression and had completed at least 12 months of follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES Outcome measures included the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score, neck disability index (NDI), EQ-5D and SF-12. These were assessed at baseline and at 12 months after surgery for the whole cohort and were further analyzed based on pre-operative disease severity: mild (mJOA ≥15), moderate (mJOA 12 – 14), and severe (mJOA METHODS N/A RESULTS Of 378 patients who underwent surgical decompression, disease severity and outcomes measures at 12 months were available for 364. Mean age is 59 years, and females comprise 37% of the cohort. A total of 104 patients (29%) were classified as having mild myelopathy, 153 (42%) as moderate, and 107 severe (29%). At baseline, patients with severe myelopathy were older, were more disabled, and had lower HRQoL scores. For the whole cohort, there was significant improvement in all outcome measures at 12 months (p CONCLUSIONS This study validates the results of previous studies that demonstrated improved outcomes with surgical decompression in cervical myelopathy. When stratified by disease severity, however, patients with mild myelopathy did not improve significantly from an mJOA or HRQoL perspective compared to patients with moderate and severe disease. These findings highlight the controversy of how to manage a patient with mild cervical myelopathy and support a more conservative approach with close clinical follow-up in neurologically stable patients. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

Surgical decompression is usually offered for improvement of neurogenic claudication in patients with symptomatic lumbar canal stenosis. These patients often have associated low back pain (LBP) and little is known about the effect of decompression on this symptom.The goal of the present study is to specifically quantify the improvement in LBP following surgical decompression for lumbar canal stenosis and to identify factors associated with changes in LBP in this population.This is a multicenter, retrospective review of consecutive spine surgery patients enrolled by the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network.Consecutive patients who underwent surgical treatment for symptomatic lumbar spine stenosis without instability between 2014 and 2017.Change in LBP on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).Patient-reported outcomes were collected at baseline and at 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery. The primary outcome was change in LBP on the NRS. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the relationship between the outcome and potential factors associated with achieving minimal clinical important difference in back pain using a backward selection procedure.In all, 1,221 patients were included in the analysis. Mean age was 64 years and 58% were males. Baseline back pain scores were available in 1,133 patients and follow-up evaluations were available in 968/1,133 (85%) patients at 3 months, 649/903 (72%) patients at 12 months, and 331/454 (73%) at 24 months. LBP significantly improved 3 months after surgery and the improvement was sustained at 24 months (p.001). We found that 74% of patients reached the minimal clinical important difference in back pain. Predictive factors for sustained improvement (12 and 24 months) in LBP after surgical intervention were absence of narcotic usage or compensation claims and increased severity of LBP before surgery (high NRS).Alleviation of clinically significant LBP was observed at 3 months after lumbar decompression surgery for neurogenic claudication and was maintained at 12 and 24 months after surgery in the majority of patients.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction internationally; however, few studies have evaluated return to work (RTW) after CSM surgery. PURPOSE Our goals were to determine rates and predictors of postoperative RTW and to compare postoperative rates to a lumbar spondylolisthesis cohort. