Search

Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS), including gluteal tendinopathy and bursitis, is a common, painful and debilitating condition. It is thought to involve overload of the gluteal tendons, which may be amplified through increased hip adduction moment (HAM) seen during gait in these individuals. Reducing the aberrant HAM may improve pain and function in this population. We aimed to determine if medially-posted foot orthoses immediately reduce HAM and pain in females with GTPS during walking gait.A double-blind, repeated-measures trial with randomised intervention order compared three conditions in 53 women with GTPS. Participants acted as their own control during baseline (everyday-shoe insole), medially-posted (active) orthosis, or flat insert (sham orthosis) walking. Data were collected via three-dimensional gait analysis for HAM, hip, pelvic, and thorax kinematics; as well as ground reaction force; and pain via the numerical rating scale. Subgroup analysis was performed based on a pronated foot-posture defined by the Foot Posture Index.A small pain reduction was found between the active orthosis and flat insert (mean difference = -0.444, p = 0.017). No difference was detected for pain between other condition comparisons. Thoracic lateral flexion increased at second-peak HAM between the baseline and active conditions (mean difference = -0.917, p = 0.040). No differences were detected for HAM, remaining kinematic or kinetic variables, or ground reaction force data across the three conditions. No significant differences were detected between any of the three conditions for biomechanical or pain data in the pronated-foot subgroup.A medially-posted foot orthosis did not immediately alter gait biomechanics or provide a clinically meaningful pain reduction in women with GTPS. There is uncertainty regarding the clinical benefit of orthoses in the management of GTPS. Longer-term follow-up or the use of customised orthoses may produce different outcomes and should be explored in future research.

Background Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) is a musculoskeletal condition which can cause disability and reduce quality of life. However, limited evidence is available on the long-term outcomes of people with GTPS. Our aims were to determine the long-term prevalence of GTPS; to calculate the proportion of people with GTPS who had developed hip osteoarthritis (OA); and to determine the level of function and quality of life, 11-years after initial GTPS diagnosis. Methods A prospective 11-year natural history study. Two groups [GTPS group (n = 24), asymptomatic control (ASC) group (n = 20)] were evaluated at baseline, 12-months and 11-years. At 11-years all participants completed the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Assessment of Quality-of-Life questionnaire. At 11-year follow-up 20/24 GTPS and 19/20 ASC participants were clinically assessed for GTPS and hip OA, completed the 10 metre-walk-test, timed up and go, and hip abduction and external rotation strength testing. Results At 11-year follow-up 45.0% of GTPS participants had GTPS compared to 5.3% of ASC participants (p = 0.008), OR [95% CI]: 10.19 [1.95, 104.3], and 35.0% of GTPS participants were clinically diagnosed with hip OA compared to none of the ASC participants (p = 0.002), OR [95% CI]: 21.6, [2.3, 2898.0]. GTPS participants reported more pain and disability than ASC participants via the ODI, mean difference [95% CI]: 6.1 [0.7, 11.6] but not the modified Harris Hip Score, mean difference [95% CI]: -3.3 [-10.3, 3.7]. Both groups had similar levels of quality of life and measures of function. Conclusions GTPS is a chronic condition: people with GTPS at baseline had twice the odds of being clinically diagnosed with GTPS or hip OA than the control group at 11-years. Further, there appears to be a temporal relationship between GTPS and the development of hip OA. This finding highlights the need to identify effective treatments that address the underlying impairments associated with GTPS. Pain and function results varied depending on the assessment tools used. Between group differences in quality of life seen at baseline are not found at the 11-year follow-up. The small sample size means the results must be considered with caution. Level of Evidence Level II Natural history Study.

Background Effective treatment of hip pain improves population health and quality of life. Accurate differential diagnosis is fundamental to effective treatment. The diagnostic criteria for one common hip problem, greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) have not been well defined. Purpose To define the clinical presentation of GTPS. Methods Forty-one people with GTPS, 20 with hip osteoarthritis (OA), and 23 age-matched and sexmatched asymptomatic participants (ASC) were recruited. Inclusion and exclusion criteria ensured mutually exclusive groups. Assessment: the Harris hip score (HHS), a battery of clinical tests, and single leg stance (SLS). Participants identified the site of reproduced pain. Analysis: Fisher’s exact test, analysis of variance (ANOVA) informed recursive partitioning to develop two classification trees. Results Maximum walking distance and the ability to manipulate shoes and socks were the only HHS domains to differentiate GTPS from OA (ANOVA: p=0.010 and

Objective To evaluate if pelvic or hip width predisposed women to developing greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS). Design Prospective case control study. Participants Four groups were included in the study: those gluteal tendon reconstructions (n=31, GTR), those with conservatively managed GTPS (n=29), those with hip osteoarthritis (n=20, OA) and 22 asymptomatic participants (ASC). Methods Anterior-posterior pelvic x-rays were evaluated for femoral neck shaft angle; acetabular index, and width at the lateral acetabulum, and the superior and lateral aspects of the greater trochanter. Body mass index, and waist, hip and greater trochanter girth were measured. Data were analysed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; posthoc Scheffe analysis), then multivariate analysis. Results The GTR group had a lower femoral neck shaft angle than the other groups (p=0.007). The OR (95% CI) of having a neck shaft angle of less than 134°, relative to the ASC group: GTR=3.33 (1.26 to 8.85); GTPS=1.4 (0.52 to 3.75); OA=0.85 (0.28 to 2.61). The OR of GTR relative to GTPS was 2.4 (1.01 to 5.6). No group difference was found for acetabular or greater trochanter width. Greater trochanter girth produced the only anthropometric group difference (mean (95% CI) in cm) GTR=103.8 (100.3 to 107.3), GTPS=105.9 (100.2 to 111.6), OA=100.3 (97.7 to 103.9), ASC=99.1 (94.7 to 103.5), (ANOVA: p=0.036). Multivariate analysis confirmed adiposity is associated with GTPS. Conclusion A lower neck shaft angle is a risk factor for, and adiposity is associated with, GTPS in women.