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective review of prospectively-collected data. PATIENT SAMPLE Non-retired patients undergoing surgical decompression for CSM. OUTCOME MEASURES Return to work (ie, active employment) at 1-year following surgery. METHODS Data were derived from the CSORN prospective, multi-center surgical CSM registry. From this cohort, we included all non-retired patients with at least 1-year follow-up. RTW rate was defined as the proportion of patients with active employment at 1-year from the time of surgery. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify patient, disease and treatment variables predicting RTW. RESULTS Of 211 surgically treated CSM patients with 1-year follow-up, 102 (48.3%) were considered non-retired preoperatively, with 54.5% working and 45.5% not working in the immediate period before surgery. At 1-year, 60 patients (58.8%) had returned to work, while 42 (41.2%) were not working. In bivariable analyses, while working preoperatively predicted postoperative RTW(p 0.05). In multivariable analyses, only preoperative employment status predicted RTW, with those working pre-op having 12 times greater odds of working at 12 months postoperative (OR:12.1,95%CI:2.2,66.5). For comparison, the 1-year post-surgical RTW rate in the CSORN lumbar spondylolisthesis study cohort was 70.0%. CONCLUSIONS The majority (58.8%) of non-retired patients undergoing surgery for CSM had returned to work 12 months postoperative; preoperative work status was the only significant predictor of RTW in this analysis. RTW rates appear to be lower in CSM compared to lumbar spondylolisthesis. These results will help to inform preoperative patient counseling, enable economic analyses and serve as a focus for future quality improvement efforts. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

Emergent surgery for patients with a traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is seen as the gold standard in acute management. However, optimal treatment for those with the clinical diagnosis of central cord syndrome (CCS) is less clear, and classic definitions of CCS do not identify a unique population of patients.The study aimed to test the authors' hypothesis that spine stability can identify a unique group of patients with regard to demographics, management, and outcomes, which classic CCS definitions do not.This is a prospective observational study.The sample included participants with cervical SCI included in a prospective Canadian registry.The outcome measures were initial hospitalization length of stay, change in total motor score from admission to discharge, and in-hospital mortality.Patients with cervical SCI from a prospective Canadian SCI registry were grouped into stable and unstable spine cohorts. Bivariate analyses were used to identify differences in demographic, injury, management, and outcomes. Multivariate analysis was used to better understand the impact of spine stability on motor score improvement. No conflicts of interest were identified.Compared with those with an unstable spine, patients with cervical SCI and a stable spine were older (58.8 vs. 44.1 years, p.0001), more likely male (86.4% vs. 76.1%, p=.0059), and have more medical comorbidities. Patients with stable spine cervical SCI were more likely to have sustained their injury by a fall (67.4% vs. 34.9%, p.0001), and have high cervical (C1-C4; 58.5% vs. 43.3%, p=.0009) and less severe neurologic injuries (ASIA Impairment Scale C or D; 81.3% vs. 47.5%, p.0001). Those with stable spine injuries were less likely to have surgery (67.6% vs. 92.6%, p.0001), had shorter in-hospital lengths of stay (median 84.0 vs. 100.5 days, p=.0062), and higher total motor score change (20.7 vs. 19.4 points, p=.0014). Multivariate modeling revealed that neurologic severity of injury and spine stability were significantly related to motor score improvement; patients with stable spine injuries had more motor score improvement.We propose that classification of stable cervical SCI is more clinically relevant than classic CCS classification as this group was found to be unique with regard to demographics, neurologic injury, management, and outcome, whereas classic CCS classifications do not . This classification can be used to assess optimal management in patients where it is less clear if and when surgery should be performed.

Retrospective cohort study.To identify patient or procedure related predictors of postoperative blood transfusions in posterior lumbar fusion (PSF).The rate of PSF surgery has increased significantly. It remains the most common surgical procedure used to stabilize the spine; however, the impact of blood loss requiring blood transfusions remains a significant concern.Analysis of data from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network. Patients who underwent PSF between 2008 and 2015 were identified. Multivariate analysis was used to identify predictors of blood transfusion from the collected information.Seven hundred seventy two patients have undergone PSF, 18% required blood transfusion, 54.8% were females and the mean age was 60 years. The analysis revealed five significant predictors: American Society of Anesthesiologist class (ASA), operative time, multilevel fusion, sacrum involvement, and open posterior approach. The odds of transfusion for those with ASA1 were 6 times those with ASA1 (odds ratio [OR] 6.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-27.1, P 0.018). For each 60-minute increase in operative time, the odds of transfusion increased by 4.2% (OR 1.007, 95% CI 1.004-1.009, P 0.001). The odds of transfusion were 6 times higher for multilevel fusion (OR 5.8, 95% CI 2.6-13.2, P 0.001). Extending fusion to the sacrum showed 3 times higher odds for blood transfusion (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.8-5.8, P 0.001). The odds of transfusion for patients undergoing open approach were 12 times those who had minimal invasive surgery (OR 12.5, 95% CI 1.6-97.4, P 0.016). Finally, patients receiving transfusions were more likely to have extended hospital stay.ASA1, prolonged operative time, multilevel fusion, sacrum involvement, and open posterior approach were significant predictors of blood transfusion in PSF.3.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Recent evidence suggests that sagittal alignment may play a role in the presentation and management of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) but its importance has not been fully established. PURPOSE Our objectives were to evaluate the extent to which (1) preoperative sagittal alignment is associated with baseline function and symptoms, (2) surgery leads to changes in sagittal alignment, and (3) postoperative sagittal alignment is associated with function and symptoms at follow-up. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING We performed an observational cohort study using prospectively collected data from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN). PATIENT SAMPLE We included consecutive patients who were diagnosed with CSM by participating surgeons at seven centers between 2015 and 2017. OUTCOME MEASURES mJOA, NDI, VAS, SF12 and EQ5D. METHODS We measured sagittal alignment using two methods: surgeon classification and Ishihara's Cervical Curvature Index (ICCI). We measured function and symptoms with multiple Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), and we adjusted for age, gender, severity, and comorbidities using multiple linear regression. RESULTS Among 474 patients, baseline alignment was neutral in 196 (41%), lordotic in 190 (40%), and kyphotic in 88 (19%). In unadjusted analyses, baseline kyphosis was associated with significantly worse EuroQol 5D (p CONCLUSIONS In patients with CSM, baseline alignment is not associated with differences in impairment of health-related quality of life after adjusting for potential confounders. Surgery for CSM increases lordosis and improves symptoms and function regardless of baseline alignment, but postoperative sagittal alignment does not seem to be associated with final patient-reported outcomes. Our findings suggest that sagittal alignment restoration may not be critical for improving PROMs in the surgical management of patients with CSM, and that surgeons may prioritize the technical goals of neurological decompression and stabilization. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

STUDY DESIGN Modified-Delphi expert consensus method. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to develop competence-based spine fellowship curricula as a set of learning goals through expert consensus methodology in order to provide an educational tool for surgical educators and trainees. Secondarily, we aimed to determine potential differences among specialties in their rating of learning objectives to defined curriculum documents. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA There has been recent interest in competence-based education in the training of future surgeons. Current spine fellowships often work on a preceptor-based model, and recent studies have demonstrated that graduating spine fellows may not necessarily be exposed to key cognitive and procedural competencies throughout their training that are expected of a practicing spine surgeon. METHODS A consensus group of 32 spine surgeons from across Canada was assembled. A modified-Delphi approach refined an initial fellowship-level curriculum set of learning objectives (108 cognitive and 84 procedural competencies obtained from open sources). A consensus threshold of 70% was chosen with up to 5 rounds of blinded voting performed. Members were asked to ratify objectives into either a general comprehensive or focused/advanced curriculum. RESULTS Twenty-eight of 32 consultants (88%) responded and participated in voting rounds. Seventy-eight (72%) cognitive and 63 (75%) procedural competency objectives reached 70% consensus in the first round. This increased to 82 cognitive and 73 procedural objectives by round 4. The final curriculum document evolved to include a general comprehensive curriculum (91 cognitive and 53 procedural objectives), a focused/advanced curriculum (22 procedural objectives), and a pediatrics curriculum (22 cognitive and 9 procedural objectives). CONCLUSION Through a consensus-building approach, the study authors have developed a competence-based curriculum set of learning objectives anticipated to be of educational value to spine surgery fellowship educators and trainees. To our knowledge, this is one of the first nationally based efforts of its kind that is also anticipated to be of interest by international colleagues.

The differences in sagittal spino-pelvic alignment between adults with chronic low back pain (LBP) and the normal population are still poorly understood. In particular, it is still unknown if particular patterns of sagittal spino-pelvic alignment are more prevalent in chronic LBP. The current study helps to better understand the relationship between sagittal alignment and low back pain.To compare the sagittal spino-pelvic alignment of patients with chronic LBP with a cohort of asymptomatic adults. Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment was evaluated in prospective cohorts of 198 patients with chronic LBP and 709 normal subjects. The two cohorts were compared with respect to the sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), lumbar tilt (LT), lordotic levels, thoracic kyphosis (TK), thoracic tilt (TT), kyphotic levels, and lumbosacral joint angle (LSA). Correlations between parameters were also assessed.Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment is significantly different in chronic LBP with respect to SS, PI, LT, lordotic levels, TK, TT and LSA, but not PT, LL, and kyphotic levels. Correlations between parameters were similar for the two cohorts. As compared to normal adults, a greater proportion of patients with LBP presented low SS and LL associated with a small PI, while a greater proportion of normal subjects presented normal or high SS associated with normal or high PI.Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment was different between patients with chronic LBP and controls. In particular, there was a greater proportion of chronic LBP patients with low SS, low LL and small PI, suggesting the relationship between this specific pattern and the presence of chronic LBP.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT The importance of sagittal balance and spinopelvic parameters are recognized in the management and outcomes of adult spinal deformity and isthmic spondylolisthesis, but less is known regarding their role in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS). The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of baseline sagittal balance and spinopelvic parameters on pain, function, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients presenting with DLS. PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of baseline sagittal balance and spinopelvic parameters on pain, function, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients presenting with DLS. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Prospective, multi-center study from the Canadian Spine Outcome and Research Network (CSORN). PATIENT SAMPLE Patients with DLS were enrolled in a prospective, multi-center study between 2015 and 2017. Inclusion into this study required DLS at 1 or 2 levels and symptoms of neurogenic claudication or radicular pain with our without back pain. Patients were excluded if they had previous lumbar spine surgery or the presence of another condition which significantly affected function OUTCOME MEASURES Patient-rated outcome measures included the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for back pain and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), SF-12 Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and Mental Component Summary score (MCS), EQ-5D. Pelvic parameter measurements included: sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbar lurdosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), T1 spino-pelvic inclination (T1 SPI), and T9 spino-pelvic inclination (T9 SPI). METHODS Baseline patient demographics, radiographic spinopelvic parameters, and sagittal alignment were analyzed for possible correlation to HRQOL using Pearson correlations. RESULTS A total of 154 patients were analyzed (mean age: 65.8, BMI: 29.1) with grade I (72%) or II (28%) DLS, of which 95 were females. Primary symptoms were related to neurogenic claudication (80%), radiculopathy (15.3%) or back pain (4.7%). On average, symptom duration was greater than 2 years in 71% of patients. Patients had moderate to severe symptoms and disability (mean NRS back: 7.2, NRS leg: 7.3, ODI: 45.6, PCS-12: 33.2, MCS-12: 49.6, EQ-5D: 0.54). Baseline measurements of radiographic alignment included sacral slope (SS=34.9±16.7°), pelvic tilt (PT=24.8±9.5°), pelvic incidence (PI=57.4±13.8°), sagittal vertical axis (SVA=35.8±40.8mm), lumbar lordosis (LL=45.7±13.6°), thoracic kyphosis (TK=36.8±13.0°), T9-spinopelvic inclination (T9SPI=9.62±4.0°), and T1-spinopelvic inclination (T1SPI=4.43±10.4°). There were 54% of patients who had an insufficient lumbar lordosis based on the relationship between PI and LL (LL CONCLUSIONS Patients with DLS have global sagittal misalignment compared to published normative controls, highlighted by less lumbar lordosis, a PI to LL mismatch, and increased PT. Spinopelvic alignment was not associated with patient outcomes, although positive sagittal balance may also be influenced by spinal stenosis. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.